top of page

Prophecies Happening NOW
DECEPTION IN OUR WORLD

Lies that the Unsaved World Believes
Every deception is working toward one goal - the Antichrist Kingdom

Matthew 24:3-25 – The Signs of the Times and the End of the Age

Mt 24:3  And what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age?” 4 And Jesus answered and said to them: “Take heed that no one deceives you. 5 For many will come in My name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and will deceive many.  … 11 Then many false prophets will rise up and deceive many. … 24 For false christs and false prophets will rise and show great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect. 25 See, I have told you beforehand.

2 Thessalonians 2:3-12 – The Great Apostasy

2Th 2:3 Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition, 4 who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God. 5 Do you not remember that when I was still with you I told you these things? 6 And now you know what is restraining, that he may be revealed in his own time. 7 For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only He who now restrains will do so until He is taken out of the way. 8 And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord will consume with the breath of His mouth and destroy with the brightness of His coming. 9 The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, 10 and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 11 And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie, 12 that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

Galatians 4:16-17, 5:7-10 – Fears for the Church

Gal 4:16 Have I therefore become your enemy because I tell you the truth? 17 They zealously court you, but for no good; yes, they want to exclude you, that you may be zealous for them.  … Who hindered you from obeying the truth? 8 This persuasion does not come from Him who calls you. 9 A little leaven leavens the whole lump. 10 I have confidence in you, in the Lord, that you will have no other mind; but he who troubles you shall bear his judgment,

End Time Deception  (Hope for Our Times w/ Joe Pedick)

“We’ll Know Our Disinformation Program Is Complete When Everything the American Public Believes Is False.”

http://truthstreammedia.com/2015/01/13/cia-flashback-well-know-our-disinformation-program-is-complete-when-everything-the-american-public-believes-is-false/

 

“We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”

William Casey, CIA Director 1981-1987

The creepy quote above has been widely attributed to Former CIA Director William Casey.

Casey was the 13th CIA Director from 1981 until he left in January 1987. He died not long after of a brain tumor in May 1987. Dead men tell no tales, as they say.

But did William Casey really say this quote?

The quote itself has been passed around extensively on the Internet, and some people claim Casey never really said it because the only main source it traces back to is late political researcher and radio show host Mae Brussell.

Brussell was the host of the radio show Dialogue: Conspiracy. She got her start when, as a radio show guest, she questioned the official JFK assassination story and the Warren Commission Hearings by suggesting that Lee Harvey Oswald wasn’t the only person involved in Kennedy’s murder. Perhaps the propagandized label of “conspiracy theorist” is the reason why people question the quote Brussell often repeated.

However, Brussell is not the only person that can be attributed to this sharing quote.

Someone posted this meme on Quora back in 2013 with the note, “A disclaimer: I just like Quorans debunking or showing the stupidity behind some of the worst FB memes.”

Disinformation Campaign.jpg

This is a new trend lately, people trying to debunk old (and most especially, establishment damaging) quotes.

This time, however, someone who claims to have been there when Casey said it showed up to validate the quote:

“I am the source for this quote, which was indeed said by CIA Director William Casey at an early February 1981 meeting of the newly elected President Reagan with his new cabinet secretaries to report to him on what they had learned about their agencies in the first couple of weeks of the administration. The meeting was in the Roosevelt Room in the West Wing of the White House, not far from the Cabinet Room. I was present at the meeting as Assistant to the chief domestic policy adviser to the President. Casey first told Reagan that he had been astonished to discover that over 80 percent of the ‘intelligence’ that the analysis side of the CIA produced was based on open public sources like newspapers and magazines. As he did to all the other secretaries of their departments and agencies, Reagan asked what he saw as his goal as director for the CIA, to which he replied with this quote, which I recorded in my notes of the meeting as he said it. Shortly thereafter I told Senior White House correspondent Sarah McClendon, who was a close friend and colleague, who in turn made it public.”
— Barbara Honegger

Not only does Honegger claim he said it, but apparently he said it in response to what he saw as his goal as CIA Director!

 

This statement was further backed by an email posted by Quora user Greg Smith from Honegger regarding the quote which is consistent and apparently prompted her to tell the story above:

“Seriously — I personally was the Source for that William Casey quote.  He said it at an early Feb. 1981 meeting in the Roosevelt Room in the West Wing of the White House which I attended, and I immediately told my close friend and political godmother Senior White House Correspondent Sarah McClendon, who then went public with it without naming the source… “

So there you go. Guess it boils down to he said she said, except when she says it, it’s because she was actually there…

 

The year 1981 was an interesting one for Director Casey. He just so happened to be under investigation and fighting to keep his new job over various seedy dealings that came to light; among them were claims he approved a plan to overthrow Libya’s Moammar Qaddafi to instill a shadow government. (Oh I know, our government would never do that, would they?)

The agency’s plan, according to an article in the July 27, 1981 Gettysburg Times, involved toppling Qaddafi via what else?

 

Disinfo:

 

“Newsweek Magazine reported the covert operation was designed to overthrow Khadafy through a ‘disinformation’ campaign to embarrass him, creation of a counter government to challenge his leadership and a paramilitary campaign.”

 

(Wow. A lot of that sounds eerily familiar… 2011 in Libya, anyone?)

That same year, investigative journalist Jack Anderson published this piece in the September 22, 1981 Santa Cruz Sentinel discussing the troubling CIA disinformation campaign being waged against Americans.

 

Anderson points out the CIA’s “triple assault on the public’s right to know” included

1) trying to shut off channels of information to the electorate,

2) seeking criminal penalties against reporters whose stories might identify CIA operatives, and the third which Anderson called most troubling,

3) spreading “disinformation” to news agencies.

And who else does Anderson specifically call out in this disinfo campaign but new CIA Director William Casey:

“Now along comes Bill Casey, the dodering CIA director, with the argument that the government has the right to mislead the public by planting phony stories in the press.”

Oh really? So the good director not only talked about his disinformation campaign but actually argued for the government’s right to wage it against the American people?

The plan involved getting around the ban on CIA operations on domestic soil by planting disinfo stories in foreign news outlets that were routinely picked up by American mainstream media agencies. Anderson also points out the various rumors and false stories going around surrounding the goings on in Libya at the time…

The bottom line here is, if anyone in our government was going to make the above disinformation statement and specifically in 1981, all available evidence points to no better person who would have likely said it than Casey.

Finally on an aside, there seems to be this mission lately to memory hole quotes or muddy the water about who said what and change history.

In this particular instance, someone who was there when William Casey said the line in question and claims to have literally heard the words come out of the man’s mouth with her own ears as he said it is vouching that this quote is true.

Then again, this is the same agency on record behind the government’s MKUltra mind control program, an illegal project in which the CIA experimented on Americans for over two decades (that we know about) to manipulate mental states and brain function with everything from drugs to microwaves — the kind of stuff DARPA is openly working on today — all of which makes the piddly quote in question here seem like mere child’s play by comparison.

Even so, people still went into the Quora thread afterwards to claim — with absolutely no evidence whatsoever as they were not personally there — the quote is false.

So, in a bitter twist of the saddest irony possible, it would seem the contents of the quote itself are also true.

“We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”
Divide and Conquer
Destroy the Current Systems
Create One-World Antichrist Kingdom

Divide and Conquer

What does the Bible say about discrimination?

Rich vs Poor

White vs Black

Systemic Racism - The New Face of Racism

What does the Bible say about systemic racism?

“Systemic Racism” The BIG Lie​

Black Lives Matter (BLM)

Black Lives Matter Exposed

How should Christians view the Black Lives Matter movement?

BLM is the New Political Party;…the New Religion

Co-Founder of Black Lives Matter: “We Are Trained Marxists”

Black Lives Matter Blames Deadly Cuban Protests on US Government, Defends Regime

Critical Race Theory / 1619 Project / Reparations

What is the critical race theory?​

Yes, critical race theory is being taught in public schools​

North Carolina dad goes viral for anti-CRT school board speech: 'Parents are taking back the wheel'

Critical Race Theory Makes Its Way Into Mandatory Trainings at Top US Medical Schools

Help Us Stop Critical Race Theory Training in our Military!

White Supremacy / White Privilege

What is the biblical view of white privilege?

Is Christianity a white man’s religion?

Why do many white supremacists claim to be Christians?

Conservatives vs Liberals

Antifa (whitehouse.gov)

What is antifa? How should a Christian view antifa?

How should a Christian view fascism?

Left Craziness / Woke Insanity

Tulsi Gabbard Leaves Democratic Party, Goes On Blistering Screed Against ‘Wokeness’

Liberal Fake News

Man vs Woman​

Toxic Masculinity

Transgender Confusion (Links to another page)

LGBTQ+ hundreds of others vs man/woman (Links to another page)

Child vs Parent

Levine legalizing transgender reassignments in minors without parental consent​

Feds form new strike force targeting ‘domestic terrorism’: Show Me the Parent and I’ll Show You the Crime?

Parents No Longer Make the Decisions for Their Children

COVID vaccinations to be added to routine pediatric immunization scheduled

Transgender surgery for kids without parental consent may become constitutional right in Michigan

Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated

2 Thessalonians 2:9-12 – The Great Apostasy

2Th 2:9 The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, 10 and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 11 And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie, 12 that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

Isaiah 66:3-4 – True Worship and False

Is 66 3 …Just as they have chosen their own ways,

And their soul delights in their abominations,
So will I choose their delusions, And bring their fears on them;
Because, when I called, no one answered, When I spoke they did not hear;
But they did evil before My eyes, And chose that in which I do not delight.”

2 Corinthians 4:3-4 – The Light of Christ’s Gospel

2Co 4:3 But even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing, 4 whose minds the god of this age [Satan] has blinded, who do not believe, lest the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine on them. 

Daniel 12:1-9 - Prophecy of the End Time

Dan 12:9 And he said, “Go your way, Daniel, for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. 10 Many shall be purified, made white, and refined, but the wicked shall do wickedly; and none of the wicked shall understand, but the wise shall understand.

 

Romans 12:1-2 – Living Sacrifices to God

Ro 12:1 I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God, which is your reasonable service. 2 And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.

1 John 2:15-17 On Not Loving the World

1Jn 2:15 Do not love the world or anything in the world. If anyone loves the world, love for the Father is not in them. 16 For everything in the world—the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life—comes not from the Father but from the world. 17 The world and its desires pass away, but whoever does the will of God lives forever.

1 John 4:4-6 – Love for God and One Another

1Jn 4:4 You are of God, little children, and have overcome them, because He who is in you is greater than he who is in the world. 5 They are of the world. Therefore they speak as of the world, and the world hears them. 6 We are of God. He who knows God hears us; he who is not of God does not hear us. By this we know the spirit of truth and the spirit of error.

James 4:1-5 – Pride Promotes Strife

Jam 4:4 Adulterers and adulteresses! Do you not know that friendship with the world is enmity with God? Whoever therefore wants to be a friend of the world makes himself an enemy of God. 5 Or do you think that the Scripture says in vain, “The Spirit who dwells in us yearns jealously”?

 

1 John 5:1-5 – Obedience by Faith

1Jn 5:1 Whoever believes that Jesus is the Christ is born of God, and everyone who loves Him who begot also loves him who is begotten of Him. 2 By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God and keep His commandments. 3 For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments. And His commandments are not burdensome. 4 For whatever is born of God overcomes the world. And this is the victory that has overcome the world—our faith. 5 Who is he who overcomes the world, but he who believes that Jesus is the Son of God?

Hosea 4:6 – God’s Charge Against Israel

Hos 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge

Because you have rejected knowledge, I also will reject you from being priest for Me;

Because you have forgotten the law of your God, I also will forget your children.

Isaiah 31:1-3 – The Folly of Not Trusting God

Is 31:1 Woe to those who go down to Egypt for help, And rely on horses,
Who trust in chariots because they are many, And in horsemen because they are very strong,
But who do not look to the Holy One of Israel, Nor seek the Lord!
2 Yet He also is wise and will bring disaster, And will not call back His words,
But will arise against the house of evildoers,
And against the help of those who work iniquity.
3 Now the Egyptians are men, and not God; And their horses are flesh, and not spirit.
When the Lord stretches out His hand, Both he who helps will fall,
And he who is helped will fall down; They all will perish together.

Romans 1:28-32 God’s Wrath on Unrighteousness

Ro 1:28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, 30 backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful; 32 who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.

Ephesians 5:3-17

Ep 5:3 But among you there must not be even a hint of sexual immorality, or of any kind of impurity, or of greed, because these are improper for God’s holy people. 4 Nor should there be obscenity, foolish talk or coarse joking, which are out of place, but rather thanksgiving. 5 For of this you can be sure: No immoral, impure or greedy person—such a person is an idolater—has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of such things God’s wrath comes on those who are disobedient. 7 Therefore do not be partners with them.

8 For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Live as children of light 9 (for the fruit of the light consists in all goodness, righteousness and truth) 10 and find out what pleases the Lord. 11 Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them. 12 It is shameful even to mention what the disobedient do in secret. 13 But everything exposed by the light becomes visible—and everything that is illuminated becomes a light. 14 This is why it is said:

“Wake up, sleeper, rise from the dead, and Christ will shine on you.”

 

15 Be very careful, then, how you live—not as unwise but as wise, 16 making the most of every opportunity, because the days are evil. 17 Therefore do not be foolish, but understand what the Lord’s will is. 

Right now, the world is experiencing the separation of the wheat, chaff, and tares

Psalm 1 The Way of the Righteous and the End of the Ungodly

Ps 1:1 Blessed is the man Who walks not in the counsel of the ungodly,
Nor stands in the path of sinners, Nor sits in the seat of the scornful;
2 But his delight is in the law of the Lord, And in His law he meditates day and night.
3 He shall be like a tree Planted by the rivers of water, That brings forth its fruit in its season, 
Whose leaf also shall not wither; And whatever he does shall prosper.

The ungodly are not so, But are like the chaff which the wind drives away.
Therefore the ungodly shall not stand in the judgment, Nor sinners in the congregation of the righteous.

6 For the Lord knows the way of the righteous, But the way of the ungodly shall perish.

A note from a friend

This was such a perfect summation of the lies that we're living in, I had to share!

GLOBALIST AGENDA ~
When I moved here with my girlfriend I quit all my addictions. And so it should have ended ... "and they lived happily ever after. THE END." But life is not a fairy tale. Math and its application to economics interested me; because I couldn't understand why our economy was so fragile; with booms and busts and unemployment and inflation etc. Then in I stumbled upon the horrifying fact that everything I thought I knew about the world is a lie.

 

​As children we go to 12 years of government indoctrination camp where we are told what to think and to obey authority. We are brainwashed by Tel-lie-Vision programming. The mainstream media spews endless government lies and propaganda. Everything and everyone is owned and controlled by the Satanic globalist deep state. All Rockafella medicine is to kill you. All Rothchild central banking is to make you poor. All governments are here to enslave you. Government enforcers (police) kidnap and extort people. Tax is theft. It's all a rich man's game, played by the elite. But in the words of George Carlin: "Nobody seems to notice; Nobody seems to care." Welcome to prison planet Earth.

​​ ​​

THE PLAN THEY HAVE FOR US ~

​Criminal psychopaths are masquerading as government. The level of evil we are being moved into is off the charts. Governments who support the NWO (New World Order) agenda are in abuse of office. They are perpetuating lies and crimes; and are guilty of reckless endangerment of public health via untested medical experimentation. A massive global fraud is being committed. The UK government is godless, without honour; and governs against the interests of the people. They are deliberately destroying our country. A biomedical security state with complete loss of freedom and even the right to life; is opening the way to full-on, Chinese-style, communist totalitarian dictatorship.

 

The Online Safety Bill/ National Security Bill/ Counter State Threats Bill will shut down freedom of speech. Police Crime Courts Sentencing Act/ Public Order Bill will criminalise protests. The Elections Act will end free and fair elections. The new Bill of Rights will remove our rights. The Nationality and Borders Bill will remove our citizenship. The Schools Bill will give the state control over education. And the Judicial Review Bill/ Covert Human Intelligence Bill (Criminal Conduct) Act will allow a host of government agencies to act freely (and unaccountably) outside of the law ~ Police; National Crime Agency; Serious Fraud Office; Intelligence Services; HM Forces; HM Revenue and Customs; Department of Health and Social Care; Home Office; Ministry of Justice; Competition and Markets Authority; Environment Agency; Financial Conduct Authority; Food Standards Agency; Gambling Commission. NetZero, Digital ID, PCCS bill, Online harms bill, Pandemic Treaty, SMART cities, Surveillance state, Stakeholder Capitalism ~ not government “by the people for the people” but government “control of the people”.  

​ ​

​I know it's difficult to get your head around; it took me ages to accept this myself so I do not judge you. However, it is important (as a first step) to understand that there is no virus. No COVID-19 "original" strain and no mutations. Zero/zip ~ all fake. SARS-CoV-2 is a computer model simulation that does not exist. The same trick has been tried over and over again by big pharma; but without success ~ until now. Think bird flu, swine flu, MERS, SARS, AIDS, Spanish flu etc. Germ theory was debunked over a hundred years ago. You can't catch a disease from an external airborne virus. "Virus" is generated internally (exosomes) and is expelled as a by-product of detoxification of the body. Seasonal flu is detox. This whole plandemic has been achieved by two simple lies ~

 ​

   ​ (1) A PCR test which is fake because it cannot test for viral "infection" (even if such a thing existed). This is clearly stated by Kary Banks Mullis who won the Nobel Prize for the invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. Fraudulent PCR tests create “cases” which are hyped by the media to create fear. 

    (2) The lie that asymptomatic (ie healthy people) can be "carriers". This was disproved in a medical trial in China conducted on 10 million people in Wuhan ~ not a single case of asymptomatic spread was found.

 ​

​Failure to grasp these facts is to buy into a false health emergency; which is, in reality, global genocide.​There can be no “COVID vaccines” for a virus that has never been isolated, purified or proved to exist. The injections are genetic modification of humans via synthetic mRNA; and nanotec Wi-Fi comms and control installation via graphene. Graphene molecules are biologically indestructible and very sharp; acting as molecular razor blades. The spike protein (clot-causing venom) and self-assembling graphene are highly toxic; and destroy the immune system. They are what give people COVID symptoms. Nobody got sick or died from COVID until the "vaccine" roll out. They died from rebranded seasonal flu, pre-existing conditions and old age. The "vaccine" is now the disease (eg Delta variant). Unvaccinated people get sick from "vaccine shedding" by vaccinated people. Or they get sick from colds and flu. And the cure? More boosters and further restrictions for the unvaccinated. The intention is to kill off the old "useless eaters" with their dangerous memories of "old normal" freedom and inalienable god given rights; and enslave the young via AI mind control (Internet of Beings).​

COVID-19 = Certificate Of Vaccination ID - AI. The vaccination program is inoculating humans with an AI bioweapon that has parasitic properties; activated by 5G (fibre-optics) and LED (black light). Patents reveal the nature of "spike protein" structures in vaccines. These hybrid structures demonstrate "cognitive action" capabilities; described as "intelligent sensor platforms" that carry out instructions. Seen with electron microscopy, they are nanotech platform quantum dot structures, small enough to enter cells in the nervous system and alter behaviour. Injected people become magnetised due to the presence of Iron, Nickel, Cobalt and rare earth metal alloys. These magnetic nano particles are attracted to areas of high electrical (and therefore magnetic) activity such as the heart and brain; Hence the high incidence of myocarditis and strokes. A new permanent neuro-network is formed in the brain, with quantum dot transceivers throughout the rest of the body; communicating with each other; and ultimately linked externally to AI via 5G ~ the Internet of Beings. “Host” humans are assimilated by the nanotech in a similar way to the Borg. {The science fiction Borg are cybernetic organisms (cyborgs) linked in a “hive mind” called "the Collective". The Borg co-opt the technology and knowledge of other species to the Collective through the process of “assimilation”: forcibly transforming individual beings into "drones" by injecting nanoprobes into their bodies and surgically augmenting them with cybernetic components. The Borg's ultimate goal is "achieving perfection"}. People's thoughts, actions, feelings and emotions will be tracked, traced and controlled via continuous biometric monitoring. When the host body wears out and is disassembled for useful parts; the “consciousness” of the host mind will be uploaded to the AI cloud and continue to “live” indefinitely ~

 

Revelation 9:6 {New International Version}

During those days people will seek death but will not find it; they will long to die, but death will elude them.

 

The “good” news is (I suppose) that most people will not survive this transhumanist agenda. This, I believe, is the true End Game.​

​​​https://www.brighteon.com/dc40f749-38ad-4a4d-8702-9c75a7b87afb

Somewhere along the line a Swedish teenager dictated that global warming became climate change; And then the flu became COVID; Adverse reactions became a good sign that the immune system was being stimulated; The lethal injections became SADS (Sudden Adult Death Syndrome); Vax shingles/ AIDS became Monkeypox; and Guillain–Barré syndrome became Polio. And, of course, hot weather causes dehydration leading to blood clots. So blame strokes and SADS on global warming, right? The next scamdemic (monkeypox) is actually VAIDS (vaccine-induced auto immune disease). A destroyed immune system gives rise to tuberculosis, hepatitis, various cancers, and an inability to fight infection. Also shingles, herpes and autoimmune blistering diseases; wrongly assigned as monkeypox. When the WHO mandates smallpox vaccine to combat this, there will be an outbreak of smallpox. Not only will immunocompromised (vaccinated) individuals get smallpox and die from sepsis; but this is another self-spreading vaccine which will infect the unvaccinated and scare (or force) more people into getting vaccinated. The smallpox vaccine will contain nanotech/ biotech poison (lipid nanoparticles/ graphene); as has the seasonal flu jab since 2019.

​It is amazing how so many people are sleepwalking towards the precipice. And even those who are awake can’t change course. The general public don’t seem to understand hyperinflation. You can’t double the money supply without halving the value of the money (or doubling prices if you prefer). Most won't be aware of the famine this winter until the supermarket shelves are suddenly empty; and we have rationing. There has been a deliberate and accelerating destruction of the food supply chain in the USA from 2019 to 2022. The same is happening in the UK. An example is the culling of millions of chickens, ducks, geese etc under the guise of an outbreak of bird flu ~ using the fake PCR test of course.

 

The “Apocalyptic Pandemic” PSYOP has been one big extended gaslighting campaign inflicted on the masses throughout the world by a global elite; to achieve agenda 2030. Part of which is 95% depopulation, mass sterilisation and enslavement via digital control. All the worlds msm news, most governments and health care systems, and the money and food supply have been weaponized against us.​The reasons are obvious:~

 

  ​(1) All fiat currencies evaporate to zero by 2025. This is a final power and resource grab by corporations, the banking system and global elites (The Great Reset).

  (2) The up-coming grand solar minimum of the sun (mini ice age) from 2028 to 2041 will cause extreme global famine. The Earth will become uninhabitable outside of equatorial regions.

  (3) The 12,000-year Earth Catastrophe Cycle ~ super flare (plasma discharge from the Sun)/ tilting of the Earth's geographical poles (axis of rotation) through 90'/ reversal of the Earth's magnetic poles ~ due to occur any time now.

 

Seen in the light of imminent cataclysmic events, many of the pieces of the Great Reset begin to coalesce under perspectives of shelter, mitigation and reconstruction of the ‘New World Order’, which shall arise from the ashes of the chaos. That seems to be the plan; But I’m sure that even those involved know neither the precise timing nor nature of the events, nor how effective their preparations will prove to be.

 

The anticipated events have been kept from the public eye, perhaps in order to maintain control over the populace whilst simultaneously making preparation under the cover of wars, national security, climate change, black budgets and various fields of research. Preparations for this could well have been the true mandate of every military, national and private space agency in the past century. These (mostly publicly funded) operations are some of the parts comprising what may be a coordinated Noah’s ark project, executed on a planetary scale, deliberately withheld from public awareness because most would violently resist some of the details of the plan {such as depopulation/sterilization}, jeopardizing it in the process.

 

The ark isn’t big enough for everybody. ‘Some sacrifices have to be made to ensure the survival of the species’ seems to be the philosophical agenda. If they are preparing for a cataclysmic event, then they have built sufficient shelter for perhaps 500,000,000 people. How are those half a billion chosen? And what to do with the other 7 billion or so people? Can’t have the survivors running amuck when they emerge from their caves. It's possible that vast areas of the surface of the planet may be affected by catastrophic levels of infrastructure disruption and destruction. It will be chaos. Best to just eliminate that problem by ensuring that any that do survive are mind-controlled sterile slaves.

 

The massively increased chemtrail spraying operations around the world are perhaps not what many believe them to be. Whilst the inhalation of the aluminium, barium, lithium (and other) nano-particulates is almost certainly detrimental to human health, I think that the primary objective of these efforts, particularly in the northern hemisphere, are an attempt to establish an airborne conductive shell of nanoparticles that may, or may not, act to mitigate a plasma discharge or cosmic radiation event.​

 

So why the apparent panic amongst the elite to birth their agenda apparently half-formed? I think that they were planning to have the pieces in place by 2050, but the recent acceleration of changes observed in our corner of the cosmos have them convinced that the event is going to happen sooner than originally anticipated. “Mathematically, the periodicity (of previous cataclysms) is a function of a helicoid“ ~ Chan Thomas (The Adam & Eve Story). I thought this an interesting comment, so I checked to confirm the statement, and determine where the "eye of the storm" would be by placing the first five events on the timeline and then progressing the spiral which passes through all of them towards its singularity. I found that the largest extinctions, genocides, wars, geomagnetic events and cataclysms of each period fall neatly on, or very near to every turn of that logarithmic spiral (growth rate: 1.0768) centred on 2025.

 

​It is all about Continuity of Government (COG) to allow those in power to continue world domination despite these catastrophic events;​ A war against humanity. You can quote statistics and show factual evidence of genocide; and it's as if the World has moved on and COVID was last years "thing"; And now we have the Russia/ Ukraine war, hyperinflation and price rises ... so just move on. A gradual normalisation of the horror they are inflicting. The lethal injection program is still being pushed for the over 50s ~ combined flu/ COVID jab. It is evident that the injections from Big Pharma have nothing to do with health or saving lives. Apart from massive profits, new industries and markets being created around the pandemic, new billionaires made; It all serves as a merger of state and corporate power, with the primary objective being global centralization of control and power. The 'Trojan Horse' is vaccine passports, which are the gateway to a social credit system and digital slavery.

 

Things are likely to go "Mad Max" this Winter. Power cuts, food shortages, economic collapse. Price and availability of diesel will ensure starvation. It only takes positive PCRs for everything to lockdown again. And I fully expect that to happen or something equally extreme ~ fake alien invasion ~ nuclear war ~ climate change lockdown ~ they will think of something. Economically we are being ground down by inflation and taxes. Fail to pay your taxes and your assets will be seized. "You’ll own nothing and you’ll be happy". 

 

​Ephesians 6:10-18 {New International Version}

​​

​THE ARMOR OF GOD ~

​​10 Finally, be strong in the Lord and in his mighty power. 11 Put on the full armour of god, so that you can take your stand against the devil’s schemes. 12 For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. 13 Therefore put on the full armour of god, so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to stand. 14 Stand firm then, with the belt of truth buckled around your waist, with the breastplate of righteousness in place, 15 and with your feet fitted with the readiness that comes from the gospel of peace. 16 In addition to all this, take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one. 17 Take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the spirit, which is the word of god. 18 And pray in the spirit on all occasions with all kinds of prayers and requests. With this in mind, be alert and always keep on praying for all the Lord’s people.

 

I would like to leave you with a link to a wonderful French comedy movie: https://lbry.tv/@QuantumRhino:9/La-Belle-Verte-1996-The-Green-Beautiful-English:a   

 

 ~ God bless    

2021: A Prophetic Review

2021: A Prophetic Review

https://www.hallindsey.com/ww-12-26-2021/

Fully half of all Americans say 2021 was the worst year of their lives. Do you know what that means? It means that what we are doing as a society is not working. It means the country is on a downward path and that rejecting God causes pain. It means that the encouragement of filth and the glorification of evil are the worst ways to raise a generation of kids. It is a reminder that sin’s final dividend is death.

 

People are increasingly miserable, and as society continues to push thoughts of God aside, it will get worse. Every day, 2021 brought more news stories pointing to signs of the last days as given in the Bible. But I want to focus on just one — the global movement to make the world ready for Antichrist. Few of the elite movers and shakers know what they are really doing or why. But let’s be clear. Satan has an agenda for our planet and its inhabitants. And those who reject Christ are increasingly vulnerable to his manipulations.

 

True democracy stands between Antichrist and world power. It must either be destroyed or dramatically changed — “reset.” And that’s where the World Economic Forum (WEF) comes in. In 2020, they began implementing something they called, “The Great Reset.” Their website says that the purpose of the Great Reset is “to build a new social contract.” Think about that phrase. According to the Oxford Dictionary, “social contract” is “a means of explaining the origin of government and the obligations of subjects.”

 

In creating “a new social contract,” elites want to reset the relationship between governments and the governed. Lately, WEF has been calling it, “The Great Narrative.” But it amounts to the same thing — global power concentrated in a few elites.

 

For years, conspiracy theorists saw sinister undertones in the World Economic Forum’s activities. But their sessions were hidden behind closed doors, and no one knew for sure what they were up to. That has now changed. In 2021, Klaus Schwab, WEF’s Founder and Executive Chairman openly spoke of a small group of unelected individuals imagining, designing, and even executing the future for billions of people.

 

At the WEF’s Great Narrative summit in November, Schwab said, “We meet today to develop a great narrative; a story for the future…. We are here now to imagine the future, design the future, and then execute.”

 

It’s no accident that the summit took place in and under the co-sponsorship of the United Arab Emirates — a “constitutional monarchy.” It was specifically held in the Emirate of Dubai, whose government is considered an “absolute monarchy.” In recent years, global elites have become increasingly distrustful of the rabble — in other words of voters and therefore of democracy. The world’s elites have come to believe that big global decisions should be left to people like themselves — rich, atheistic, proud, and unaccountable.

 

Global manipulations can be extremely frustrating to see. That’s why we should always remember the scriptural admonition found in Psalms 37:1 (NASB). “Do not fret because of evildoers.” You can drive yourself to distraction looking at and fretting over the deeds of evil men. But in John 14:27 (NASB), Jesus gave this glorious promise. “Peace I leave with you; My peace I give to you; not as the world gives, do I give to you. Let not your heart be troubled, nor let it be fearful.”

 

It’s like recording a football game while you are out, then learning that your team wins in the end. When you get home to watch the game, even the dark moments for your team do not discourage you because you already know how things turn out. We win! Rest in the comfort of those words.

Why does God allow deception?

https://www.gotquestions.org/God-allow-deception.html

God’s desire is that all people repent and be saved (2 Peter 3:9). At the same time, Satan, the “father of lies” (John 8:44), deceives the very people who need to accept the truth. “The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ” (2 Corinthians 4:4). Surely, God could stop Satan’s lies and give people a fighting chance.

The Bible presents a consistent picture of how sin and deception are related. What’s revealed is that the way we tend to think of deceit is, well, a bit deceived. Spiritually speaking, deception is deeper than merely being tricked or lied to. In order to be saved, one does not need any particular level of intelligence, philosophical ability, or wisdom (Galatians 3:281 Corinthians 1:2026). In fact, mankind has an unfortunate habit of using increased knowledge to develop more sophisticated ways to sin.

Key to understanding spiritual deception is the fact that we often choose what we want to believe rather than what we should believe, even in the face of the evidence (Luke 16:31). “Even after Jesus had done all these miraculous signs in their presence, they still would not believe in him” (John 12:37). Notice that they would not believe Jesus, despite the miracles. Their unbelief was willful.

Eve’s fall into sin is the earliest example of how spiritual deception works. When the serpent asks her, “Did God really say . . . ?” Eve responds by quoting what God had said, although she added to the command (Genesis 3:1–3). She knows what to do and what not to do. The serpent then tempts her with what she can gain by eating from the tree (Genesis 3:4–5), and she notices other attractive aspects of the fruit (Genesis 3:6). Eve was lied to, and the serpent was cunning (2 Corinthians 11:3), but she ultimately chose to disobey God, even though she knew the commandment.

When confronted with her sin, Eve said, “The serpent deceived me, and I ate” (Genesis 3:13). The original Hebrew word for “deceived” implies trickery and craftiness. Eve was tricked, but she also had a choice in the matter. She exercised her God-given free will to make a wrong choice, seeking pleasure and personal promotion over what God had willed for her.

The same dynamic is at work today. Satan appeals to our natural desires and urges us to fulfill them in ways that dishonor God. Our desire for self-satisfaction makes Satan’s deception all the more potent.

God has sent the Savior (John 3:16), He fills the world with signs of Himself (Romans 1:20), He makes Himself available to those who seek Him (Deuteronomy 4:29), and He secures anyone who comes to Him (John 6:37). When people reject what is “clearly seen” of God (Romans 1:20), it leads to a downward spiral of “foolish hearts” made dark (verse 21), idolatry (verse 23), and sexual impurity (verse 24). Finally, mankind “exchanged the truth of God for a lie” (verse 25). In other words, the spiritual deception of mankind is the direct result of rejecting readily apparent truth. The unbeliever has made an exchange—the truth for a lie—and the devil is happy to facilitate the swap by presenting the sinner with a wide array of lies from which to choose.

Anyone who resists God risks falling into spiritual deception (2 Thessalonians 2:8–10). Nature abhors a vacuum, and the void created by the eviction of truth will soon be filled by something less than true. Give up the truth, and you’ll believe just about anything.

Eve didn’t sin because she was hopelessly outmatched by a demonic force, making her do wrong when she thought she was doing right. Yes, she was lied to, but she chose to listen to the lie. That was followed by her longing look at what was forbidden and, finally, her taking the fruit in hopes of a better life.

All human sin is based in human choice (1 Corinthians 10:13). When we reject the truth, we make ourselves vulnerable to the lie. Repeated rejection of spiritual truth brings spiritual deception as a divine consequence.

God often allows spiritual deception as a form of punishment for willful sin, and in order to cultivate an awareness in our lives of how badly we need the One who is Himself Truth, our Lord Jesus Christ (John 14:6).

What is the great deception in the Bible?

https://www.gotquestions.org/great-deception.html

Usually, when people speak of the “great deception,” they refer to 2 Thessalonians 2:11, which predicts that God will, in an end-times judgment, send “a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie.” This great deception is associated with the satanic work of the Antichrist and his “displays of power through signs and wonders that serve the lie” (verse 9).

The same passage in 2 Thessalonians also speaks of a great apostasy that will take place before the man of lawlessness is revealed. Similar apostasies are predicted elsewhere: “The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons” (1 Timothy 4:1). Of course, people are complicit in the deception, for they reject the truth and prefer lies: “For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths” (2 Timothy 4:3–4).

Jesus spoke about a time to come when the deception will be especially great when false messiahs and false prophets will appear. Even the people of God could be deceived if it were not for God’s providential protection: “For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect” (Matthew 24:24, see also Mark 13:5–6Luke 21:8).

All of these deceptions are instigated by the devil. However, 2 Thessalonians 2:11 also speaks of the deception as God’s punishment on people who refuse to believe the truth. The context seems to be similar to that of the gospel passages above and speaks of one to come who will be especially deceptive: “The coming of the lawless one is by the activity of Satan with all power and false signs and wonders, and with all wicked deception for those who are perishing, because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. Therefore God sends them a strong delusion, so that they may believe what is false, in order that all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness” (2 Thessalonians 2:9–12, ESV).

In this passage, after people have refused the truth for so long, God causes them to believe what is false—a “strong delusion.” This is not an instance where God actively deceives people; rather, God is simply giving those who reject the truth what they really want.

We see a similar pattern in Romans 1:18–25 where people reject God’s truth for so long that He simply abandons them to their own sinfulness. They have, as it were, crossed the point of no return:

“The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.

“For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles.

“Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. They exchanged the truth about God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.”

Much the same thing happened to Pharaoh after he refused to let the Israelites leave Egypt, and God hardened his heart. It was not as though Pharaoh would have been an obedient follower of the Lord if God had not hardened his heart. Pharaoh set his heart against the Lord, and God simply confirmed for all time Pharaoh’s decision (see Exodus 8:15329:3410:1).

The deception spoken of in the Gospels has to do with false prophets and/or messiahs who appear and seem to be authenticated by miracles. Taking the futurist position, we see the great deception spoken of in 2 Thessalonians 2 as a future event associated with the coming of the Antichrist after the rapture of the church. “Those who are perishing” will willingly embrace the imitation and follow the beast of the end times; they will perish “because they refused to love the truth and so be saved” (verse 10).

We don’t know exactly what the great deception will be, only that it will be a strong delusion capable of swaying the world’s allegiance toward the Antichrist. The Bible says that, in the time of the Antichrist and false prophet, there will be many signs to bolster their lies. The false prophet “performed great signs, even causing fire to come down from heaven to the earth in full view of the people. Because of the signs it was given power to perform on behalf of the first beast, it deceived the inhabitants of the earth” (Revelation 13:13–14). It is hard to imagine, but the deception during the tribulation will be worse than all of Satan’s other deceptions. The Antichrist will have a deadly wound healed, his “image” will breathe and speak and give orders, etc. (Revelation 13:1215).

In the broader sense, anyone who rejects the truth of God is being deceived, and at some point, God may simply abandon him to the deception that he has willingly embraced. There are plenty of false teachers today who claim to teach God’s Word. Some claim to be Christians, and some claim to bring a word from God from outside of the Bible. It is vitally important that every Christian compare every teaching with what the Bible says and spend the time necessary to evaluate what is being taught. This is the mission of Got Questions, and in keeping with that mission, we would encourage every reader to compare what we say with Scripture as well.

What is the great deception in the Bible?
Why does God allow deception?

Father of Liars

https://terryjamesprophecyline.com/2022/01/16/father-of-liars/

Jesus foretold that one of the great signals of His Second Coming and of the end of the age would be deception and deceivers. Paul, in 2 Thessalonians 2 tells us there will be strong delusion in the last days. He prophesied also that there will be “evil men and seducers growing worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived.”

God’s Word—Jesus Himself—declared that the evil at the core of all the deception is a being full of lies. He said in answer to the Jewish religious zealots who tried to entrap Him:

Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he spiked a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. (John 8:44)

 

There is scriptural proof, therefore, that the charge is based on God’s truth when we say all the lies we see perpetrated in these closing days of this Age of Grace (Church Age) come from the chief minion of Ephesians 6:12. Indeed we have experienced an increase in lies coming at us from many directions.

Remember the explosion of lies following the presidential election of 2016. The accusation of Trump’s campaign and election being in cahoots with the Russians—with Vladimir Putin himself—was in our faces for Trump’s full four years as president. The lies kept coming, and were front and center on every mainstream news outlet and left-wing social media every hour of every day for those years.

Then it was proven that that the Russian collusion charge was all lies, based upon a phony, political dirty trick. The opposing presidential campaign paid operatives to concoct and distribute a false dossier involving charges accusing Mr. Trump of paying Russian prostitutes to do salacious things in order to spew vitriol against Barack and Michelle Obama, his predecessor and former first lady.

The same political party concocted lies against a Trump administration Supreme Court candidate. We remember the weeks and weeks of that parade of prevarication. The president was subjected to a daily barrage for weeks and months in impeachment efforts—all based on lies.

Mainstream newscasts, social media blogs, and other platforms made up lies about the Black Lives Matter and Antifa destruction of cities across America being peaceful protests rather than riots. The same news and entertainment media, while ignoring those destructive, anti-American insurrections, now accuse Trump supporters who protested—mostly peacefully—in Washington, DC, on January 6, 2021, as being insurrectionists. The vice president declared the protest and march to be the evil equivalent of December 7, 1941, and September 11, 2001.

Lies of less magnitude, but progressing geometrically on an hour-by-hour basis in order to maintain the political power they achieved through one of the biggest lies—those involved in the stolen election of 2020—continue to do their destructive work against the republic.

We have covered a number of times the fact that the globalist minions, both human and demonic, are working incessantly to set the stage for the coming Antichrist regime. I’ve pointed out that two prongs of this evil effort are primary in Satan’s blueprint. One is the climate-change mantra and the other is the COVID pandemic that, it is becoming obvious, isn’t likely to end anytime soon. Both are based largely on lies generated by the principalities and powers in high places.

The initial effort was the lies of global warming. That morphed into climate change, when the ice cap at the North Pole didn’t melt and submerge New York City in the waters of the Atlantic after the first prediction of such catastrophe some thirty years ago.

 

Reports have it that the University of Alabama at Huntsville data set presented from satellite reconnaissance has shown that there has been no global warming at all for the last seven years. Based on the HadCRUT4 data set, there has been no statistically significant global warming for more than nine years—August 2012 to October 2021.

Before the findings, the United Nations-backed Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) confidently said in its First Assessment in 1990 that global warming is a great deal and a climate emergency. But given the succession of long periods without global warning as shown by HadCRUT4 data set, it is safe to say that the IPCC’s warning is way off the mark.

One writer renders judgment on the climate-change hoax.

Journalist and blogger Christopher Monckton noted that the West is self-destructing due to its belief in global warming, which has benefited China and Russia…

Monckton noted that totalitarian administrations, such as that of the United Kingdom, is imagining climate emergency–giving as example the situation in rural Cornwall. He predicted that the first political party to find the courage “to oppose the global warming nonsense root and branch” will sweep the board at the next elections.

