Prophecies Happening NOW
EUGENICS, ABORTION & GENOCIDE
See also: Genetic Modification and Transhumanism
See also: Sexual Immorality: Transgender Confusion
Eugenics, If You Think That This Ended With Hitler – Think Again :: by Geri Ungurean
Medical technology can be a wonderful thing. It has given the world hope when their joints have worn out. We have seen organ replacement surgeries which significantly prolong a person’s life.
But, as with anything else in this fallen world, technology can and is being used in nefarious ways. In my research, I’ve discovered plans to use medical technology in ways which sound like something from a science fiction novel. I wish that it was “fiction” but it’s real. I have written articles on the United Nations and their 2030 and Agenda 21 Initiatives for a “perfect world.” One of the criteria which is not openly discussed is massive depopulation of the earth.
By mid 2016, the world’s population will reach 7.4 Billion. The goal of the elites and of the U.N. is to substantially decrease the population. The magic number? That would be 500 million. Is that substantial enough for you? It is shocking to me, and makes the mass murdering by Hitler pale in comparison.
I wrote an article about the Georgia Guide Stones. On this structure is articulated the ten commandments of the Antichrist. They even carved in a sustainable population for the earth: 500 million. Here is the article: The Georgia Guide Stones and the Ten Commandments of the Coming Antichrist
“This is the first part of a two part series exploring the relationship between the controversial eugenics movement of the past and modern genetics. Eugenics was dedicated to cleansing and purifying humanity from “inferior” members with the hope of solving various social problems related to poverty, disability, and illness. To accomplish this, it sought to create a superior race of people and to use forced sterilization and extermination to eliminate future generations of defective human beings. Darwin’s theory of evolution was used to justify the practice of eugenics. Later, when eugenics fell from favor, modern genetics began to grow up from the ashes of the former movement.
When Adolf Hitler applied Darwin’s theory of evolution and the principles of eugenics to the goals of the German state, the result was the murder of eleven million men, women and children. These lives were sacrificed in the name of eugenics. Eugenicists were seeking to improve the conditions of life for humanity by creating a “superior” race of people.
When we compare the way eugenicists view the people on our planet, with the way that God views these same people, it truly brings the evil of eugenics into clear view. There is no gray area here – it is good vs. evil:
“The Lord thy God in the midst of thee is mighty; he will save, he will rejoice over thee with joy; he will rest in his love, he will joy over thee with singing” (Zephaniah 3:17)
God loves each and every one of us. He rejoices over everyone of us with singing! The Creator of the Universe loves us that much. He doesn’t look at our economic status, or whether we have grave illnesses which run in our families. He doesn’t see us as having “defects.” He loves us with an everlasting love.
The eugenics movement had a very dark side, which led to social control, loss of reproductive freedom, and the loss of life. Should we be concerned that modern genetic science might have a dark side as well? Will the fruit of genetic research be misused by ill-intentioned people to gain control over others as happened with eugenics in the past? Has modern genetics completely severed itself from its roots? Or, might it become the tool that will be used to try to create a master class of genetically superior human beings in America?
What are the deceptions and dangers of the modern genetics movement? Does true health and true happiness lie in the human genome? Are we really bound to the set of genes that we received from our parents, or can we overcome what we were given? What are the factors that activate or deactivate certain genes, and how can we control the expression of our genetic make-up to promote our health and the health of our children? What are the motivations of certain groups who want us to believe that genes control every aspect of our lives – that we have no other options than to suffer while genetic scientists look for genetic cures for all that ails us? Are we really more than our genes or is our genetic code all there is?
The article which I am using as a reference in this piece is quite long, but amazingly thorough, and the best article I’ve seen on the subject of eugenics. I encourage each and every one of you to view this article in its entirety. I could go on and post excerpts from it, but honestly it is just too long – not in a negative way – it is an exhaustive expose on the eugenics movement.
I have decided to list the topics spoken of in the Health Impact News article (with a blurb expanding on the section), in hopes that you will read the article and be informed as to what is happening in the world of eugenics. Be ready to be shocked:
1. Eugenics in a nutshell
“The word Eugenics means “good genes.” Eugenicists believe that principles of Darwin’s theory regarding “the survival of the fittest” can be used to support the elimination of weak and undesirable people from society. They believe that human beings are inherently no different than animals, and therefore we can and should be bred like animals. A farmer does not allow deficient cows in his herd to reproduce, and in the same way, eugenicists believe that certain people in our society should control human reproduction.”
2. Children Up to the Age of Five is Another Option
People now believe that if parents decide that they wish to have the life of their child brought to an end before age five, because of disability, illness, inconvenience of the parents, or for any other reason, then the parents should have the right to abort the child. So, if you don’t like the color of his hair, the color of her eyes, the developmental delays that you are observing, the illnesses that are making life difficult, or the behaviors that you cannot control, then you should have the right to have your child aborted (legally killed) up to age 5 or 