“There is no more of a climate emergency today than there was in 2012, so the only reason for declaring one now is not that it is true (for it is not) but that it is politically expedient,” wrote Monckton.

The political leadership in the West, said Monckton, is committing economic suicide as it allowed high-energy industries to be wasted because of the fear of imagined global warming. “Whole industries are have already been or are soon to be laid waste – coal extraction, distribution and generation (and, therefore, steel and aluminum); oil and gas exploration and combustion; internal-combustion vehicles; and a host of downstream industries which will create joblessness and hardship to income earners,” he wrote. (“Global warming statistically insignificant: Climate emergency is imaginary,” Matthew Davis, 1/6/22, Rapture Ready News)

With regard to the pandemic that has the entire world in fear of facing death, the deception—the lies involved—are beyond our ability to comprehend at this point. I’m of the conviction that could be at the center of the prophesied lie that leads to enslavement of the populations of planet earth following the Rapture of the Church.

Never has there been such a global effort among the leaders of the world’s nations in attempts to bring their peoples into subjection. Demanded compliance in the matter of vaccinations and mask-wearing constitutes a powerful mechanism that could soon force all into the one-world mold Antichrist will impose.

The big lie—the great delusion of 2 Thessalonians 2—might spring from the present delusion being foisted—that the jab will bring freedom from pestilences and freedom to be an accepted citizen of the new order.

What we are witnessing might be the catalyst for Antichrist’s underlings—his liars—to bring about control over humanity which the father of lies has desired for millennia.

Before that can happen, the One who is the Way, the Truth, and the Life will step out of the heavenly throne room and call those who belong to the eternal family of God the Father to Himself. You don’t want to miss that magnificent reunion in the clouds of glory.

Again, here’s how you can make sure you will go to Christ when He calls the saints.

That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. (Romans 10:9–10)

Father of Liars

THE RISE OF A FALSEHOOD

https://getalifemedia.com/video/prophecy/fc.shtml

The ultimate sign that you're headed for the worst day of your life would have to be this...You wake up one morning only to realize that your family has suddenly disappeared. So you run to turn on your TV to see what's happening and there you watch a special worldwide news report declaring that millions of people all over the planet have simply vanished. As you spy the Bible on the coffee table, it suddenly dawns on you that your family was right after all when they kept telling you about the rapture of the Church. Then to your horror, you realize that you've been left behind and have been catapulted into mankind's darkest hour, the 7-year Tribulation that really is coming upon the whole world. But thankfully, God is not only a God of wrath; He's a God of love as well. And because He loves you and I, He has given us many warning signs to show us that the Tribulation is near and that His 2nd Coming is rapidly approaching. Therefore, The Final Countdown takes a look at 10 signs given by God to lovingly wake us up so we'd give our lives to Him before it's too late. These signs are the Jewish People, Modern Technology, Worldwide Upheaval, The Rise of Falsehood, The Rise of Wickedness, The Rise of Apostasy, One World Religion, One World Government, One World Economy, and The Mark of the Beast. Like it or not folks, we are headed for The Final Countdown. Please, if you haven't already done so, give your life to Jesus today, because tomorrow may be too late!

The Rise of Falsehood
Divide & Conquer

DIVIDE AND CONQUER

 

Matthew 12:25 – A House Divided Cannot Stand

Mt 12:25 But Jesus knew their thoughts, and said to them: “Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and every city or house divided against itself will not stand

Galatians 5:13-15 – Love Fulfills the Law

Gal 5:13 For you, brethren, have been called to liberty; only do not use liberty as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another. 14 For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” 15 But if you bite and devour one another, beware lest you be consumed by one another!

The Separation is Happening

Rock Harbor Church Prophecy Update

Jesus predicted that the world would be separated by the truth (Himself) and today more than ever we see that divide. Our world is divided on purpose based on the Bible, vaccination vs. unvaccinated who are largely evangelicals, the divide us by white and non whites with CRT. free market system vs. Communism, Marxism, socialism. nationalism vs, globalism. tangible coins and paper money vs. Digital currency. The devil is dividing people to attach the evangelicals but God is allowing its there is really no turning back—the divide will get larger and larger as predicted by the Messiah. Today we want to look at the evidence for this predicted separation.

Why Does Truth Divide Us? (ReEdit of The Deconstruction of Morality)Pastor Jack Hibbs
00:00 / 01:04

Why Does Truth Divide Us? (ReEdit of The Deconstruction of Morality) (Jack Hibbs Podcast)

We are seeing a rise in political, racial, economic, and social division among people all over the world. Why? Because we are listening to the deception of the enemy. Jack Hibbs explains in today’s episode.

Visit https://JackHibbs.com for more information.

What does the Bible say about discrimination?

https://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-discrimination.html

Discrimination is itself the neutral act of perceiving differences. A music aficionado, for example, who recognizes the influence of Chopin in the études of Debussy may be said to have a “discriminating ear”; that is, the music lover is a person of refined perception. In most contexts, however, discrimination is a negative term referring to the practice of unfairly treating a person or group of people differently from other people or groups of people, and this is the sense we will assign the word in this article. Discrimination can be based on disabilities, race, ethnicity, intelligence, or any number of factors that make human beings different.

Discrimination is not the same as discernment. Discernment is proper discrimination based on truth and fact. For example, discernment may not choose to hire someone because he showed up fifteen minutes late for an interview reeking of alcohol. Discernment rightly assesses that person as an unsuitable candidate for a responsible job. Discrimination, on the other hand, may choose to not hire someone simply because he is of a different race or did not wear expensive clothing to the interview. Discrimination wrongly judges a person based only on external factors or personal preference.

One of the first problems that arose in the early church was due to discrimination: “But as the believers rapidly multiplied, there were rumblings of discontent. The Greek-speaking believers complained about the Hebrew-speaking believers, saying that their widows were being discriminated against in the daily distribution of food” (Acts 6:1, NLT). The Jerusalem church was multi-ethnic, and some racial prejudice crept into their practices and caused trouble. This squabble pulled the apostles away from teaching and preaching, so the church elected the first deacons to deal with the problem and make sure no one was being discriminated against (Acts 6:2–3).

Discrimination was also a problem for the first Jewish believers in Jesus. Because God’s Messiah had come through the line of David and to the Jews first (Romans 1:16), they assumed He was their Messiah only. Disagreement arose then as Gentiles were added to the church. Some Jewish leaders wanted to know how “Jewish” the Gentile believers must become (Acts 14:2715:5). Many Jews could not believe that mere faith in their Messiah was enough to justify Gentiles as it had them. Surely the Gentiles should have to do something “Jewish,” such as observe the Sabbath or be circumcised, to be saved (see Acts 15:1 and Galatians 5:1–12). This clash of cultures, with its theological implications, necessitated the Jerusalem Council (Acts 15:2–35). The modern church often wrestles with similar problems. Christians can discriminate against certain people groups or lifestyles, unsure if the same faith that saved us is enough to save “those people,” too (Ephesians 2:8–9).

No human being is fully free of prejudice or discrimination. It’s part of our selfish nature to prefer those of our own kind, whatever that represents to us. Races tend to congregate in their own neighborhoods and churches, preferring their way of doing things to that of other races or nationalities. Preferences are fine as long as they don’t turn into legalistic discrimination against believers who differ on non-essential aspects of faith. Without realizing it, we can all be guilty of discrimination. Legalists discriminate against those they judge as rebels, while rebels discriminate against traditionalists. The goal should be to disagree without discriminating.

We can overcome our tendency toward discrimination by modeling Jesus’ attitude of humble service (Matthew 20:28). He washed the feet of Judas, knowing that Judas was a traitor (John 13:27). He ministered in Gentile regions and in Samaria (Mark 7:2431John 4:4). Rather than incite discrimination between “us and them,” Jesus’ coming to earth broke down the barriers that separated people: “He himself is our peace, who has made the two groups one and has destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility” (Ephesians 2:14). We can practice the instruction of Philippians 2:3, which says, “Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit. Rather, in humility value others above yourselves.”

God has made all who trust in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior one. Jews and Greeks, rich and poor, every nation, and every ethnicity—Jesus has formed His church from all groups (Galatians 3:28Revelation 5:9). There should be no discrimination within the Body of Christ because there is no discrimination with God (Acts 10:34).

What does the Bible say about discrimination?
Rich vs Poor

RICH vs POOR

http://blog.gdi.manchester.ac.uk/countering-divide-conquer-build-human-economy/

Have we all been “divided and conquered” by the super-rich? Political divides and polarisation were highly apparent in the UK and the US in 2016, and are highly prominent elsewhere in Europe. Votes for Brexit and Donald Trump have brought renewed attention to major cleavages within society – along economic, social, cultural, urban/rural lines. This has fostered disagreement and tensions amongst people who encounter each other in their daily lives, distracting attention from the almost mythical super-rich, with their almost impossible-to-relate-to amount of wealth. While such divides amongst the 99% (or even 99.9%) have grown and need to be addressed, stealthily the global super-rich seem to get wealthier and wealthier.

Oxfam’s flagship annual report of global inequalities, timed to coincide with the Davos World Economic Forum meeting reveals its most shocking-yet figures in terms of global wealth inequality – the combined wealth of the wealthiest 8 people (all men) on the planet is equivalent to that of the bottom 50% of the global population. The report valuably refocuses attention on where the starkest inequalities lie – between the super-rich and the rest.

 

The report contains a range of staggering statistics on various inequalities. A few that stand-out include:

  • The World’s richest 1% own more than the other 99% combined

  • While two buses were needed a couple of years ago to fit those people who own more than the poorest half of humanity, now only a large golf buggy is needed

  • Between 1988 and 2011 the incomes of the poorest 10% increased by just $65, while the incomes of the richest 1 percent grew by $11,800 – 182 times as much.

  • A FTSE-100 CEO earns as much in a year as 10,000 people in working in garment factories in Bangladesh.

  • On current trends, it will take 170 years for women to be paid the same as men.

Black vs White

WHITE vs BLACK (Systemic Racism)

The New Face of Racism :: By Daniel Payne

https://www.raptureready.com/2020/06/07/the-new-face-of-racism-by-daniel-payne/

What follows is my own observation, through my own life experience. My experiences while going to both public and private schools, serving in the military, and working in the private sector are only my own experiences, as seen through my own eyes. I realize it’s different for everyone, especially for those of different backgrounds.

I have witnessed the many ways that people hurt each other, including through the division of racism. I’ve also witnessed the many ways people heal each other, including through the unity of working together without prejudice.

The racists of the past are not fading away; they’re being reborn.

Today, a new form of racism is taking over America. Yes, there are still people who are part of the old and vulgar form of racism, but their numbers were decreasing.

However, today many people are being reborn into a new large racist group of the present. What do both groups of racists, both past and present, have in common?

For one, both groups are weak, because they’re only willing to be part of the majority. In the past, many people vulgarly condemned the African race, so it was easy to fit into that particular largest racist group.

Also in the past, the minority stood and fought alongside those who were only trying to win their freedom, and their civil rights. Theirs was the group that was the hardest to be part of.

Now, after years of courage and hard work on the part of Americans of both African, and European decent, the new majority of racists have hijacked that progress. They are twisting our increased union into increasing division.

Had race relations in America reached perfection? Quite obviously not. Were race relations in America making progress? It could be argued that yes, they were. Many barriers were removed allowing new friendships, understanding, and milestones to be achieved, in spite of a system designed to keep the status quo.

And that was a big issue for the powers of darkness. Those who wish to rule over the majority know that the keys to absolute power are not given in times of union, prosperity, and freedom.

What better way to get back on track toward tyranny, than to sow a new venomous discord among the increased fellowship of America.

The new deceived racists constantly scream about African Americans in order to feel better about themselves. They’re obsessed with propping themselves up at the expense of African Americans.

They can’t exist without putting an entire race of people underneath their own self-inflated worth. Now today, by condemning their own race, they are rebirthing the same vulgar form of racism that existed in the recent past.

The devil knows this because he knows what happens when one race in particular is constantly condemned at the expense of another; extreme bitterness and animosity is produced toward the other race.

The exact same brand of dangerous and violent racism of America’s bloodstained past is being reborn in the present. Everyone who currently feels entitled enough to condemn an entire race at the expense of another, are puppets being played by the powers of darkness in order to create further division, not unity.

Racism is not the disease; it’s a symptom of hardened, hate-filled hearts. Decent and kind people would never allow the hateful venom being shouted on the streets of America today to flow from their lips.

Those screaming at the top of their lungs today are nothing less than modern-day Pharisees.

Do not be deceived!

The New Face of Racism

What does the Bible say about systemic racism?

https://www.gotquestions.org/systemic-racism.html

The Bible does not use the phrase systemic racism in any translation, and neither the word systemic nor racism is found individually. However, Scripture does address racial equality, injustice, oppression, and so forth. In fact, ideals set forth in the Bible form the basis for modern views that “systemic racism” is evil. Such a perspective is radically contrary to the worldwide culture of the ancient world. Opposition to systemic racism stems from beliefs only natural to a Christian worldview. Likewise, the correct response to the evil of racism must follow a godly approach in order to succeed.

Generally, the term systemic racism suggests that race-based discrimination is ingrained or woven into rules, laws, or traditions, even if the actual text of laws makes no overt reference to race. Of course, it’s possible for nations to have openly racist laws or policies. However, charges of systemic racism typically suggest the system is structured or applied with an unfair impact on a particular group. The concept of systemic racism implies that effectively racist outcomes can occur even if no participating individual personally holds racist attitudes, and even if no law mentions race. This concept is obviously controversial, and the extent to which any process exhibits systemic racism is subject to debate.

Prior to the dominance of Judeo-Christianity, broad concepts such as human equality and universal rights were nonexistent. The natural assumption was that the strong and privileged had a moral authority to do as they pleased with the weak and underprivileged. Likewise universal were sweeping judgments based in sex, race, or social status. These biased assumptions were not merely common; they were considered obvious and universal truths. This point cannot be overstated: what the modern world considers “evils” were ingrained conventions in pre-Christian worldviews. The biblical perspective that all people are image-bearers of God, all individually accountable to God, and all subject to the same moral code is foreign to non-Christian perspectives (1 Corinthians 12:13Galatians 3:28Colossians 3:11).

Of course, the growing influence of a biblical worldview did not eradicate racism and oppression overnight. But biblical teaching is an inherent contradiction to racism and oppression, and, like a solvent steadily eating away at a material, the Bible progressively weakened those sins’ acceptance in society. In some cases, biblical ideals led to the abolition of practices that every other culture in history had embraced, such as slavery. Modern cultures impacted by a Christian heritage often take for granted that civil rights, racial equality, freedom, and so forth are moral imperatives. In truth, those beliefs are anchored in biblical teachings.

In broad strokes, Scripture places obligations on Christians to push back against systemic racism. The Bible promotes impartiality (James 2:1), the equality of all people (Genesis 1:27), concern for those who are oppressed (Zechariah 7:10Proverbs 28:16), and fair treatment of the weak or poor (James 1:27Proverbs 14:1). If some law, tradition, or interpretation of law truly has an unfair impact on one race, then that realization ought to spur Christians to action (James 4:17). And Christians ought to be open to the experiences and thoughts of others, rather than simply ignoring those perspectives (Proverbs 18:1317John 7:24).

This does not mean every claim of “systemic racism” should result in the destruction of suspect laws or structures (Proverbs 11:2914:1629:8). Careful reflection and good judgment are important both in identifying and addressing these issues. Believers need to accept that systemic racism is possible. It cannot be dismissed out-of-hand. Believers ought to be open to the perspective of those who believe they have been victimized by it. We should be equally receptive to the perspectives of those who are blindsided by claims they are perpetuating racism (Galatians 6:1).

Christians need to be thorough and Christlike in their response (1 John 4:1James 1:221 Corinthians 13:4–6). Countering legitimate evil must be done according to a biblical worldview, not by embracing anti-biblical philosophies.

What does the Bible say about systemic racism?

“Systemic Racism” The BIG Lie :: By Dr. David R. Reagan

https://christinprophecy.org/articles/systemic-racism-the-big-lie/

 

[read in Lamplighter (pdf)]

I was watching a local Dallas, Texas, television station interviewing protestors in a crowd that had descended on Dallas City Hall after the killing of George Floyd. Individuals in the crowd were asked, “Why are you protesting?” Some said, “I’m protesting against police violence.” But most gave an answer that really surprised me. Over and over I heard these words: “I’m protesting against systemic racism.” Young protestors in the streets using an academic phrase?

Providing a Definition

Now, that is not a phrase that would naturally roll off the tongues of street protestors, nearly all of whom were in their teens and twenties. It had to be supplied by the protest organizers. I kept hoping that the TV interviewer would ask one of the people what they meant by the phrase because I was certain none of them had the slightest idea what it meant — either because of naiveté or a lack of historical knowledge and perspective.

The word, systemic, is defined as something that is ingrained throughout a whole system — something that is intentional, methodical or implemented according to a plan. Thus, “systemic racism” in reference to a nation would mean that everything in the society is designed to discriminate against one or more races. The former policy of Apartheid in South Africa would be a classic example.

Now, with that definition in mind, just try to wrap your brain around the insanity of someone in Dallas, Texas, protesting against “systemic racism.” The top governmental official in Dallas is the City Manager, who is a black man. Additionally, the Mayor is a black man, the Police Chief is a black woman, the District Attorney is a “progressive” black man, and the Sheriff is a black woman. The previous Sheriff, who resigned to run for Governor, was an Hispanic lesbian. I ask you, where is the “systemic racism”?

Personal Experience

I happen to know very well the meaning of “systemic racism.” That’s because I grew up in it. I was born in Texas in 1938, and I was raised in the 1940s and 50s when racism was interwoven in the fabric of our nation. Everything was segregated, and I mean everything — schools, hotels, sports arenas, restaurants, public transportation, movie theaters, churches and yes, even drinking fountains.

One of the most important ways of keeping blacks “in their place” was to deny them the right to vote. There were a variety of barriers to voting, like the poll-tax, which was essentially a voting fee. This technique was not outlawed until the passage of the 24th Amendment in 1964.

Literacy tests were another technique used to limit black voting. An illiterate white person would always miraculously pass the test, while a black who could read and understand Shakespeare, just never could seem to read well enough to qualify.

Always lurking in the background in many states was the Ku Klux Klan, which was more than willing to intimidate blacks from voting.

Blacks were mainly confined to manual labor jobs. Access to professions like law, medicine and teaching were highly limited. The military was segregated.

Franklin Roosevelt

The President of the United States during my childhood years was Franklin Roosevelt. Although he was a liberal icon, he did nothing to improve race relations. That’s because the key to his powerful political coalition was what was referred to as the “Solid South,” and he was unwilling to do anything that might jeopardize Southern support.

He was first elected in 1932 and was re-elected for a second term in 1936. In 1937, he had his first opportunity to nominate a Supreme Court justice. His selection was a U.S. Senator from Alabama named Hugo Black. This man had been a lawyer for the Klan and was on record as having said terrible things about Blacks, Jews and Catholics. He was confirmed easily by the Senate by a vote of 63 to 16. Can you even imagine such a person being nominated today?

Right before our nation got involved directly in World War II, President Roosevelt made his most daring decision regarding race relations. In June of 1941, he created by Executive Order the Fair Employment Practice Committee. Its assigned purpose was to prevent “discrimination in the employment of workers in defense industries or government because of race, creed, color or national origin.” But this applied only to the national government. Beyond this, the President realized he was walking on eggs, and he had no desire to break any of them.

After the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in December of 1941, President Roosevelt very quickly issued an Executive Order in February of 1942 that constituted one of the worst racist actions in our nation’s history. Incredibly, he ordered all Japanese Americans arrested and sent to ten internment camps located in seven states. They were kept there for the duration of the war. This was obviously a very racist decision since no similar action was taken against Americans of German heritage despite the fact that we were also at war with Germany.

The President’s highly unconstitutional action was upheld by the Supreme Court in December 1944 by a vote of 6 to 3. Justice Hugo Black wrote the majority opinion. Again, can you even imagine something like this happening in America today?

Personal Experiences with Racism

Although I am a white man, I have personally experienced the emotional pain of racism three times — twice as a child and once as an adult. The first occasion occurred in 1948 when I was ten years old. One of my dad’s younger brothers came to visit us in Waco, Texas, for a couple of weeks. He had worked during World War II in the Pearl Harbor shipyards in Hawaii. During that time he had met and married a beautiful and very sweet lady of Asian descent who had been born and raised in Hawaii. Her name was Rosie.

One Saturday while they were visiting with us, it was decided, for some reason I can’t remember, that I should take Rosie downtown and accompany her while she was doing some shopping. So, we took the bus and spent the morning going from store to store. As noon approached, Rosie asked if I knew where we could get a sandwich before returning home. I told her I knew where there was a soda fountain.

When we arrived, there were two stools available that were adjacent to each other, so we sat down and waited to be served. And we waited and waited and waited. Finally, I grew impatient, so I leaned across the bar and grabbed the arm of a waitress who was walking by. I said, “Ma’am, we’ve been waiting a long time. Could you take our order?” She stepped back, looked at my aunt and then back at me. Then, she snarled, “I don’t serve Japs!” I was embarrassed and enraged, but before I could say anything, Rosie put her arm around my shoulders and whispered, “It’s okay, David; let’s go home.”

Two years later, in 1950, my parents bought a very nice new home in Waco in a very upscale part of town. The house had a detached garage, and above the garage was an apartment. My folks proceeded to rent the apartment to an Asian couple.

Over the next few weeks, my parents received a series of nasty phone calls and hate letters condemning them for renting to Asians. The neighborhood kids picked up on their parents’ attitude and started harassing me, calling me a “Jap lover.”

My worst experience with racism came ten years later in 1960, when my new wife and I moved to Boston, where I was going to attend a Harvard graduate school. We had arranged to stay the first week with a pastor and his wife while I searched for an apartment.

The first morning after our arrival, I surveyed the apartment ads in the Boston paper, selected the ones that were in my price range and started calling. What happened next was something I could not understand. As soon as I would start inquiring about the apartment for rent, the person on the other end of the line would either hang up or interrupt me by saying, “It’s already been rented!” This happened over and over, and it continued the second day. I could never get past my opening words.

Finally, on the third day, I ran across a brutally honest person. He yelled, “I don’t rent to niggers!” That’s when it dawned on me that my Southern accent was my problem. Again, this was 1960 when regional accents were still very strong, before they began to be leveled out by national television. So, I had to start going personally to seek an apartment. Still, what I experienced was nothing compared to a black person who could not even go personally.

That was not the end of the matter. Over the following three years, I came to the realization that Boston was the most outwardly racist city I had ever lived in. The Italians hated the Irish, and the Irish reciprocated. Both of those groups seem to hate Blacks and Jews. When the movie, Exodus, opened in Boston in 1960, hundreds of people demonstrated against it in the street in front of the theater because the film was favorable to the Jewish people.

The Turning Point

That was America in 1960 — characterized by real systemic racism to the nation’s core.

The first real chink in the armor of that entrenched system occurred in 1954, when the Supreme Court outlawed segregation in public schools. Up to that time, the rule had been “separate but equal.” The states recognized the separate part of this equation, but gave the equal part little attention. Thus, schools for colored children were usually run down and poorly equipped.

It soon became very apparent that a court decision was worthless without enforcement follow-up. Thus, nine years later, in 1963, Governor George Wallace of Alabama was still proclaiming, “segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.” Wallace backed up his words by standing in the door of a building at the University of Alabama campus in Tuscaloosa, refusing to allow two black students to enter. President Kennedy had to call out the National Guard to get the students in the school.

Praise God, the tumultuous decade of the 1960s would prove to be the real turning point in the fight against systemic racism in America. First came the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which outlawed racial discrimination in schools, employment and public accommodations. The bill had been proposed by President Kennedy, but he was unable to get it through Congress. His assassination in November of 1963 changed the political system. His successor, President Lyndon Johnson, called on the Congress to pass the bill as a memorial to Kennedy.

The Civil Rights Act was revolutionary, but its provisions concerning voting were very weak. For example, it did not eliminate literary tests. It just specified that all rules and regulations concerning voting had to be applied equally to all races. There was no recognition of a “right” to vote, and therefore the concept of qualifying to vote in some way was left in place.

This serious problem was addressed the next year in the Voting Rights Act of 1965. It guaranteed the right to vote to all racial minorities. Many legal experts consider this bill to be the most effective civil rights legislation ever enacted in the history of our nation. Its purpose was to enforce the rights guaranteed in the 14th and 15th Amendments of the Constitution. The 14th Amendment, adopted in 1868, guaranteed “equal protection under the law;” the 15th, adopted in 1870, prohibited states from denying the right to vote based on “race, color or previous condition of servitude.” Yes, these vital freedoms had been in our Constitution since the Civil War, but they had not been enforced.

The guarantee of the right to vote was the nail in the coffin of systemic racism. It would be only a matter of time before minorities of all colors would be elected to important public offices throughout our nation, culminating in the election of Barack Obama as President in 2008.

The Key Element

The key factor in accomplishing these major legal victories against racism was the Civil Rights Movement led by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. from 1955 to his death in 1968. He was an ordained Baptist preacher who believed very strongly in non-violence. He therefore advocated peaceful civil disobedience.

Yes, there was a lot of violence associated with his movement, but his protesters were not the source of the violence. Rather, the violence was directed toward them on the part of white racists. In fact, the willingness of his followers to be beaten in behalf of their beliefs, without retaliation, was what began to turn the tide of public opinion in America.

Luther’s movement climaxed on August 28, 1963 with a rally at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C. This was the historic occasion when he delivered his incredible, “I Have A Dream,” sermon. In that sermon, he presented his dream for an America of racial equality. Eight times he proclaimed, “I have a dream…” The most memorable was when he said:

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

He concluded the sermon by saying that he was dreaming of the day when “all of God’s children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing, in the words of the old Negro spiritual, ‘Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!'”

The Need for Historical Perspective

So, where are we today with regards to racism? Systemic racism is dead. The legitimate protestors in our streets today who are denouncing systemic racism are too young to appreciate how far this nation has come since 1960. Instead of condemning our nation, they should be celebrating its freedom and its advancement for racial equality. And they need to realize that the great accomplishments of the Civil Rights Movement were gained peacefully under the leadership of a Baptist preacher who believed in non-violence.

They also need to realize that if systemic racism was still a reality, millions of white Americans would not have been outraged by the killing of George Floyd, and the policeman responsible would not have been arrested and charged with a crime.

As for those protestors who have resorted to violence, most are thugs and hoodlums who could care less about racial equality. They just want to ride the issue as an excuse to loot and burn to satisfy their greedy and irresponsible hearts. And then there are the anarchists who desire to exploit the issue as a way of venting their fury against law and order and Judeo-Christian values.

Does the elimination of systemic racism in our nation mean that there is no lingering aspects of the problem? No! There are still racists in our nation among all groups. White people do not have any exclusive franchise dealership on racism. There are black racists. In fact, the two loudest racist voices in America today are both blacks. They are Louis Farrakhan and Al Sharpton.

Let me give you an example of widespread black racism that occurred all across our nation in 2008, during the presidential campaign when Barack Obama was running against John McCain. I have a dear friend who is a black evangelist, and every Monday during the campaign, he would call me and say, “Well, Dave, it happened again yesterday.” That’s all he needed to say because I knew exactly what he was talking about.

You see, each Sunday when it was time for him to preach, the host pastor would say to the congregation, “Before I introduce our visiting evangelist, I want to emphasize how important it is for you to vote for Obama.” He would then launch into a pep talk for Obama before turning the pulpit over to my friend.

Afterwards, my friend would go to the pastor privately and say, “I can’t believe you are endorsing Obama. Don’t you know that he mocks Judeo-Christian values — that he is in favor of abortion, that he promotes homosexuality and that he is anti-Israel?” And always, the pastor would respond by saying, “Yes, I know, but he’s a bro.” That, folks, is racism. And it is a particularly sad form because it consists of a representative of God who is willing to elevate skin color above God’s Word.

Police Reform

So, if systemic racism is dead in America, what is the problem with our police departments? Well, first of all, the vast overwhelming majority of police in this nation are responsible officers. They are not racists, and they do not get up every morning looking forward to shooting someone. And when they do shoot a black person, it is by no means automatically an action of racism.

The police officers of our nation constitute our first line of defense against barbarism. Every day they have to deal with some of the worst elements of our society. Their lives are often at risk, and they often find themselves in dangerous situations that require split-second decisions. They can certainly make mistakes, but they must always be given the benefit of doubt.

The last thing in the world we need to do is “defund the police” or “abolish the police.” These are idiotic ideas that can come only from either very naive minds or depraved minds. What we should be doing, instead, is to provide the police increased funding to be used for more extensive and in-depth training.

I have actually heard “progressives” proposing that police be replaced with psychological counselors! Do these people really believe a counselor can control a hardened criminal by giving him a big bear hug and telling him that we love him?

Are there reforms that are needed? Of course, there are. For example, we need to establish a national computer base that identifies police who have been dismissed for improper conduct or who have been convicted of crimes. That would stop bad apples from silently transferring from one police department to another.

Police candidates need to be screened more carefully, and they need to be given specific training in how to peacefully diffuse highly volatile situations.

A Basic Problem

Some people respond that the majority of police must be racists because so many more blacks are arrested each year, totally out of proportion to their population. That is true, but that does not mean the cops are racists. It’s due, instead, to the fact that a disproportionate amount of crime is committed by blacks.

And why is that? I would argue that it is due to the collapse of black families, resulting in young blacks growing up in dysfunctional households where they have no male parent. Thus, we have the startling statistic that 77% of black children today are born into a home without a father.

A remarkable man by the name of Daniel Patrick Moynihan (1927- 2003) predicted this would happen as a result of the “Great Society” programs of the Lyndon Johnson Administration. He issued his report in 1965 while he was serving Johnson as Assistant Secretary of Labor. Despite his warnings, the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program included a rule that no payments could be made to any family if “a man was in the house.” The liberals condemned Moynihan as a “racist.” But his warning proved to be prophetic. Moynihan was later to serve four terms in the United States Senate, representing the state of New York (1977-2001).

Another Aspect of the Problem

The most important factor in all this — applying to blacks and whites and citizens of all colors — is that there is a famine of the Word of God in our land today (Amos 8:11).

We have kicked God and His Word out of our public schools and the public arena. Church attendance has fallen to an all time low. Parents are distracted and are neglecting moral training. And our kids are being bombarded on television and the Internet with violence, blasphemy and immorality. The result is that we have raised a whole generation of moral pygmies who are willing to kill each other over a pair of tennis shoes.

The Answer to Racism

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Franklin Graham went to every state capital in our nation to hold a prayer rally. He was not there to endorse any party or candidate. He just wanted people to join him in praying for our nation. He began each rally with the same words:

I have no hope in the Democratic Party, and I have no hope in the Republican Party. Zero hope. Our only hope is God.

Franklin Graham was 100% correct with these insightful words. The answer to continuing racism in our nation is not politics or violence or socialism. The answer is Jesus. That’s because He transforms hearts and turns haters into lovers.

The Problem with the Solution

I know that some of you will respond to this assertion of mine by saying, “If that’s true, then why did so many pastors and Christians defend slavery before the Civil War and segregation after the War? I can think of three reasons: 1) Social Pressure, 2) Religiosity and 3) Spiritual Weakness.

What I mean by “Social Pressure” is that many were intimidated into being silent about racism. The pastor who wanted to speak out feared losing his pulpit. The laymen feared losing friends and jobs.

This type of intimidation is still alive and well today. Consider the Christians in the limelight who are caving in to social pressure — people like sports stars, movie actors and singers. Over and over again we see them speaking out in behalf of some Christian value — like opposition to abortion or sexual perversion — only to watch them then fast-track backward, apologize and ask for forgiveness when they are attacked for expressing their Christian viewpoint.

A second and more important reason that so many Christians were silent is because of what I call “Religiosity.” By this, I mean that many professing Christians over the years, and today, are not really Christians. They are just caught up in religion. They are what I call “Cultural Christians,” or, “Christians-in-name-only.”

This is so true of our nation today. About 65% of Americans claim to be Christians. But most of them are simply professing Christians who have never been born again, who never read their Bibles, who never pray and who hardly ever attend church. The result is that public opinion polls show that only 17% of professing Christians are “Bible-believing.”

The third reason for the failure of Christians to stand against racism is a very sad one. It is what I have labeled “Spiritual Weakness.” I’m speaking of the fact that many true, born-again Christians are actively grieving the Holy Spirit within them. Yes, the Holy Spirit can be grieved (Ephesians 4:30), and He can be quenched (1 Thessalonians 5:19).

The purpose of the indwelling of the Holy Spirit within true believers is to shape and mold them into the image of Jesus. But the believer retains his free will, and he can resist the efforts of the Spirit to cleanse him of all his evil thoughts and practices.

Let us pray that every Cultural Christian in America will get serious about their faith and truly receive Jesus as their Lord and Savior. And, let’s pray that all true Christians will surrender their wills to the Holy Spirit, enabling Him to cleanse their hearts of any racism.

 

One other thing — keep in mind that despite these Christian failures in the past, many of the abolitionists were very outspoken Christians. The abolitionist movement in England was led by a Christian named William Wilberforce, and the modern civil rights movement in our nation was led by a Baptist preacher, Martin Luther King, Jr.

A Warning

When responding to racial issues, Christians need to be salt and light, speaking out in behalf of righteousness. But Christians also need to be discerning. I’m issuing this warning because Christians tend to think the best of everybody, and this naivete often gets them in a lot of trouble.

Take the Black Lives Matter organization, for example. No Christian should be affiliated with it in any way. Just check out its website and you will see that it is a radical left-wing socialist organization that opposes the biblical view of marriage and supports the Sexual Perversion Movement. Its leaders are committed to violence, and they are virulently anti-Semitic.

Now, notice, I did not say avoid identifying with the slogan, “Black Lives Matter.” I’m speaking, instead, of the BLM organization. It is an abomination that is fomenting racism by playing the race card with respect to every event it possibly can.

The Sanctity of Life

Do black lives matter? Or course they do! In fact, all lives matter, including precious babies in the wombs of their mothers.

 

And that concern for life should also apply to the elderly and the increasing efforts to get states to pass laws legalizing euthanasia. I have always said that if a society will allow parents to pay doctors to kill their children, the day will come when children will be allowed to pay doctors to kill their parents.

All human beings are created in the image of God (Genesis 1:27). That image is sacred. Life is sacred.

I [the Lord God Almighty] call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, the blessing and the curse. So choose life in order that you may live, you and your descendants… Deuteronomy 30:19

Is An Increase in Racism A Sign of the End-Times?

Christ in Prophecy w/ Don Perkins

Ethnos versus ethnos in the end times! Is there a cure for racism?

“Systemic Racism” The BIG Lie

Racism in America

Christ in Prophecy w/ Dennis Pollock

Is America still systemically racist? Find out with guest Dennis Pollock on television’s “Christ in Prophecy.”

Racism Hoaxes- It's Supply and Demand!

Dinesh D'Souza

Dinesh D'Souza joined Pete Hegseth on the Laura Ingraham Show to discuss recent racism hoaxes.

What The Media Isn't Telling You About Daunte Wright

The Charlie Kirk Show

There are far too many lies being spread around the death of Daunte Wright. I’m here to set the record straight.

Tim Scott Reminds America Biden's Race Narrative is FALSE

The Charlie Kirk Show

“Hear me clearly: America is not a racist country. It's backwards to fight discrimination with different types of discrimination.”

BLM Black Lives Matter

BLACK LIVES MATTER (BLM)

Black Lives Matter Exposed :: by Daymond Duck

https://www.raptureready.com/2016/06/29/black-lives-matter-exposed-by-daymond-duck/

Many of the comments that I have heard about the shooting of 12 police officers (5 were killed) at the Black Lives Matter protest inDallas on July 7, 2016 contained expressions of concern about the future of the U.S.

Considering the fact that the police are investigating the possible motives of the murderer, Micah Johnson, and searching for connections to activist and terrorist groups such as Black Lives Matter, I have decided to note some of the important facts that I have read and heard about the group.

Pres. Obama is one of the most powerful supporters of Black Lives Matter. He has held meetings with them at the White House. Logs show that one of their leaders, DeRay McKesson (Google him), is a frequent visitor to the White House and he has even attended one of the White House Christmas parties. Pres. Obama has praised him and his associates as people who “are going to take America to new heights.”

George Soros, a radical globalist who occasionally visits the White House and wants to destroy the sovereignty of America, has given more than 30 million dollars to Black Lives Matter and groups that pay people to protest and demonstrate.

Hillary Clinton has had problems with Black Lives Matter, but she has catered to them by repeating the words Black Lives Matter in her speeches and by blaming the death of young black men on whites and the police.

The Democratic National Committee has officially endorsed Black Lives Matter.

Wealthy donors to the Democratic Party and some large corporations such as Google have given large donations to Black Lives Matter.

 

Black Lives Matter often calls for violence against the police with chants of: 1) “What do we want? Dead Cops! When do we want it? Now!” 2) “Pigs in a blanket, fry ‘em like bacon!” and 3) “Hands up, don’t shoot!”

Following the death of five Dallas police officers, supporters of Black Lives Matter celebrated and Tweeted expressions of joy and satisfaction.

Videos show that many of the demonstrators at Ferguson, MO.,Baltimore, MD. and other places are the same people. At Ferguson,MO. there was rioting, looting and property destruction.

Assata Shakur is a convicted cop-killer (Google her). She has been accused of bank robbery, armed robbery and kidnapping; she has escaped prison and fled to Cuba; she is on the FBI’s most wanted terrorist list; and more. She is often quoted and praised by DeRay McKesson, Pres. Obama’s frequent White House visitor.

Following the August 2014 rioting in Ferguson, MO., the Congressional Black Caucus, the ACLU, several labor unions (the AFL-CIO and SEIU) and several members of Hollywood called upon Pres Obama to nationalize the local police forces and to put them under the Dept. of Justice.

Pres. Obama responded by creating a task force on “21st Century Policing.” He appointed at least two Black Lives Matters leaders (Brittany Packnett and DeRay Mckesson follower of Assata Shakur) to be on that task force.

At a celebration of Black History Month, Pres. Obama praisedBrittany for leading many of the demonstrations in Ferguson, MO.and DeRay Mekesson for his outstanding mobilizing work inBaltimore, MD.

On Mar. 18, 2016, it was reported that many of those that helped with the demonstrations in Ferguson, MO. and Baltimore, MD.were planning more demonstrations in 2016 and in some cases they would target Donald Trump and some of his events.

 

Another report said protesters were being paid 10-15 dollars an hour with money that was originating with George Soros.

 

In addition to nationalizing the local police, it is being reported that Black Lives Matters wants U.S. citizens to be disarmed. And Pres. Obama has used most of the violence and killing to talk about Gun control.

On July 8, 2016, according to a report by Stefhan Standford, a writer for All News Pipeline, the Baltimore Sun reported that DeRay McKesson’s Twitter account has been hacked. It is Mr. Standford’s opinion that McKesson messages that were made public show that Black Lives Matter and the Obama Administration are working together to stop the November elections and to keep Donald Trump out of office. Mr. Standford even thinks the Obama Administration may be planning to declare Martial Law.

On that same day, Alex Jones, a nationally syndicated radio host, called Black Lives Matter a “domestic terrorist organization” that is part of a “plan to destabilize America and bring in the UN to take over.”

On the next day, Dave Hodges, host of The Common Sense Show, expressed a similar opinion, “George Soros’ organizations are organizing protests, which will soon escalate into violence all across this country. This will provide this administration with the justification to enact marital law.”

On July 9, 2016, DeRay McKesson was one of 30 people arrested at demonstrations in Baton Rouge, LA. The demonstrations were described as tense, two firearms were confiscated, but a reason was not given for why Mckesson was arrested.

 

There is much more and readers should be able to Google most or all of these things. Sadly, there appears to be a connection between the Pres. of the U.S., racial violence, gun control, the Democrat Party and perhaps even Martial Law.

Finally, many of those in Congress that should be working to protect the U.S. from anarchy and things like this are tied up with ways to protect the U.S. from Donald Trump. Pres. Obama’s co-conspirator on many issues, Paul Ryan, is even threatening to sue Donald Trump.

 

I ask your forgiveness Lord. There should be repentance and prayer in every church in the U.S., but it is hard to find a handful that believes and cares.

Please Lord! Help America. If you don’t, she will soon be gone.

Prophecy Plus Ministries

Daymond & Rachel Duck
duck_daymond@yahoo.com

More on Black Lives Matter :: by Daymond Duck

https://www.raptureready.com/2016/07/28/more-on-black-lives-matter-by-daymond-duck/

Most of the responses to my recent article titled “Black Lives Matter Exposed” were positive. But two responders called me a racist and one said some things that were clearly unrepeatable.

If I am a racist for trying to shine some light on what is going on so be it. I am even willing to be called a low down dirty double racist for writing a second article on the subject.

From what I have read 49 policemen were shot in the U.S. in 2014, 42 in 2015, and 26 so far in 2016. This needs to stop.

First, everyone needs to know about George Soros and his Open Society Institutes and Open Society Foundations.

An article by Steve Kroft (of CBS 60 Minutes fame) titled “One Evil Human” says George Soros (birth name was Gyorgy Swartz) was born of Jewish parents in Hungary, but he is an atheist, anti-God, anti-family, anti-American and anti-good.

The article says in France, George Soros was convicted of “insider trading.” In Hungary, he was fined for “illegal market manipulation.” In Malaysia, the prime minister called him a “villain and a moron.” In Thailand, an activist called him a kind of Dracula that “sucks the blood out of people.”

The article calls Pres. Obama a “puppet” of George Soros. It says George Soros is the man who most probably put Pres. Obama in office, in 2008 Soros gave $5 billion dollars to the Democratic National Committee and he “controls President Obama’s every move.”

 

A Jan. 14, 2015 Washington Times article by Kelly Riddell titled “George Soros Funds Ferguson Protests, Hopes to Spur Civil Action” says tax reports show that Mr. Soros’ Open Society Foundations gave $33 million in one year to organizations that supported the Ferguson, MO protests.

Second, everyone needs to be honest about Pres. Obama’s character. He is a chronic liar with a forged birth certificate and stolen Social Security number. He has been caught breaking the law and refusing to obey court orders.

Like his friend George Soros he appears to be anti-American. For years, he sat under a preacher (Jeremiah Wright, Jr.) that preached, “God damn America.” He promised to fundamentally change America. He travelled to foreign nations criticizing America.

Newt Gingrich said, “Obama is . . . in many ways the first anti-American president.” New York Mayor Rudy Giuliana said he does not think Pres. Obama loves America. Alan Keyes said he is anti-American and “it was insane to put him there” (into the White House).

He has made America’s weak economy worse; purged dozens of America’s military leaders and presided over the loss of America’s superpower status; damaged America’s relations with her allies, especially Israel; released billions of dollars to a nation that calls for the destruction of America and made it possible for that nation to get nuclear weapons in the future.

Pres. Obama released thousands of prisoners from jail; opened our borders knowing that terrorists are coming in; fast-tracked an agreement (TPP) that surrenders the sovereignty of America; and supported the establishment of a world government by 2030.

Third, everyone needs to know who DeRay McKesson is. Records show that he is a leader in Black Lives Matter and a frequent visitor to the White House.

In an article titled “Cozy: BLM leader lives in home owned by Soros’ Open Society Board Member,” writer Ryan Girdusky reveals where DeRay McKesson lives and he shows that the house is owned by James E. Wood, Jr. and his wife Robin.

In 2008, George Soros’ Open Society Institute website listed Robin as a board member.

On July 7, 2016, Black Lives Matter protestors marched in Dallas, TX chanting: 1) “What do we want? Dead Cops! When do we want it? Now!” 2) “Pigs in a blanket, fry ‘em like bacon!” and 3) “Hands up, don’t shoot!”

While they were still in the streets chanting that they wanted dead cops now, Micah Johnson started shooting at police officers. And it didn’t end until he had shot 12 officers (5 were killed).

On July 9, 2016, DeRay McKesson was arrested at demonstrations in Baton Rouge, LA. Others were arrested and at least 2 guns were confiscated. Mr. McKesson was released the next day.

On July 12, 2016, Pres. Obama spoke at a memorial service for the deceased police officers. The next day, on July 13, 2016, Pres. Obama met for about three hours with DeRay McKesson and others at the White House.

Understand that an anti-American man called George Soros helped what some believe is an anti-American man named Barack Obama get elected; that Mr. Soros has been giving money to organizations such as Black Lives Matter that are paying demonstrators and chanting for the death of cops.

Mr. Soros once had a board member on his Open Society Institute that has an interest in the house in which a Black Lives Matter leader named DeRay McKesson lives; that DeRay McKesson visits Pres. Obama at the White House often and that DeRay McKesson met with Pres. Obama and others at the White House about one week after the Dallas police officers were shot.

Finally, I am not convinced that George Soros and his ally Barak Obama are really trying to help black people. They have had seven and one-half years to do it and things have gotten worse not better. As far as I am concerned, all of the evidence seems to say that they are just using black people to advance their own anti-American agenda.

If they succeed, everyone in the U.S. (black, white, police or whatever) will be worse off not better off. All of us need to love each other, forgive each other, help each other and pray for each other regardless of race.

Prophecy Plus Ministries
Daymond & Rachel Duck
duck_daymond@yahoo.com

Black Lives Matter Exposed

How should Christians view the Black Lives Matter movement?

https://www.gotquestions.org/black-lives-matter.html

Modern “discussions” of race and politics are more often dueling echoes than conversations. Deep issues require careful consideration. With that in mind, please refer to our other resources on social issues, such as systemic racism, for important background perspectives. Phrases such as “Black Lives Matter” often mean entirely different things to different people, depending on what they want to defend or support. Examining every possible nuance of these variations is well beyond our ministry’s ability.

Rather, we choose to address points, commonly associated with Black Lives Matter, over which Christians ought to be concerned. Our focus is on pointing out where legitimate concerns over racism, inequality, or culture can be co-opted by non-biblical ideas and become unbiblical. Neither our expertise nor our purpose is in the subtlest, finest details of social theories or cultural debates. We choose to present clear biblical principles in places where they intersect with culture. No article will ever present every facet of a social issue to the satisfaction of every possible reader, and we make no claims otherwise.

Started in 2013 in response to separate police shootings of two young black men, the Black Lives Matter movement (or BLM) came into prominence with its use of the #BlackLivesMatter hashtag. Ever since, the phrase black lives matter has been a rallying cry of those who believe there is institutional racism against African-Americans in virtually every aspect of society, but especially in police departments and the legal system.

There is no point in discussing the statistics on black crime vs. the percentage of the black population and/or the numbers of black-on-black murders vs. the number of blacks killed by police officers. For every statistic, there is a dueling statistic or a way to reinterpret the statistic. There is no point in discussing the specific cases that spawned the Black Lives Matter movement. The various sides all seem to be rigorously locked into their understanding of the events and the aftermaths. Like most issues connected to race, it appears to be virtually impossible to have a constructive dialogue about the Black Lives Matter movement.

As a concept, it is true that black lives matter. Blacks/African-Americans are equally created in the image of God (Genesis 1:26). In God’s eyes, blacks are equal in value to whites, browns, reds, yellows, and everyone in between. Racism is evil. There is only one race, and that is the human race. Ultimately, we all have the same parents (Genesis 5).

As a movement, Black Lives Matter has taken that true concept (black lives matter) and twisted it into something completely unbiblical. The organization has recently showed its true colors, openly promoting causes that oppose biblical values. The two co-founders of Black Lives Matter, Patrisse Cullors and Alicia Garza, claim Marxism as their ideology: “We actually do have an ideological frame,” Cullors said in an interview, “Myself and Alicia in particular, we’re trained organizers. We are trained Marxists. We are super-versed on ideological theories” (quoted in the Washington Times, “The matter of Marxism: Black Lives Matter is rooted in a soulless ideology,” June 29, 2020).

On their official website, BLM expresses their support of the LGBTQ agenda: “We make space for transgender brothers and sisters to participate and lead. We . . . dismantle cisgender privilege and uplift Black trans folk. . . . We foster a queer‐affirming network. When we gather, we do so with the intention of freeing ourselves from the tight grip of heteronormative thinking, or rather, the belief that all in the world are heterosexual” (https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe, accessed 6/16/20).

Perhaps most troubling is Black Lives Matter’s stance on the family: “We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and ‘villages’ that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable” (ibid.). What BLM calls the “Western-prescribed nuclear family” is actually the God-ordained family unit: a father, a mother, and their children. To work to “disrupt” that design is to actively oppose God’s plan for society.

Concerning racism, we can all agree that no one should be judged by the color of his or her skin. We should fight against all true forms of racism and be compassionate to its victims. Through it all, we should point people to Christ as the only answer for racism. Protests, policies, awareness, changes to the legal system, etc., will never solve the problem. Racism is the result of sin. Until the sin problem is dealt with—until people become new creations in Christ (2 Corinthians 5:17)—the problem of racism will never be eradicated. Only in Christ can racial reconciliation be found: “For he himself is our peace, who has made the two groups one and has destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility” (Ephesians 2:14).

Concerning the methods used by Black Lives Matter, peaceful protests against racial injustice are appropriate. But Christians should never be involved in rioting, looting, violence against police officers, hateful speech, and/or “reverse” discrimination/racism against non-blacks. Injustice and hatred will not be ended by more injustice and hatred.

As for BLM’s position on issues not related to race, there is no way a Christian should support the godless ideology of Marxism, allow the destruction of the nuclear family, or be involved in a “queer-affirming network” that advocates for the normalization of transgenderism.

As with any group, it’s important to know what Black Lives Matter believes. And some of what they believe is incompatible with biblical truth. Of course, all Christians should be in full support of black lives matter as a concept, as we are all created in the image of God; however, Christians should reject the BLM movement’s hijacking of this truthful concept and its promotion of philosophies and methodologies that are completely unbiblical.

The two co-founders of Black Lives Matter, Patrisse Cullors and Alicia Garza, claim Marxism as their ideology: “We actually do have an ideological frame,” Cullors said in an interview, “Myself and Alicia in particular, we’re trained organizers. We are trained Marxists. We are super-versed on ideological theories” (quoted in the Washington Times, “The matter of Marxism: Black Lives Matter is rooted in a soulless ideology,” June 29, 2020).

 

“We make space for transgender brothers and sisters to participate and lead. We . . . dismantle cisgender privilege and uplift Black trans folk. . . . We foster a queer‐affirming network. When we gather, we do so with the intention of freeing ourselves from the tight grip of heteronormative thinking, or rather, the belief that all in the world are heterosexual” (https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-..., accessed 6/16/20).

 

“We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and ‘villages’ that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable” (ibid.).

 

In this video, Pastor Nelson with Bible Munch answers the question, “How should Christians view the Black Lives Matter movement?”.

How should Christians view the Black Lives Matter movement?

BLM is the New Political Party;…the New Religion :: By Vanessa P.

https://www.raptureready.com/2021/05/31/blm-is-the-new-political-party-the-new-religion-by-vanessa-p/

BLM is the New Political Party; Social Justice the New Religion 

Lori Lightfoot has recently decided she will only grant interviews to people of color. She specifically said white reporters are talented but “white nonetheless.” As Chicago collapses around her with a 50% increase in violent crime, she is worried about the color of the person interviewing her.

Chicago is a sanctuary city where criminals have been pouring in. When a Latino DEMOCRAT politician, Ramen Lopez, questioned what she was doing on crime and to end sanctuary policies, she, of course, called him a racist. That’s the left’s “go-to.” Stop giving them power with that word.

The only racists I see are on the left. They feel blacks need whites to take care of them. Fancy Nancy thanked George Floyd for dying. This is how sick the left is. The Democrats have wanted to control the Pentagon with a far-leftist for over a decade. The left is even trying to emasculate our most prized institution in this country. Our military. Those who keep this nation FREE AND SAFE.

Our Pentagon is supposed to be NON-POLITICAL. Have you seen our new recruitment ads for the military? They look like recruitment ads for some “university of the arts.” Then there’s Russia’s new ad that just happened to come out after ours. It shows MEN. Strong men who look like they are ready for war.

God said Babylon’s men will turn into women as she’s invaded. Look around you. How many old-school, tough, manly men are left?

 

It’s recently been discovered that the Pentagon has had a secret military of 60,000 people with fake identities to essentially spy on Americans. That’s ten times the size of the CIA. This secret military includes people that worked for NSA, private contractors, and special forces. They specialize in espionage. That’s what they do. The program they operate under is called “signature reduction.” They carry out top-secret military operations within the US and abroad. Now I wonder, who could this secret military be watching in the US?

 

Our own soldiers are having their social media accounts looked over to see if they are “racist or extremist.” If you voted Trump, you are now BOTH.

We were energy-independent just one year ago, thanks to Trump. We depended on nobody but hard-working blue-collar men to supply our gas and oil. Biden and the Democrats apparently didn’t like that. The Democrats loathed the fact that America was becoming great again. Like I said before, we now have people running America who hate America. They are running us into the ground. The world has noticed Biden’s weakness.

Palestinians especially have noticed his weakness, which is why they have started pogroms on the Jews in the nation of Israel and abroad. What has Joe Biden done? He’s pulled the only troops we had in Israel, out of Israel. First of all, this wouldn’t have happened under Trump. Second of all, had it happened, Trump would be boldly declaring we stand with Israel.

This isn’t the usual rocket attack that Israel faces on a regular basis either. This is different; this is slowly turning into a civil war. Some Palestinians have been captured on camera beating Jews and carrying AR-15’s as they hunt for them in Israel.

 

This hatred of Jews has ignited a fire all over the world too. Israeli flags are being burned. People like that goofball AOC are calling the terrorists the victims while labeling Israel the aggressors. We have “leaders” in the US disparaging Israel as they are being attacked.

 

And during all of this, the leader of the free world is pretending to drive F-150’s. He can’t even do that for real. He wasn’t driving. His secret service was.

Speaking of civil war in Israel, over 120 retired generals recently drafted and signed an open letter questioning the mental health of Joe Biden. They are also questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election.

I said several months ago that Arizona was the state to watch. Leaked reports are showing that almost one million votes were switched from Trump to Biden or were illegally cast. And just days prior to handing over the dominion voting machines, the Democrats attempted to wipe the data. It was mysteriously found days later.

God said Babylon was a golden cup in His hand, meaning we were a prized possession of His. Then in Revelation, He said Babylon is a golden cup full of abominations. God’s anger with America has reached a boiling point, and it’s only going to get worse. The America we grew up in? Gone.

We need to stop saying America is “One nation under God.” We haven’t been one nation under God in decades. This country is now MANY NATIONS UNDER MANY GODS. Why wouldn’t God be angry? He’s had enough of us.

The Pentagon is no longer being trained to protect us from foreign enemies, just domestic. It’s you and I they are coming for.

Space force Lt. Gen. Stephen Whiting recently appeared on a podcast to promote his new book, Irresistible Revolution: Marxism’s Goal of Conquest and the Unmaking of the American Military.”

In his book, he outlines how America’s military is now using Marxist indoctrination to train our troops. And the left is furious. He’s now being investigated for partisan politics as an officer. Meanwhile, the entire Democrat Party is partisan politics.

The new recruits aren’t being shown video of Hamas or Mexican drug cartels building tunnels. They’re not talking about how China aims to dominate the world. No. They are now being shown videos of January 6, 2021, at the US Capitol.

They are being programmed to see YOU as the enemy. Those in the military that supported Trump are now the extremely silent majority. Even the upper brass isn’t saying anything. Is this what our founders envisioned? Not in a million years. This is what they were tired of under King George. Taxation with zero representation. The Biden administration doesn’t mind collecting your taxes, but don’t you dare speak your opinion. I’m being taxed but no longer represented.

I told you a few weeks ago about our new leader at the Pentagon, Lloyd Austin. He’s a “social justice warrior” who believes the United States military is full of white supremacists and racists. He also believes that the biggest threat the US is facing also happens to be these imaginary racists filling our ranks.

MAGA now equals extremism. Your MAGA hat made you a target before with the basement-dwelling leftist fascists running around our streets. But now? That MAGA hat is fast-tracking towards the US military arresting you for treasonous behavior. If anyone thinks the US military would never do this, did you ever think a US president would do what Biden’s been doing? Did you ever see this nation turning on Israel? Well, just wait. Basically, you are not allowed to criticize this country or the military. Just ask that creeper, Joe Scarborough. He says you’re a traitor and if you don’t like this new America, GET OUT. How quickly we’ve changed. How quickly the long-standing meaning of Patriotism has changed.

You know who else isn’t allowed to criticize their military? The Chinese. Go ahead and criticize the CCP as a Chinese citizen and see what happens. Then again, looks like we’re about to find out right here at home.

This vaccine passport is gaining traction, and I believe it’s going to usher in the full effect of “Can’t buy or sell.” We are already starting to see it implemented with sports games. They know the average American male wants his sports and beer. He’s not giving up season tickets for anything; bring on the vaccine.

Recently Joe Biden made an ominous statement to anti-maskers and anti-Vaxxers. He said we will pay the price for not getting the vaccine. Imagine Trump saying that?

https://dailycaller.com/2021/05/17/biden-issues-dark-prediction-unvaccinated-americans-warns-paying-price-coronavirus/

The thing is, he isn’t just saying that. Lloyd Austin isn’t calling our military racist for no reason.

Bishop Garrison is the new Senior Advisor to the Secretary of Defense, Mr. Lloyd Austin, for Diversity and Inclusion. Cancel culture and wokeness has now reached the greatest military in modern history.

Garrison posted on his personal social media account that EVERY single Trump supporter is a racist, misogynistic extremist.

 

Garrison, as well as Lloyd, are partisan hacks. They hated Trump, and so now hate you. Garrison is in charge of separating “permissible” opinions from extremist views. He is in charge of spreading Marxism throughout the military. The purge is happening. You may not see it yet, but it’s going on. Garrison is basically the “opinion” police.

Every communist nation purges their military first, and America will be no different. You think Jinping has people in his communist military that aren’t loyal to him and who will carry out his orders?

DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which is also called “The Pentagon’s brain,” recently recommended that the Pentagon add a new category to the extremist list. It’s called “Patriot Extremism.” Patriot extremists believe “the US government has become corrupt” or “has overstepped its constitutional boundaries”:

Are you a constitutionalist? Pro 2 amendment? You’re an Extremist, according to our very own Pentagon.

As China strengthens and threatens our allies in the region, we are training our soldiers on how to be diverse.

Are militaries of superpower nations supposed to be more concerned with image than winning wars? No. When China and Russia invade, our military will have been almost dismantled. How many people majoring in the “arts” also join the military? They DON’T! It’s good ole boys from the South that mainly join our military. The South is the Bible Belt; it’s filled with conservatives. CONSERVATIVES ARE USUALLY CHRISTIANS. These are the people that Austin and Garrison are targeting. So, are these soldiers with conservative leanings and strong support for Trump going to be removed from the military? Court martialed? Maybe re-education camps that Hillary first suggested in 2016.

An escalation against the American people is beginning. The covid vaccine isn’t being pushed for no reason. They aren’t offering million-dollar jackpots for nothing. Our Pentagon and Democrat leadership want you vaccinated and are even going to bars at night in Texas to do it. So we have uniformed men walking the streets with vaccine doses, going into bars with inebriated people.

They don’t care about possible side effects. And they want me getting this shot? Not on your life.

I still love America; the flag gets me teary sometimes, though. I miss being a kid in the eighties when patriotism was all around you. When other nations feared and respected us, when people came here legally and were extremely proud to become an American. That’s all gone. America has spread her corruption and her influence throughout the world. We haven’t always been the good guy. As a matter of fact, when’s the last time we were looked at as the good guy? Far too long.

The world is over, America. The Democrats destroyed the greatest nation God ever built. A nation He had waiting for His people to be free. Americans have spread the gospel since her founding, we praised God for all we had been given, and even that is gone. The churches are filled with people who don’t believe half of what the Bible says. I love this nation for all it stood for until we allowed the Democrats, and especially Democrat women, to take over. God says a woman rides the beast, after all.

We are about to witness a world without America, a world where evil prevails over good. Until Jesus Christ returns out of the sky, things are about to get bad for all of God’s people.

America and Israel are in trouble. God help us.

Vanessa P

Womanofchrist@yahoo.com

Twitter @nessaredkingdom

https://heistruth.home.blog/

BLM is the New Political Party;…the New Religion

Co-Founder of Black Lives Matter: “We Are Trained Marxists”

https://grandmageri422.me/2020/06/24/co-founder-of-black-lives-matter-we-are-trained-marxists/

So, what many of us suspected is now confirmed. Black Lives Matter (Organization) is not  about Racism. It is about overthrowing our Republic to implement Communism.

Listen to the man in this video carefully. He knows what he is talking about. He is very knowledgable about history and about Black Lives Matter:

BLM founder admits they are trained Marxists (BoonedogNewz)

Just in case you forgot. BLM founders are Marxist trained by the Chinese Communist Party. Their goal is the destruction of the nuclear family and the United States.

"We Are Trained Marxists" - Patrisse Cullors, Co-Founder, #BlackLivesMatter (Martyn Iles)

"We actually do have an ideological frame... we are trained Marxists." - Patrisse Cullors, Co-Founder

At one point in the first video, the man (in disgust) accuses whites of following and kneeling and financially supporting TRAINED MARXISTS. They think that they are funding Black Lives Matter. And that is exactly right – Black Lives DO Matter.

But these people have no clue how they are being used and duped by MARXIST/COMMUNISTS.

We are told to keep our eye on the end game. That is to rid the country of Racism.  What you need to know is that Black Lives Matter (the Organization) is all about Marxism and Communism, and overthrowing our Republic and replacing it with a Communist form of government. 

Truly, what we have been seeing in the last weeks is a Communist Insurrection. Our president is not attempting to contains these people. They are holding Seattle captive and have renamed it CHOP. Lawlessness reigns – rapes, murders – all manner of horrific crimes and the people in that area have no police department to call.

This has been the dream of the Democrat Party for many decades, and they are no longer hiding it. The Democratic Socialist Party is the party of ANTIFA. I cannot imagine a peaceful election this fall. It saddens and frightens me.

Racism Shames People

But Racism is what shames people and sends them to their knees. Pretty diabolical, yes?  Shame the people with Racism and keep them ignorant of the fact that their (BLM) end game is Communism. It’s truly NOT about Racism. Is the reader finally understanding what is happening to America?

Truth About Communism

Do you know how many people died under Communism? We hear a lot about Hitler’s Nazis and they were satanic and so incredibly evil. We know that 6,000,000 Jews were murdered and millions of other groups of people were murdered as well under Hitler.

This was how Hitler’s ideology of a pure supreme race of people was attempted. Thank God that Hitler’s Nazi government was crushed. The Nazis were a National movement. ANTIFA is international.

 

From scottmanning.com

Communist Body Count

The following estimates represent citizens killed or starved to death by their own Communist governments since 1918. These numbers do not include war dead. The governments are sorted by body count (highest to lowest).

All numbers are mid-estimates.

While this list is as complete as I have been able to determine, it is evolving. Some numbers are incomplete and there are still five Communist countries that have the potential to kill more of their citizens. Over the next year, each government will be profiled in detail on this website.

Communist Body Count: 149,469,610

https://scottmanning.com/content/communist-body-count/

Brethren, our children have not been taught true history. Their teachers and professors are leftist Marxist Communists – I’m not saying all, but I am saying many.  They have taught the students revisionist history. 

Our children believed all of it – lock stock and barrel. They were told that Marxism/Communism is a glorious governing system where all are equal.  If all are equal, why the huge number of murders in each Communist country?  Those who were murdered were dissenters and the governments would not stand for this. 

There is no such thing as freedom of speech in Communism. And there is no freedom to worship our Lord. The Communist government will not compete with anyone for your loyalties. They insist on being your god.

I do hope and pray that this article is shared widely. If America is being destroyed, at least we should know why.

 

And I wanted the reader to be able to tell their children about BLM – to understand that their agenda is to bring Communism to America.

We’ve have a good run with our Republic. Benjamin Franklin knew that it was only a matter of time before our Democratic Republic would fall. He said these words at the Constitutional Convention:

“In these sentiments, Sir, I agree to this Constitution with all its faults, if they are such; because I think a general Government necessary for us, and there is no form of Government but what may be a blessing to the people if well administered, and believe farther that this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in Despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic Government, being incapable of any other. I doubt too whether any other Convention we can obtain, may be able to make a better Constitution.”  (emphasis added)

And we have come to that dreaded day, when people have become so corrupted and they are crying out for a despotic government. 

 

I weep and grieve over the loss of the greatest country in the world.

How Can I Be Saved?

Shalom b’Yeshua

MARANATHA!!

Co-Founder of Black Lives Matter: “We Are Trained Marxists”

Black Lives Matter Blames Deadly Cuban Protests on US Government, Defends Regime

https://www.raptureready.com/2021/07/21/blm-defends-cubas-communist-regime-by-geri-ungurean/

Brethren, this is a perfect example of why those on the Left (the public, media and Congress) have NO clue about reality. They believe the narrative that is pushed by Leftwing news stations. I have conclusive evidence that BLM is a Marxist organization and have written on this.

But even presented with FACTS, the Left cannot accept it if it does not match the narrative.

Co-founder of Black Lives Matter: “We are Trained Marxists” (VIDEO) <click to view)

From theepochtimes.com

Black Lives Matter is blaming the U.S. government’s “cruel and inhumane” economic embargo for the current unrest in Cuba while praising the communist regime for its “solidarity” by granting asylum to “black revolutionaries.”

The Marxist organization has faced strong criticism since posting a statement on July 14 in response to protests that have erupted in multiple cities across Cuba, where demonstrators have called for greater freedoms and an end to leader Miguel Díaz-Canel’s authoritarian regime.

In the note that was posted to its social media profiles, the group condemned the 1962 U.S. embargo, claiming it was instituted with the “explicit intention” to destabilize Cuba and “undermine the right of Cubans to choose their own government.”

“Black Lives Matter condemns the U.S. federal government’s inhumane treatment of Cubans and urges it to immediately lift the economic embargo,” the group wrote. “This cruel and inhumane policy, instituted with the explicit intention of destabilizing the country and undermining Cubans’ right to choose their own government, is at the heart of Cuba’s current crisis.”

The largest protest that the communist-controlled country has seen in decades erupted over the weekend after citizens rallied against ongoing shortages of food and other goods, high prices, and power cuts, amid a deep economic crisis in the country made worse by CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus pandemic-related lockdowns.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken, who rejected the claim that the United States is to blame for Cuba’s unrest, said on July 12 that the main factor that has led people to the streets lies with the mismanaged economy of the nation and the communist regime’s failure to supply its citizens with basic needs.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), among other officials, also rebuked the group for the claim. “The extortionist ring known as the Black Lives Matter organization took a break today from shaking down corporations for millions & buying themselves mansions to share their support for the Communist regime in #Cuba,” the Florida senator said on social media.

Cuban leader Díaz-Canel, in a televised address on July 14, conceded that government shortcomings in handling shortages and other problems played a role in the protests while also urging Cubans not to act with hate.

Before his announcement, the Cuban regime had only blamed social media and the U.S. government for the protests, which were the biggest in Cuba since a quarter-century ago, when then-leader Fidel Castro personally went into the streets to calm crowds of thousands furious over dire shortages following the collapse of the Soviet Union and its economic subsidies for the island.

The BLM statement—which was posted around the same time as Díaz-Canel commented about the revolt—was quickly disputed online, including by the group’s own followers, urging them to take the post down.

“Very disappointing and uninformed statement,” one person wrote. Another said BLM’s view of Cuba’s situation is “a horrible misrepresentation of what’s happening.”

In the note, BLM also praised the communist regime for its “historically demonstrated solidarity with oppressed peoples of African descent” and “protecting black revolutionaries” such as Assata Shakur, also known as JoAnne Chesimard, a former member of the Black Liberation Army who escaped from prison in 1979 while serving life for the execution-style murder of a New Jersey state trooper; she was granted asylum by Castro. She remains one of the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorists.

BLM, known for organizing protests against police brutality in the United States, didn’t mention Cubans’ calls for “freedom” against an oppressive regime and widespread reports of police brutality, sparking controversy.

“Disgusting! Despite the Cuban dictatorship’s murdering and beating of protestors (many of them black), BLM’s statement on Cuba … condemns the U.S., praises the Castro regime, and makes no mention of the atrocities being committed by the dictatorship,” said Giancarlo Sopo, a communication strategist who once worked on President Donald Trump’s reelection campaign. Source

I have given up trying to convince leftist family members that BLM is Marxist.

If it doesn’t match the narrative, they will NOT accept it!

Pray for these people, and keep sharing the Gospel with them.

How Can I Be Saved?

Shalom B’Yeshua

MARANATHA!!

grandmageri422@gmail.com

Articles at grandmageri422.me

BLM supports CUBA'S TYRANNICAL DICTATORSHIP!!! 

James Kaddis

When evil movements seek to take root in any nation, the people seeking to further its cause will always seek to target the true church of Jesus Christ first!!! The marxist movement's in this country and in Cuba bot serves as great examples of this truth!

Black Lives Matter Blames Deadly Cuban Protests on US Government, Defends Regime

From BLM Website (https://blacklivesmatter.com/about/)

#BlackLivesMatter was founded in 2013 in response to the acquittal of Trayvon Martin’s murderer. Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation, Inc. is a global organization in the US, UK, and Canada, whose mission is to eradicate white supremacy and build local power to intervene in violence inflicted on Black communities by the state and vigilantes. By combating and countering acts of violence, creating space for Black imagination and innovation, and centering Black joy, we are winning immediate improvements in our lives. (https://blacklivesmatter.com/about/)

 

Many see the slogan ‘Black Lives Matter (BLM) as a noble plea for equal treatment under the law. It's a cry to

secure the rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for everyone. 

 

But what does the BLM organization actually stand for? To find out, look no further than their leaders – Patrisse Cullors, Alicia Garza, and Opal Tometi.  Here is Cullors in a revealing

 

I actually do have an ideological frame. Myself and Alicia, in particular, are trained organizers - we are trained Marxists. -- Patrisse Cullors in a 2015 interview

 

Visit the BLM website and read the list of demands to get a sense of how deep a transformation they seek.  One of those demands proclaimed “We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another”

 

We can't be certain but it's hard to believe that this radical agenda is what most signed up for when they made that # Black Lives Matter social media post. Or that every employee, customer or shareholder at Nike endorses a “disruption of the family”.

 

Garza first coined the phrase in 2013, the day George Zimmerman was acquitted of murdering Trayvon Martin.  Her friend Cullors added the hashtag and joined the words so it could travel through social media. Tometi created the digital platform blacklivesmatter.com. 

 

According to Robert Stilson of the Capital Research Center, the group became a self-styled global network in 2014,

and a “fiscally sponsored project” of a separate progressive non-profit in 2016.

 

When Black Lives Matter is used to refer to an organization, it typically means the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation (BLM Global Network Foundation). This is the central group that traces its beginnings to “three radical Black organizers — Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and Opal Tometi,” and operates the BlackLivesMatter.com website.

 

The group has been a fiscally sponsored project of Thousand Currents, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, since 2016. What this means in practice is that the organization does not have its own IRS tax-exempt status but is operating as a “project” of an organization that does. In the case of 501(c)(3) fiscally sponsored projects, this allows for tax-deductible donations.

 

Thousand Currents says on its website that the official name of this Black Lives Matter entity is “Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation, Inc.,” which is also the name the group has used on recent press releases.

(https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/06/21/the_various_faces_of_black_lives_matter.html)

 

This evolution has helped embolden an agenda vastly more ambitious than a “national defunding of police”. The goals of the Black Lives Matter organization go far beyond what most people think. They're hiding in plain sight – there for

the world to see. If only we would read beyond the slogans and the summaries of the movement they helped to create. It's a distinction with a profound difference.

 

Their radical Marxist agenda is bent on supplanting the basic building blocks of society:

  • replacing the family with the state

  • destroying the economic system that has lifted more people from poverty than any other

 

Theirs is a blueprint for misery, not justice. It must be rejected.

From video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8J68p5l-gjQ

BLM - Destruction of family.jpg

This is no longer on their list of demands - but that does not mean that they are not still working towards their original intent.

We Need To Talk (J.D.Farag)

 

CRITICAL RACE THEORY (CRT) / 1619 PROJECT /  REPERATIONS

Critical Race Theory (CRT) is the view that the law and legal institutions are inherently racist and that race itself, instead of being biologically grounded and natural, is a socially constructed concept that is used by white people to further their economic and political interests at the expense of people of colour. According to critical race theory (CRT), racial inequality emerges from the social, economic, and legal differences that white people create between “races” to maintain elite white interests in labour markets and politics, giving rise to poverty and criminality in many minority communities.  (Britannica)

Racism Hoaxes- It's Supply and Demand!

Dinesh D'Souza (Reparations - Start at 3:19)

Dinesh D'Souza joined Pete Hegseth on the Laura Ingraham Show to discuss recent racism hoaxes.

The FINAL ANTICHRIST and CRITICAL RACE THEORY!!!

Countdown2Eternity

On today's episode of Countdown 2 Eternity, we'll talk about the dangers of critical race theory and how it's propagation could potentially be used in these last days!!! We’ll talk about that and much more on this very special edition!!!

D'Souza Debunks the Lies in Critical Race Theory: "Indoctrination Program, Pure and Simple"   (Dinesh D'Souza)

In this episode, Dinesh makes the case for reparations--not reparations for slavery, but for the Communist Party of China to pay reparations for its role in the global spread of Covid-19. Dinesh contrasts the media's coverage of Biden's decision to get the US out of Afghanistan with Trump's decision to do exactly the same thing. And Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton joins Dinesh to talk about Biden's border policy, voter integrity laws and mask mandates.

Chip Roy SLAMS Critical Race Theory and Tells the Press to do Their Job   (Dinesh D'Souza)

Texas Representative speaks the truth about the corrupt public education system in the US.

Even Socialists Attacked the 1619 Project | Mike Gonzalez

The 1619 Project isn’t just a series of articles placing slavery at the center of the American story. It is also a curriculum that is sweeping the land. Its overt political nature should alert parents, educators, members of school boards, and political leaders that a major political experiment is being practiced on the nation’s schoolchildren.

 

In early May, The Pulitzer Prize Board this week awarded its commentary award to The New York Times’ Nikole Hannah-Jones for her essay launching the 1619 Project. Mike Gonzalez joined FRC's Washington Watch on May 15, 2020, to discuss the 1619 Project and how this deeply flawed project is being used to push socialism on students — and how some socialists are ironically pushing back.

Dad's school board speech goes viral: We're 'taking back the wheel' (Fox News)

North Carolina parent Brian Echevarria joins ‘The Faulkner Focus’ to discuss fighting back against critical race theory in schools.

CNN accidentally exposes the fraud of critical race theory (Fox News)

Laura Ingraham urges parents to stand up against the ‘propaganda’ in their children’s curriculums.

CRT Critical race theory

What is the critical race theory?

https://www.gotquestions.org/critical-race-theory.html

Critical race theory is a modern approach to social change, developed from the broader critical theory, which developed out of Marxism. Critical race theory (CRT) approaches issues such as justice, racism, and inequality, with a specific intent of reforming or reshaping society. In practice, this is applied almost exclusively to the United States. Critical race theory is grounded in several key assumptions. Among these are the following:
 

• American government, law, culture, and society are inherently and inescapably racist.
• Everyone, even those without racist views, perpetuates racism by supporting those structures.
• The personal perception of the oppressed—their “narrative”—outweighs the actions or intents of others.
• Oppressed groups will never overcome disadvantages until the racist structures are replaced.
• Oppressor race or class groups never change out of altruism; they only change for self-benefit.
• Application of laws and fundamental rights should be different based on the race or class group of the individual(s) involved.

 

In short, critical race theory presupposes that everything about American society is thoroughly racist, and minority groups will never be equal until American society is entirely reformed. This position is extremely controversial, even in secular circles. Critical race theory is often posed as a solution to white supremacy or white nationalism. Yet, in practice, it essentially does nothing other than inverting the oppressed and oppressor groups.

From a political standpoint, critical race theory closely aligns with concepts such as communism, Marxism, nationalism, progressivismintersectionality, and the modern version of social justice. Strictly speaking, the Bible neither commands nor forbids Christians regarding specific political parties or philosophies. However, believers are obligated to reject any aspect of a philosophy that conflicts with biblical ideals. Critical race theory is deeply rooted in worldviews that are entirely incompatible with the Bible.

Spiritually, some have attempted to apply critical race theory principles to Christianity. This even includes suggestions that the Christian church must adopt the critical race theory approach to society, or else it is not really preaching the gospel. In applying critical race theory to faith, some have gone even further, suggesting that “whiteness,” defined in a unique sense, is a type of sin and incompatible with salvation. In other words, critical race theory implies that those in certain ethnic/social economic groups must “repent” of such status, above and beyond other sins, in order to be truly Christian. Less inflammatory uses of critical race theory echo older claims that biblical faith is often presented as a “white man’s religion,” or that Christianity ought to follow a progressive theology, especially with respect to gender and sexuality.

While not necessarily embracing critical race theory, some Christian groups have embraced the modern approach to social justice. This raises the concern that non-biblical preferences will crowd out legitimate commands from Scripture. While critical race theory is not identical to social justice, the two philosophies are closely linked in modern American culture. Christian organizations that speak about social justice should be cautious about the terms and assumptions those discussions entail.

So far as it applies to faith, Christianity, or spirituality, there is no truth whatsoever to critical race theory. This is not to say that self-labeled Christians have never perpetrated racism. Nor does it mean every Christian in America is innocent of overlooking suffering people. It certainly does not mean that believers in the United States have no need to self-examine or seek change.

Critical race theory entirely violates a biblical worldview, however, by suggesting that people are essentially defined by their race or class, rather than by their individual acts and attitudes (Jeremiah 31:31–34Revelation 20:11–13). Critical race theory incorrectly emphasizes intersectional categories such as gender, race, sexual preference, and economic status above and beyond a person’s own choices and responsibilities (Galatians 3:28). Critical race theory also conflicts with a biblical approach to objective, absolute truth. In no small part, this includes suggesting that an “oppressed” person’s feelings matter more than what the “oppressor” has actually done or intended (1 Corinthians 4:410:29).

As applied to spiritual matters, critical race theory effectively replaces an individual, personal relationship with God with a tribalisticethnocentric, collectivistic system. It also greatly overemphasizes material and social concepts to the detriment—or even the exclusion—of the true gospel. When and where prejudices are found in the church, they should be addressed according to sound doctrine, not according to an inherently unbiblical approach such as critical race theory.

What is the critical race theory?
Yes, critical race theory is being taught in public schools

Yes, critical race theory is being taught in public schools

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/yes-critical-race-theory-is-being-taught-in-public-schools/ar-AAM2t1V

While we all debate what critical race theory is and whether lawmakers should ban it from public schools, every honest person should agree on one thing: This theory is behind the curricula in school districts all over the country, shaping the minds of unsuspecting, malleable children.

Just this week, the Manhattan Institute’s Christopher Rufo reported that 30 public school districts in 15 states are teaching a book, Not My Idea, that tells readers that “whiteness” leads white people to make deals with the devil for “stolen land, stolen riches, and special favors.” White people get to “mess endlessly with the lives of your friends, neighbors, loved ones, and all fellow humans of color for the purpose of profit,” the book adds.

There are plenty of other examples that prove racial essentialism and collective guilt are being taught to young students. In Cupertino, California, an elementary school required third graders to rank themselves according to the “power and privilege” associated with their ethnicities. Schools in Buffalo, New York, taught students that “all white people” perpetuate “systemic racism” and had kindergarteners watch a video of dead black children, warning them about “racist police and state-sanctioned violence.” And in Arizona, the state’s education department sent out an “equity toolkit” to schools that claimed infants as young as 3 months old can start to show signs of racism and “remain strongly biased in favor of whiteness” by age 5.

If that’s not enough evidence, the nation’s largest teachers union outright endorsed the teaching of CRT to public school students in an agenda item it passed last week. The National Education Association vowed to “share and publicize” information “already available on Critical Race Theory — what it is and what it is not” and fight back against legislation that would ban CRT from school curricula.

Knowing full well that it cannot escape from the facts, the Left has taken to distorting reality. Many, including the head of the second-largest teachers union, have tried to claim CRT is not being taught in public schools at all.

“Let’s be clear: Critical race theory is not taught in elementary schools or high schools. It’s a method of examination taught in law school and college that helps analyze whether systemic racism exists,” Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, said during a conference just days after the NEA passed its agenda item endorsing CRT.

This is a lie. CRT left the universities long ago and has been infiltrating the culture ever since, manifesting itself in corporate diversity and equity seminars, political activist groups such as Black Lives Matter, and now in school curricula. The book, Not My Idea, for example, adapted the idea that “whiteness” is a form of “stolen land and riches” from an original CRT legal text written by Cheryl Harris in 1993, as Rufo pointed out.

The purpose of CRT has always been the same: to teach people that America is an irreparably racist nation built on racist institutions upheld by racist people. It is a sinister and toxic ideology, and it is being taught to children in the schools that we, the taxpayers, fund. Don’t let the Left fool you into thinking differently.

North Carolina dad goes viral for anti-CRT school board speech: 'Parents are taking back the wheel'

https://www.foxnews.com/us/north-carolina-dad-viral-crt-school-board-parents-wheel

Echevarria said parents are 'the most powerful group in the country' who are 'taking back the wheel'

North Carolina father has gone viral for remarks he made at a school board meeting Monday evening, where he criticized critical race theory.

Brian Echevarria, a business owner running for North Carolina General Assembly, attended a Cabarrus County School Board hearing on Feb. 14, where he called the race-based teachings a "discrimination revolution," and said parents are "the most powerful group in the country" who are "taking back the wheel" to drive policy changes across the country, a video of the hearing showed.

PARENT BLASTS INDOCTRINATION IN SCHOOLS, CELEBRATES AMERICA'S OPPORTUNITIES FOR MINORITIES

Echevarria, who described himself as "bi-racial, bilingual, [and] multicultural," said no school administrators or curriculum had the right to call him or his children "oppressed" based on the color of their skin.

"The fact is, in America, I can do anything I want and I teach that to my children," he started his remarks, "and the person who tells my pecan-color skins that they’re oppressed based on the color of their skin would be absolutely wrong and absolutely at war with me."

MICHIGAN DAD, A MARINE VET, SAYS CRITICAL RACE THEORY CONTRARY TO VALUES LEARNED IN MILITARY

The school board voted last Monday to return to a face mask-optional policy in schools.

"What the masks showed us is the parents, the most powerful group in the country, [are] taking back the wheel," the business owner said.

WHAT IS CRITICAL RACE THEORY?

"CRT— it’s a big fat lie," he continued in the video, "and parents don’t want it."

Echevarria also addressed how some schools have allowed transgender individuals to compete in sports leagues, which he said could impact his own daughter.

"I don’t want a man swimming against her in the pool," he said in the video. "And I don’t want boys playing against her in soccer. I don’t let my sons rough her up, you think I’m going to let your sons rough her up?"

On Thursday, Echevarria made an appearance on "The Ingraham Angle" with host Laura Ingraham, where he said America is the greatest place in the world for minorities.

"Obviously, we have people who have financial problems and all of that, but this is America. We can get the dream," Echevarria added.

North Carolina dad goes viral for anti-CRT school board speech: 'Parents are taking back the wheel'

Critical Race Theory Makes Its Way Into Mandatory Trainings at Top US Medical Schools, New Database Shows By Bill Pan

https://www.theepochtimes.com/critical-race-theory-makes-its-way-into-mandatory-trainings-at-top-us-medical-schools-new-database-shows_4292594.html

Almost all of the nation’s top 25 medical schools are incorporating ideas related to critical race theory (CRT) into mandatory training programs for students and staff, warned a watchdog website documenting leftist indoctrination in K-12 and higher education.

 

Critical Race Training in Education, a project founded by Cornell University law professor William Jacobson, has recently put online a new database on America’s most prestigious medical schools. The database finds that 23 of those 25 institutions maintain some form of mandatory student training or coursework related to CRT doctrines.

“The trainings can be targeted, such as a new requirement for a major or a department, or school-wide,” the website states, noting that the subjects of those trainings and coursework may be worded differently at individual schools, but usually use terms including “anti-racism,” “cultural competency,” “equity,” “implicit bias,” “DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion)” and critical race theory.

The database also observes that 17 schools have mandatory CRT training for employees. For example, Cornell’s Weill Medical College requires all faculty and staff to complete “anti-bias training” on an annual basis while it works to “introduce additional educational content related to racism, social injustice, and social determinants of health into the medical curriculum.”

In addition, 21 of the 25 listed institutions have offered their students materials such as books, talks, and articles by Ibram X. Kendi and Robin DiAngelo, two authors celebrated among proponents of CRT for their works on “anti-racism” and “white fragility.”

Inspired by CRT, which interprets American society through the lens of a power struggle between white and non-white people, the self-styled “anti-racists” believe that racism is woven into every aspect of American life and must be identified and confronted with “anti-racist” actions. In her 2010 paper (pdf) titled “Addressing Whiteness in Nursing Education,” DiAngelo argued that the question “is not ‘Did racism take place?’ but rather, ‘In which ways did racism manifest in this specific context?'”

“The direction of power between white people and people of color is historic, traditional, normalized, and deeply embedded in the fabric of US society,” DiAngelo wrote. “A key aspect of this emancipatory education process is to ‘raise the consciousness’ of white people about what racism is, and how it works.”

A long-time critic of CRT and the so-called “woke” movement, Jacobson said this leads to a dangerous path for medical education.

 

“The mantra of the so-called ‘anti-racism’ movement has no place in medicine. Current racial discrimination in order to remedy past racial discrimination is wrong generally, but is downright dangerous in medicine,” the professor told Fox News Digital, referencing a quote from “How To Be an Antiracist” by Ibram X. Kendi.

“When a patient presents for treatment, that person needs to be treated as an individual, not just as a member of some larger racial or ethnic group,” Jacobson added.

Last year, the American Medical Association (AMA), the largest national organization representing physicians and medical students, pledged to dump its long-held concept of meritocracy and embrace “racial justice” and “health equity.”

 

In an 86-page strategic plan, the AMA set out a three-year road map detailing how the advocacy group will use its influence to dismantle “structural and institutional racism” and advance “social and racial justice” in America’s health care system.

Part of its plan is to “expand medical school and physician education to include equity, anti-racism, structural competency, public health and social sciences, critical race theory and historical basis of disease,” reads the document, which is loaded with CRT vocabulary.

Critical Race Theory Makes Its Way Into Mandatory Trainings at Top US Medical Schools

Help Us Stop Critical Race Theory Training in our Military!

https://wethepeopleconvention.org/articles/Stop-CRT-in-US-Military

Some Republican lawmakers, concerned about critical race theory being introduced in the U.S. military, are seeking to amend a defense spending bill in a bid to stamp out the promotion and teaching of leftist bias.

“My Republican colleagues and I hear regularly from active duty and retired service members that even holding conservative values is now enough to endanger a service member’s military career,” said Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Ala.), the ranking Republican member of the House Armed Services Committee.

Rogers said in a statement that the issue needs to be addressed in the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)—which typically garners bipartisan support—and that he’ll work with “any free-speech-minded Democrats interested in joining our cause.”

In the Senate, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) suggested that Republicans may have to hold up NDAA spending to ban training that involves critical race theory (CRT) within the military. The quasi-Marxist theory claims that the United States is a fundamentally racist country, with a continuing power struggle between “oppressors” and “oppressed” based on skin color.

 

======================================

Contact Your Senator and Members of Congress This Week!
We can do this! WE MUST DO THIS!

Tell them that they must demand that all Critical Race Training and anti-American indoctrination be purged from the US Military IMMEDIATELY and that any attempts to spy on and to drive conservatives out of the Military must be ended IMMEDIATELY or they must not pass the National Defense Spending Act! 

CLICK HERE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO CONTACT YOUR CONGRESSMAN!

======================================


Cotton, in response to a Fox News question about legislation proposing to remove CRT-related training in the military, said that holding up funding “may be a step we have to take … but I wouldn’t say that we can’t get that passed either.” (Click Here to Watch Senator Cotton confront the Secretary of Defense with evidence of CRT training in the Military.)

“Remember, the defense bill passes every year. It has passed every year for 60 years,” Cotton told Fox on May 18, referring to the NDAA. “We have an open amendment process in the committee and on the floor. I think there may be one or two Democrats who don’t think that we should be teaching our troops that the most important thing about them is the color of their skin, rather than their ability to help save the lives of the men and women to the right and to their left.”

The comments from Rogers and Cotton followed a report from the left-leaning online publication The Intercept that the Defense Department plans to scrutinize military members’ social media accounts for so-called extremist political material. The report, which cited internal Pentagon documents reviewed by the publication, as well as a source claiming direct knowledge of the situation, said the department would rely on a private firm for the surveillance program.

Click to Watch the Newest We the People Convention News & Opinion Podcast!

Pentagon spokesman John Kirby responded, telling media outlets that “there’s no pilot program being run by [senior Pentagon official Bishop] Garrison or the extremist working group to examine social media.”

 

Who is Bishop Garrison? Radical leftist heads Pentagon’s purge of ‘extremists’


Kirby said he’s “not aware” of a Pentagon contract with any private firm to surveil service members’ social media accounts.

“Certainly, there is no such contract being led by Mr. Garrison’s program,” he said.

A Space Force commander, Lt. Col. Matthew Lohmeier, was relieved of duty after he self-published a book that details the alleged spread of Marxism and CRT teachings in the military, claiming that the Pentagon has shown videos that “taught that the country was evil, that it was founded in 1619 and not 1776, and that whites are inherently evil.”

Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, told the Washington Examiner he would look into the claims.

“I’ve still got to get more details, but we do have freedom of speech in this country. So, we’ve got to, we’ve got to allow people to express their opinions,” he said.

Click Here to sign-up to get our WTPC emails and/or text Messages!

Help Us Stop Critical Race Theory Training in our Military!

WHITE SUPREMECY / WHITE PRIVILEGE

“White Privilege” Is A Racist Lie (The Charlie Kirk Show)

There’s no such thing as “white privilege in America. Period.

What is the biblical view of white privilege?

https://www.gotquestions.org/white-privilege.html

White privilege is a sociological phenomenon in which people who are identified as white in some countries (primarily Western countries) experience more privileges and status than non-white people. White privilege has been described as “an invisible package of unearned assets.” They are unearned, because one who is born white is assumed to have them regardless of any personal skills or accomplishments.

Many deny that white privilege is a reality or argue that, if it seems to be a reality, it is not due to skin color but to the wealth, prosperity, and power that Western countries have amassed. Regardless, a person whose skin color is white is usually assumed to be from one of these nations of power and as such is given deference.

The reality or extent of white privilege is often a point of political contention. However, it cannot be denied that those in the underprivileged “Third World” often have darker skin.

The Bible does not address white privilege directly since the concept did not exist at the time. However, there have always been people of privilege and people who are in need. The Bible has a lot to say about this kind of situation.

First, there is no distinction in value before God based on race or skin color. In the New Testament, there was a Jewish privilege that had to be addressed. It was true that the Jews had been chosen by God for special blessing; however, all (Jews and Gentiles) have sinned and all can be freely justified by faith in Christ (Romans 3:23–24). Galatians 3:26–29 explains, “So in Christ Jesus you are all children of God through faith, for all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.” If God accepts people based on their relationship to Christ, then believers must do the same regardless of color or wealth. People from every tribe, language, people, and nation will make up the Body of Christ on the final day (Revelation 7:9–10).

James 2:1–4 says, “My brothers and sisters, believers in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ must not show favoritism. Suppose a man comes into your meeting wearing a gold ring and fine clothes, and a poor man in filthy old clothes also comes in. If you show special attention to the man wearing fine clothes and say, ‘Here’s a good seat for you,’ but say to the poor man, ‘You stand there’ or ‘Sit on the floor by my feet,’ have you not discriminated among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts?”

Second, the Bible teaches that those who have been blessed with material possessions should freely share with those who are in need. Those who occupy positions of privilege and power should not use their position to take advantage of others. The following verses make this clear:

“Command those who are rich in this present world not to be arrogant nor to put their hope in wealth, which is so uncertain, but to put their hope in God, who richly provides us with everything for our enjoyment. Command them to do good, to be rich in good deeds, and to be generous and willing to share. In this way they will lay up treasure for themselves as a firm foundation for the coming age, so that they may take hold of the life that is truly life” (1 Timothy 6:17–19).

“Jesus called them together and said, ‘You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their high officials exercise authority over them. Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be your slave—just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many’” (Matthew 20:24–28).

“Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit. Rather, in humility value others above yourselves, not looking to your own interests but each of you to the interests of the others” (Philippians 2:3–4).

Third, those who do experience great privileges should recognize that they receive many benefits that they did not earn. By the gracious act of God, they were born into a situation that allowed them to have their physical needs met and to advance their station in life. Their response should be thanksgiving and generosity. “For who makes you different from anyone else? What do you have that you did not receive? And if you did receive it, why do you boast as though you did not?” (1 Corinthians 4:7).

Scripture readily admits that some people have advantages over others in this life. Those who have those advantages should not feel guilty about them but should use them to meet the needs of those who do not have those same advantages. There is no question that Christians in the “First World” have responsibilities to those in the “Third World” to provide physical and spiritual resources, and we will be held accountable for how we used what God has entrusted us with. “For everyone to whom much is given, from him much will be required; and to whom much has been committed, of him they will ask the more” (Luke 12:48).

White Supremecy
What is the biblical view of white privilege?

Is Christianity a white man’s religion?

https://www.gotquestions.org/Christianity-white-religion.html

The charge is sometimes leveled that Christianity is a “white man’s religion,” due to the historical connections that Christianity had with the rise of European nations and the founding of the United States. This is complicated by the fact that, during the era of the African slave trade, many white slave owners claimed to be Christians and tried to use the Bible to justify their actions. Acceptance of the idea that Christianity is a white man’s religion causes some people of color to embrace non-Christian religions such as Islamanimism, and Rastafarianism.

Regardless of world history since the reign of Charlemagne, Christianity was never intended for white people only. The Bible teaches that all people are created in the image of God (Genesis 1:27). The first Christians were all Semitic in ethnicity and likely had light- to dark-brown skin. Christianity having been predominantly a white religion in recent centuries has nothing to do with the message of Christianity. Rather, it is due to the failure of Christians to take the gospel of Jesus Christ to the ends of the world (Matthew 28:19–20Acts 1:8). Jesus Christ is the propitiation for the sins of the entire world—all races and nationalities (see 1 John 2:2). Spiritually, men of all races are in need of the Savior because of their shared sinful condition (Romans 5:12).

The idea that Christianity is a white man’s religion is countered in the book of Acts. When the church began, there were Africans who responded to the gospel (Acts 2:10). Philip the evangelist was called specifically to share the message of Christ with an Ethiopian official in Acts 8:26–38. This Ethiopian was saved and baptized, and the last we read of him, he “went on his way rejoicing” (verse 39). The Ethiopian Coptic Church traces its origin to the evangelistic work of the Ethiopian official in Acts 8.

The spread of the gospel in Syrian Antioch—a metropolitan city located in Asia—highlights the varied roots of the church. In fact, Antioch was the first dominant hub of Christianity once it spread beyond Jerusalem. More evidence of the strength of the Asian church is found in the number of Paul’s letters (Galatians, Ephesians, and Colossians) that were written to Asian churches, and the letters to the churches in Revelation 2–4, also written to residents of Asia.

Church leaders such as AugustineAthanasius, and Tertullian—all from Northern Africa—demonstrate the vibrancy of Christianity in Africa. IrenaeusIgnatius, and others demonstrate the vitality of Christianity in Asia in the first three centuries. Ethiopia, present-day Libya, Egypt, and western Asia remained firmly Christian territory until Muslim invasions in the Middle East and Africa turned it over to Islamic control. Before the arrival of Islam, many African and Asian regions were hubs of Christianity as much as Europe ever was.

Forgiveness of sin through the sacrifice of Christ, the essence of Christianity, is offered to all races, colors, creeds, and genders, to all “those who receive God’s abundant provision of grace and of the gift of righteousness” through Him (Romans 5:18). In giving His life as a substitute for sin, Jesus Christ purchased for God with His blood “men from every tribe and tongue and people and nation” (Revelation 5:9).

No, Christianity is not a white man’s religion. Christianity is not a black, brown, red, or yellow religion, either. The truth of the Christian faith is universally applicable to all people. “How true it is that God does not show favoritism but accepts from every nation the one who fears him and does what is right” (Acts 10:34–35).

Is Christianity a white man’s religion?

Why do many white supremacists claim to be Christians?

https://www.gotquestions.org/white-supremacists-Christian.html

Any fair answer to the question “why are many white supremacists Christian,” starts by carefully defining terms. That includes how to identify a “Christian” but also includes a discussion of what culture, nation, or group we’re speaking of. Talk is cheap; it’s easy to claim to follow a major religion without being especially committed to it, and racial prejudice is used to warp spiritual ideas in every culture.

When ascertaining why many white supremacists claim to be Christians, we must understand self-identification. In Western civilization, including the United States, a substantial proportion of people self-identify as “Christian.” In that context, many white supremacists are “Christian” for the same reason that many musicians are “Christian” and many politicians are “Christian.” When an entire culture identifies as Christian, regardless of other basic beliefs, we can expect to find people from across the social, political, and moral spectrum who call themselves “Christians.”

Racial bias and prejudice have existed in every culture in human history. A person from India might equally ask, “Why are many Indian supremacists Hindus?” Or, in Africa, “Why are many Somalian supremacists Muslims?” The answer, in part, would be the same: because most people in those respective cultures claim a common religious identity. One would expect, statistically, such to be the case.

That leads to the next point: self-identifying is different from self-authenticating. A person can say, “I am a sports fan,” but if he rarely watches or attends games, does not play, and knows little about the sport, his statement has little practical meaning. Identification is not the same as authentication. The self-identified sports fan might attend two or three games a year and wear the logo of a team on his shirt. That doesn’t mean he’s connected to the sport in any consequential way. Some would argue that anyone who says he is a sports fan is a sports fan—but that’s not how the term fan, derived from fanatic, is used in actual conversation.

The same applies to Christianity. Calling oneself a “Christian,” attending church every so often, or having a cross tattoo isn’t proof that one is genuinely connected to the faith. Christianity is not about mere affinity for the Christian religion through a loose cultural connection; it’s about loving and following Christ. It’s not about wearing a label, but imitating a person, Jesus Christ. There may be no mandatory behaviors or attitudes for sports fans, but there are such things for Christians (see John 14:15). A person who operates via racism, arrogance, or prejudice is acting against the principles taught in the Christian faith (Galatians 3:28James 2:8).

For that reason, self-identifying as a “Christian” while harboring white supremacist attitudes is contradictory at best, and self-deceiving at worst. That’s not to say born-again believers could never hold such attitudes. It is to say that such attitudes are not Christlike; they oppose the very faith the racial supremacist claims to hold. In most nations, racial supremacists rely on cultural traditions and preferences to justify their claims; religion is usually among those traditions. Sadly, that means some in the West hold to racial supremacy while also—paradoxically—claiming to hold to Christianity.

Why do many white supremacists claim to be Christians?

CONSERVATIVES vs LIBERALS

ANTIFA (ANTI-FASCIST)

antifa.com = https://www.whitehouse.gov/ (See for yourself!)

What is antifa and what does the movement want?  Antifa – short for "anti-fascist" – is the name for loosely affiliated, left-leaning, anti-racist groups that monitor and track the activities of local neo-Nazis. The movement has no unified structure or national leadership but has emerged in the form of local bodies nationwide, particularly on the West Coast.

Trump has said the federal government would designate antifa as a “terrorist organization” and blamed it for violence at protests against racial injustice and police brutality.  Now, the Biden administration has decided that antifa is OK, but the conservative Christians are domestic terrorists because we do not believe the lies – we believe that boys are boys, girls are girls, and you don’t get to choose.

Wash. GOP Cong. Candidate: Antifa trying to reshape America

(One America News Network)

A GOP congressional candidate for Washington state's third district, Joe Kent, said that Antifa is making a play to transform the United States.

London Descends Into Chaos as Antifa Riots, Destroys Property and Fights Police (Dinesh D'Souza)

Antifa communists are destroying cities around the world.

WHO ARE THE FASCISTS? (Dinesh D’Souza Podcast Ep 70)

In this special episode, Dinesh devotes the full hour to an in-depth discussion on fascism and civil war with one of America's preeminent historians, Stanley Payne. An emeritus professor of history at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, Payne is the author of "A Short History of Fascism" and "The Spanish Civil War."  Dinesh engages Payne in a wide-ranging discussion of such questions as, what is the core meaning of fascism? Is fascism on the Right or on the Left? Are there fascist strains in America today?  What are the factors that led up to the Spanish civil war, and are there parallels between Spain then and America now?  Is America headed toward civil strife?  What lessons can we learn from history on how to resist fascism and avoid civil war?

Antifa Recorded Plotting Portland Rampage, "Let's Burn Some S***!"  (Dinesh D'Souza)

Very surprising to hear these plots and threats from Portland Antifa since, according to Joe Biden, this organization is merely an “idea.”

"Let's Kill People. Let's Kill Some Cops." Leaked Antifa Recordings Reveal Group's Evil Goals (Dinesh D'Souza)

A person infiltrated a California Antifa group and recorded some dark comments made by the group members.

Antifa

What is antifa? How should a Christian view antifa?

https://www.gotquestions.org/antifa.html

Antifa is the name given to a loosely organized set of activists, mostly from the United States, who claim to oppose authoritarianism, racism, and right-leaning politics. The word antifa comes from the German antifaschistisch, meaning “anti-fascist.” Antifa’s version of activism is distinguished mostly by a willingness to (anonymously) engage in intimidation, denial of speech, and violence. Antifa members believe their tactics are mild in comparison to what they perceive as the threat of conservative political views. While being “anti-fascist” is noble, in theory, antifa’s tactics are counterproductive and inherently oppressive. At best, their actions represent politically motivated vigilantism. Scripture does not support antifa’s approach to politics or culture.

The dominant theme in defending antifa is the claim that fascism takes hold due to insufficient resistance. Voting, debate, dialogue, legal action, and other such courses of action are dismissed as inefficient or ineffective. Rather, antifa believes the necessary response to perceived fascism is tangible, physical action, including harassment. It also condones direct acts of violence against people and property. While self-identified antifa members frequently denounce violence publicly, the movement is consistently associated with acts of destruction and personal assault.

Using the same justifications, antifa routinely engages in intimidation tactics. Violence and rioting are, of course, intimidating, but antifa also uses the “de-platforming” of those with whom they disagree. Any words, speakers, writers, or events that fall outside of antifa’s preferred ideology are censored, cancelled, boycotted, or otherwise shut down and denied a voice. The de-platforming approach involves disinviting, protesting, blockading, or literally shouting over unwanted expressions to nullify them—de-platforming literally denies people the ability to express or explain their views.

Another tactic commonly associated with antifa is doxing/doxxing: deliberately revealing personal information about ideological opponents (phone numbers, home addresses, or other details). This is meant to invite further harassment and increase social pressure to conform to antifa’s way of thinking.

From a purely secular perspective, antifa’s tactics are hypocritical and self-defeating. Organizations who otherwise sympathize with antifa’s ideology have denounced the movement for that reason. In practice, antifa merely replaces government fascism with mob fascism. Fascist ideology is a combination of unaccountable leadership, regimented adherence to certain ideas, and forcible suppression of dissent, heavily relying on fear and intimidation. An unofficial, anonymous group who violently harasses, drowsn out, or destroys any person or business with whom they disagree is not resisting fascism—they are crowdsourcing it.

The fact that the antifa movement is effectively anonymous and informal makes responses to it especially difficult. There is no single, unified antifa group. This complicates both private and government attempts to counter antifa violence.

Scripture encourages civic engagement, including voting and other political actions. The Bible supports both civil disobedience and even physical self-defense when necessary. However, the Christian worldview in no way allows for rioting, predatory attacks, intimidation, or any of the other tactics commonly associated with antifa (see John 18:36Romans 12:18). Beyond the use of immoral tactics, antifa is strongly associated with ideologies difficult to square with a biblical Christian worldview such as critical theorycommunism, and anarchism.

While believers should stand against racism and oppression, antifa’s methods and ideology are inherently contradictory to biblical Christianity.

What is antifa? How should a Christian view antifa?

How should a Christian view fascism?

https://www.gotquestions.org/Christian-fascism.html

According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, fascism is “a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.”

The greatest example of fascism is, of course, Nazism in twentieth-century Germany. An autocratic dictator (Adolph Hitler) decided to pursue policies that put Germany first at all costs and then also that put the “Arian race” first so that other non-Arians (primarily Jews) and the handicapped were exterminated. In the process, the individual rights of all Germans were severely curtailed.

Christians should condemn what happened in Nazi Germany and, today, all do. However, at the time it seems that many Christians (or at least those who identified themselves as such) had no trouble going along with the Nazi program. All too often, the cause of nation somehow gets confused with the cause of Christ. This happened in Germany, in part, because it was a “Christian” nation with a national church.

For a Christian assessment of fascism, we need to look at each of the individual components found in the definition above. The first is that of the autocratic leader or dictator. Scripture does not condemn dictators. In fact, in ancient times, almost all leaders were dictators. From Pharaoh to Nebuchadnezzar to Caesar, all had more or less supreme power in their kingdoms. Even the king of Israel had much more power than any leader in a modern democracy, but the king of Israel was supposed to rule with justice according to the Law as God’s representative. In fact, all kings are supposed to rule with justice and will be judged accordingly (Psalm 82). While it may offend modern sensitivities, dictators as such are not condemned in Scripture. However, autocratic dictators are a problem if they refuse to be governed by the law of God and become a law unto themselves.

Christians in modern democracies have tools to oppose out-of-control rulers that ancient Christians probably never imagined—voting, freedom of expression, the right to assemble, etc.—and these tools should be used. Of course, as the definition of fascism above states, a fascist regime is repressive, so individual rights are usually suppressed. The key would be to use these rights while they are still available to prevent fascism from coming to full power.

The second component of fascism to consider is the exaltation of national good above individual rights. Scripture has no direct assessment of individual versus national rights. There is always a balance. At times, men are called to go to war to protect the nation when many of them would rather not. At times, a governmental body can confiscate private property for the public good. In the United States, this cannot be done without due process and compensation for the property. In a fascist regime, private property can be confiscated at will, but this is true of many totalitarian regimes, not just fascist ones. On the other hand, if individual rights are absolutized, the result is anarchy. There must be a balance, and Western democracies have been able to maintain that balance through a system of “checks and balances” between the government and the people and within the government so that no single individual gains too much power.

Fascist regimes also often exalt their own nation above all other nations. Certainly, there is nothing wrong with a nation looking out for its own interests, but when this happens to the detriment of other nations, it runs contrary to Scripture. Philippians 2:3–4 give us the ideal: “Do nothing out of selfish ambition or empty pride, but in humility consider others more important than yourselves. Each of you should look not only to your own interests, but also to the interests of others.” What is said here of the individual would also apply to nations. In a fascist regime, the individual dictator often considers himself to be the embodiment of the nation, so he may confuse his own personal good with that of the nation and its people.

Biblically speaking, it seems that the most odious aspect of fascism is the distinction between “races” and the exaltation of one’s own race above others. There is no biblical basis for these distinctions. First, biologically speaking, there is only one race—the human race with the scientific classification Homo sapiens. The differences we often associate with race such as skin color or the shape of the eye are simply variations with the species. Other distinctions such as food, music, and style of dress are the result of cultural forces. Ultimately, there is no real difference between people—all are made in the image of God, and all have sinned and all must be saved by faith in Christ or they will stand condemned before God. Racism is wrong in every instance and should be resisted by Christians both in the church in in larger society. For this reason, a Christian should have no part in fascist organizations.

How should a Christian view fascism?

LEFT CRAZINESS / WOKE INSANITY

​Ecclesiastes 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.

Americans Fled 'Woke' States in 'Historic' Numbers in 2021

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2021/12/21/americans-fled-woke-states-in-historic-numbers-in-2021-n1543239

The communist Chinese-inflicted COVID virus and reactions by American Democrat politicians created devastating changes in the U.S. population in 2021, according to statistics revealed by the U.S. Census Bureau on Tuesday.

The U.S. experienced a “historic” decline in the number of children that were born, and Americans fled Leftist, freedom-sucking, gulag-like cities and states where Democrat dictators toyed with their constituents the way a cat plays with a flapping bird before devouring it.

First, Americans gave birth to a “record low” number of babies in 2021, in large part due to the pandemic.

The Wall Street Journal reported that although American population replacement has been going down since the 2008-2009 recession — another Democrat-fueled disaster — with “just 393,000 people in the year that ended July 1, including 148,000 more births than deaths … it was the first year in which growth from births exceeding deaths fell below net arrivals from abroad, according to the bureau.”

And there was also a “historic” migration of citizens, whose Democrat politicians issued mandates, lockdowns, and freedom-sucking COVID edicts ever their populations. And those states notched historic net population losses as droves of Americans fled to more free states.

Look at this map from the Census Bureau.

Woke states.png

The map shows the states with the worst COVID restrictions and some of the highest crime rates lost American population.

The states with the worst net population loss — New York, California, and Illinois — chased out nearly 700,000 Americans to other states. Florida, Texas, Arizona, North Carolina, and Georgia had a net influx of 713,000 Americans to their freer and less-crowded states.

 

The Census Bureau reported:

Between 2020 and 2021, 33 states saw population increases and 17 states and the District of Columbia lost population, 11 of which had losses of over 10,000 people. This is a historically large number of states to lose population in a year.

Woke states decline.png

Oregon and Washington, whose leaders imposed ridiculous COVID lockdowns and mandates, shockingly had a virtual net neutral change according to the Census Bureau, but Americans fled the tropical paradise of Hawaii due to its draconian lockdowns and mandates.

The top spot for population loss in 2021 was Washington, D.C., which reported that 2.9% of its population got the heck out of the nation’s capital.

Americans have voted with their feet, and they’ve shown that they will go to places where there is more freedom to conduct their own lives.

Left Craziness
Tulsi Gabbard Leaves Democratic Party, Goes On Blistering Screed Against ‘Wokeness’

Tulsi Gabbard Leaves Democratic Party, Goes On Blistering Screed Against ‘Wokeness’

https://conservativebrief.com/blistering-67257/

A former Democrat representative and former Democrat candidate for president has officially left the Party.

Former Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, who has been critical of the party in recent times, has finally had enough of the “wokeness” and “warmongers” in the party, calling it an “elitist cabal.”

“I can no longer remain in today’s Democratic Party that is now under the complete control of an elitist cabal of warmongers driven by cowardly wokeness, who divide us by racializing every issue & stoke anti-white racism, actively work to undermine our God-given freedoms, are hostile to people of faith & spirituality, demonize the police & protect criminals at the expense of law-abiding Americans, believe in open borders, weaponize the national security state to go after political opponents, and above all, dragging us ever closer to nuclear war,” she said on Twitter while not elaborating on whether she would join another Party.

“I believe in a government that is of, by, and for the people. Unfortunately, today’s Democratic Party does not. Instead, it stands for a government of, by, and for the powerful elite,” the former representative said.

“I’m calling on my fellow common sense independent-minded Democrats to join me n leaving the Democratic Party. If you can no longer stomach the direction that so-called woke Democratic Party ideologues are taking our country, I invite you to join me,” she said.

 

It was a brutal statement that took down the entire Party and it was not the first time she took apart her Party and its leaders.

 

In August, Gabbard Tore Into Vice President Kamala Harris, a former prosecutor, over her response to the imprisonment and sentence of WNBA star Brittney Griner in Russia.

“With today’s sentencing, Russia continues its wrongful detention of Brittney Griner. She should be released immediately. @POTUS and I, and our entire Administration, are working every day to reunite Brittney, as well as Paul Whelan, with loved ones who miss each of them dearly,” the vice president said.

The vice president was immediately called on her hypocrisy by many on Twitter.

“Two things: How many people are still incarcerated for the same offense because of you? And you’re high right now aren’t you?” Chad Prather said.

 

“It’s not a wrongful detention. If you break the law, you pay the price. If you go to a different country, learn the laws before you go. How many people did Harris imprison for weed when she was AG of Failifornia?” Kimberly Morin said.

 

“And if anyone knows anything about wrongful detentions of people, it’s Kamala Harris,” another said.

Speaking to Fox News host Will Cain, Gabbard went in on the vice president.

“Another note of hypocrisy coming from Kamala Harris and this administration, as you mentioned during her illustrious record as attorney general in California…she kept prisoners in prison longer than their sentences to use them as free slave labor yet at the same time these very same people are condemning other countries for doing the exact same thing. It doesn’t make any sense,” she said.

“”My question for her and the Biden administration – where is your outrage for your fellow Americans who are sitting in prison today here in the United States of America because of minor marijuana violations,” she said. “How come you are not fighting as hard for them to be returned home and reunited with their families as you are for Brittney Griner.”

 

“To me, the message to the American people through [the administration’s] actions is loud and clear, is that if you are rich and powerful or famous, then you will get special treatment from this administration,” the former representative said. “If you are not. We don’t care about you, and we’re going to let you sit there and rot in jail.”

 

“Unfortunately, like too many politicians, it seems that she puts her finger to the wind and decides the things she’s supposed to be angry about on any given day and if it becomes politically inconvenient or damaging then she’ll switch the other way,” she said.

“Kamala Harris cries crocodile tears for Britney Griner’s marijuana possession prison sentence, but as AG she incarcerated thousands of people for marijuana possession, kept them in jail to use as slave labor, and laughed about her own marijuana use in college. Shameful hypocrisy,” she said on Twitter.

LIBERAL FAKE NEWS

Fake News

MAN vs WOMAN

TOXIC MASCULINITY

Toxic Masculinity

CHILD vs PARENT

Minors do not need parental consent for sex change

Feds form new strike force targeting ‘domestic terrorism’: Show Me the Parent and I’ll Show You the Crime?

https://leohohmann.com/2022/01/12/feds-form-new-strike-force-targeting-domestic-terrorism-show-me-the-parent-and-ill-show-you-the-crime/

‘Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime.‘ 

Stalin’s Secret Police Chief Lavrentiy Beria

By Christopher Wright

The FBI is starting a new domestic terrorism unit.  It’s not clear what the focus will be, but there’s reason to believe the unit will spend part of its time going after ordinary parents who object to radical school board policies.  This is because, in October, Attorney General Merrick Garland instructed the FBI to work with local officials to investigate parents who challenge such policies, effectively hanging the label ‘domestic terrorist’ around parents’ necks. 

Here’s the latest in the War on Parents [which is at its core a War on Children]:

 

The FBI used a battering ram to break down the front door of a woman who has run a website objecting to school board policies since 2018. The FBI invaded her home while she was homeschooling her children. 

Parents near Detroit held a rally to protest their school district’s “21 Day Equity Challenge” which, among other things, teaches that calling America ‘the land of opportunity’ is a microagression.  The school board thumbed its nose at the parents and said the program would continue.

Education groups in North Carolina objected to an early learning program that teaches “we are all products of a racialized society” and that “Whiteness affects everything … inside and outside the classroom.” The three- and four-year-olds in the program are being taught to “deconstruct whiteness.”   Parents also criticized the state for hiding the materials. 

A teacher in Indiana was fired after blowing the whistle on the teaching of critical race theory concepts in math, science and other subjects that officials denied doing. 

Parents were apoplectic at a school board meeting in California after it became known that teachers were coaching 12-year-olds to change genders and were changing children’s names and pronouns without telling parents. The teachers had renamed the Gay-Straight Alliance Club to an “equality club” to cover their tracks.

 

In Illinois, parents will no longer be informed when their young daughters are getting an abortion.

The creator of the 1619 Project repeated the idea that cost Terry McAuliffe the Governor’s mansion in Virginia last November, namely, that parents should have no say over what their children are taught in school. 

A Virginia school district took a parent to court after she filed a freedom of information request for details on how it was spending its $3 billion budget. 

A school board in Texas shut down parents from speaking at a school board meeting and — get this — sent its school police officers to their homes afterwards to arrest them for disorderly conduct. 

Editor’s Note: Watch the short video below and ask yourself, is Covid being used as a tool to permanently suspend the U.S. and State Constitutions?

A grandmother and two parents were arrested for trespass for attempting to attend a closed school board meeting about a principal who had been arrested for molesting dozens of boys.  They were smeared as ‘insurrectionists’ as they were being hauled away. 

 

Parents are fighting back with lawsuits and recalls, as well they should.  But as school boards double down on radical agendas, one can’t help but wonder where their willing accomplices in the Justice Department and FBI will use their battering ram next.

 

Christopher Wright is a writer, freedom activist and retired attorney living in Virginia.

Child v Parent
Feds form new strike force targeting ‘domestic terrorism’: Show Me the Parent and I’ll Show You the Crime?

Parents No Longer Make the Decisions for Their Children

COVID vaccinations to be added to routine pediatric immunization schedule

https://leohohmann.com/2022/10/18/what-kind-of-society-injects-its-children-with-experimental-products-now-is-the-time-to-choose-pull-your-kids-out-of-public-schools-or-hand-them-over-to-big-pharma-to-be-used-as-guinea-pigs/

What kind of society injects its children with experimental products? Now is the time to choose: Pull your kids out of public schools or hand them over to Big Pharma to be used as guinea pigs

The government-pharma cartel is making its move on our children.

The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices is scheduled to vote on Thursday, October 20, on whether or not to include COVID vaccinations in the routine pediatric immunization schedule. The CDC will almost certainly vote to give Big Pharma what it wants — to permanently shield Pfizer and Moderna from any liability or accountability for their unsafe and ineffective Covid jabs.

We’ve been warning you that they are coming after the children and now the hour is at hand. All of the Judas Iscariots are in place and they will show their hand and do the unthinkable, betraying the trust of every parent, every grandparent, every child in America as they escalate their diabolical depopulation program to devastate an entire generation of kids.

They will do that this week by making the poisonous Covid injection part of the required child vaccine schedule. Most parents won’t even know that in most states they have the option of opting out through a religious exemption. They will just hand their kids over to these merchants of techno-totalitarianism and medical madmen.

 

Even if you do opt out by getting a religious exemption, you are risking the chance of your child being injected without your knowledge and against your will.

If you are still sending your children to public school, now is the time to get them out. Homeschooling sounds daunting to the average parent, but trust me it can be done and you don’t need some advanced degree. Most of the parents I know who work in various fields are much smarter than the average professional teacher. Yes, there are superstar teachers, but the vast majority are of average I.Q. at best.

You can take control of your own child’s education. Do not let them destroy your child’s life over your lack of self-confidence. Most communities also have homeschool co-ops in which parents share teaching responsibilities. One parent is good in math and teaches all the kids math, another is good at writing and literature and teaches that, another is good in history and social studies and loves to share his/her knowledge on that. Time to wake up folks. Pool your resources. Get it done!

The inclusion of the Covid death shot on the childhood vaccine schedule is being done for one reason and one reason only. When the children start falling over dead, no one will be held accountable. Not criminally. Not civilly.

And they’re already falling.

On Friday evening, authorities announced that a 17-year-old student at Naperville North High School, Daniel Moshi of Franklin Park, Illinois, had died suddenly during a choir rehearsal.

Daniel died suddenly after he collapsed on stage. He had no known serious health issues. He joins hundreds of other young people who just die suddenly, in their sleep, on stage, or on the athletic field. More than 1,000 such cases have been documented in the last 18 months, since the Covid shots were rolled out. These are just the ones we know of. Most go unreported.

The DuPage County coroner’s office said an investigation into Daniel’s death is ongoing, but no cause of death has been determined at this time. That’s what they all say.

Sarhadoon Ibrahim wrote on Facebook that Daniel “was a choir member and singing to Lord he will be missed from all who have chance to know him he was humble, active and loved by all. Daniel you will be missed from all family members and friends.”

When asked what the cause of his death was, Sarhadoon claimed that a heart attack was likely a possibility.

“[He] suddenly collapsed while he was practicing on stage – until now no real reason – just like a heart attack,” Sarhadoon said.

 

We warned you this was going to happen. Everyone involved in the injecting of innocent children with an experimental pharmaceutical product is guilty of international crimes against humanity and deserves to be executed. I mean that. Every pediatrician. Every nurse. Every school official who pressures any family to get their child injected with this poison. This is what the Nazis did. I challenge anyone to explain to me how it is any different. An adult can make an informed decision for his or her self, but a child must do whatever his or her parents and doctors say to do. They are 100 percent vulnerable and dependent on their elder caretakers.

Article below by Jim Hoft, TGP

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) under CDC is scheduled to vote on Thursday on whether or not to include COVID vaccinations in their routine pediatric immunization schedule. As a result, companies may have total liability protection and be able to impose more mandates on children.

“This will allow the vaccine makers to escape product liability for the adult vaccines which means the “emergency” can end, but the liability protection lives on,” Steve Kirsch wrote.

“In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), located within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), announces the following meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP),” according to the news release. The meeting will take place on October 19, 2022, from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. EDT, and on October 20, 2022, from 8:30 a.m. to 3:20 p.m. EDT. This conference will be broadcasted live on the Internet. This meeting is open to the public.

The deadline for submitting written comments is October 20, 2022. You can leave your comments here: regulations.gov/document/CDC-2022-0111-0001/comment

“The committee is charged with advising the Director, CDC, on the use of immunizing agents. In addition, under 42 U.S.C. 1396s, the committee is mandated to establish and periodically review and, as appropriate, revise the list of vaccines for administration to vaccine-eligible children through the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program, along with schedules regarding dosing interval, dosage, and contraindications to administration of vaccines,” ACIP said.

“The agenda will include discussions on influenza vaccines, pneumococcal vaccine, meningococcal vaccines, respiratory syncytial virus vaccine, rotavirus vaccine, dengue vaccines, adult immunization schedule, child/adolescent immunization schedule, COVID-19 vaccines and Chikungunya vaccine. Recommendation votes on pneumococcal, adult immunization schedule, child/adolescent immunization schedule and COVID-19 vaccines are scheduled. A Vaccines for Children (VFC) vote on COVID-19 vaccine is scheduled,” it added.

Read the entire article: HERE WE GO: CDC Will Likely Vote this Week to Add Experimental COVID-19 Vaccines to the Childhood Vaccination Program (thegatewaypundit.com)

LeoHohmann.com is 100 percent reader supported, bringing you the news that you won’t find in the corporate mainstream media. If you would like to help fund our continued existence (every little bit helps), you may send a contribution c/o Leo Hohmann, P.O. Box 291, Newnan, GA 30264, or electronically below. Thanks!

Parents No Longer Make the Decisions for Their Children
COVID vaccinations to be added to routine pediatric immunization schedule

Transgender surgery for kids without parental consent may become constitutional right in Michigan if Gov. Whitmer has her way

https://www.theblaze.com/news/transgender-surgery-kids-without-parents-consent-constitution-michigan

A proposal on the Michigan ballot next month would reportedly enshrine in the state constitution transgender care, up to and including sterilization surgery, for minors, and parents would be powerless to stop it. And Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D), who is running for reelection, has vowed to "fight like hell" to make sure it passes.

Right to "sterilization," hidden in plain sight

According to the alarming legal analysis of Margot Cleveland of the Federalist, the so-called "gender affirming" care Proposal 3 would ensure for minors is buried in vague language about "reproductive freedom," deceiving voters into believing that the proposal relates to abortion only. But the ambiguous language of the proposal, carefully crafted by Planned Parenthood and other "gender affirming" and abortion outlets, incorporates children as well as adults and deliberately excludes parents from interfering, Cleveland said.

The opening paragraph of Proposal 3, entitled the "Reproductive Freedom for All" initiative, reportedly reveals just how broadly such "reproductive freedom" would extend:

Every individual has a fundamental right to reproductive freedom, which entails the right to make and effectuate decisions about all matters relating to pregnancy, including but not limited to prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, contraception, sterilization, abortion care, miscarriage management, and infertility care. An individual’s right to reproductive freedom shall not be denied, burdened, nor infringed upon unless justified by a compelling state interest achieved by the least restrictive means. (Emphasis added.)

 

Cleveland claims that the term "individual" applies to men and women, boys and girls, regardless of age. And because the proposal later says that the state may not "discriminate in the protection or enforcement of this fundamental right," parents would no longer have any legal recourse, she said, to contest the "sterilization" demands of their minor children, since denying them such "care" based on their young age would be an act of discrimination.

 

And lest parents believe that other preexisting parental notification laws would supersede this amendment, Cleveland also warned that such parental notification laws regarding abortion have already been ruled unconstitutional in states like Alaska and Florida. California, Massachusetts, and New Jersey have likewise curtailed parental rights regarding abortion, she said.

An irreversible medical "experiment" on the ballot

In an effort to combat Whitmer's "fight like hell" abortion and reported gender-reassignment fervor, Bishop Earl Boyea and the Diocese of Lansing have launched their own "Fight Like Heaven" initiative, intended to provide Michigan voters what they say is the truth about the language of Proposal 3 and to encourage people of all faiths to pray that the proposal fails.

As part of the "Fight Like Heaven" effort, the diocese has enlisted experts in many related fields, including medicine, to speak about the evil it believes is buried within the proposal. One such expert, Dr. Patrick Lappert, a renowned plastic surgeon from Alabama with over 25 years of experience, has sounded the alarm that Proposal 3 and others like it would inflict irreversible medical damage on young people.

"Essentially, it’s guaranteed that your child is going to be rendered sterile by these interventions, such as puberty blockage and cross-sex hormones," Dr. Lappert asserted, "and that is something your child cannot fully understand nor give informed consent to and, certainly, something no parent would want."

Lappert further called puberty blockers "a public experiment" with unknown long-term effects.

Finally, Lappert suggested that the ultimate goal of the proposal is not the well-being of children but the destruction of families.

 

"The amendment asserts that the state somehow has more wisdom than the family that knows, and has loved, this child for all their life," he said. "That's a terrible idea. It's a terrible idea that must be rejected."

Abortion on demand

If the amendment to the state constitution passes, the use of the amendment to obtain medical transgender procedures for minors would be part of the broader enshrinement of abortion on demand with no restrictions, for women and minor girls alike.

 

Whitmer and others advocating for this proposal have argued that Proposal 3 would merely restore the abortion rights women had for 50 years under Roe, but Cleveland and Bishop Boyea both vehemently deny that assertion.

"If passed, the constitutional amendment would create an extreme regime in Michigan of abortion on demand, at any time, for any reason, without informed or parental consent, and paid for by taxpayers," writes Cleveland.

"The Reproductive Freedom for All initiative is the most extreme abortion proposal this country has ever witnessed," Boyea added. "Based on the wording of the proposed amendment, this initiative seeks to enshrine abortion up to, and including, the day of birth in our state constitution. ...

"It will also likely prohibit parental consent rights if your child wishes to pursue – or is being pressured into pursuing – medical procedures or chemical treatments intended to change the outward appearance of his or her biological sex," he added.

In other words, Cleveland argues, Proposal 3 in Michigan seeks to sacrifice "the children of the state — both born and unborn" through unfettered access to abortion and transgender treatment.

Whitmer's office did not respond to request for comment.

Transgender surgery for kids without parental consent may become constitutional right in Michigan

DESTROY THE CURRENT SYSTEMS

The single, most distressing question no one wants to contemplate: Has the U.S. Constitution already been terminated?https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/john_whiteheads_commentary/the_constitution_has_already_been_terminated

We have a guest post today from the great constitutional attorney John Whitehead, who strikes at the core of the situation facing America and by extension the entirety of the formerly Free World. He poses the question no one wants to ask, let alone try to answer.

 

The media, including most of the conservative media, keeps us distracted and gaslighted with sensational stories like Samuel Brinton stealing women’s luggage at airports, drag queens, and wars started by foreign dictators, while ignoring strong indications that our government has been hijacked and occupied by an alien entity that is 100 percent hostile to the nation’s Constitution and its people.

This entity ruling the people from Washington is every bit as dangerous and bloodthirsty as the foreign dictator we’re supposed to hate and fear, as it has been known to harass truth-tellers, making sure just enough of them die or disappear under debatable circumstances (Philip HaneySeth RichGary WebbMichael Hastings, etc.). As a result, everyday Americans are left feeling angry, confused, disoriented, disillusioned, isolated, powerless and, most importantly, looking at everyone but the real source of their growing misery.

By John Whitehead

“That was when they suspended the Constitution. They said it would be temporary.”—Margaret Atwood, The Handmaid’s Tale

If there is one point on which there should be no political parsing, no legal jockeying, and no disagreement, it is this: For anyone to advocate terminating or suspending the Constitution is tantamount to a declaration of war against the founding principles of our representative government and the rule of law.

Then again, one could well make the case that the Constitution has already been terminated after years on life support, given the extent to which the safeguards enshrined in the Bill of Rights—adopted 231 years ago as a means of protecting the people against government overreach and abuse—have been steadily chipped away at, undermined, eroded, whittled down, and generally discarded with the support of Congress, the White House, and the courts.

Consider for yourself.

We are in the grip of martial law. We have what the founders feared most: a “standing” or permanent army on American soil. This de facto standing army is made up of weaponized, militarized domestic police forces which look like, dress like, and act like the military; are armed with guns, ammunition and military-style equipment; are authorized to make arrests; and are trained in military tactics.

We are in the government’s crosshairs. The U.S. government continues to act as judge, jury and executioner over a populace that have been pre-judged and found guilty, stripped of their rights, and left to suffer at the hands of government agents trained to respond with the utmost degree of violence. Consequently, we are at the mercy of law enforcement officers who have almost absolute discretion to decide who is a threat, what constitutes resistance, and how harshly they can deal with the citizens they were appointed to “serve and protect.” With alarming regularity, unarmed men, women, children and even pets are being gunned down by the government’s standing army of militarized police who shoot first and ask questions later.

We are no longer safe in our homes. This present menace comes from the government’s army of bureaucratized, corporatized, militarized SWAT teams who are waging war on the last stronghold left to us as a free people: the sanctity of our homes.

We have no real freedom of speech. We are moving fast down a slippery slope to an authoritarian society in which the only opinions, ideas and speech expressed are the ones permitted by the government and its corporate cohorts. In more and more cases, the government is declaring war on what should be protected political speech whenever it challenges the government’s power, reveals the government’s corruption, exposes the government’s lies, and encourages the citizenry to push back against the government’s many injustices. The ramifications are so far-reaching as to render almost every American who criticizes the government an extremist in word, deed, thought or by association.

We have no real privacy. We’re being spied on by a domestic army of government snitches, spies and techno-warriors. This government of Peeping Toms is watching everything we do, reading everything we write, listening to everything we say, and monitoring everything we spend. Beware of what you say, what you read, what you write, where you go, and with whom you communicate, because it is all being recorded, stored, and catalogued, and will be used against you eventually, at a time and place of the government’s choosing.

We are losing our right to bodily privacy and integrity. The debate over bodily integrity covers broad territory, ranging from forced vaccinations, forced cavity searches, forced colonoscopies, forced blood draws and forced breath-alcohol tests to forced DNA extractions, forced eye scans, and forced inclusion in biometric databases: these are just a few ways in which Americans continue to be reminded that we have no real privacy, no real presumption of innocence, and no real control over what happens to our bodies during an encounter with government officials. The groundwork being laid with these mandates is a prologue to what will become the police state’s conquest of a new, relatively uncharted, frontier: inner space, specifically, the inner workings (genetic, biological, biometric, mental, emotional) of the human race.

We no longer have a right to private property. If government agents can invade your home, break down your doors, kill your dog, damage your furnishings and terrorize your family, your property is no longer private and secure—it belongs to the government. Hard-working Americans are having their bank accounts, homes, cars electronics and cash seized by police under the assumption that they have allegedly been associated with some criminal scheme.

We have no due process. The groundwork has been laid for a new kind of government where it won’t matter if you’re innocent or guilty, whether you’re a threat to the nation, or even if you’re a citizen. What will matter is what the government—or whoever happens to be calling the shots at the time—thinks. And if the powers-that-be think you’re a threat to the nation and should be locked up, then you’ll be locked up with no access to the protections our Constitution provides.

We are no longer presumed innocent. The burden of proof has been reversed. Now we’re presumed guilty unless we can prove our innocence beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. Rarely, are we even given the opportunity to do so. The government has embarked on a diabolical campaign to create a nation of suspects predicated on a massive national DNA database. Having already used surveillance technology to render the entire American populace potential suspects, DNA technology in the hands of government coupled with artificial intelligence will complete our transition to a suspect society in which we are all merely waiting to be matched up with a crime.

We have lost the right to be anonymous and move about freely.  At every turn, we’re hemmed in by laws, fines and penalties that regulate and restrict our autonomy, and surveillance cameras that monitor our movements. Likewise, digital currency provides the government and its corporate partners with a mode of commerce that can easily be monitored, tracked, tabulated, mined for data, hacked, hijacked and confiscated when convenient.

We no longer have a government of the people, by the people and for the people. In fact, a study conducted by Princeton and Northwestern University concluded that the U.S. government does not represent the majority of American citizens. Instead, the study found that the government is ruled by the rich and powerful, or the so-called “economic elite.” Moreover, the researchers concluded that policies enacted by this governmental elite nearly always favor special interests and lobbying groups. In other words, we are being ruled by an oligarchy disguised as a democracy, and arguably on our way towards fascism—a form of government where private corporate interests rule, money calls the shots, and the people are seen as mere subjects to be controlled.

We have no guardians of justice. The courts were established to intervene and protect the people against the government and its agents when they overstep their bounds. Yet through their deference to police power, preference for security over freedom, and evisceration of our most basic rights for the sake of order and expediency, the courts have become the guardians of the American police state in which we now live. As a result, sound judgment and justice have largely taken a back seat to legalism, statism and elitism, while preserving the rights of the people has been deprioritized and made to play second fiddle to both governmental and corporate interests.

We have been saddled with a dictator for life. Secret, unchecked presidential powers—acquired through the use of executive orders, decrees, memorandums, proclamations, national security directives and legislative signing statements and which can be activated by any sitting president—now enable past, present and future presidents to operate above the law and beyond the reach of the Constitution.

Unfortunately, we have done this to ourselves.

We allowed ourselves to be seduced by the false siren song of politicians promising safety in exchange for relinquished freedom. We placed our trust in political saviors and failed to ask questions to hold our representatives accountable to abiding by the Constitution. We looked the other way and made excuses while the government amassed an amazing amount of power over us, and backed up that power-grab with a terrifying amount of military might and weaponry, and got the courts to sanction their actions every step of the way. We chose to let partisan politics divide us and turn us into easy targets for the government’s oppression.

Mind you, the powers-that-be want us to be censored, silenced, muzzled, gagged, zoned out, caged in and shut down. They want our speech and activities monitored for any sign of “extremist” activity. They want us to be estranged from each other and kept at a distance from those who are supposed to represent us. They want taxation without representation. They want a government without the consent of the governed.

They want the Constitution terminated.

“We” may have contributed to our downfall through our inaction and gullibility, but we are also the only hope for a free future.

 

After all, the Constitution begins with those three beautiful words, “We the people.” Those three words were intended as a reminder to future generations that there is no government without us—our sheer numbers, our muscle, our economy, our physical presence in this land.

As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, when we forget that, when we allow the “Me” of a self-absorbed, narcissistic, politically polarizing culture to override our civic duties as citizens to collectively stand up to tyranny and make the government play by the rules of the Constitution, there can be no surprise

Remember, there is power in numbers.

There are 332 million of us in this country. Imagine what we could accomplish if we actually worked together, presented a united front, and spoke with one voice?

Destroy Systems
Has the U.S. Constitution already been terminated?
Free Speech
Is freedom of speech a biblical concept?

END OF FREE SPEECH - 1st Amendment

Is freedom of speech a biblical concept?

https://www.gotquestions.org/freedom-of-speech.html

Freedom of speech is defined by Webster’s dictionary as “the right to express facts and opinions subject only to reasonable limitations (as the power of the government to protect itself from a clear and present danger) guaranteed by the 1st and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution and similar provisions of some state constitutions.” Freedom of speech, according to this definition, is a right given to the citizens of the United States by law. In that sense, freedom of speech is not a biblical concept but a political one specific to a certain time and place in history.

The founders of the United States believed that mankind has certain “inalienable rights” including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under that umbrella of liberty falls freedom of speech. Thomas Jefferson spoke of these rights as having been endowed to man by his Creator; he called the right to liberty “inherent” and postulated that governments are instituted in order to allow man (the governed) to secure those rights and to pursue his rights freely. The liberty and consent of the governed were, in Jefferson’s mind, imperative for governments to be efficient and beneficial.

The idea that the Creator has endowed us with the right to liberty is debatable, but it is true that God created man with a free will. Adam and Eve had the liberty to partake of any fruit in the garden (except one), and they even had the liberty to disobey. God created man to serve Him, to know Him, and to enjoy Him forever in eternity, so liberty within the bounds of righteousness is certainly a biblical ideal. Christians believe that serving God and enjoying a relationship with Him is the ultimate liberty. The ultimate freedom is found in belonging to Christ (Galatians 5:12 Corinthians 3:17). Sin brings bondage (Romans 7:14), but the one who belongs to Christ is spiritually free (Romans 8:2).

But does that spiritual freedom from sin entail political freedom of speech? Perhaps not directly, but speaking the truth in love is a biblical mandate (Ephesians 4:15). Therefore, any government law that guarantees citizens the right to speak the truth aligns with godly principles. By the same token, any law that suppresses a person’s right to speak truth is working against God’s command. Freedom of speech does not guarantee that truth is told, of course, but it does permit it to be told. In the final analysis, there is no conflict between biblical principles and the civic principle of freedom of speech.

Despite the First Amendment, in the United States today, Christians do not have total freedom of speech. There are things we believe, ideas clearly taught in the Scriptures, that are now considered “hate speech” in our world of political correctness. A society that proudly proclaims freedom of speech and then creates laws against hate speech is talking out of both sides of its mouth. Laws and governments aside, there are still what we might call “social laws” in place, and when Christians are faced with ostracization due to their beliefs, it certainly does not demonstrate freedom of speech. Many believers throughout history have been persecuted by their societies because the expression of their beliefs did not line up with the status quo. A notable example is Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, whose refusal to bow down to the king’s idol landed them in the midst of a fiery furnace (Daniel 3:1–26).

God wants us to obey Him and to speak according to His Word. If obedience to that principle makes people hate us or gets us thrown in jail or even killed, we are not to back down. God wants us to speak the truth boldly (Ephesians 6:20), but He never promises that we will always be free to speak without consequences.

Parler Exec speaks out on Google and Apple Ban (Fox News)

Parler Chief Policy Officer Amy Peikoff discusses a potential ban for Parler following President Trump's Twitter ban

The New York Times Attacked Tucker Carlson and His Response BREAKS the Internet (Dinesh D'Souza)

The NYT attacked Tucker Carlson for calling out one of their reporters. He took the time to respond to their comments.

Tucker defends Piers Morgan: He's an inspiration to all of us (Fox News)

'Tucker Carlson Tonight' host defends British TV host who walked off his job after criticizing Meghan Markle.

The World has changed almost overnight. Now we are watching America turn into a totalitarian state and censorship is happening. No one cares about facts and evidence. The globalist communist narrative is the narrative and the agenda is the most important. Blackouts are coming for believers as more and more people will just be removed from social media platforms.

What does the Bible say about censorship?

https://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-censorship.html

The Bible does not directly address censorship because “freedom of speech,” “freedom of the press,” and “freedom of religion” are relatively modern concepts. In many places around the world today, these freedoms are still denied. Ancient rulers all exercised censorship in that a person could be killed for criticizing the king/emperor or any of his policies. Likewise, a person could be killed for going against the prevailing religious thought or practice. This “censorship” was considered normal and natural.

In ancient Israel, people were not allowed to worship any way they pleased, nor were they allowed to spread any teaching they wanted. False teachers in Israel faced the “ultimate censorship”: “But a prophet who presumes to speak in my name anything I have not commanded, or a prophet who speaks in the name of other gods, is to be put to death” (Deuteronomy 18:20). “If a prophet, or one who foretells by dreams, appears among you and announces to you a sign or wonder, and if the sign or wonder spoken of takes place, and the prophet says, ‘Let us follow other gods’ (gods you have not known) ‘and let us worship them,’ you must not listen to the words of that prophet or dreamer. The LORD your God is testing you to find out whether you love him with all your heart and with all your soul. It is the LORD your God you must follow, and him you must revere. Keep his commands and obey him; serve him and hold fast to him. That prophet or dreamer must be put to death for inciting rebellion against the LORD your God” (Deuteronomy 13:1–5). False teachers and false teaching were supposed to be censored.

On the other hand, when the king was living in disobedience to God, he might try to censor God’s Word. In Jeremiah 36, Jeremiah’s scribe wrote the words that the Lord gave to Jeremiah. Subsequently, they were read to the king, who listened and periodically cut out a portion of the scroll that he had just heard and burned it. Even today, the Bible remains one of the books that is most often the target of censorship.

The church today is to “censor” false teaching. Church leaders should maintain control over what is taught in the church, making sure it is in accordance with Scripture. Many fear that, if Christians ever became a majority in the United States, they would impose something like Old Testament Law on the population at large and people would no longer be free to express their ideas. Indeed, some branches of Christian theology would view this condition as ideal. In the most strident of these groups, some would say that, if the United States were constituted as a biblical theocracy, the proper response to certain cults would not be evangelism but execution for blasphemy and false teaching. This is an extreme position, and most Christians today would reject it, even if they do long for society to be ordered along biblical priorities.

In reality, every organization and society exercises censorship on some level. Today, certain things are simply not allowed. For instance, child pornography is illegal and punishable by imprisonment. Other things may be legal but are socially unacceptable. Anyone who utters certain words or ideas may be “cancelled.” Even with lax social standards, there are still some things that are not allowed on broadcast television because the airwaves belong to the public and therefore must maintain some semblance of public decency. These standards are much more relaxed than they were a generation ago, and more and more obscenity, vulgarity, and profanity is allowed on broadcast television. There are no restrictions on cable, internet, or movies shown in a theatre.

Public libraries have long stood against censorship, but every library makes decisions about what to put in, what to take out, and what to keep out. There is simply not enough room or budget to put everything in, and collection development decisions will inevitably be influenced by the beliefs and values of the librarian who is making those decisions. Christians are often accused of censorship because they want filters to be placed on computers at the public library or object to certain materials being made available to children.

As far as Christians censoring other materials, there is fine line to walk, especially in Western-style democracies. On one hand, it is best that people be protected from certain images and ideas like pornography. On the other hand, censoring something often has the effect of making it more interesting and desirable. Christianity seems to thrive in the “free marketplace of ideas,” in which ideas have to be refuted by sound argumentation and the loving presentation of truth rather than censored. Likewise, Christian parents have to walk a fine line between protecting their children from harmful content and over-protecting them so that they are unprepared to make good decisions when they are on their own.

Increasingly, biblically based positions on public behavior are considered intolerant by society at large, and there is an increased call for censorship of Christian ideas that are labeled “hate speech.” Merely expressing certain ideas based on biblical truth is increasingly considered hateful or even violent. Obviously, when the powers that be attempt to censor truth, Christians must stand against it. In many cases this may involve political and legal action, but it should always involve a bold proclamation of the truth, both publicly and privately. Peter and John set the example when they refused to stop preaching in the name of Jesus even when they were threatened by the authorities (Acts 5:28–29).

Perhaps most importantly, Christians are supposed to censor what they put into their minds and what comes out of their mouths. “Finally, brothers and sisters, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things” (Philippians 4:8). “Do not let any unwholesome talk come out of your mouths, but only what is helpful for building others up according to their needs, that it may benefit those who listen” (Ephesians 4:29).

What does the Bible say about censorship?
Biden FCC Nominee Presents Grave Danger To Christian/Conservative Media

Biden FCC Nominee Presents Grave Danger To Christian/Conservative Media

https://www.frc.org/updatearticle/20220211/grave-danger

The nomination of a commissioner for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) may seem like a routine matter, but in this time of unprecedented crackdowns on the freedom of speech, nothing about the federal regulation of media should be considered routine. 

 

Indeed, even a cursory look at Biden administration FCC nominee Gigi Sohn's background is cause for grave concern for free speech, which is why Senate Republicans are mounting strong opposition to Sohn potentially serving as an FCC commissioner.

 

"I'm disturbed by her basic worldview and philosophy about broadcast freedom or the lack thereof," said ACLJ attorney and special counsel Craig Parshall on "Washington Watch." "Broadcast freedom, you know, has been protected for long enough where a lot of us who are in this area felt fairly comfortable regardless of who is in the White House in terms of the freedom of broadcasters to pick content that may be controversial as long as it's not illegal, and they're free to be the conservative, libertarian, or liberal, or anything in between. But she seems to have a real tension, a real appetite for controlling content, and that's my concern."

What makes Sohn's nomination particularly worrisome is that she would represent the tie-breaking fifth vote on issues that the FCC rules on, with the Commission's current two-two split between conservative and liberal commissioners. As Parshall pointed out, this could mean a rollback of free speech in a whole host of ways.

 

"President Reagan, during his administration, had the Fairness Doctrine disbanded, but it was a pernicious problem because it basically browbeat radio and television networks not to have any opinion for the sake of running into a regulatory nightmare and hiring more lawyers on their staff than broadcasters. 

 

She can use techniques like 'misinformation' as grounds to clamp down on content that she doesn't like, particularly conservative content. And I have no question that that would probably become one of her primary positions. She could also use the old 'Public Interest Doctrine,' which is still a part of the FCC law and regulations, as rubric for viewpoint suppression against views that she happens to disagree with."

 

As multiple senators have pointed out during Sohn's confirmation hearing, even a brief glance at what she has publicly posted on social media makes her left-wing activist views crystal clear, calling into question her ability to remain impartial in her decision-making. 

 

In addition, an advocacy group Sohn co-founded was funded by leftist billionaire George Soros, and she was embroiled in a copyright infringement lawsuit with NBC, ABC, CBS, and Fox over a supposed "nonprofit" that she worked for that made money off of the big network's content.

 

Perhaps most concerning, though, is her support for increasing the federal regulation of the internet, including the idea of "net neutrality," which would impose huge regulatory burdens on internet providers, in addition to her support for the federal regulation of "misinformation." 

 

It's easy to see how this kind of increased regulation would lead to the suppression of conservative speech. With Christian radio being one of the last areas that the Left has been unable to clamp down on, it's easy to see how a liberal FCC would begin to target conservative media.

 

"Sohn seems to have a real appetite for censorship," Parshall observed. "She wouldn't call it that. She'd simply say that it's 'eradicating dangerous misinformation' about political, social, and religious issues that foment the population. Well, no matter what you call it, it is a violent suppression of free speech. And remember that the FCC is the arm of the federal government. 

 

So when the ire of the federal government says we're going to pick and choose winners and losers in terms of what opinions and viewpoints and information comes over the broadcast airwaves, we are in big trouble."

 

Contact your senators and urge them to oppose the confirmation of Gigi Sohn to the FCC.

Craig L. Parshall, attorney and special counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice and senior advisor of legal policy & civil liberty for the American Principles Project, shares whether Gigi Sohn’s confirmation to FCC could lead to reinstating the Fairness Doctrine. For more Washington Watch with Tony Perkins, visit www.tonyperkins.com.

World Economic Forum Calls For Merging of Human and AI Intel to Censor ‘Hate Speech’ & ‘Misinformation’

https://summit.news/2022/08/12/world-economic-forum-calls-for-merging-of-human-and-ai-intel-to-censor-hate-speech-misinformation/

Despite the fact that no one asked, the World Economic Forum is now advocating for the merger of human and artificial intelligence systems to censor “hate speech” and “misinformation” online before it is even allowed to be posted.

report published to the official WEF website ominously warns about the peril of “the dark world of online harms.”

The solution to online abuse? AI plus human intelligence | World Economic Forum (weforum.org)

But the globalist body, run by comic book Bond villain Klaus Schwab, has a solution.

They want to merge the ‘best’ aspects of human censorship and AI machine learning algorithms to ensure that people’s feelings don’t get hurt and counter-regime opinions are blacklisted.

“By uniquely combining the power of innovative technology, off-platform intelligence collection and the prowess of subject-matter experts who understand how threat actors operate, scaled detection of online abuse can reach near-perfect precision,” states the article.

 

After engaging in a whole host of mumbo jumbo, the article concludes by proposing “a new framework: rather than relying on AI to detect at scale and humans to review edge cases, an intelligence-based approach is crucial.”

“By bringing human-curated, multi-language, off-platform intelligence into learning sets, AI will then be able to detect nuanced, novel abuses at scale, before they reach mainstream platforms. Supplementing this smarter automated detection with human expertise to review edge cases and identify false positives and negatives and then feeding those findings back into training sets will allow us to create AI with human intelligence baked in,” the article rambles.

 

In other words, your free speech will probably get censored before you’re even able to post it on social media sites. Some are calling it “preemptive censorship.”

Or as the WEF puts it, “Trust and safety teams can stop threats rising online before they reach users.”

No doubt that a central part of such “misinformation” will be strident denunciation of the WEF itself, given that the organization is notorious for blocking its critics on Twitter.

Many would ask why the World Economic Forum, amidst a cost of living crisis, upcoming energy rationing and a global recession, is concerning itself with any of this.

Why don’t they just stick to the economy?

 

“It’s never a sure bet if this Davos-based elite’s mouthpiece comes up with its outlandish “solutions” and “proposals” as a way to reinforce existing, or introduce new narratives; or just to appear busy and earn its keep from those bankrolling it,” writes Didi Rankovic

 

“No – it’s not the runaway inflation, energy costs, and even food security in many parts of the world. For how dedicated to globalization the organization is, it’s strangely tone-deaf to what is actually happening around the globe.”

World Economic Forum Calls For Merging of Human and AI Intel to Censor ‘Hate Speech’ & ‘Misinformation’

END OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM - 1st Amendment

Is freedom of religion a biblical concept?

https://www.gotquestions.org/freedom-of-religion.html

The first amendment of the U. S. Constitution says that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” Ever since the Bill of Rights was ratified, Americans have enjoyed religious freedom. Our Constitution guarantees the free observance of religion and prevents the government from ever establishing a state church. Thomas Jefferson called religious freedom “the most inalienable and sacred of all human rights.” Was Jefferson right? Is freedom of religion a divine right? Is it biblical?

Under the Mosaic Law, Israel operated under a theocracy. The nation’s success or failure depended on their degree of obedience to God. “Religious freedom” was not part of the Old Testament system, because God ruled over Israel directly. Of course, Israel’s theocracy was not intended to be a government model for the rest of the world. Nations which have imposed a self-styled theocracy, such as medieval Spain, have produced totalitarian nightmares. The religious intolerance of the Inquisition was not a product of true theocracy; it was the result of power-hungry, sinful men.

In the New Testament, we have a clearer picture of the God-ordained role of government. Romans 13:3-4 delineates the government’s responsibilities, which are, quite simply, to punish evil deeds, reward good deeds, and render justice. So, God has given the government certain duties, but enforcing a particular system of worship is not among them.

There is no conflict between biblical principles and the civic principle of religious freedom. In fact, it is precisely because the United States was founded on biblical principles that religious freedom exists. Only governments rooted in Judeo-Christian values allow such broad freedom. Most Islamic, Hindu, and Buddhist governments do not allow religious freedom; therefore, countries such as Pakistan, India, and Tibet are, as a whole, intolerant of other religions. Atheistic governments, such as the former Soviet Union, have also proved to be antagonistic toward free religious expression.

The concept of the freedom of religion is biblical for several reasons. First, God Himself extends a “freedom of religion” to people, and the Bible has several examples. In Matthew 19:16-23, the rich young ruler comes to Jesus. After a brief conversation, the young man “went away sorrowful,” choosing not to follow Christ. The salient point here is that Jesus let him go. God does not “force” belief in Him. Faith is commanded but never coerced. In Matthew 23:37, Jesus expresses His desire to gather the children of Jerusalem to Himself, but they “were not willing.” If God gives men the freedom to choose or to reject Him, then so should we.

Second, the freedom of religion respects the image of God in man (Genesis 1:26). Part of God’s likeness is man’s volition, i.e., man has the ability to choose. God respects our choices in that He gives us freedom to make decisions regarding our future (Genesis 13:8-12Joshua 24:15), even if we make the wrong decisions. Again, if God allows us to choose, we should allow others to choose.

Third, the freedom of religion acknowledges that it is the Holy Spirit who changes hearts, not the government (John 6:63). Only Jesus saves. To take away the freedom of religion is to empower human government, with its fallible rulers, to determine the eternal destiny of every soul. But Christ’s kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36), and no one becomes a Christian by government fiat. We are made Christians by the grace of God through faith in Christ (Ephesians 2:8-9). What the government does or does not do has no relation to the new birth (John 1:12-133:5-8).

Fourth, the freedom of religion concedes that, in the final analysis, it’s not about religion; it’s about relationship. God does not desire an external form of worship but a personal relationship with His children (Matthew 15:7-8). No amount of government control can produce such a relationship.

The framers of the Constitution were God-fearing men making a sincere attempt to establish a new nation on biblical principles, including equity, justice, and liberty. One of the liberties they recognized as “inalienable and sacred” was the freedom of religion. Praise the Lord for such wisdom.

Is freedom of religion a biblical concept?
END OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
Viral Threats to Religious Liberty - Beware of Power That Corrupts Absolutely

Viral Threats to Religious Liberty - Beware of Power That Corrupts Absolutely :: By Colonel Tim Moore

https://christinprophecy.org/articles/viral-threats-to-religious-liberty/

[read in Lamplighter (pdf)]

 

As American Christians celebrated Easter in 2020, they were coping with unprecedented levels of government intrusion into typical worship practices. Most churches in America complied with generalized public health decrees to minimize group gatherings. So, instead of full houses of worship on the most important day on the Christian calendar, they settled for taped services streamed via the internet.

A very few pastors refused to cancel their live worship services. Opening their doors to any who felt led to attend, they claimed that their allegiance to God outweighed their fealty to Caesar. Other churches decided to host “drive-in” worship services where the faithful could gather corporately, while honoring social distancing guidelines from the comfort of their cars.

Even that option was deemed too risky by some elected leaders. In Kentucky, the mayor of Louisville banned drive-in worship — only to have his decree ruled unconstitutional by a federal judge. Kentucky’s Governor, Andy Beshear, who mandated the closure of all churches but declared Kentucky’s abortion clinic and liquor stores to be “essential” services, sent state police to record the license plate of every vehicle that attended unauthorized church services. And in Mendocino County, California, overzealous local officials prohibited churches from singing and playing wind instruments in their online services. Talk about tyrannical overreach!

Striking a Balance

Much debate has ensued over the right balance for Christians to strike in the midst of a public health crisis. A real desire to “love others as ourselves” by taking reasonable measures to safeguard public health seems necessary and prudent.

But as the crisis continues, voices have sounded a legitimate alarm over the long-term consequences of an economic catastrophe — something that will impact mental, social and physical health. One Tennessee county official lamented eight recent suicides, arguing that social isolation was having a much greater impact on his community than the coronavirus.

Even as I write, national, state and local officials are weighing the risks of continued shutdown against the virus itself. Inevitably, some states and regions will emerge from the crisis more quickly than others. Sadly, precedents are being set as some officials exhibit autocratic tendencies and undermine the Constitutional primacy of religious freedom.

Among the important lessons to be gleaned from this experience is an awareness of the corrosiveness of power wielded without restraint. The sinful nature of mankind means that absolute power really does tend to corrupt absolutely. That is why our Founders created a system of checks and balances — ensuring that power was never consolidated in one branch or one office. As John Adams wrote: “Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast view beyond the comprehension of the weak; and that it is doing God’s service, when it is violating His laws.”

So, although we are commanded to pray for those in authority, we should never place all our trust or faith in them. Times like this demonstrate the importance of placing our hope in the One who is omniscient and omnipotent.

Lessons from the Passion of Christ

 

The Bible consistently describes kings and rulers as imperfect. Even David — Israel’s greatest king — was flawed and prone to error. Every king’s rule was deemed righteous or evil based on their consistent adherence to God’s Word. When a king strayed, the nation suffered the consequences.

That truism is not limited to the Old Testament. It is an axiom that has been proven time and again around the world. In the New Testament, various authorities involved in Jesus’ crucifixion offer indelible examples of power wielded irresponsibly.

1. The first group of officials Jesus encountered consisted of the chief priest and members of the Sanhedrin (Luke 22:66-71). Their collective animosity toward Him was already apparent. Because they could not discern the truth of His claims and because He threatened the status quo of their authority, the Bible says that they looked for an opportunity to condemn Him before the people (John 11:47-53). In the end, they bribed Judas to deliver Jesus over to them. Then, they violated their own judicial process to rush a pronouncement of guilt.

2. The second individual who stands out in Jesus’ conviction is Pontius Pilate (Luke 23:1-7). He was appointed by Caesar to represent Rome in Judea. As such, his responsibility was to impose Pax Romana (Roman Peace) on a resistant population — quelling uprisings, ensuring the collection of taxes and maintaining the status quo. Scripture makes it clear that Pilate had grown cynical. He scoffingly dismissed the very concept of truth (John 18:33-38). Pilate was more interested in balancing the expectations of Caesar, the demands of the Jewish religious leaders, his own wife’s clear misgivings and his sense that Jesus was undeserving of death. But in the end, Pilate did not have the moral fortitude to do what was just and right. Instead, he sought to appease the loudest voices and absolve himself of responsibility (Matthew 27:17-24Mark 15:9-15).

3. The next individual who stands out in the narrative is Herod Antipas — the same Herod who had John the Baptist beheaded. This was not Herod the Great — the great builder who ruled with an iron fist. This son of the former Herod was a sycophant who ruled the region of Galilee. Instead of taking seriously his role in reigning and administering justice, he had a reputation as a hedonistic pleasure-seeker. He was mainly interested in Jesus as a curiosity and a worker of miracles. It is telling that Jesus never responded to Herod’s inquiries and pleas to see a miracle (Luke 23:8-11). Although Herod saw no reason to condemn Jesus, he joined his soldiers in mocking Jesus.

4. The next group of individuals who played a part in the passion of Jesus Christ was composed of the various guards and soldiers who were “just following orders.” Both the Jewish temple guards and the Roman soldiers treated Jesus with great contempt, mindlessly following the edicts of the men appointed over them (Matthew 27:27-31John 18:12-13). In both cases, they demonstrated a sadistic callousness that offends our senses to this day. But, mankind has produced millions just like them throughout history. The Nazis in Germany, the Soviets in Russia, and the hate-filled racists in our own nation’s past could not have perpetrated their evils without huge cadres of men wielding power in an ungodly manner. Every dictator to this day has a throng of unquestioning secret policemen to fulfill their authoritarian decrees.

5. The final group we must observe from Jesus’ experience is the mass of sheep-like people who tolerated injustice. They represent an authority in themselves because the religious leaders and Pilate alike were wary of their collective will — or at least the threat that they might start an insurrection (Luke 22:2Matthew 27:24). Many of those common people were part of the fickle crowd that had hailed Jesus as the “Son of David” less than a week before — a clear recognition of His Messianic title. But by the morning of His crucifixion, they had either been swayed against Him, caught up in the mob, or cowed into silence. After an initial burst of resistance in the Garden of Gethsemane, even Jesus’ own disciples were frightened into despair.

The Gospel Shines Through

Recognizing the behavior of sinful men does not take away from the orchestrated plan of God that led to Jesus’ death. As He said, no one took His life from Him. He laid it down and took it up again — both of His own authority (John 10:17-18). Even Pilate was only able to exercise authority over Him because he had been given that authority from above (John 19:10-11).

The good news is that God did send His Son — offering Him as a perfect sacrifice for the sin of the world. The shortcomings of man did not lessen the magnitude of God’s great love for mankind which was manifested at the Cross. Nor did it restrain the power of God which was demonstrated by the empty tomb.

2020 Applications

The same character traits manifested by all the authorities leading up to the crucifixion of Jesus are evident around us today. I make that assertion as someone who has served in the marbled halls of a state capital. Here are some modern observations and applications:

1. Like many on the Sanhedrin, there are some in authority who have no discernment. Lacking a moral compass, they resent any threat to their power and authority. The Communist leaders of China and North Korea clearly fall into this category. They reject Christianity not because they have weighed its truth claims and found them lacking, but because embracing Christian faith would inevitably impose limits on their own power. And they despise Christ most of all because He asserts His Lordship over them.

While American elected officials were seldom so brash in the past, a growing number share the same animosity toward Christianity. I personally witnessed Democratic legislators in Kentucky disparaging Christians, and the Christian faith in general, on numerous occasions. Believers impose too great a restraint on their secular agenda. In America today, we have many officials who prioritize their support for abortion, abomination, and apostasy above any respect for God or His Word. Why else would they take advantage of a crisis to dictate the closure of churches but defend abortion mills at all costs? New York Mayor Bill de Blasio even threatened the permanent shuttering of churches who did not heed his every order.

2. The next type of leader that is far too prevalent is the one who wrings his hands and is unwilling to buck a vocal but wrong constituency. Desperate to preserve their own power and eager to please the masses, they stick their finger in the air to determine which way the wind is blowing in every circumstance. These officials are dangerous because they bend to every ungodly influence. Like Pilate, they scoff at truth. Unlike President Harry Truman who famously said, “the buck stops here,” they avoid any responsibility that might cause people to blame them for anything. Dithering indecision and weak ingratiation mark their tenure. Leaders like these have allowed our national debt to explode and unfunded liabilities to multiply in most states and major cities.

3. Following in the footsteps of the lesser Herod are those shallow-minded officials who wallow in the pleasures of power and position but do not really serve the people they represent. We’ve all known people who wanted a position more than a job. In government and in every other sphere of human activity, these people are a drain on society. Once again, every legislature and bureaucracy has far too many people like this. As Jesus demonstrated before Herod Antipas, Truth doesn’t even bother speaking to them.

4. The next category of people is those who know better but do not speak up or resist ungodliness. They prove the adage that the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Like the Thyatirans, they tolerate the intolerable (Revelation 2:20). In the context of this pandemic crisis, they enable violations of the Constitution by elected officials that are sworn to defend the Constitution. In that regard, keep in mind that elected officials at every level swear an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Faithfully doing so allows citizens to safeguard their own lives and livelihood.

Claiming to protect people from themselves by trampling on their Constitutional rights violates that oath, undermines those God-given rights and forfeits their lives and livelihood — a trade-off none of us should tolerate. And, as military members are taught, unlawful orders should never be obeyed.

I am not heaping scorn on my law enforcement friends who are expected to follow the misguided orders of governors and mayors and judges. I am challenging all of us who have allowed our nation to embrace abominations — tolerating through our votes and our silence the murder of millions of unborn innocents and passing laws that are an affront to a holy God. Virtually none of us are beyond reproach when it comes to the corporate waywardness of our nation.

5. Finally, what of the fickle sheep who profess faith on Sunday but turn their back on Jesus the rest of the week? Far too many would claim Him as Savior without honoring Him as Lord.

One of the most disappointing experiences during my legislative tenure was witnessing professing Christians — legislators and voters — abandon biblical positions in order to defend their own perceived self-interest. A growing chorus of Christians have been radicalized by our secular society — even pooh-poohing abortion and endorsing abominations in their insistency on embracing the full mantra of liberal ideologies. Some of those would willingly submit to any dictator who could promise sustenance and entertainment (bread and circuses).

How many of us have allowed our witness to be muddled by the choices we make on a regular basis? Does the language you use, the television shows and movies you watch, the media you absorb and the lies you tolerate reflect a life built upon the Lordship of Jesus Christ? Know that you cannot swear allegiance to Jesus Christ on Sunday and then refuse to keep His commandments the rest of the week (John 14:15).

Judge a Tree by Its Fruit

It has been said that “the road to hell is paved with good intentions.” Some of the most egregious purveyors of authoritarian overreach have proven the truth of this adage during the current coronavirus crisis by citing their altruistic intentions. Adding insult to injury, for many of them, the tendency to marginalize Christianity and defend abortion has been absolute.

Jeremiah warned that the human heart is more deceptive than all else (Jeremiah 17:9). But Christians grounded in the Word and blessed with discernment should not be deceived — even by wolves in sheep’s clothing.

Instead, we should look at a person’s fruit. Does an official’s actions erode reliance on and faith in God? Do they honor constitutional restraints on their own power? Or, do they take advantage of every opportunity to grow the scope and intrusiveness of government — even at the cost of religious liberty?

Freedom’s Flame is Flickering

Previous generations of Christians fought and bled to lay claim to the religious freedom granted by our Creator and enshrined in the American Constitution. They considered it a sacred duty to exercise that freedom and then pass it on unencumbered to the next generation. Religious liberty is under attack as never before — and is being relinquished by many who ought to know better.

 

Benjamin Franklin said, “Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Ordered by the high priest to stop teaching in Jesus’ name, Peter and the apostles responded, “We must obey God rather than men” (Acts 5:27-29). Flogged as a warning, “they went on their way rejoicing that they had been considered worthy to suffer shame for His name” (Acts 5:40-41).

The signs of the times indicate that we are witnessing the fulfillment of Romans 1:18-32 and 2 Timothy 3:1-8 and 4:3-4. Men and women who purport to represent our society show growing animosity toward sound doctrine of the Christian faith. Their hatred for those who love the Lord’s appearing will only increase as the Day of the Lord draws near.

We have been posted on the watchtowers of our society. While we still have a voice, let us sound the alarm. When we run afoul of secular despots, we will be warned and may even be persecuted. But some who are groping in darkness will heed our call, repent and turn to Him who will set them free indeed.

In such a time as this, let’s heed the advice of the Apostle Paul (Romans 13:11-14):

11) Do this, knowing the time, that it is already the hour for you to awaken from sleep; for now salvation is nearer to us than when we believed.

12) The night is almost gone, and the day is near. Therefore let us lay aside the deeds of darkness and put on the armor of light.

13) Let us behave properly as in the day, not in carousing and drunkenness, not in sexual promiscuity and sensuality, not in strife and jealousy.

14) But put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh in regard to its lusts.

 

Godspeed!

GUNS ARE DANGEROUS - 2nd AMENDMENT

Judge Jeanine: Biden's gun grab (Fox News)

'You leftists don't have a clue on how to stop gun crime. How about you start going after those who illegally possess guns'

Stimulus Check (Buddy Brown)

So late last year, a group of Congressional Democrats introduced a bill to “modernize” gun sales in all the ways you’d expect. We have to pay extra attention to laws like this right now. Because in a speech yesterday, Joe Biden endorsed getting rid of the filibuster for the sake of passing “voting rights” laws. But the real point of getting rid of the filibuster isn’t passing one law, but hundreds of them. Paul Helinski is the founder of GunsAmerica.com. He’s written about all of this. He joins us now.

This show is brought to you by Express VPN https://www.expressvpn.com/bongino

Joe Biden and his cabal of liberal totalitarians are moving to confiscate your firearms. In this episode, I discuss the latest leftist efforts to destroy the Second Amendment and I debunk the outrageous talking points they’re using to advance their agenda.

The Gun Grabbing Begins! (The Dan Bongino Show)

WOW. Investigative reporter, Edward Szall, joined Stew Peters to dissect the reemergence of the treaty vacated by President Trump, which will allow the Biden regime to confiscate American firearms from law-abiding citizens, and use the United Nations (or whomever) to assist.

Antonia Okafor Cover, spokesperson for Gun Owners of America, discusses the impact of President Biden’s gun grab on the 2022 midterms.

Guns

Representative Michael Cloud (R-TX) is raising awareness on a growing problem within America: The State’s violation of God-given, natural rights to protect life, liberty, and property.

Representative Cloud made a recent appearance on NTD’s Capitol Report and shared some alarming news about the encroachment of the federal government to monitor, track, record, and potentially act upon knowledge of gun sales and purchases. It seems obvious that in the wrong hands, information about gun ownership could quickly turn into a bloody mess. Would guns be outrageously taxed? Confiscated? To what end would they pursue goals of civilian disarmament?

There are no good intentions by the government if armed, pun intended, with any of this information. All we need to see is what happened in gun-free Australia and New Zealand to realize basic rights are all protected by the 2nd amendment. No 2A, no other rights. It is as simple as that.

Here is what Cloud had to say on his appearance:

Rep. Michael Cloud: New Gun Rights Bill Rallies Over 50 Co-Sponsors (Capitol Report)

As the Ukrainians take up arms to defend the country from a foreign enemy, we are reminded of the significance of our own Second Amendment. NTD spoke with Rep. Michael Cloud (R-Texas) to discuss both issues.

“You’ll hear a lot of people say that the primary job of the federal government is to keep us safe. Well, the primary job of the federal government is actually to keep us free…It’s really about our protection. It’s about ensuring tyranny doesn’t enter into our government. It’s about ensuring that each individual has the right to protect themselves and their families.”

Powerful stuff.

The Epoch Times picked up more of the story:

“Cloud said the Biden administration is getting too close to creating a federal gun registry—encroaching on our constitutional liberties—which is currently prohibited by federal law.

“At the end of 2021, Cloud said he became aware that the ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives) had collected over 54 million gun records in one year and that the Biden administration was trying to extend how long gun vendors to keep their records.

‘We began an investigation and come to find out that the ATF had over time collected almost 1 billion gun records. They had put them into a database in digital format in a way that’s searchable,” said Cloud. “So, you look at a database with almost a billion gun records in it—that’s an astronomical figure—in a searchable database. It comes really close to that line of a gun registry, if not crossing it.’”

Amazingly, Cloud also relates the fact that in 2020, 40% of all gun purchases went to first-time buyers and that in 2021 the number was 30%. That can easily be translated as saying people do not trust anyone to defend them but themselves. As it should be, but those numbers frighten a government that demands subordination and subjugation.

It is worth asking the rhetorical question: Why does the government want or need any of this information?

It is clearly not about keeping people safe. If the government were interested in people’s safety from gun crime, it would lock up urban thugs rather than releasing them fifty times to recommit the same violent acts. It would prioritize illicit handgun ownership in urban centers rather than attack the fake boogeyman of “assault rifles,” which aside from not being used in most gun crimes aren’t even a real category.

Add to the that the murderous cover up of cheap, plentiful, and efficacious off-patent treatments for Covid as well as massive propaganda that abortion is a healthcare right and it quickly becomes apparent the government absolutely has no interest in actual public safety.

Illegal National Gun Registry? Fed’s ATF Has Amassed ‘1 Billion Gun Records’

Federal law specifically prohibits a national gun registry but that has not stopped the data-hungry Technocrats at Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) agency from accumulating almost 1 billion gun transactions in the U.S. As with other Federal agencies, ATF has gone rogue.

 

Note that the nature of these records is not described. It is estimated that there are just under 400 million firearms in the hands of civilians in the U.S., with an additional 40 million sold each year. The size of the AFT database could indicate that additional information is being collected. ⁃ TN Edito

SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE

Separation of church and state is not a Constitutional separation.  It was mentioned in a private letter from Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptists and stated that:

“legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.”

 

Though this has been deceptively misrepresented and used as the basis for many Supreme Court rulings that have removed God from our government.

The Candace Owens Show: Jack Hibbs (PragerU)

Is there a separation of church and state? Should pastors discuss political and controversial issues from the pulpit? Candace Owens and Pastor Jack Hibbs of Calvary Chapel Chino Hills discuss the church’s role in culture and politics in this episode. Watch now!

Christian Citizenship (Lamb & Lion Ministries)

Should Christians vote according to biblical principles? Find out with Dr. David Reagan and team on television’s “Christ in Prophecy.”

Jefferson's Letter to the Danbury Baptists

https://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/9806/danpre.html

The Final Letter, as Sent

To messers. Nehemiah Dodge, Ephraim Robbins, & Stephen S. Nelson, a committee of the Danbury Baptist association in the state of Connecticut.

 

Gentlemen

 

The affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which you are so good as to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury Baptist association, give me the highest satisfaction. my duties dictate a faithful and zealous pursuit of the interests of my constituents, & in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them becomes more and more pleasing.

 

Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.

 

I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves & your religious association, assurances of my high respect & esteem.

 

Th Jefferson
Jan. 1. 1802.

Billy Crone on Hope for a Last Days Revival (Start 8:56)

Lamb & Lion Ministries w/ Billy Crone

Will America have a last days revival?

Church & State
Jefferson's Letter

How should a Christian view the separation of church and state?

https://www.gotquestions.org/separation-church-state.html

The issue of the separation of church and state has prompted much debate. In spite of the rhetoric common to revisionist historians, America’s Founding Fathers did not seek to eradicate religion. Indeed, an overwhelming majority of those who signed the Declaration of Independence counted themselves as religious men. It may come as a surprise to learn that nowhere in the Constitution do the words separation of church and state appear. The idea of church/state separation came from a letter penned by Thomas Jefferson. Again, contrary to the propaganda from the revisionists, Jefferson’s cause was to protect religious liberties from an intrusive government! In no way did Jefferson or any of the other framers of the U.S. Constitution seek to restrict Americans’ religious activities.

Americans live in a constitutional republic rather than a theocracy—and for good reason. State-sanctioned churches have historically become puppets of the government. In countries with state churches, the edicts of fallible man take precedence over the inspired teachings of Scripture. When the state is the head of the church, the integrity of the gospel is all too easily compromised.

Christians are glad for the separation of church and state, as the separation is designed to protect religious liberty. The first of the Bill of Rights says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” That wording is the result of lessons learned from the dictatorial Holy Roman Empire and King Henry VIII’s power grab in the 1534 Act of Supremacy. The point of the First Amendment was not to rid the country of religion but to ensure that the federal government did not select a religion and give it exclusive support. Americans are free to worship as they please.

Another popular misconception is that men and women of faith have no business being involved in politics. But it is hardly a secret that George Washington was an active member of Truro Parish, his local Episcopal Church. In the early days of the republic, a church met within the Capitol Building —a church attended, of all people, by Thomas Jefferson. “Within a year of his inauguration, Jefferson began attending church services in the House of Representatives. . . . Throughout his administration Jefferson permitted church services in executive branch buildings. The Gospel was also preached in the Supreme Court chambers” (“Religion and the Founding of the American Republic: Religion and the Federal Government, Part 2,” www.loc.gov/exhibits/religion/rel06-2.html, accessed 4/13/20).

A Christian should view the separation of church and state as a good thing. Those who wish to combine church and state usually do so thinking that Christianity can help stamp out evil, if the church is in charge. But history shows that the melding of church and state gives rise to corruption, totalitarianism, and oppression. Christians can and should be involved in the political process, just as anyone else. But Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world” (John 18:36), and Christians understand that enforcing Christianity through a national church is not the answer to the world’s problems. The limits imposed on the government in the U.S. Constitution are wise and designed to preserve the religious freedom of individuals.

How should a Christian view the separation of church and state?
The Separation of Church and State

The Separation of Church and State :: By Pete Garcia

https://www.raptureready.com/2019/07/04/separation-church-state-pete-garcia/

The Separation of Church and State (A Short Treatise on our Heritage and our Future)

243 years ago to the day, our liberty-minded forefathers (fifty-six British colonists representing thirteen colonies) committed the ultimate act of treason by declaring their independence from the then world’s number-one superpower, Great Britain. Having lived under a corrupt monarchial system, the founding fathers understood all too well what despotism looked like. They addressed this tyranny by declaring,

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. (Source)

By signing their names to the Declaration of Independence, these men jeopardized their own health, wealth, and liberty to give teeth to the ideal that all men are created equal and entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. They put in place an ingenious form of government, which ensured that the power of governance went to the governed (by way of unalienable rights). The law (the bill of rights) was designed to reduce government authority and reach. Lastly, that the authority for said unalienable rights belonged not to government (who could take away said rights), but to God alone (our Creator).

They borrowed from the ancient cultures of Israel (morality and ethics), from Greece (political philosophy), and from Rome (jurisprudence). They then mixed that formula with a Christian worldview to create a new form of government, a Constitutional Republic. We know this was a Christian worldview for three simple reasons:

1. Christianity is the most superior belief structure ever known to man and thus, is not challenged or afraid to let other worldviews operate under its umbrella of protection.

 

~q. Which other religious systems (atheism, Islam, Roman Catholicism, Hinduism, paganism, etc.) allows other belief systems to operate freely and unimpeded under their umbrella?

 

~a. Historically speaking, none.

 

2. Christianity is the only belief structure in the world that recognizes that at its core, belief must be genuinely heartfelt and not forced. Thus, adherence to true, biblical Christianity is not about our own works or righteousness, but about Christ’s.

 

~q. Can morality and ethical behavior be mandated or enforced by law (thou shalt not murder; thou shalt not steal, etc.)?

 

~a. Yes. However, keeping those might make you a good citizen and a decent human being, but they do not make you a Christian.

3. Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely (Lord Acton). While not explicitly citing chapter and verse, our forefathers understood this timeless principle to be as sure as the rising of the sun each day through their reading of the Bible. The Bible is replete with examples that power corrupts (Nimrod, Pharaoh, King Saul, Nebuchadnezzar, etc.) because man himself is corrupt (sinful).

 

~q. Given their own recent experiences (Roman Catholic Popes, English, Spanish, and French monarchs, etc.), why did the founders limit the power given to the government they themselves would be running?

 

~a. They understood authority should come from a divine and benevolent Creator, not from flawed and corruptible human beings. Only Christianity teaches this (Romans 3:23).

Numerous arguments have been made to say, our nation was never a Christian nation. Whether these critics do so by nonsensically citing Thomas Jefferson or Thomas Paine, I would agree with the premise, but not their reasoning. Our country was never intended to be purely a Christian nation (see point #1) because governments are incapable of being Christian. We were however, a nation governed by Christian people with Christian principles.

“Separation of church and state” is a common metaphor that is well recognized. Equally well recognized is the metaphorical meaning of the church staying out of the state’s business and the state staying out of the church’s business. Because of the very common usage of the “separation of church and state phrase,” most people incorrectly think the phrase is in the constitution.

The phrase “wall of separation between the church and the state” was originally coined by Thomas Jefferson in a letter to the Danbury Baptists on January 1, 1802. His purpose in this letter was to assuage the fears of the Danbury, Connecticut Baptists, and so he told them that this wall had been erected to protect them. The metaphor was used exclusively to keep the state out of the church’s business, not to keep the church out of the state’s business.

The constitution states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” Both the free exercise clause and the establishment clause place restrictions on the government concerning laws they pass or interfering with religion. No restrictions are placed on religions except perhaps that a religious denomination cannot become the state religion. (Source)

Understandably, some of the founders were Masons, and others possibly deists (biblically undecided). However, the overwhelming majority of the signers of the Declaration of Independence were bonafide, born-again Christians. What they all understood however was that our form of government would cease to work should we ever depart from those Christian ideals (as it is part of the formula).

 

Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

Second President of the United States, John Adams

In a moment of rare concurrence, I happen to agree with Preterist Gary DeMar (The American Vision) in that our nation was not so much founded in 1776, but rather, 150 years earlier at Plymouth Rock by the Pilgrims. 1776 was simply the watershed year for the long-awaited response by the colonials to address said train of abuses. Nevertheless, both the Pilgrims and the founding fathers understood that this endeavor into the New World was something divinely ordained. Should they (we) ever depart from acknowledging God as the orchestrator of this endeavor, we would succumb to the same fate as all other kingdoms and empires before us…as one relegated to the dustbins of history.

“For we must consider that we shall be as a City upon a hill. The eyes of all people are upon us. So that if we shall deal falsely with our God in this work we have undertaken, and so cause him to withdraw his present help from us, we shall be made a story and a byword throughout the world. —John Winthrop, aboard the Arbella, 1630

What has sustained these United States over the past four-centuries has been an unwavering belief that the United States was special and unique, and source for good in the world. A shining city on the hill as President Ronald Reagan once famously stated in his farewell address to the nation. Three tangible things have aided that ideal:

  1. Building and maintaining a strong, independent economy

  2. Maintaining a robust education system that promoted the ideals of religious morality and liberty

  3. Allegiance to our nation as a Constitutional Republic

 

There has been however, a concerted effort (both physically and spiritually) over the last two-centuries to destroy the United States both from without and within, and to prematurely remove it from the pages of world history. This has been a multifaceted effort and is only by the grace of God and His divine sovereignty that we have not succumbed much earlier to the aforementioned fate.

 

And He has made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, and has determined their preappointed times and the boundaries of their dwellings, so that they should seek the Lord, in the hope that they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us; Acts 17:26-27

Dollars and Sense

These efforts to destroy America from within began in earnest with the numerous attempts to create a centralized bank. Beginning with the seventh president, Andrew Jackson, all the way through the twenty-seventh president, William Howard Taft, the repeated proposals to hand over the authority to print and coin monies (a responsibility of Congress) was repeatedly rejected. However, Democratic president Woodrow Wilson approved the passage of legislation for the creation of a non-federal (i.e., privately owned) central bank in his first year of office. This would prove to become the foundation for which, the downfall of American economic system would eventually come.

History records that the moneychangers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.

Fourth President of the United States-James Madison

From an economic standpoint, this began in 1913 with Christmas Eve passage of the Federal Reserve Act. This took the responsibility of printing and coining money away from Congress, and gave it to a private institution, the erroneously labeled Federal Reserve. 106 years later and the Federal Reserve has yet to be audited. By 2019, the US crossed the boundary of twenty-one trillion dollars in national debt. While it has been argued that there is no dreaded redline a nation has to cross before it becomes financially insolvent, a nation’s continued indebtedness is only as good as its ability to either continue borrowing money, or printing their own. The downside is that they are borrowing against our children’s future assets, as well as adding inflation and potentially, deflation, into the mix.

What this really means is that our indebtedness really relies on the strength of the US Dollar, which, as our debt continues on its downward death spiral, continues to weaken substantially. With the rise in digital cryptocurrencies (security by encryption) and quantum systems (to handle the volume of information processing), nations have already begun looking for alternatives to US financial hegemony on the world’s markets. It is only a matter of time before the world feels secure enough to abandon the US Dollar for something else, which means our national economy will crumble, and be forced to accept whatever global or regional currency is forced upon it. At that point, we will have completely lost our autonomy.

The Passed Torch

From spacious skies and purple mountain majesties, to her amber waves of grain, America has long been blessed with abundant resources unparalleled in all the world. Furthermore, she was fearfully guarded by two large oceans (Atlantic and Pacific) which helped shelter her from both the atrocity and frequency of wars that had long plagued Europe, Asia, and Africa. However, the sparkling jewel in America’s crown was her rich educational systems, which rivaled the natural endowments Americans were blessed with. Harvard (Puritan-1636), Yale (Puritan-1701), and Princeton (Presbyterian-1746) to name a few, were all initially established as theological seminaries.

 

However, by the mid-1800s, they all began to increasingly embrace liberalism (in regards to a Biblical hermeneutics), which was fueled by the rise in naturalistic sciences that both advocated for an old-earth and ultimately, Darwinian evolution. Once the foundation of Genesis was destroyed for the average student, the floor as it were, fell out and the schools largely abandoned Christian teaching altogether for that of methodological naturalism and secularism.

Methodological naturalism says that scientists must do their work as if there is no God and that everything they study must be explained by three things: time, chance, and the laws of nature. Such a methodology for studying the physical world rules out the miraculous and providential works of God in His creation, even before investigation begins. (Source)

This was in essence, the beginning of the end for the United States as a “Christian nation.” Although technology would continue to propel the United States through the industrial revolution, the computer age, and the age of information (where we are today), educationally speaking, we are less educated individually and collectively, than that of our predecessors a hundred years ago. Our public education system was one of the first areas targeted by Marxists going back to the 1930s through institutions like the Frankfurt School and the things they promoted like political correctness (aka, cultural Marxism).

Even worse, though, the work done by those promoting secular humanism through men like John Dewey and the Humanist Manifest, have essentially performed an abortion on the conscience of the American nation. Secular humanism is a worldview based on atheism, naturalism, Darwinian evolution, and ethical relativism (e.g., everything is morally relative). It has abrogated the very worldview (Judeo-Christian) necessary for this nation to function as intended. Instead, children have been systematically taught that God has a box, and they should take Him out of said box only between the hours of 0900-1200 on Sunday mornings. By removing God from the classrooms, the public education system created a vacuum. As the popular maxim states, nature abhors a vacuum. Something has to fill it, and what was placed in God’s stead, was the Nihilistic worldview that man is nothing more than a cosmic accident, evolved from apes, objective truth was really subjective, and that we only have this life, so live it however you want.

On the fundamental religious issue [the existence of God], the modern [school] intends to be, and supposes it is, neutral, but it is not. Certainly it neither inculcates nor expressly repudiates belief in God. But it does what is far more deadly than open rejection; it ignores Him . . . . It is in this sense that the [school] today is atheistic. Sir Walter Moberly (Source)

Furthermore, students today are financially burdened with worthless degrees that are increasingly biased toward an atheistic and socialist worldview. Each passing generation (either through public education or cultural indoctrination) has increasingly become antichrist in its nature.

Correspondingly, revivals would come and go (the first and second Great Awakenings, Billy Graham crusades, etc.), yet, this nation has decidedly become a post-Christian nation that has long been steering away from both God and nationalism. Not that nationalism has anything to do with being a Christian, but they are somewhat connected.

Europe abandoned Christianity a long time ago and has since suffered two major world wars, seventy-years of iron fisted communism, and is now threatened with its own cultural extinction due to the leftist-progressive open borders policies and unchecked mass immigration. We here in the United States are being force-fed this same idea that we should abandon our own American Constitution to become a part of the greater multicultural global community. This means either an absolute watering down or complete abandonment of our own Christian heritage.

The Resolve of a Nation

The Civil War (1861-1865), proved to be America’s bloodiest and most costly war (in terms of American life). However, it took a godly man, the sixteenth president, Abraham Lincoln (Republican), to shepherd the nation through its darkest hour. In the end, he kept the country together by refusing (through armed conflict) to allow the southern states to secede, declared the Emancipation Proclamation as a war for freedom, and was assassinated after the war.

Both the Great War (WWI) and World War II demonstratively showed the resolve of the American fighting forces and her people. During the first five decades of the 20th-century, Americans were largely viewed as champions for liberty wherever they might be needed in the world. It set the stage for the ensuing seventy-years Cold War, which attempted to contain the spread of communism from spreading (primarily to developing nations).

However, all was not well on the Homefront.

Globalist-minded Americans (Democrats, Socialists, Communists, etc.) have long been plotting to commit treason against their own nation, by incrementally weakening the United States through whatever means possible. This war of cultural incrementalism had been fought in the shadows and largely ignored by most of the media and politicians for decades.

However, by 2008, this treason surfaced to the mainstream with a vengeance through the election of one President Barack Hussein Obama. Along with his lapdog media (i.e., the fourth estate and the fifth column simultaneously), Obama began culturally dissecting the military as well as the building block of this nation, the family unit, to systematically weakening our foreign policy objectives, and emboldening the shadow government.

Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.

Fortieth President of the United States- Ronald Reagan

Conclusion

With a decaying academic program of diminishing returns, to its precariously unbalanced financial system, the last vestige of a sovereign nation has always been the family unit. It is neither accidental nor coincidental that the family unit has been under attack as long and as viciously as it has. From the 1960s promotion of free love and easy divorce, to the federally sanctioned and funded abortion-mill industry of the 1970s, the family unit is under attack. Adding what they hope to be the death knell of the family structure, is the now normalization of gay marriage, drag queen story hours, transgenderism and gender fluidity.

If they cannot accomplish the destruction of the family unit with those aberrations, and should the Lord tarry a little longer, we will surely see the normalization of pedophilia, necrophilia, and the reinstitution of polygamy among other things.

Along the same vein as that of the 2014 Houston, Texas Sermon Subpoenas, the state of California recently passed legislation (Resolution ACR 99) that intends to browbeat churches, counselors, or anyone else of influence, that calls homosexuality a sin or portrays it in a negative way. The intent being having drummed God out of schools and government, that they should now drum God out of the United States. They will do this through lawsuits, legal actions, violence, public shaming, and financial boycotts.

Hollywood and numerous movie streaming services, have all but abandoned states who either passed strict abortion laws (heartbeat law) or have banned abortion altogether. Furthermore, they (Hollywood) continue to put pressure on businesses to boycott states, individuals, or businesses who adhere to Christian principles, or does not wholly endorse homosexuality or abortion on demand.

It is getting rough out there these days being a Christian in America. The pace at which the spirit of antichrist is rising is becoming frightening surreal. While not at the levels of persecution we see presently in the Middle East, Africa, and China, the United States (even if Post-Christian) is truly the last safe haven of Christianity left on the planet. If we fall here, there will be nowhere else Christians can seek refuge in the future. Some of you might be asking, why does it seem like the leftist progressives and their godless agenda always seem like their winning. Why are they so intent on destroying America? Why are they so intent on trying to remove every trace of God from our once great nation? What does all this have to do with the separation of Church and State?

I am about tell you.

While I love this nation, and what it has stood for, for over four hundred years, I fear, as John Winthrop prophetically noted in 1630, our abandonment of God is hastening the moment of our demise, and that we will become nothing more than a byword of a formerly great nation. Beloved, there is coming a day when the Separation of Church and State will absolutely happen, but not by the will of man or the schemes of Satan. No, this separation will be one that is divinely enforced and in its own rights, a form of judgment (Luke 12:48). It (the separation) will happen with such a quickness and certainty that it should cause anyone reading this to fear for those left behind.

For this we say to you by the word of the Lord, that we who are alive and remain until the coming of the Lord will by no means precede those who are asleep. For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And thus we shall always be with the Lord. Therefore comfort one another with these words. But concerning the times and the seasons, brethren, you have no need that I should write to you. For you yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so comes as a thief in the night. For when they say, “Peace and safety!” then sudden destruction comes upon them, as labor pains upon a pregnant woman. And they shall not escape.

1st Thessalonians 4:16-5:3

Even so, Maranatha!

Were the Founding Fathers of the United States Christians?

https://www.gotquestions.org/Founding-Fathers.html

With words like God, Lord, and Creator found in the Declaration of Independence, it is easy to assume that the founders of the United States were Christians. John Adams, the nation’s second President, said, “The Christian religion is, above all the religions that ever prevailed or existed in ancient or modern times, the religion of wisdom, virtue, equity and humanity” (The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States, Charles Francis Adams, ed., Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1856, Vol. III, p. 421, diary entry for July 26, 1796). Benjamin Franklin, one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence, wrote to Yale president Ezra Stiles, “I think the system of morals and [Jesus’] religion as He left them to us, the best the world ever saw or is likely to see” (Works of Benjamin Franklin, John Bigelow, ed., New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1904, p. 185). Such statements imply that Christianity was influential in the founders’ lives.

The reality is that the Founding Fathers were a diverse group of individuals. There is varied evidence as to the religious affiliation of several of the founders. George Washington is often cited as an Episcopalian. His public addresses contain many statements that support the claim that Washington was, in fact, a committed Christian. There is also evidence that Washington was only nominal in his faith. Thomas Jefferson made statements implying he was a Christian, but his brand of Christianity was dubious, at best. Jefferson rejected the supernatural accounts of the Bible, the Trinity, and the incarnation of Christ. James Madison was Anglican, but he is also argued to be a deist. Thomas Paine never served in any elected capacity, but he had great influence in the early years of the country. Paine was not a Christian; in his work The Age of Reason, he attacked the fundamental beliefs of Christianity.

There is little doubt that the principles upon which the United States was founded are indeed found in the Bible. Equality, liberty, and justice are all biblical principles. The faith of the founders, on the other hand, will continue to be debated. Did the founders respect God and the Christian religion? Absolutely. Were they influenced by the Bible? Surely. Were they all born-again believers in Jesus Christ? No.

Even in reading what the founders themselves stated and wrote for the public, none of us will ever truly know their hearts. The apostle Paul wrote, “The Lord knows those who are his” (2 Timothy 2:19). While it is interesting to research the religious convictions of the founders, only God truly knows the ones who put faith in Jesus. More important than the heart condition of the Founding Fathers, is the spiritual condition of those presently in public office. It is our duty to pray for rulers and those in positions of authority (1 Timothy 2:2).

Were the Founding Fathers of the United States Christians?

America’s Christian Heritage - Is America based on Christian principles?  By Dr. David R. Reagan

https://christinprophecy.org/articles/americas-christian-heritage/

 

[read in Lamplighter (pdf)]

The American constitutional system was the first government devised by Man that was based upon biblical principles.

Its cornerstone was a belief in the evil nature of Man, which produced a conviction that no person can be trusted with power. This belief that Man’s nature is corrupted and irreparable (apart from the power of the Holy Spirit) represented a radical departure from history. Until that time, most of Mankind had always been ruled by kings who were considered to have a divine right to rule and who usually ended up ruling like they thought they were gods.

A Biblical Example

I am reminded of the children of Israel when they arrived in the Promised Land under the leadership of Joshua. The Lord God Almighty served as their king. He protected them and blessed them with freedom and prosperity. When they took their eyes off Him and rebelled, He would allow foreign nations to conquer them. When they repented, He would raise up leaders, called judges, who would deliver them from foreign domination.

This unique form of supernatural rule continued for 400 years until the people rose up in rebellion during the judgeship of Samuel and demanded an earthly king so that they would be “like all the other nations” (1 Samuel 8:520). Samuel tried to warn them that an earthly king would abuse his power and make their lives miserable by sending their sons into war, exploiting their daughters, confiscating their fields, and imposing heavy taxation (1 Samuel 8:10-18). But they would not listen, and they got what they asked for — a long history of abusive kings.

A Unique Form of Government

The American colonists rebelled against such a king, and they had no intention of replacing the British monarch with an American one. What is amazing is that they did not proceed to establish an oligarchical form of government since most of the leaders of the American Revolution were wealthy aristocrats.

But the vast majority of them were also devout Christians, and they were fully aware of the biblical teaching about the fallen nature of Man (Jeremiah 17:5,7,9):

5) Thus says the Lord, “Cursed is the man who trusts in mankind…
7) “Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord…
9) “The heart is more deceitful than all else And is desperately sick…”

Accordingly, our Founding Fathers did not trust anyone with power — not even themselves. They therefore proceeded to construct a government that would limit the use of power.

 

Equally important was their conviction that the Word of God constitutes a higher law to which all men and governments are subject and that the fundamental rights of Mankind are derived from that law and not from government. Thus, in the nation’s Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson wrote:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”

To put it another way, the Founding Fathers of our nation expressly rejected the traditional philosophy of Humanism and its concept that Man is basically good and capable of perfection and that therefore those who are highly educated have a natural right to rule over those less fortunate. They also rejected the radical form of Humanism that came to prevail in the French Revolution and which produced a reign of terror — namely, a belief in the essential goodness of the common man.

Again, because of their world view, our Founding Fathers trusted no one. They refused to establish a monarchy or an oligarchy. But they also distrusted the common man, and so they refused to establish a democracy because they feared it would quickly evolve into mobocracy.

A Representative Republic

They therefore carefully constructed a representative republic with an ingenious set of checks and balances. For example, in the original government established by our constitution, there was only one national official directly elected by the people — the local Congressman who was elected to serve for two years in the House of Representatives. Senators were not directly elected. They were appointed by state legislatures, and this continued to be the case until the adoption of the 17th Amendment in 1913 which requires the selection of Senators by direct popular vote.

Likewise, the President was not originally selected by direct election. Instead, he was selected by electors who, in turn, were appointed by the state legislatures. Over a period of time, the state legislatures began to allow voters to select the electors. But as late as 1824, more than a quarter of the state legislatures were still appointing electors.

Today, all electors are selected by popular vote. Even so, the system of selecting the President continues to be indirect since voters are voting directly for electors and it is the electors who directly select the President. Thus, in the election of 2000, George W. Bush was selected as President by the Electoral College (271-266) even though his opponent, Al Gore, garnered more popular votes (543,895 more than Bush).

Our Founding Fathers also divided the powers of government between the federal government and the state governments, defining what was given to the central government, prescribing what was denied to state governments, and stating that all other powers were retained by the States (10th Amendment). Within the federal government, power was further divided between three branches — legislative, executive, and judicial. And the basic rights of the people to be protected from all governmental intrusion were spelled out in the Constitution’s Bill of Rights (the first ten amendments approved in 1791 and considered to be a part of the original Constitution since their proposal was essential to the ratification of the Constitution).

The Philosophical Foundation

The philosophical concept undergirding all the actions of our Founding Fathers was the belief that Christian morality was absolutely essential for both the preservation of liberty and the stability of law. They emphasized this crucial point in their writings over and over again:

 

Samuel Adams (1722-1803) — Governor of Massachusetts, signer of the Declaration of Independence, and organizer of the Boston Tea Party:

A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy. While the people are virtuous they cannot be subdued; but when they lose their virtue they will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external or internal invader.1

Religion and good morals are the only solid foundations of public liberty and happiness.2

Benjamin Rush (1745-1813) — Signer of the Declaration of Independence, attendee at the Continental Congress, physician, and first Surgeon General:

The only foundation for… a republic is to be laid in Religion. Without this there can be no virtue, and without virtue there can be no liberty, and liberty is the object and life of all republican governments.3

Patrick Henry (1736-1799) — First governor of Virginia and member of the Continental Congress:

The great pillars of all government and of social life [are] virtue, morality, and religion. This is the armor… and this alone, that renders us invincible.4

George Washington (1732-1799) — Commander in Chief of the Continental Army, overseer of the Constitutional Convention, and first President of the United States:

Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports… in vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens…5

John Adams (1735-1826) — Member of the Continental Congress, one of the drafters of the Declaration of Independence, and second President of the United States:

We have no government armed in power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion… Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.6

Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) — Governor of Virginia, first Secretary of State, principle author of the Declaration of Independence, and third President of the United States:

No nation has ever yet existed or been governed without religion. Nor can be. The Christian religion is the best religion that has ever been given to man, and I as chief Magistrate of this nation am bound to give it the sanction of my example.7

James Madison (1751-1836) — Political philosopher, considered the “Father of the Constitution” and the “Father of the Bill of Rights,” member of the House of Representatives, and fourth President of the United States:

We have staked the whole future of American civilization, not upon the power of government, far from it. We have staked the future of all of our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self government; upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God.8

A Continuing Concept

This concept of the inalienable interdependence of constitutional order and Christian virtue was not just characteristic of our Founding Fathers. It has continued to be emphasized throughout our history:

Noah Webster (1758-1843) — Considered the “Father of American Education” and publisher of The American Dictionary of the English Language in 1828:

In my view, the Christian Religion is the most important and one of the first things in which all children, under a free government, ought to be instructed… no truth is more evident to my mind than that the Christian Religion must be the basis of any government intended to secure the rights and privileges of a free people.9

John Quincy Adams (1767-1848) — American diplomat, member of the House and Senate, and sixth President of the United States. On the occasion of the celebration of the 45th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, he declared:

The highest glory of the American Revolution was this: it connected in one indissoluble bond the principles of civil government with the principles of Christianity.10

Daniel Webster (1782-1852) — United States Senator from Massachusetts and Secretary of State:

No truth is more evident to my mind than that the Christian religion must be the basis of any government intended to secure the rights and privileges of a free people.11

To preserve the government we must also preserve morals. Morality rests on religion; if you destroy the foundation, the superstructure must fall. When the public mind becomes vitiated and corrupt, laws are a nullity and constitutions are waste paper.12

William McGuffey (1800-1873) — American educator and author of the McGuffey’s Reader, first published in 1836:

The Christian religion is the religion of our country. From it are derived our prevalent notions of the character of God, the great moral governor of the universe. On its doctrines are founded the peculiarities of our free institutions.13

The New York State Legislature — In 1838 the New York State Legislature declared:

This is a Christian nation. Ninety-nine hundredths, if not a larger proportion, of our whole population, believe in the general doctrines of the Christian religion. Our government depends… on that virtue that has its foundation in the morality of the Christian religion.14

Andrew Jackson (1767-1845) — Victorious commander of American forces in the Battle of New Orleans in 1815, military governor of Florida, and seventh President of the United States. Speaking of the Bible, he said:

That Book, sir, is the Rock upon which our republic rests.15

Supreme Court of the United States — Case of the United States v. Church of the Holy Trinity (1892):

No purpose of action against religion can be imputed to any legislation, state or national, because this is a religious people. This is historically true. From the discovery of this continent to the present hour, there is a single voice making this affirmation…These, and many other matters which might be noticed, add a volume of unofficial declarations to the mass of organic utterances that this is a Christian nation… We are a Christian people, and the morality of the country is deeply engrafted upon Christianity.16

Calvin Coolidge (1872-1933) — Governor of Massachusetts, Vice President of the United States, and 30th President of the United States:

The foundations of our society and our government rest so much on the teachings of the Bible that it would be difficult to support them if faith in these teachings would cease to be practically universal in our country.17

The United States Supreme Court — Case of United States v. McIntosh (1931):

We are a Christian people, according to one another the equal right of religious freedom, and acknowledging with reverence the duty of obedience to the will of God.18

Franklin Delano Roosevelt (1882-1945) — Governor of New York and 32nd President of the United States:

We cannot read the history of our rise and development as a nation, without reckoning with the place the Bible has occupied in shaping the advances of the Republic. Where we have been the truest and most consistent in obeying its precepts, we have attained the greatest measure of contentment and prosperity. 19

Peter Marshall (1902-1949) — Scottish-American preacher, pastor of New York Avenue Presbyterian Church in Washington, D.C., and Chaplain of the United States Senate, in a prayer offered before the Senate in 1947:

May it be ever understood that our liberty is under God and can be found nowhere else… We were born that way, as the only nation on earth that came into being for the glory of God and the advancement of the Christian faith.20

Earl Warren (1891-1974) — Governor of California and 14th Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, in a Time magazine interview in February of 1954:

I believe no one can read the history of our country without realizing that the Good Book and the spirit of the Savior have from the beginning been our guiding geniuses… Whether we look to the first Charter of Virginia… or to the Charter of New England… or to the Charter of Massachusetts Bay… or to the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut… the same objective is present… a Christian land governed by Christian principles. I believe the entire Bill of Rights came into being because of the knowledge our forefathers had of the Bible and their belief in it… I like to believe we are living today in the spirit of the Christian religion. I like also to believe that as long as we do so, no great harm can come to our country.21

Dwight D. Eisenhower (1890-1969) — Supreme Commander of Allied Forces in Europe during World War II and 34th President of the United States:

Without God there could be no American form of government, nor an American way of life. Recognition of the Supreme Being is the first — the most basic — expression of Americanism.22

Ronald Reagan (1911-2004) — Governor of California and 40th President of the United States:

America needs God more than God needs America. If we ever forget that we are “One Nation Under God,” then we will be a Nation gone under.23

Foreign Recognition

The French historian, Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-1859), visited the United States in the early 1830’s. In 1835 he published the first of a two volume study of this nation, titled, Democracy in America. He revealed that the intertwining of Christianity with government was very surprising to him:

Upon my arrival in the United States, the religious aspect of the country was the first thing that struck my attention; and the longer I stayed there, the more did I perceive the great political consequences resulting from this state of things, to which I was unaccustomed.

In France I had almost always seen the spirit of religion and the spirit of freedom pursuing courses diametrically opposed to each other; but in America I found that they were intimately united, and that they reigned in common over the same country… The Americans combine the notions of Christianity and of liberty so intimately in their minds, that it is impossible to make them conceive the one without the other.24

De Tocqueville’s traveling companion, Gustave de Beaumont (1802-1866) was similarly impressed with the Christian foundation of American government. He wrote:

Religion in America is not only a moral institution but also a political institution. All of the American constitutions [national and state] exhort the citizens to practice religious worship as a safeguard both to good morals and to public liberties. In the United States, the law is never atheistic…25

Contemporary Recognition

University of Houston political science professors Donald Lutz and Charles Hyneman in 1983 published a monumental study that took them 10 years to bring together. They surveyed over 15,000 documents written by our Founding Fathers between 1760-1805 and discovered that the Bible was, by far, the most cited source, comprising 34 percent of all quotations. In fact, the Bible was quoted four times more than any other source.26

Significantly, the next most commonly cited sources were Barron Montesquieu (1689-1755), William Blackstone (1723- 1780), and John Locke (1632-1704). All of these men were strong adherents of natural law philosophy and encouraged the incorporation of biblical law into civil law.

Lutz and Hyneman affirmed that the Pilgrims, the Puritans and the constitutional framers all insisted on cementing the connection between law and morals by infusing biblical precepts into the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and Bill of Rights.

 

In 1982 Newsweek magazine published an article entitled, “How the Bible Made America.” It concluded, “historians are discovering that the Bible, perhaps even more than the Constitution, is our founding document.”27

Even contemporary American Jewish leaders have asserted their belief that our nation is one that is based on Christian principles, and they have expressed their appreciation for the fact that this foundation has produced religious liberty for them.

Consider, for example, the viewpoint of Jeff Jacoby, a Jewish columnist at the Boston Globe:

This is a Christian country — it was founded by Christians and built on broad Christian principles. Threatening? Far from it. It is in precisely this Christian country that Jews have known the most peaceful, prosperous, and successful existence in their long history.28

Dennis Prager, a Jewish columnist and popular radio talk show host, has warned:

If America abandons its Judeo-Christian values basis and the central role of the Jewish and Christian Bibles (its Founders’ guiding text), we are all in big trouble, including, most especially, America’s non-Christians. Just ask the Jews of secular Europe.29

Don Feder, a Jewish columnist and long time writer for the Boston Herald, expressed a similar viewpoint:

Clearly this nation was established by Christians… As a Jew, I’m entirely comfortable with the concept of a Christian America.30

 

The choice isn’t Christian America or nothing, but Christian America or a neo-pagan, hedonistic, rights without-responsibilities, anti-family, culture-of-death America. As an American Jew… [I] feel very much at home here.31

Michael Medved, a Jewish radio talk show host and columnist, agrees that America is indeed a Christian nation:

The framers may not have mentioned Christianity in the Constitution but they clearly intended that charter of liberty to govern a society of fervent faith, freely encouraged by government for the benefit of all. Their noble and unprecedented experiment never involved a religion-free or faithless state but did indeed presuppose America’s unequivocal identity as a Christian nation.32

President Obama’s Viewpoint

President Barack Obama has repeatedly asserted that the United States is “no longer a Christian nation,” but he has never defined what he means by this statement. What about it? Are we still a Christian nation, or have we abandoned the faith our nation was based upon?33

 

There is certainly a sense in which the President is correct. Although the vast majority (85%) of Americans identify themselves as Christians, only about 9% at most would claim to be born-again, Evangelical Christians. This means that most Americans are simply professing Christians, or cultural Christians.

But this sad fact does not negate the historical evidence that our Founding Fathers established this nation on Christian principles and that those principles still serve as the basis of our constitutional structure and our laws.

The problem, of course, is that those with Obama’s viewpoint are determined to cut America loose from its Judeo-Christian foundation. They have a classic European-style Humanist worldview that despises Christianity and Capitalism, and the result is that freedom is endangered.

We are speeding toward a secular, pagan society devoid of values that contribute to virtue and civility. If this transition continues unabated, our system of government will not be able to survive, for it is based upon the assumption of a citizenry that is endowed with biblical truths.

We need to pray for our nation as never before. We need to pray that the schemes of the secularists will be frustrated, confused, and defeated. And we need to pray for a national spiritual revival.

“Remember therefore from where you have fallen, and repent and do the deeds you did at first…” (Revelation 2:5)

Notes

1) Dr. James Kennedy, “Our Constitution Was Made Only for a Moral and Religious People,” www.coralridge.org.

2) Paul H. Smith, Gerald W. Gawalt, Rosemary Fry Plakes, et. al., Letters of Delegates to Congress 1774-1789, volume 11.

3) Benjamin Rush, Essays, Literary, Moral & Philosophical, (Philadelphia: Thomas and Samuel F. Bradford, 1798), page 8.

4) Moses Coit Tyler, Patrick Henry, (New York: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1898; reprint, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1962), page 409.

5) The Great Books Foundation, The Will of the People: Readings in American Democracy (Chicago: Great Books Foundation, 2001), page 38.

6) John Adams, “Letter to Zabdiel Adams, Philadelphia, 21 June 1776,” in The Works of John Adams — Second President of the United States, ed. Charles Francis Adams (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1854), vol. 9, p. 401.

7) Joseph Loconte, “Why Religious Values Support American Values,” The Heritage Foundation, www.heritage.org/Research/Lecture/Why-Religious-Values-Support-American-Values.

8) Ibid.

9) Harry A. Warfel (ed.), Letters of Noah Webster, (New York: Library Publishers, 1953), pp. 453-454.

10) Dr. James Kennedy, “Christian Zeal Fueled the American Revolution,” www.coralridge.org.

11) Dr. James Kennedy, “America’s Schools Were Formed to Advance the Christian Faith,” www.coralridge.org.

12) Truth and Reason, “Religious Freedom,” http://truthandreasonblog.wordpress.com/religious-freedom.

13) Dr. James Kennedy, “America’s Schools…”

14) Dr. James Kennedy, “Our Constitution Was Made Only…”

15) William J. Federer, America’s God and Country: Encyclopedia of Quotes (Coppell, Texas.: Fame Publishing, 1994), page 311.

16) Justia.com: US Supreme Court Center, “Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States, 143 U. S. 457 (1892), http://supreme.justia.com/us/143/457/case.html.

17) Cal Thomas, “Silent Cal Speaks: Why Calvin Coolidge is the Model for Conservative Leadership Today,” www.heritage.org/Research/Lecture/Silent-Cal-Speaks-Why-Calvin-Coolidge.

18) Google Scholar, “United States v. Macintosh, 283 US 605 – Supreme Court 1931,
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7655506457544924278
&q=united+states+v.+macintosh&hl=en&
as_sdt=10000000000002&as_vis=1.

19) Franklin D. Roosevelt, “Statement on the Four Hundredth Anniversary of the Printing of the English Bible,” October 6, 1935, www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=14960.

20) William Federer, “American Minute,” www.amerisearch.net/index.php?date=2004-05-27.

21) Murray Hornsby, “America: Our Christian Heritage, Our History and Faith in God,” www.americanheritagealliance.org/heritage4.htm.

22) Eisenhower Presidential Library, “Dwight D. Eisenhower Quotes,” www.eisenhower.archives.gov/all_about_ike/Quotes/Quotes.html.

23) BrainyQuote, “Ronald Reagan Quotes,”
www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/r/ronald_reagan_3.html.

24) Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, (New York: A. S. Barnes & Co., 1851), pp. 332, 336-337.

25) Dr. James Kennedy, “Foreign Nations Acknowledge Our Christian Roots and Heritage,” www.coralridge.org.

26) Charles S. Hyneman and Donald S. Lutz, American Political Writing During the Founding Era, 1760-1805, (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1983), 2 volumes.

27) Kenneth Woodward and David Gates (1982), “How the Bible Made America,” Newsweek, December 27, page 44.

28) Jeff Jacoby, “The freedom not to say ‘amen’,” Jewish World Review, February 1, 2001 (www.jewishworld review.com/jeff/jacoby020101.asp).

29) Dennis Prager, “America founded to be free, not secular,” Townhall.com, January 3, 2007 (http://townhall.com/columnists/DennisPrager/
2007/01/03/america_founded_to_be_free,_not_secular).

30) Don Feder, A Jewish Conservative Looks at Pagan America (Lafayette, LA: Huntington House Publishers, 1993), pp. 59-60.

31) Don Feder, “Yes – Once and For All – America is a Christian Nation,” DonFeder.com, February 16, 2005 (www.donfeder.com/articles/0502chrisAmerica.pdf).

32) Michael Medved, “The Founders Intended a Christian, not Secular, Society,” Townhall.com, October 3, 2007 (http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/MichaelMedved/
2007/10/03/the_founders_intended_a_christian,_not_secular,_society).

33) For an outstanding article about Obama’s denial that America is still a Christian nation, see David Barton’s article, “Is President Obama Correct: Is America No Longer a Christian Nation?”
www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissuesArticles.asp?id=23909#FN3.

America’s Christian Heritage - Is America based on Christian principles?
Judeo-Christian Roots of Gvt
Judeo-Christian Roots of America's Founding Ideals and Documents

https://nccs.net/blogs/articles/judeo-christian-roots-of-americas-founding-ideals-and-documents

 

Principle: Reliance on the Providence of God

 

American Founding Ideal

  • "We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent states; … And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor."
    --Declaration of Independence
    --See also John Eidsmoe, Christianity and the Constitution, Baker Book House, Grand Rapids, MI, 1987, pp. 355-377

 

Judeo-Christian Roots

  •     Isaiah 54:10 For the mountains shall depart And the hills be removed,
        But My kindness shall not depart from you, Nor shall My covenant of peace be removed,” 
        Says the Lord, who has mercy on you.

11 “O you afflicted one, Tossed with tempest, and not comforted,
Behold, I will lay your stones with colorful gems, And lay your foundations with sapphires.
12 I will make your pinnacles of rubies, Your gates of crystal, And all your walls of precious stones.
13 All your children shall be taught by the Lord, And great shall be the peace of your children.
14 In righteousness you shall be established;
You shall be far from oppression, for you shall not fear; And from terror, for it shall not come near you.
15 Indeed they shall surely assemble, but not because of Me.
Whoever assembles against you shall fall for your sake.

16 “Behold, I have created the blacksmith Who blows the coals in the fire,
Who brings forth an instrument for his work; And I have created the spoiler to destroy.
17 No weapon formed against you shall prosper, And every tongue which rises against you in judgment
You shall condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the Lord, And their righteousness is from Me,” Says the Lord.

 

Principle: Law of God forms basis of good human laws

American Founding Ideal

  • "Suppose a nation in some distant region should take the Bible for their only law book, and every member should regulate his conduct by the precepts there exhibited! Every member would be obliged in conscience, to temperance, frugality, and industry; to justice, kindness, and charity towards his fellow men; and to piety, love, and reverence toward Almighty God ... What a Eutopia, what a Paradise would this region be." --John Adams, February 22, 1756 (Federer, William J., America's God and Country Encyclopedia Of Quotations , FAME Publishing, Coppell, Texas, 1994, p.5)

 

  • "These laws laid down by God are the eternal immutable laws of good and evil .... This law of nature dictated by God himself, is of course superior in obligation to any other. It is binding over all the globe, in all countries, and at all times: no human laws are of any validity if contrary to this... "The doctrines thus delivered we call the revealed or divine law, and they are to be found only in the holy scriptures ... [and] are found upon comparison to be really part of the original law of nature. Upon these two foundations, the law of nature and the law of revelation, depend all human laws; that is to say, no human laws should be suffered to contradict these. --William Blackstone (Federer, p.52)

 

Judeo-Christian Roots

  • Ps 19:7 The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul;
    The testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple;
    8 The statutes of the Lord are right, rejoicing the heart;
    The commandment of the Lord is pure, enlightening the eyes;

 

Principle: Religion and Morality form basis of Liberty

 

American Founding Ideal

  • "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." --John Adams (Federer, p. 10)

  • "It is impossible to rightly govern the world without God and the Bible" --George Washington (Federer, p.660)

  • "Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.... And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion ... Reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail to the exclusion of religious principle." --George Washington's Farewell Address

 

Judeo-Christian Roots

  • Leviticus 25:10 …proclaim liberty throughout all the land to all its inhabitants.

  • Jeremiah 24:17 “Therefore thus says the Lord: ‘You have not obeyed Me in proclaiming liberty, every one to his brother and every one to his neighbor. Behold, I proclaim liberty to you,’ says the Lord

  • 2 Chronicles 7:14 …if My people who are called by My name will humble themselves, and pray and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land. 

  • John 8:32 And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”

 

Principle: The Equality of Man

American Founding Ideal

  • "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal." --Declaration of Independence

  • "No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States" --U.S. Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 9, Paragraph 8

 

Judeo-Christian Roots

  • Deuteronomy 1:16 “Then I commanded your judges at that time, saying, ‘Hear the cases between your brethren, and judge righteously between a man and his brother or the stranger who is with him. 17 You shall not show partiality in judgment; you shall hear the small as well as the great; you shall not be afraid in any man’s presence, for the judgment is God’s. The case that is too hard for you, bring to me, and I will hear it.’ 

  • Leviticus 19:15 ‘You shall do no injustice in judgment. You shall not be partial to the poor, nor honor the person of the mighty. In righteousness you shall judge your neighbor. 

  • Acts 10:34 Then Peter opened his mouth and said: “In truth I perceive that God shows no partiality. 

  • Galatians 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 

 

Principle: God-Given Human Rights

American Founding Ideal

  • ".that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." --Declaration of Independence

 

Judeo-Christian Roots

  • Genesis 1:27 So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. 28 Then God blessed them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”

  • Exodus 20:13 “You shall not murder.

14 “You shall not commit adultery.

15 “You shall not steal.

16 “You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

17 “You shall not covet

Principle: Government authority by Consent of the Governed

American Founding Ideal

  • ".governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." --Declaration of Independence

  • "The United States shall guarantee to every state in this Union a republican form of government" --U.S Constitution, Art. IV, Section 4

 

Judeo-Christian Roots

  • Deuteronomy 16:18 “You shall appoint judges and officers in all your gates, which the Lord your God gives you, according to your tribes, and they shall judge the people with just judgment. 

  • Deuteronomy 1:13 Choose wise, understanding, and knowledgeable men from among your tribes, and I will make them heads over you.’ 14 And you answered me and said, ‘The thing which you have told us to do is good.’ 15 So I took the heads of your tribes, wise and knowledgeable men, and made them heads over you, leaders of thousands, leaders of hundreds, leaders of fifties, leaders of tens, and officers for your tribes.

 

Principle: Sanctity of Contract

American Founding Ideal

  • "No state shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts." --U.S Constitution, Art. I, Section 10, Paragraph 1

Judeo-Christian Roots

  • Numbers 30:2 If a man makes a vow to the Lord, or swears an oath to bind himself by some agreement, he shall not break his word; he shall do according to all that proceeds out of his mouth.

 

Principle: Two Witnesses

American Founding Ideal

  • "No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court." --U.S Constitution, Art. III, Section 3, Paragraph 1

Judeo-Christian Roots

  • Deuteronomy 17:6 Whoever is deserving of death shall be put to death on the testimony of two or three witnesses; he shall not be put to death on the testimony of one witness. 

 

Principle: No Corruption of Blood

American Founding Ideal

  • ".but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted." --U.S Constitution, Art. III, Section 3, Paragraph 2

Judeo-Christian Roots

  • Deuteronomy 24:16 “Fathers shall not be put to death for their children, nor shall children be put to death for their fathers; a person shall be put to death for his own sin.

 

Principle: Sabbath Day Excepted

American Founding Ideal

  • "If any bill shall not be returned by the President within ten days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the same shall be a law, in like manner as if he had signed it." --U.S Constitution, Art. I, Section 7, Paragraph 2

Judeo-Christian Roots

  • Exodus 20:8 “Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy. 9 Six days you shall labor and do all your work, 10 but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord your God. In it you shall do no work

 

Principle: Separation of Church and State

American Founding Ideal

  • "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. --First Amendment, U.S. Constitution

Judeo-Christian Roots

  • Luke 20:25 And He said to them, “Render[f] therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.”

 

Principle: Teaching the Law of Liberty to Next Generation

American Founding Ideal

  • "Let [the Constitution] be taught in schools, in seminaries, and in colleges, let it be written in primers, in spelling books and in almanacs, let it be preached from the pulpit, proclaimed in legislative halls, and enforced in courts of justice. And, in short, let it become the political religion of the nation." --Abraham Lincoln, "The Perpetuation of Our Political Institutions", January 27, 1838

Judeo-Christian Roots

  • Deuteronomy 6:7 You shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, when you walk by the way, when you lie down, and when you rise up.

Reagan on the Christian Heritage of America

(Lamb & Lion Ministries)

Was America established on Christian principles? 

Jonathan Cahn on the Biblical Blueprint for America

(Lamb & Lion Ministries w/ Jonathan Cahn)

What fascinating biblical blueprint is unfolding in America today?

Why Democracy Works (Faith Counts)

“Some time ago I had a conversation with a marxist economist from China. He was coming to the end of a Fulbright fellowship here in Boston, and I asked him if he had learned anything that was surprising or unexpected, and without any hesitation he said, ‘yeah, I had no idea how critical religion is to the functioning of democracy.’

 

’The reason why democracy works,’ he said, ‘is not because the government was designed to oversee what everybody does, but rather, democracy works because most people, most of the time, voluntarily choose to obey the law, and in your past, most Americans attended a church or a synagogue every week, and they were taught there by people who they respected.’

My friend went on to say that Americans followed these rules because they had come to believe that they were not just accountable to society but they were accountable to God. My Chinese friend heightened a vague but nagging concern I’ve harbored inside, that has religion loses its influence over the lives of Americans, what will happened to our democracy? Where are the institutions that are going to teach the next generation of Americans that they too need to voluntarily choose to obey the laws?”

Submitting to Govt
Submit to Governing Authorities – What does the Bible Say?

We ARE to submit to the governing authorities that submit to the higher authority of God.

We ARE NOT to submit to the governing authorities when they reject God’s authority (promote evil).

Romans 13:1-5 – Submission to Governing Authorities

Romans 13:1 Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. 2 Consequently, whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves. 3 For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and you will be commended. 4 For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer. 5 Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also as a matter of conscience.

Hebrews 13:16-17 – Concluding Religious Directions

Heb 13:16 But do not forget to do good and to share, for with such sacrifices God is well pleased. 17 Obey those who rule over you, and be submissive, for they watch out for your souls, as those who must give account. Let them do so with joy and not with grief, for that would be unprofitable for you.

John 19:10-11 – Pilate’s Decision

Jn 19:10 Then Pilate said to Him, “Are You not speaking to me? Do You not know that I have power to crucify You, and power to release You?” 11 Jesus answered, “You could have no power at all against Me unless it had been given you from above. Therefore the one who delivered Me to you has the greater sin.”

Daniel 2:19-21 – God Reveals Nebuchadnezzar’s Dream

Dan 2:19 Then the secret was revealed to Daniel in a night vision. So Daniel blessed the God of heaven.

20 Daniel answered and said: 

“Blessed be the name of God forever and ever, For wisdom and might are His.
21 And He changes the times and the seasons; He removes kings and raises up kings;
He gives wisdom to the wise And knowledge to those who have understanding.

1 Peter 2:13-16 – Submission to Government

1Pe 2:13 Therefore submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord’s sake, whether to the king as supreme, 14 or to governors, as to those who are sent by him for the punishment of evildoers and for the praise of those who do good. 15 For this is the will of God, that by doing good you may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men— 16 as free, yet not using liberty as a cloak for vice, but as bondservants of God. 

Proverbs 29:2 – Happy Is He Who Keeps the Law

Pro 29:2 When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; But when a wicked man rules, the people groan.

Isaiah 3:11-12 – Judgment on Judah and Jerusalem

Is 3:11 Woe to the wicked! It shall be ill with him, For the reward of his hands shall be given him.
12 As for My people, children are their oppressors, And women rule over them.
O My people! Those who lead you cause you to err, And destroy the way of your paths.”

Acts 4:17-20 – The Name of Jesus Forbidden

Acts 4:17 But so that it spreads no further among the people, let us severely threaten them, that from now on they speak to no man in this name.” 18 So they called them and commanded them not to speak at all nor teach in the name of Jesus. 19 But Peter and John answered and said to them, “Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you more than to God, you judge. 20 For we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard.” 

Acts 5:25-29 – The Apostles Persecuted

Acts 5:25 Then someone came and said, “Look! The men you put in jail are standing in the temple courts teaching the people.” 26 At that, the captain went with his officers and brought the apostles. They did not use force, because they feared that the people would stone them. 27 The apostles were brought in and made to appear before the Sanhedrin to be questioned by the high priest. 28 “We gave you strict orders not to teach in this name,” he said. “Yet you have filled Jerusalem with your teaching and are determined to make us guilty of this man’s blood.” 29 Peter and the other apostles replied: “We must obey God rather than human beings! 

Titus 3:1-2 – Graces of the Heirs of Grace

Tit 3:1 Remind them to be subject to rulers and authorities, to obey, to be ready for every good work, 2 to speak evil of no one, to be peaceable, gentle, showing all humility to all men. 

Supreme Court Rulings that have removed God from the Country
 

Contrary to the Lord's commands, America has made it illegal to teach about God and to pray to Him in public schools.

America has made it legal to murder unborn children and has legalized homosexuality in the form of God's sacred institution, marriage!

Start 27:56

Engel v. Vitale (1962) – Removed prayer from schools

Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that it is unconstitutional for state officials to compose an official school prayer and encourage its recitation in public schools.

In a 6–1 decision, the Supreme Court held that reciting government-written prayers in public schools was unconstitutional, violating the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

In his opinion for the Court, Justice Black explained the importance of separation between church and state by giving a lengthy history of the issue, beginning with the 16th century in England. He noted that prayer is a religious activity by its very nature, and that prescribing such a religious activity for school children violates the Establishment Clause.

The Court rejected the defendant's arguments that students were not asked to observe any specific established religion, that the traditional heritage of the nation was religious, and that the prayer was voluntary. The Court held that the mere promotion of a religion is sufficient to establish a violation, even if that promotion is not coercive. The Court further held that the fact that the prayer is vaguely-enough worded not to promote any particular religion is not a sufficient defense, as it still promotes a family of religions (those that recognize "Almighty God"), which still violates the Establishment Clause.

In a concurring opinion, Justice Douglas argued that the Establishment Clause is also violated when the government grants financial aid to religious schools.

In his dissenting opinion, Justice Stewart contended that the Establishment Clause was originally written to abolish the idea of a state-sponsored church, and not to stop a non-mandatory "brief non-denominational prayer".

Abington School District vs Schempp (1963) - Removal of Bible reading in public schools

Abington School District v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 (1963), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court decided 8–1 in favor of the respondent, Edward Schempp on behalf of his son Ellery Schempp, and declared that school-sponsored Bible reading in public schools in the United States was unconstitutional.

Roe vs Wade (1973) – Legalized abortions

 

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects a pregnant woman's liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction. It struck down many U.S. federal and state abortion laws, and prompted an ongoing national debate in the United States about whether and to what extent abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, what methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication, and what the role of religious and moral views in the political sphere should be. Roe v. Wade reshaped American politics, dividing much of the United States into abortion rights and anti-abortion movements, while activating grassroots movements on both sides.

The decision involved the case of Norma McCorvey—known in her lawsuit under the pseudonym "Jane Roe"—who in 1969 became pregnant with her third child. McCorvey wanted an abortion, but she lived in Texas, where abortion was illegal except when necessary to save the mother's life. She was referred to lawyers Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee, who filed a lawsuit on her behalf in U.S. federal court against her local district attorney, Henry Wade, alleging that Texas's abortion laws were unconstitutional. A three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas heard the case and ruled in her favor. Texas then appealed this ruling directly to the U.S. Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case.

In January 1973, the Supreme Court issued a 7–2 decision ruling that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides a "right to privacy" that protects a pregnant woman's right to choose whether or not to have an abortion. But it also ruled that this right is not absolute, and must be balanced against the government's interests in protecting women's health and protecting prenatal life. The Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the three trimesters of pregnancy: during the first trimester, governments could not prohibit abortions at all; during the second trimester, governments could require reasonable health regulations; during the third trimester, abortions could be prohibited entirely so long as the laws contained exceptions for cases when they were necessary to save the life or health of the mother. The Court classified the right to choose to have an abortion as "fundamental", which required courts to evaluate challenged abortion laws under the "strict scrutiny" standard, the highest level of judicial review in the United States.

Roe was criticized by some in the legal community, and some have called the decision a form of judicial activism. In 1992, the Supreme Court revisited and modified its legal rulings in Roe in the case of Planned Parenthood v. Casey. In Casey, the Court reaffirmed Roe's holding that a woman's right to choose to have an abortion is constitutionally protected, but abandoned Roe's trimester framework in favor of a standard based on fetal viability, and overruled Roe's requirement that government regulations on abortion be subjected to the strict scrutiny standard.

Since this ruling, there have been over 60 million abortions in the US alone.

US vs Windsor (2013)

Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which stated that one man should be married to one woman

United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S. 744 (2013), is a landmark United States Supreme Court civil rights case concerning same-sex marriage. The Court held that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which denied federal recognition of same-sex marriages, was a violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer, a same-sex couple residing in New York, had their marriage recognized by the state of New York in 2008; Spyer died in 2009, leaving her entire estate to Windsor. Windsor sought to claim the federal estate tax exemption for surviving spouses, but was barred from doing so by Section 3 of DOMA. Seeking a refund, Windsor sued the federal government in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. As the Department of Justice declined to defend the constitutionality of Section 3 of DOMA, the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) intervened to defend the law. District Judge Barbara S. Jones ruled that Section 3 of DOMA was unconstitutional, and her ruling was affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

The Supreme Court granted certiorari in December 2012 and handed down its judgment on June 26, 2013. In the majority opinion, which was joined by four other justices, Justice Anthony Kennedy declared Section 3 of DOMA to be unconstitutional "as a deprivation of the liberty of the person protected by the Fifth Amendment". He further wrote: "The federal statute is invalid, for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and to injure those whom the State, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity." Four justices filed dissenting opinions, including Justice Antonin Scalia, who argued that the Court had "no power under the Constitution to invalidate this democratically adopted legislation."

On the same day, the Court also issued a separate 5–4 decision in Hollingsworth v. Perry that effectively allowed same-sex marriage in California to resume. Following the decision, the Obama administration began to extend other federal rights, privileges, and benefits to married same-sex couples. Two years later, in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges, the Court struck down all state bans on same-sex marriage, ruling that marriage is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause.

DOMA is Biblically supported - Ge 2:24 Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.

Obergefell vs Hodges (2015) - Ruled in favor of same sex marriages

Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015) (/ˈoʊbərɡəfɛl/ OH-bər-gə-fel), is a landmark civil rights case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The 5–4 ruling requires all fifty states, the District of Columbia, and the Insular Areas to perform and recognize the marriages of same-sex couples on the same terms and conditions as the marriages of opposite-sex couples, with all the accompanying rights and responsibilities.

Between January 2012 and February 2014, plaintiffs in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee filed federal district court cases that culminated in Obergefell v. Hodges. After all district courts ruled for the plaintiffs, the rulings were appealed to the Sixth Circuit. In November 2014, following a series of appeals court rulings that year from the Fourth, Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits that state-level bans on same-sex marriage were unconstitutional, the Sixth Circuit ruled that it was bound by Baker v. Nelson and found such bans to be constitutional. This created a split between circuits and led to a Supreme Court review.

Decided on June 26, 2015, Obergefell overturned Baker and requires all states to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and to recognize same-sex marriages validly performed in other jurisdictions. This established same-sex marriage throughout the United States and its territories. In a majority opinion authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Court examined the nature of fundamental rights guaranteed to all by the Constitution, the harm done to individuals by delaying the implementation of such rights while the democratic process plays out, and the evolving understanding of discrimination and inequality that has developed greatly since Baker.

Prior to Obergefell, same-sex marriage had already been established by law, court ruling, or voter initiative in thirty-six states, the District of Columbia, and Guam.

Supreme Court Rulings
America

WHAT IS HAPPENING IN AMERICA

Democracy / Republic --> Oligarchy

See Future Prophecies - Destruction of the United States

Archbishop Viganò’s Startling Warning to the American People

https://theaquilareport.com/archbishop-viganos-startling-warning-to-the-american-people/

The archbishop has issued a Christmas letter to the United States that is unusually blunt about what he sees as a conspiracy underlying the handling of COVID.

Written by Thomas Lifson | Friday, December 31, 2021

We all know how much the mainstream media has contributed to supporting the insane pandemic narrative, the interests that are at stake, and the goals of these groups of power: reducing the world population, making those who survive chronically ill, and imposing forms of control that violate the fundamental rights and natural liberties of citizens. And yet, two years after this grotesque farce started, which has claimed more victims than a war and destroyed the social fabric, national economies, and the very foundations of the rule of law, nothing has changed in the policies of Nations and their response to the so-called pandemic.

 

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò is a noteworthy maverick within the Catholic Church hierarchy.  He retired as papal nuncio to the United States in 2016 and has exposed what he sees as great scandals within his Church.  This lengthy Wikipedia entry provides background.

 

The archbishop has issued a Christmas letter to the United States that is unusually blunt about what he sees as a conspiracy underlying the handling of COVID.  Archbishop Vigano first shared this message with John Wells on Ark Midnight’s The Fortnight Intelligence Briefing. The letter was then published in Gateway Pundit but is presented here for readers’ convenience.

DEAR AMERICAN PEOPLE, DEAR FRIENDS, for two years now, a global coup has been carried out all over the world, planned for some time by an elite group of conspirators enslaved to the interests of international high finance. This coup was made possible by an emergency pandemic that is based on the premise of a virus that has a mortality rate almost analogous to that of any other seasonal flu virus, on the delegitimization and prohibition of effective treatments, and on the distribution of an experimental gene serum which is obviously ineffective, and which also clearly carries with it the danger of serious and even lethal side effects. We all know how much the mainstream media has contributed to supporting the insane pandemic narrative, the interests that are at stake, and the goals of these groups of power: reducing the world population, making those who survive chronically ill, and imposing forms of control that violate the fundamental rights and natural liberties of citizens. And yet, two years after this grotesque farce started, which has claimed more victims than a war and destroyed the social fabric, national economies, and the very foundations of the rule of law, nothing has changed in the policies of Nations and their response to the so-called pandemic.

Last year, when many still had not yet understood the gravity of the looming threat, I was among the first to denounce this coup, and I was promptly singled out as a conspiracy theorist. Today more and more people are opening their eyes and beginning to understand that the emergency pandemic and the ”ecological emergency” are part of a criminal plan hatched by the World Economic Forum, the UN, the WHO, and a galaxy of organizations and foundations that are ideologically characterized as clearly anti-human and — this needs to be said clearly — anti-Christian.

One of the elements that unequivocally confirms the criminal nature of the Great Reset is the perfect synchrony with which all the different Nations are acting, demonstrating the existence of a single script under a single direction. And it is disconcerting to see how the lack of treatment, the deliberately wrong treatments that have been given in order to cause more deaths, the decision to impose lock downs and masks, the conspiratorial silence about the adverse effects of the so-called “vaccines” that are in fact gene serums, and the continuous repetition of culpable errors have all been possible thanks to the complicity of those who govern and the institutions. Political and religious leaders, representatives of the people, scientists and doctors, journalists and those who work in the media have literally betrayed their people, their laws, their Constitutions, and the most basic ethical principles.

The electoral fraud of the 2020 presidential election against President Trump has shown itself to be organic to this global operation, because in order to impose illegitimate restrictions in violation of the principles of law it was necessary to be able to make use of an American President who would support the psycho-pandemic and support its narrative. The Democratic Party, part of the deep state, is carrying out its task as an accomplice of the system, just as the deep church finds in Bergoglio its own propagandist. The recent rulings of the Supreme Court and the autonomous action of some American states — where the vaccination obligation has been declared unconstitutional — give us hope that this criminal plan can collapse and that those responsible will be identified and tried: both in America as well as in the whole world.

How was it possible to arrive at such a betrayal? How have we come to be considered enemies by those who govern us, not in support of the common good, but rather to feed a hellish machine of death and slavery?

The answer is now clear: throughout the world, in the name of a perverted concept of freedom, we have progressively erased God from society and laws. We have denied that there is an eternal and transcendent principle, valid for all men of all times, to which the laws of States must conform. We have replaced this absolute principle with the arbitrariness of individuals, with the principle that everyone is his own legislator.

Archbishop Viganò’s Startling Warning to the American People

Biden Admin & The Media are Working Together to Destroy America (Charlie Kirk)

Charlie joined Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures to discuss the sinister partnership between the activist media and the Biden Administration to make America a radically more "progressive" nation.

The Plot To Destroy America | The Ben Shapiro Show Ep. 1103

(The Daily Wire)

Get your copy of "How to Destroy America in Three Easy Steps" here: https://utm.io/uHjV

AMERICAN OLIGARCHY Podcast Ep 85 (Dinesh D'Souza)

In this episode, Dinesh argues that it's not about the woke corporations or the woke CIA or the woke media, because these are all the same people--the new American oligarchy.  Kamala Harris insists South Americans want to come to America because of the effects of climate change; Dinesh envisions how a dialog might go between a poor Salvadoran farmer and the cackling Kamala. Also, Senator Josh Hawley joins Dinesh to talk about the best practical ways to fight digital censorship.

America Today Isn't a Democracy or a Republic - It's an Oligarchy (Dinesh D'Souza)

Are we a democracy? Or a republic? Actually, neither. America today has come to resemble an oligarchy.

America’s Future (Christ in Prophecy)

Is America facing revival or destruction?

CANCEL HISTORY AND CULTURE / REPLACE WITH WOKENESS

Erasing History - Societal Chaos :: By Dr. David R. Reagan

https://christinprophecy.org/articles/erasing-history/

[read in Lamplighter (pdf)]

“The foundations of law and order have collapsed.
What can the righteous do?”
(Psalm 11:3)

 

When the mobs started tearing down statues of Confederate generals, we yawned. When they shifted their attention to memorials of Confederate soldiers, we shrugged our shoulders. When they actually started destroying statues of abolitionists, including President Abe Lincoln, we woke up. It was only when the mobs decided that the Lincoln Memorial, the Jefferson Memorial and the images of presidents on Mount Rushmore had to be destroyed that we became outraged.

What we have been witnessing is barbarians intimidating spineless politicians who are unwilling to take any decisive action to stop the insanity — forcing President Trump to intervene.

The Justification

There is really no justification in destroying any of these statues. One of the most beautiful ones to come under attack is in Dallas, Texas. It depicted General Robert E. Lee riding a horse with a young boy riding alongside of him. It was sculptured by A. Phimister Proctor (1860-1950), who is considered to have been one of the greatest sculptors of animals.

The statue was dedicated on July 12, 1936 by President Franklin D. Roosevelt who described Lee as “one of the greatest American Christians and one of our greatest American gentlemen.” At least this priceless work of art was not destroyed. Instead, the Dallas City Council voted to remove it and put it in storage.

All across the South, governors and mayors have given in to pressure to remove memorials to Confederate soldiers. This has been very disturbing to me. These are not memorials to slavery. They were erected in memory of husbands, fathers, sons and brothers who were killed in America’s bloodiest war. What about their descendants? Are we to have no compassion for them as the memorials to their ancestors are defaced, destroyed or hidden?

A Local Example of Compassion

In McKinney, Texas, close to where I live, there is a beautiful cemetery still in operation today that contains the burial places of many Confederate soldiers. Are their graves to be desecrated?

I am pleased to report that just the opposite has been the case for several years — all due to a Boy Scout who needed a community project to earn a particular merit badge. His parents had been taking him for years to visit the cemetery on each Memorial Day because the city sponsored a special commemorative service. The boy noted that a small flag was placed at the grave of every person who had served in the U.S. Armed Forces, but there was no recognition of Confederate graves. So, he came up with the idea of also marking the graves of Confederate soldiers with a Confederate flag.

It was an idea that deeply touched the hearts of many people because it was an idea motivated by love rather than hate. I was pleased to see this last year that the procedure was still taking place, although the Confederate Battle Flag had been replaced with the regular flag of the Confederacy.

Attacks on Lincoln!

Once the mobs started tearing down statues, their appetite became both insane and insatiable. The wonderful Lincoln Emancipation statue in Washington, D.C., and its duplicate in Boston became targets.

Why Lincoln? There didn’t need to be any reason — although some were given. “The statue shows a black man kneeling before a white man.” No, it shows a freed black man rising up from his slavery. One mob member justified his actions by declaring, “Lincoln didn’t go far enough!” Incredible! Lincoln only gave his life on behalf of emancipation.

President Trump intervened to save the statue in Washington, D.C., and he provided protection for all the other statues in the city. In contrast, the Boston City Council voted unanimously to remove their copy of the statue to storage!

Incidentally, the original Lincoln statue in Washington, D.C. was paid for by donations from former slaves. It was dedicated on the 11th anniversary of Lincoln’s death by Frederick Douglass, who was the leading black abolitionist. Why in the world would such a statue be offensive to those demonstrating against racism?

The Height of Irrationality

The point is that reason has been thrown to the wind. Further evidence can be found in the wanton destruction of the statue of Hans Christian Heg which has stood in front of the Wisconsin Capitol building since 1925. And its destruction was not enough to satisfy the mob. They actually hauled the statue to Lake Manona and threw it into the water!

And who was Mr. Heg? He was a Norwegian immigrant who came to the United States in 1840 and became the leading abolitionist in the State of Wisconsin. He was appointed a colonel in the Wisconsin infantry and was killed in the Battle of Chickamauga in Georgia in September of 1863 while fighting to free the slaves.

The rationale for destroying Heg’s statue was the same as an attempt to destroy Ulysses S. Grant’s statue in New York City. It just happened to be convenient. Who cares that Grant led the Union Forces to the victory that freed the slaves? Mobs are not characterized by rationality.

Further, these actions have made it clear that anarchists who hate America have been using racial equality as a pretext for rampant and widespread destruction. Yet cowardly politicians continue to do nothing in response for fear they will be labeled “racists.”

The Newest Targets

And then, there are our Founding Fathers — like Washington and Jefferson and Hamilton. They have to go too. After all, they actually owned slaves. Yes, they did, as did most of the people worldwide at that time who could afford to do so. But through the Declaration of Independence and our Constitution, our Founding Fathers laid down the philosophical principles that guaranteed the ultimate abolition of slavery.

Tearing down statues does not erase history. But it does help to hide it from future generations. And that is dangerous because those who do not know history are destined to repeat it. Why not use these monuments as teaching aids to impress upon young minds the horrors of racism?

Further, if we can erect statues only to perfect people, then all statues must come down, including the newly erected one of Martin Luther King, Jr. There has been only one perfect person, and that one is Jesus of Nazareth. And even His statues have come under attack because “they portray Him as a white man.”

All of this statue-bashing is just sheer insanity.

A Fundamental Question

I have a crucial question for the persons in the mobs. Why do they think they are so morally superior to the people whose statues they are defacing or destroying? I would be willing to say that the overwhelming majority of those participating in the mobs favor the killing of the most innocent life on planet earth — namely, babies in their mother’s wombs.

Our Founding Fathers would have been adamantly opposed to abortion. In fact, it would have been beyond their imaginations that American society would ever become so secular and pagan that the murder of babies would become legal.

I wonder, too, how many of the self-righteous people in the mobs are living together immorally without being married? How many of them are actively involved in promoting the Sexual Perversion Movement in our nation? How many are obsessed with pornography? How many are motivated by an overwhelming hatred of Christianity and the Bible? How many of them are anti-Semites, like the leadership of the Black Lives Matter organization? In the words of Jesus, “Let him who is without sin cast the first stone” (John 8:7).

Luke 6:41 “How can you say to your brother, ‘Brother, let me take out the speck that is in your eye,’ when you yourself do not see the log that is in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take out the speck that is in your brother’s eye.”

THE “WOKE” RUSE (Dinesh D'Souza)

Cancel Culture: Social Media Blackouts Are Coming to Believers

Rock Harbor Church Prophecy Update

The World has changed almost overnight. Now we are watching America turn into a totalitarian state and censorship is happening. No one cares about facts and evidence. The globalist communist narrative is the narrative and the agenda is the most important. Blackouts are coming for believers as more and more people will just be removed from social media platforms.

Cancel Culture
Erasing History - Societal Chaos

CREATE ONE-WORLD ANTICHRIST SYSTEM

SOCIALISM / COMMUNISM / MARXISM

See One World - Government for the United Nations (UN) and World Economic Forum (WEF) agendas, The New World Order

Socialism

http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/socialism.html

Socialism is the doctrine that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that his life and his work do not belong to him, but belong to society, that the only justification of his existence is his service to society, and that society may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good.

The essential characteristic of socialism is the denial of individual property rights; under socialism, the right to property (which is the right of use and disposal) is vested in “society as a whole,” i.e., in the collective, with production and distribution controlled by the state, i.e., by the government.

The alleged goals of socialism were: the abolition of poverty, the achievement of general prosperity, progress, peace and human brotherhood. The results have been a terrifying failure—terrifying, that is, if one’s motive is men’s welfare. Instead of prosperity, socialism has brought economic paralysis and/or collapse to every country that tried it. The degree of socialization has been the degree of disaster. 

When one observes the nightmare of the desperate efforts made by hundreds of thousands of people struggling to escape from the socialized countries of Europe, to escape over barbed-wire fences, under machine-gun fire—one can no longer believe that socialism, in any of its forms, is motivated by benevolence and by the desire to achieve men’s welfare. No man of authentic benevolence could evade or ignore so great a horror on so vast a scale.

Socialism is not a movement of the people. It is a movement of the intellectuals, originated, led and controlled by the intellectuals, carried by them out of their stuffy ivory towers into those bloody fields of practice where they unite with their allies and executors: the thugs.

The fallacies and contradictions in the economic theories of socialism were exposed and refuted time and time again, in the Nineteenth Century as well as today. This did not and does not stop anyone: it is not an issue of economics, but of morality. The intellectuals and the so-called idealists were determined to make socialism work. How? By that magic means of all irrationalists: somehow.

There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by force, socialism—by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and suicide.

Both “socialism” and “fascism” involve the issue of property rights. The right to property is the right of use and disposal. Observe the difference in those two theories: socialism negates private property rights altogether, and advocates “the vesting of ownership and control” in the community as a whole, i.e., in the state; fascism leaves ownership in the hands of private individuals, but transfers control of the property to the government.

Ownership without control is a contradiction in terms: it means “property,” without the right to use it or to dispose of it. It means that the citizens retain the responsibility of holding property, without any of its advantages, while the government acquires all the advantages without any of the responsibility.

Socialism is Coming!

(Lamb & Lion Ministries - Prophetic Perspectives #149)

Socialism is coming! What will it do to America? 

Have You Noticed?...Something Strange is Going on in the World (The Watchman)

Was socialism taught in the Bible (Start 4:56) 

Are People Afraid Of Freedom? (Charlie Kirk)

Freedom is like a muscle, if you don't use it, you lose it. If you don't want to wear a mask, don't! But don't stop people from living their lives. Why does it seem like the American people are afraid of freedom?

Jesus Christ Was NOT A Socialist (Charlie Kirk)

Don't let anyone in the media or academia lie to you. Read the scripture, know the truth.

Our GOVERNMENT WANTS the SAME oppression as CUBA!!! (James Kaddis)

It's amazing to see how the Biden administration fueled by the Woke industrial complex Deeply desires what Cubans are now fighting to be free from! It's time to stand against this nonsense!!!

Socialism/Communism/Marxism
CREATE ONE-WORLD ANTICHRIST SYSTEM
Socialism

How should a Christian view socialism?

https://www.gotquestions.org/socialism-Christian.html

Socialism is a societal system in which property, natural resources, and the means of production are owned and controlled by the state rather than by individuals or private companies. A basic belief of socialism is that society as a whole should share in all goods produced, as everyone lives in cooperation with one another. Various theories of socialism have been put forward from ancient times, including a form of Christian socialism.

The most prominent philosopher to argue in favor of socialism was Karl Marx, who taught that the driving factor behind all of human history is economics. Marx was born to German Jewish parents in 1818 and received his doctorate at age 23. He then embarked on a mission to prove that human identity is bound up in a person’s work and that economic systems totally control a person. Arguing that mankind survives by labor, Marx believed that human communities are created by the division of labor.

Marx saw the Industrial Revolution as changing the basic lifestyle of humanity, because, in Marx’s mind, those who had freely worked for themselves were now forced by economics to work in factories instead. This, Marx felt, stripped away their dignity and identity, and now they were reduced to mere slaves controlled by a powerful taskmaster. This perspective made the economics of capitalism the natural enemy of Marx’s brand of socialism.

Socialism seeks to do away with private property. Karl Marx surmised that capitalism emphasizes private property and, therefore, reduced ownership to the privileged few. Two separate “communities” emerged in Marx’s mind: the business owners, or the bourgeoisie; and the working class, or the proletariat. According to Marx, the bourgeoisie use and exploit the proletariat with the result that one person’s gain is another person’s loss. Moreover, Marx believed that the business owners influence lawmakers to ensure their interests are defended over the workers’ loss of dignity and rights. Last, Marx felt that religion is the “opiate of the masses,” which the rich use to manipulate the working class; the proletariat is promised rewards in heaven one day if they keep working diligently where God has placed them (subservient to the bourgeoisie).

In the socialism Marx envisioned, the people own everything collectively, and all work for the common good of mankind. Marx’s goal was to end the ownership of private property through the state’s ownership of all means of economic production. Once private property was abolished, Marx felt that a person’s identity would be elevated and the wall that capitalism supposedly constructed between the owners and working class would be shattered. Everyone would value one another and work together for a shared purpose. Government would no longer be necessary, as people would become less selfish.

There are at least four errors in Marx’s thinking, revealing some flaws in socialism. First, his assertion that another person’s gain must come at another person’s expense is a myth; the structure of capitalism leaves plenty of room for all to raise their standard of living through innovation and competition. It is perfectly feasible for multiple parties to compete and do well in a market of consumers who want their goods and services.

Second, Marx was wrong in his socialist belief that the value of a product is based on the amount of labor that is put into it. The quality of a good or service simply cannot be determined by the amount of effort a laborer expends. For example, a master carpenter can more quickly and beautifully make a piece of furniture than an unskilled craftsmen can, and therefore his work will be valued far more (and correctly so) in an economic system such as capitalism.

Third, Marx’s theory of socialism necessitates a government that is free from corruption and negates the possibility of elitism within its ranks. If history has shown anything, it is that power corrupts fallen mankind, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. People do not naturally become less selfish. A nation or government may kill the idea of God, but someone will take God’s place in that government. That someone is most often an individual or group who begins to rule over the population and seeks to maintain their privileged position at all costs. This is why socialism has led to dictatorships so often in world history.

Fourth and most importantly, socialism is wrong in teaching that a person’s identity is bound up in the work that he does. Although secular society certainly promotes this belief, the Bible says that all have equal worth because all are created in the image of the eternal God. True, intrinsic human value lies in God’s creation of us.

Was Marx right in saying that economics is the catalyst that drives human history? No, what directs human history is the Creator of the universe who controls everything, including the rise and fall of every nation. God also controls who is put in charge of each nation: “The Most High is ruler over the realm of mankind, and bestows it on whom He wishes and sets over it the lowliest of men” (Daniel 4:17). Further, it is God who gives a person skill at labor and the wealth that comes from it, not the government: “Here is what I have seen to be good and fitting: to eat, to drink and enjoy oneself in all one’s labor in which he toils under the sun during the few years of his life which God has given him; for this is his reward. Furthermore, as for every man to whom God has given riches and wealth, He has also empowered him to eat from them and to receive his reward and rejoice in his labor; this is the gift of God” (Ecclesiastes 5:18–19).

Socialism, for all its popularity in some circles, is not a biblical model for society. In opposition to socialism, the Bible promotes the idea of private property and issues commands to respect it: commands such as “You shall not steal” (Deuteronomy 5:19) are meaningless without private property. Unlike what we see in failed experiments in socialism, the Bible honors work and teaches that individuals are responsible to support themselves: “The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat” (2 Thessalonians 3:10). The redistribution of wealth foundational to socialism destroys accountability and the biblical work ethic. Jesus’ parable in Matthew 25:14–30 clearly teaches our responsibility to serve God with our (private) resources.

How should a Christian view socialism?

What is Christian Socialism?

https://www.gotquestions.org/Christian-Socialism.html

Socialism is a system in which the means of production, distribution, and exchange of goods are regulated by the community as a whole. It is often juxtaposed with capitalism, a system in which the means of production, distribution, and exchange are controlled by each individual. “Redistribution of wealth” is a key socialist concept, and it means that wealth is taken from the “rich” and redistributed to the poor so that it is spread out more equally.

In the mid-nineteenth century, Christian Socialism was interested in improving the plight of the poor by various social programs. Many of the reforms regarding working conditions came out of these efforts. In more recent years, Christian Socialism has come to refer to any system that combines the goals of socialism with the ethics of Christianity. Many Christians, especially among millennials, see socialism as a viable political option.

Socialism has long been associated with leftist politics. In recent years, there have been more and more evangelicals who advocate for some form of socialism in the society at large. Capitalism is rejected as unchristian because it is supposedly based on greed. Capitalism is seen to be the cause of inequality as the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, which seems to go against biblical values. In contrast, socialism is seen as a system in which the less fortunate can be cared for in a compassionate way by the community.

A number of biblical passages are mustered to support the view of Christian Socialism. Many passages in the Old Testament speak of helping the poor and the weak, and some find an example of Christian Socialism in the early church:

“Learn to do right; seek justice. Defend the oppressed. Take up the cause of the fatherless; plead the case of the widow” (Isaiah 1:17).

“When you are harvesting in your field and you overlook a sheaf, do not go back to get it. Leave it for the foreigner, the fatherless and the widow, so that the Lord your God may bless you in all the work of your hands. When you beat the olives from your trees, do not go over the branches a second time. Leave what remains for the foreigner, the fatherless and the widow. When you harvest the grapes in your vineyard, do not go over the vines again. Leave what remains for the foreigner, the fatherless and the widow. Remember that you were slaves in Egypt. That is why I command you to do this” (Deuteronomy 24:19–22).

“All the believers were one in heart and mind. No one claimed that any of their possessions was their own, but they shared everything they had. With great power the apostles continued to testify to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus. And God’s grace was so powerfully at work in them all that there were no needy persons among them. For from time to time those who owned land or houses sold them, brought the money from the sales and put it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to anyone who had need” (Acts 4:32–35).

Jesus said that, after loving God, the supreme commandment is to love your neighbor as yourself (see Matthew 22:25–40Mark 12:28–31Luke 10:25–28).

Christian Socialists, among whom are a growing number of evangelicals, seek to influence public policy so that society will become less capitalistic and more socialistic, and they see this as a means to live out the biblical passages mentioned above.

While it seems like a noble effort, there are some problems with Christian Socialism. The most glaring is that none of the passages mentioned above call for a socialist society or mandates a redistribution of wealth. In the Old Testament, when Israel was a theocracy, it was still a capitalistic society with private property rights and commerce whereby some people gained great wealth while others did not. The Law did not call Israel to redistribute wealth or censure people who gained wealth; rather, there were programs in place to prevent generational poverty (e.g., limitation of debt slavery and the Year of Jubilee). The rich were forbidden to take unfair advantage of the poor (Deuteronomy 24:15Proverbs 22:22), and certain practices (like the partial gleaning mentioned in Deuteronomy 24) were instituted so that the working poor could still get enough to eat.

The New Testament does not call for the church to embrace socialism within the church, much less in society at large. The one example often referred to, in Acts 4, specifically rejects any kind of mandatory socialism. The donations given in Acts 4 were completely voluntary. In the next chapter, Ananias and his wife, Sapphira, sold some land and contributed money to help the poor, but they kept back part of it for themselves. Peter condemns them not because they kept part of the money but because they lied, misrepresenting their gift and the extent of their generosity. “Then Peter said, ‘Ananias, how is it that Satan has so filled your heart that you have lied to the Holy Spirit and have kept for yourself some of the money you received for the land? Didn’t it belong to you before it was sold? And after it was sold, wasn’t the money at your disposal? What made you think of doing such a thing? You have not lied just to human beings but to God’” (Acts 5:3–4).

The early church demonstrated a pattern of generous giving as the Lord had blessed individuals and as He led them to give to help the poor. There is no mandated redistribution of wealth, and the example of the Jerusalem church was not meant to be taken as a model for national governments. Paul regularly collected offerings from churches to help believers in other places. He asked them to give generously, but the gift was not mandated. In writing to the Corinthians to remind them that he will be taking a collection for poor believers, Paul says, “Each of you should give what you have decided in your heart to give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver” (2 Corinthians 9:7). The pattern in the New Testament is voluntary, joyful generosity (see also 1 Timothy 6:17–19).

It may be that Christians in the United States have not been generous enough and have selfishly focused on building wealth and living in luxury. It is possible that this self-indulgence has pushed a younger generation toward Christian Socialism as a political philosophy. However, socialism, when applied on a grand scale, has never worked to create wealth or to enrich the lives of people. Far more is accomplished by robust capitalism accompanied by generosity. Unfortunately, generosity cannot be legislated, and the redistribution of wealth usually causes a decrease in the activities that produce wealth, leaving generous people with much less to be generous with.

What is Christian Socialism?
The Immorality of Socialism, The Need for Common Sense

THE IMMORALITY OF SOCIALISM - The Immorality of Socialism, The Need for Common Sense   By Dr. David R. Reagan

https://christinprophecy.org/articles/the-immorality-of-socialism/

The Rise and Fall of Socialism in America

The Socialist Party of America was founded in 1901. It received support from trade unionists, progressive social reformers, populist farmers, and various immigrant groups. But it never did well at the polls, particularly in presidential elections. And its staunch opposition to American involvement in World War I resulted in a large number of defections.

The best showing ever for a Socialist ticket was in 1912, when their candidate, Eugene Debs, received 901,551 total votes, or 6% of the popular vote. In 1920 Debs ran again, this time from prison, and received 913,693 votes, 3.4% of the total.

Socialism rebounded in the 1930s during the Great Depression under the leadership of Norman Thomas, but President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal policies, which introduced America to Welfare–Statism, prevented Socialism from gathering much steam. Later, the party’s opposition to American involvement in World War II cost it much of its support.

The party stopped running presidential candidates after 1956 when its nominee won fewer than 6,000 votes. The party decided, instead, to focus its efforts on educational programs. In the early 1970s the party splintered into three main groups, and the original party changed its name to Social Democrats, USA.

The Resurrection of Socialism in America

It was therefore startling to most people when Newsweek magazine proclaimed on the cover of its February 6, 2009 issue that “We Are All Socialists Now.” As proof, the magazine pointed to the fact that the U.S. government had already — under a conservative Republican administration — effectively nationalized the banking and mortgage industries. The writer of the cover article then asserted, “Whether we want to admit it or not…the America of 2009 is moving toward a modern European state.”

 

How can this resurrection of Socialism be explained? It relates to the rapid secularization and paganization of American society in recent years, especially since the election of President Barack Obama in 2008.

Socialism always flourishes in a secular society. And the reason is simple. Here’s how Robert Knight of the American Civil Rights Union explained it in a recent article: “…Socialism goes hand in hand with abandoning God and worshiping the idol of an ever–growing government.”

And that’s how United States Senator Bernard Sanders of Vermont, an openly avowed Socialist, won more than 12 million votes in the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries — by promising that government would become the National Nanny by providing every need. He promised free college, free health care and another $10 trillion in federal spending. When considering such reckless promises, Robert Knight asks, “What’s not to like if you view government as an ATM machine for all your needs?” Or, to put it another way, “Who needs God when government will supply everyone’s needs at someone else’s expense?”

 

The Competing Systems

There are really only two types of social organization — collectivism and individualism. In the 20th Century, collectivism took many forms, such as Socialism, Fascism, Nazism, Welfare Statism and Communism. The alternative system, and the only one compatible with individualism and freedom, is Capitalism.

Collectivist systems like Socialism rely on state power to forcibly redistribute wealth. These systems amount to legalized theft. C. Bradley Thompson, who is a professor at Ashland University and a staff member at the John M. Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs, has summarized Socialism brilliantly as a ruling system that “uses compulsion and the organized violence of the State to expropriate wealth from the producer class for its redistribution to the parasitical class.”

Defenders of Socialism always try to present themselves as compassionate people who care for the underprivileged. They characterize Capitalism as a dog–eat–dog system that produces inequities, with great disparities between the rich and the poor. Thompson responds to these arguments as follows:

Yes, there are winners and losers in Capitalism. The winners are those who are honest, industrious, thoughtful, prudent, frugal, responsible, disciplined and efficient. The losers are those who are shiftless, lazy, imprudent, extravagant, negligent, impractical and inefficient. Capitalism is the only social system that rewards virtue and punishes vice.

 

Thompson then sums up his whole argument against Socialism by saying, “Simply put, Socialism rewards sloth and penalizes hard work, while Capitalism rewards hard work and penalizes sloth.”

The Need for Common Sense

The young people who are swarming to Senator Sanders’ support are a spiritually bankrupt generation who view government as God. They are also a greedy generation that desires “free stuff.”

And they are obviously ignorant of economics and are hard up for common sense, for one of the facts of life is that there are no free meals. Thus, if government gives you a “free” education, you will spend the rest of your life paying exorbitant, confiscatory taxes to cover the cost of that education and the “free” educations of those who follow you. I guess the problem with common sense is that it is not very common.

 

Considering Scripture

Some liberal Christian spokesmen have tried to defend Socialism on the grounds that the early Church in Jerusalem practiced Socialism as described in Acts 2:44–45:

44) And all those who had believed were together, and had all things in common;

45) and they began selling their property and possessions and were sharing them with all, as anyone might have need.

 

Yes, the early Christians, who were severely persecuted, banded together in communal groups to help defend and support each other, but that is a far cry from Socialism. The key here is that they shared their goods of their own free will. No one forced them to do so.

In like manner today, I give a lot of my income to many ministries, churches and social welfare organizations that provide food, clothing and even lodging to poor people. But I do so willingly as an expression of my love of Jesus. No one forces me to do so.

Again, the Socialists utilize the power of the State to force people to give to others through policies that result in a forced redistribution of income. And that is theft, pure and simple. Their desire is to make people dependent on the State because such dependence, in turn, will provide the Socialists with ever greater power over people’s lives.

One interesting thing in this regard that I have noticed over the years is that when Socialist politicians are forced to reveal their income tax returns, they never show any significant donations to help the poor. No, these “compassionate” liberals want to help the poor with your money and mine — not theirs.

Insights About Socialism

Rupert Murdoch, the British media mogul, recently gave a speech about the virtues of Capitalism. In the process, he made a very insightful comment about Socialism:

Socialism is a form of feudalism. The Lord is the State and the Aristocracy which rises up around the State…The serfs are the same people who have always been serfs throughout history. Socialism doesn’t save anyone from working for the company store. Government just becomes the company store.

Winston Churchill always had a pithy way of presenting profound ideas in brief statements. Here’s what he had to say about Socialism as compared to Capitalism: “The inherent vice of Capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of misery.”

One blogger, who chooses to remain anonymous, has this to say about the morality of Socialism:

Socialism is immoral at its core [because] it requires an acceptance that the government owns you, that when the rubber hits the road, you are simply a number, and that if you are more productive than most other people, you will be replaced as a cash cow to be milked for what some group of Statists consider “The Common Good.”

History attests to the fact that people are always willing to surrender their freedoms for the promise of security. That is exactly what Socialism does. Beware!

Does the Bible support Communism?

Does the Bible support Communism?

https://www.gotquestions.org/communism-Bible.html

Communism, a branch of socialism, is an experimental social system based on a set of ideals that, at first glance, seem to agree with some biblical principles. On closer examination, however, little evidence can be found that the Bible truly supports or endorses communism. There is a difference between communism in theory and communism in practice, and the Bible verses that seem to comply with communist ideals are in fact contradicted by the practices of a communist government.

There is a surprising sentence in a description of the church in Acts 2 that has led many people to wonder whether the Bible supports communism, and has led some people to defend strongly the idea that communism is actually biblical. The passage reads, “All the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need” (Acts 2:44-45). This statement seems to imply that communism (which has, at its heart, a desire to eliminate poverty by “spreading the wealth around”) is found here in the earliest of Christian churches. However, there is a crucial difference between the church in Acts 2 and a communist society that must be understood.

In the Acts 2 church, the people were giving to each other out of their own good will to those who had a need, and they were giving freely, without regulation of how much they were to give. In other words, they shared what they had out of a shared love for one another and a common goal—living for Christ and glorifying God. In a communist society, people give because a system of government forces them to give. They don’t have a choice in the matter as to how much they give or to whom they give. This, therefore, does not reflect on who they are; it says nothing about their identity or character. Under communism, the cheerful, generous giver and the stingy man are both required to give exactly the same amount – namely, everything they earn.

The issue is one of cheerful giving (which the Bible supports) versus forced giving. Second Corinthians 9:7 says, “Each man should give what he has decided in his heart to give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver.” After all, the Bible contains a great number of references to helping the poor, being generous with what we have, and looking out for those who are less fortunate. When we obey in this area with cheerful hearts with the proper motivation, our giving is pleasing to God. What is not pleasing to God is giving out of compulsion, because forced giving is not giving out of love and therefore profits nothing in the spiritual sense. Paul tells the Corinthians, “If I give all I possess to the poor and surrender my body to the flames, but have not love, I gain nothing” (1 Corinthians 13:3). Loveless giving is the inevitable result of communism.

Capitalism is actually a better system when it comes to giving because it has proven to increase individual wealth, which allows its citizens to give out of their increase. Communism has proven to simply make all its citizens poor, except the very few in power who decide where the wealth goes. But even capitalism won’t work, by itself, as a system for aiding the poor. It depends on its citizens to be diligent (Proverbs 10:4) and generous with the fruits of their labor (1 Timothy 6:18) and to give out of love for God and neighbor. Thus, we see that God has designed for the physical and financial needs of the poor to be met by Christian individuals, rather than by any system of government.

What is cultural Marxism?

https://www.gotquestions.org/cultural-Marxism.html

Cultural Marxism can be a controversial term—some assert there’s no such thing, and others use the term as a catch-all for anything they see as undermining society. In short, cultural Marxism is a revolutionary leftist idea that traditional culture is the source of oppression in the modern world. Cultural Marxism is often linked to an insistence upon political correctness, multiculturalism, and perpetual attacks on the foundations of culture: the nuclear family, marriage, patriotism, traditional morality, law and order, etc. Cultural Marxists are assumed to be committed to establishing economic Marxism, in which case their cultural attacks are a necessary preparation for their ultimate goal.

After World War I, some Marxist philosophers felt the need to modify their political strategy. Karl Marx generally saw culture as a secondary concern. His successors realized that culture was, in fact, critical to social change. When a society is willing to criticize its institutions, it is ready to make changes. The result of these ideas was the Frankfurt School, a generic term for Marxist philosophy focused on social criticism and bottom-up change. In particular, the Frankfurt School rejected the idea of absolute truth and promoted aggressive criticism of all aspects of life and society. Some early observers referred to this new approach as cultural Marxism to distinguish it from the earlier, classical forms of Marxism. More orthodox Marxists do not see cultural Marxism as Marxist at all.

The philosophy of cultural Marxism endures today, although the term itself is rarely used by those who subscribe to the Frankfurt School of thought. In actual practice, cultural Marxism is often used as a derogatory term for various left-leaning, progressive, or liberal practices. Unfortunately, various conspiracy theorists and anti-Semitic groups also use the term cultural Marxism to promote their belief in the Illuminati or to blame the Jews for society’s ills. Such misuses of the term do not negate the existence of an intellectual movement to destabilize society from within.

Beyond question, there is a purposeful effort in parts of Western culture to reject traditional values and aggressively replace them with more (supposedly) progressive ideals. This often results in an extreme imbalance in criticism and cultural sensitivity. For instance, derogatory attitudes toward men, whites, Christians, fathers, heterosexuals, and so forth are often celebrated or encouraged. Equally critical comments directed at women, minorities, Muslims, mothers, homosexuals, and so forth are readily condemned as “hateful.” Whether or not cultural Marxism is behind this imbalance, many people do seem purposefully prejudiced against certain points of view.

For Christians, dealing with cultural Marxism involves a spiritual dimension. It is undeniable that, in the West, Christian values are under attack. However, the root cause of these attacks is not wholly political or racial or social. It is spiritual. To the extent that traditional Western culture reflects biblical truth, attacks on that culture are anti-God. As an example, for centuries Western culture promoted chastity before marriage as an ideal; modern culture downplays chastity and glorifies immorality. Cultural Marxism at work? Possibly. Satan working in tandem with humanity’s sin nature? Assuredly (see James 1:14).

There are certainly reasons for Christians to resist political correctness, relativism, unfair attitudes toward Christianity, acceptance of immoral behavior, and so forth. We can and should work diligently to stand against those problems. We are lights in the world (Matthew 5:14). Our best strategy is not necessarily to rail against cultural Marxism, especially given the controversies surrounding that term. Rather, we must recognize the roots of these problems and deal with them accordingly. It is a spiritual battle fought in the minds and hearts of individuals (Ephesians 6:12).

What is cultural Marxism?

Is Marxism compatible with the Christian faith?

https://www.gotquestions.org/Marxism-Christian.html

Marxism is a political philosophy developed by Prussian (German) philosopher Karl Marx that focuses on class struggle and various ways to ensure equality of outcome for all people. Marxism and Marxian analysis have various schools of thought, but the basic idea is that the ruling class in any nation has historically oppressed the lower classes, and thus social revolution is needed to create a classless, homogeneous society. Marxism teaches that the best system of government is one in which wealth is distributed equally, there is no private property (ownership of productive entities is shared by everyone), and every citizen gives selflessly to the collective. The purported goal of Marxism is a government-run utopia in which the needs of each individual are always provided for. Ideally, the strong work hard, the inventive create technological marvels, the doctors heal, the artists delight the community with beauty, and anyone who is weak or poor or in need can draw on society’s combined resources as their needs demand. When this idealistic model is attempted in the real world, it is called “socialism,” “communism,” “statism,” “liberalism,” or “progressivism,” depending on the degree to which the model is explored and implemented.

Thus far, Marxism has never worked in real life—and, without exception, in the places where Marxism has been the governmental model, Christians have been persecuted. That’s because there’s a foundational difference between Marxism and Christianity, a deep divide that cannot be bridged. There are several aspects of Marxism, as a philosophy, that put it at odds with the Christian faith. Here are a few:

Marxism is, at heart, an atheistic philosophy with no room for belief in God. Karl Marx himself was clear on this point: “The first requisite of the happiness of the people is the abolition of religion” (“A Criticism of the Hegelian Philosophy of Right,” 1844). Christianity, of course, is rooted in theism and is all about God. In the Marxist model, the state becomes the provider, sustainer, protector, and lawgiver for every citizen; in short, the state is viewed as God. Christians always appeal to a higher authority—the God of the universe—and Marxist governments don’t like the idea of there being any authority higher than themselves.

One of the basic tenets of Marxism is that the idea of private property must be abolished. Where Marxism has taken root, land owners see their property confiscated by the state, and private ownership of just about anything is outlawed. In abolishing private property, Marxism directly contradicts several biblical principles. The Bible assumes the existence of private property and issues commands to respect it: injunctions such as “You shall not steal” (Deuteronomy 5:19) are meaningless without private property. The Bible honors work and teaches that individuals are responsible to support themselves: “The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat” (2 Thessalonians 3:10). The redistribution of wealth mandated by Marxism destroys accountability and the biblical work ethic. Jesus’ parable in Matthew 25:14–30 clearly teaches our responsibility to serve God with our (private) resources. There is no way to reconcile Marxism with the parable of the talents.

Marxism is ultimately about material things; Christianity is ultimately about spiritual things. Frederick Engels, a close associate of Karl Marx, said that Marx’s greatest insight was that “men must first of all eat, drink, have shelter and clothing before they can pursue politics, science, art, religion and the like” (“Speech at the Grave of Karl Marx,” Highgate Cemetery, London. March 17, 1883, transcribed by Mike Lepore). In other words, Marxism seeks to meet the physical needs of man and posits that, until those needs are met, man is incapable of any aspirations higher than an animal-like existence. Jesus taught, “Do not worry about your life, what you will eat or drink; or about your body, what you will wear. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothes? . . . Seek first [God’s] kingdom and his righteousness” (Matthew 6:2633). Marx taught, “Seek first man’s kingdom and the stuff of this world.” Jesus’ words are the antithesis of communism and Marxism, and it’s one reason why Karl Marx reviled Christianity.

The utopia that Marxism seeks to develop is earthly and man-made; Christians look to the Lord Jesus to establish a heavenly, perfect kingdom some day. Believers understand that, given man’s sinful nature, there is no perfect system in this world. Greed and abuse of power and selfishness and laziness will taint even the purest motives.

Some people attempt to combine Christianity with Marxist philosophy. Their attempts may be well-meaning, but they are impractical. The Puritans in the New World tried communal living for a while. When the Plymouth Colony was founded, there was no private property, and all food was distributed equally amongst all, regardless of one’s job (or work ethic). But that system, lacking any incentive to hard work, was soon abandoned as a complete failure. See “Of Plymouth Plantation” by Plymouth Colony Governor William Bradford for the full story.

Attempting to combine Christianity with Marxism also ignores their widely divergent views on sin, God, equality, responsibility, and the value of human life. Of course, some people point to Acts 2:44–45 as proof that Christianity is compatible with communism: “All the believers were together and had everything in common. They sold property and possessions to give to anyone who had need.” Two things must be said here: first, this passage, as with much of Acts, is descriptive, not prescriptive; that is, this passage contains no command for the church to function this way; it is simply a description of what the early church in Jerusalem did to meet some unique and urgent needs. There is no indication that such extensive sharing was ever copied by other New Testament churches. Second, the communal arrangements in Acts were completely voluntary and motivated by the love of Christ. Any attempt to apply this to involuntary, secular (godless) communism really makes no sense.

When Frederick Engels heard that some Christians were using Acts 2 to promote socialism, he wrote against melding his philosophy with Christianity: “These good people are not the best Christians, although they style themselves so; because if they were, they would know the bible better, and find that, if some few passages of the bible may be favourable to Communism, the general spirit of its doctrines is, nevertheless, totally opposed to it” (“Progress of Social Reform on the Continent,” in The New Moral World, 3rd Series, Nos. 19, Nov. 4, 1843, transcribed by Andy Blunden). According to Engles, the Bible and Marxism are “totally opposed.”

In short, the Bible promotes freedom and personal responsibility, and neither of those concepts lasts long under Marxism. There’s a reason why, in Marxist states such as Communist China and Vietnam and the old Soviet Union, Christians are always persecuted—the ideas espoused by Marxism are antithetical to the teachings of Jesus Christ. The differences are irreconcilable.

Is Marxism compatible with the Christian faith?

OPEN BORDERS (Illegal Immigration)

See also One-World - Rush to Globalism (Return to Babylon)

Illegal Immigrants Filmed Boarding Plane to Be Relocated Throughout Country​ (Dinesh D'Souza)

The Daily Signal filmed illegal immigrants boarding a plane. Biden's border crisis is destroying the country.

Heaven Has Walls.jpg

In this episode, Dinesh considers why San Diego teachers who have kept their schools closed are volunteering to provide free in-person instruction to illegals. Investigative journalist Julie Kelly joins Dinesh to talk about the Biden Justice Department’s elaborate effort to frame January 6 defendants, and how the scheme is falling apart. And Dinesh makes the moral case against democratic socialism by showing how capitalism is inherently more “democratic” than socialism.

Illegal immigration and open borders have never been good for a nation of law and order. That’s always been the truth and it always will be, yet there are many political leaders that are seeking to make accommodations that go directly against this way of thinking. Why are they doing this? If you look a little closer you might recognize the fact that they choose to operate with the inspiration of the spirit of antichrist! We must open our eyes to see this! #spiritofantichrist #timeisrunningout #markofthebeast #ccsignalhill #godisgoodallthetime #revelation13

Open Borders

The Folly Of Open Borders :: By Sally Law

https://www.raptureready.com/2018/12/04/folly-open-borders-sally-law/

The United States of America is a sovereign nation – a Republic democracy with a constitution, bill of rights and citizenship for those either born here or those who have applied for it legally. Something else is required that the mainstream media would like us all to forget. A person who has applied for citizenship here is sworn in with an oath on the day they become a citizen. Let’s look together.

“Oath of allegiance to the United States: The applicant must pledge allegiance to the United States, renouncing other national allegiances. The pledge includes an obligation to support the Constitution and to bear arms on behalf of the United States if required.” – source

Wow, support the Constitution! Now there is a long forgotten concept among those who would love nothing more than to ignite the old parchment and throw our sovereign nation under the bus of progressive socialism. If you come here illegally, you make no such oath—no promise.

Members of Congress should re-evaluate if this is the kind of nation they want to represent. Many could not honestly pledge to uphold the Constitution this very day, as their actions and words are just the opposite.

This same group wants to have open borders and a “come on in” open-door policy. I would like to ask these progressives a few questions. These are not hard ones, either.

Do you lock your doors at night? Lock your car when you go inside to shop or to work? Do you leave your wallet, cellphone, credit cards information and electronics out on the sidewalk with a note attached that says help yourself?

Do you kiss your children goodbye in the morning and remind them to get in the car of any stranger who offers? Join their cult? Take their drug offerings?

Hopefully, you don’t. But anything you hold dear and value is worth protecting, is it not?

I hope you see the hypocrisy of those who would want open borders. Those who do have no love for our country, values, people, property rights – and most importantly, our children. They say to the violent strangers pressing our gates, “Come on in—take what you want.”

There was a very wise king who lived a long time ago. The court was in an uproar on this particular day. Women and babies were involved. The story had spread like wildfire throughout the kingdom. Tears, crying, and accusatory language were heard by this sovereign, wise king. One woman claimed a baby was hers, stolen in the night by the other who had rolled over on top of her baby and suffocated him. She switched the dead baby for the live one while the other mother was sleeping. It was a “she said, she said” case and hard to prove.

The wise king listened carefully before making his decision. “Cut the baby in half by sword,” was King Solomon’s verbal decision. Each mother would be satisfied.

The evil, lying mother agreed. The righteous and good mother said, “No, give her the child, only spare his life!”

The evidence and heart of the real mother had come to light. She had something to lose…the life of her newborn son. (See 1 Kings 3:16-28 for the full story).

I am watching my nation in an uproar about protecting it from those who are not asking, but demanding to be here—violently. They put women and young children in the front of the mob, exposing their most vulnerable and precious commodities to potential harm. The tear gas was used since verbal commands were not heeded. (The tear gas, by the way, will not harm anyone; it is simply a deterrent.) Border patrol agents were attacked with rocks and bottles being thrown at them. No one was injured, thankfully, at the borders this past weekend.

Is the answer open borders? I say no. It will be the end of our sovereign nation in my opinion. We have many people from a multitude of nations who become citizens every year.

Look at these statistics: The United States welcomed more than 7.4 million naturalized citizens into our nation in the last decade. In fiscal year 2016, 752,800 people were naturalized. – source

Please don’t give away our nation’s sovereignty at the borders or anyplace else. If you love America and Americans, you will want to protect it. Let people come here legally who appreciate being citizens and love its freedoms. If we dissolve our borders, that will be it. There will be no going back.

The progressives love the thought of open borders and massive immigration, riding on the backs of human misery. More people homeless living on the streets, more crime and drugs, gangs…you name it. By all means, let them vote for more progressives, although here illegally! The list of our national woes will compound with each passing day. The hard-working will be taxed until there is no more to tax. We are already in over our heads. The land I love and value, my family’s home since the 1600’s, will take on socialism and then…communism. Twin evils, and the enemy of America.

Secure our sovereignty at our borders! Guard what is loved and esteemed. Our ancestors fought and died for our sovereignty and constitutional freedoms.

Don’t give these valuables away; pass them on intact to your children. It’s what our forefathers and framers of the Constitution intended.

 

Sally Law

The Folly Of Open Borders

What does the Bible say about illegal immigration?

https://www.gotquestions.org/illegal-immigration.html

Note: We wholeheartedly believe that Christians are called to be compassionate and merciful toward immigrants (Exodus 22:21Leviticus 19:33–34Matthew 25:35). We also believe that the United States should have a compassionate and merciful immigration policy. However, that is not the question at hand. The question at hand concerns illegal immigration—whether it is wrong to violate a nation’s borders and transgress its immigration laws.

Romans 13:1–7 makes it abundantly clear that God expects us to obey the laws of the government. The only exception to this is when a law of the government forces us to disobey a command of God (Acts 5:29). Illegal immigration is the breaking of a government’s law. There is nothing in Scripture that contradicts the idea of a sovereign nation having immigration laws. Therefore, it is rebellion against God to unlawfully enter another country. Illegal immigration is a sin.

Illegal immigration is definitely a controversial issue in the United States (and some other countries) today. Some argue that the immigration laws are unfair, unjust, and even discriminatory—thus giving individuals justification to immigrate illegally. However, Romans 13:1–7 does not give any permission to violate a law just because it is perceived as unjust. Again, the issue is not the fairness of a law. The only biblical reason to violate a government’s law is if that law violates God’s Word. When Paul wrote the book of Romans, he was under the authority of the Roman Empire, led by Emperor Nero. Under that reign, there were many laws that were unfair, unjust, and/or blatantly evil. Still, Paul instructed Christians to submit to the government.

Are the immigration laws of the United States unfair or unjust? Some think so, but that is not the issue. All developed countries in the world have immigration laws, some more strict than the USA’s, and some less strict, and all have to deal with illegal immigration. There is nothing in the Bible to prohibit a country from having completely open borders or to have completely closed borders. Romans 13:1–7 also gives the government the authority to punish lawbreakers. Whether the punishment is imprisonment, deportation, or even something more severe, it is within the rights of the government to determine.

Illegal immigration is a complex issue. The vast majority of illegal immigrants in the United States have come for the purpose of having a better life, providing for their families, and escaping poverty. These are good goals and motivations. However, it is not biblical to violate a law to achieve a “good.” Caring for the poor, orphans, and widows is something the Bible commands us to do (Galatians 2:10James 1:272:2–15). However, the biblical fact that we are to care for the unfortunate does not mean we should violate the law in doing so. Supporting, enabling, and/or encouraging illegal immigration is, therefore, a violation of God’s Word. Those seeking to emigrate to another country should always obey the immigration laws of that country. While this may cause delays and frustrations, it is better than acting illegally. A frustrating law is still a law.

What is the biblical solution to illegal immigration? Simple—don’t do it; obey the laws. If disobedience is not a biblical option, what can be done in regards to an unjust immigration law? It is completely within the rights of citizens to seek to change immigration laws. If it is your conviction that an immigration law is unjust, do everything that is legally within your power to get the law changed: pray, petition, vote, peacefully protest, etc. As Christians, we should be the first to seek to change any law that is unjust. At the same time, we are also to demonstrate our submission to God by obeying the government He has placed in authority over us.

“Be subject for the Lord’s sake to every human institution, whether it be to the emperor as supreme, or to governors as sent by him to punish those who do evil and to praise those who do good. For this is the will of God, that by doing good you should put to silence the ignorance of foolish people. Live as people who are free, not using your freedom as a cover-up for evil, but living as servants of God” (1 Peter 2:13–16).

What does the Bible say about illegal immigration?

(Got Questions Ministries)

What does the Bible say about illegal immigration? How should Christians view illegal immigrants?

What does the Bible say about illegal immigration?

How should a Christian respond to illegal immigrants?

https://www.gotquestions.org/illegal-aliens-immigrants.html

Illegal immigration is a volatile issue in many parts of the world. There is fervent passion and claimed biblical support on both sides. The vast majority of illegal immigrants are people who are seeking safety and/or greater economic opportunity for themselves and/or their families. This leads to a struggle. As Christians, what should be our priority? Promoting submission to the rule of law or compassionate care for the less fortunate?

Please read our articles on illegal immigration and refugees. In summary, based on Romans 13:1–7 and 1 Peter 2:13–14, we are convinced that it is a sin to violate a nation’s immigration laws. Should prosperous nations have compassionate immigration laws? Absolutely. At the same time, there is nothing in the Bible that contradicts a nation’s setting and enforcing its own immigration policy. Since immigration laws do not violate God’s Word, it is therefore wrong to trespass those laws. Regardless of emotional appeals and mitigating circumstances, the initial act of coming into a country illegally is sin.

At the same time, as Christians, we have to separate our attitude toward the act of entering the country illegally from our attitude toward illegal immigrants themselves. Illegal immigrants are individuals who are created in the image and likeness of God (Genesis 1:26), and for whom Jesus died (John 3:161 John 2:2). The first obligation of a Christian is to express Christlikeness in all our thoughts, words, and deeds (Romans 8:29). There is no room for hatred toward illegal immigrants who seek work, refuge from danger and persecution, or a better life for themselves and their families. Christian compassion must be shown toward those who would risk their lives in a dangerous attempt to cross a border. Acts of hatred or violence toward illegal immigrants are never to be tolerated by those who name the name of Christ.

How should a Christian respond to illegal immigrants? The same way we respond to anyone else—love and compassion. The Bible is filled with instructions to demonstrate care for the poor, destitute, and distressed (Exodus 22:21Matthew 25:31–45Galatians 2:10James 1:272:15–16). While we should never do anything to promote, enable, or excuse illegal immigration; we should do everything we possibly can to demonstrate the love of Christ to the illegal immigrants themselves.

How should a Christian respond to illegal immigrants?

Fentanyl Now the #1 Cause of Death Among Americans 18-45, Surpassing COVID

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/not-making-headlines-fentanyl-now-1-cause-death-among-americans-18-45-surpassing-covid/

Thanks to Joe Biden’s open borders policies fentanyl deaths are surging.

Fentanyl deaths are not the #1 cause of death among Americans 18 to 45.

Fentanyl Fatalities Fact Sheet

Fentanyl Fatalities.png
Fentanyl Fatalities 2.png
Fentanyl Fatalities 4.png
Fentanyl Fatalities 5.png

Families Against Fentanyl

https://familiesagainstfentanyl.org/

Factsheet – Fentanyl Deaths by Race, and Disproportionate Impact on Black Communities

Factsheet – Fentanyl Deaths More Than Doubled in 30 States in Just Two Years

Factsheet – Fentanyl: The #1 Cause of Death for Americans Age 18 to 45

Our Letter to President Biden, Featuring Co-Signers Including Former CIA Director John Brennan, Former Secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge, Former Acting Administrator of the DEA Uttam Dhillon, and More

Families Against Fentanyl One-Sheet for Leaders in the Black Community

Families Against Fentanyl WMD Presentation References

Our Plea to the President

By the Numbers

2020 to date: estimated 81,500+
2014-2019: 375,730
1999-2014: 75,510

TOTAL OVERDOSE DEATHS: 930,177+

The CDC estimates that half of all overdose deaths are directly caused by fentanyl.
Two-thirds of all accidental overdose deaths are caused by synthetic opioids like fentanyl, carfentanil, and other manufactured substances.

 

About 200 people die every day from fentanyl poisoning in the U.S.
Accidental overdose is now the leading cause of death for people under age 50 in the U.S.
Accidental overdose is the leading cause of injury-related death in the U.S. regardless of age group.

597,833+ TOTAL ESTIMATED DEATHS DUE TO FENTANYL IN 20 YEARS

We can and must stop this.

Illicitly manufactured fentanyl emerged as a street drug in recent years because it’s inexpensive to buy, profitable to sell, and relatively easy to smuggle in from China, where most of it is made. America’s fentanyl problem has gotten worse during the pandemic. More than 40 states have reported increases in opioid-related deaths during the pandemic.

But the threat from fentanyl isn’t just to drug users and their families. Illicitly manufactured fentanyl and fentanyl analogs endanger every American. Just 2 milligrams of fentanyl is enough to kill an average person. Just one pound of fentanyl can kill as many people as have died to date in the U.S. from the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2019 alone, Customs and Border Patrol and Mexican authorities seized more than 5,000 pounds of illicitly manufactured fentanyl that had been destined for the U.S.

Read our Detailed Case for Support to designate illicitly manufactured fentanyl as a weapon of mass destruction, and sign our petition.

Want to learn more? Explore our frequently asked questions.

Fentanyl Now the #1 Cause of Death Among Americans 18-45, Surpassing COVID
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Contact Me
Suggestions, improvements, comments?

Thanks!

bottom of page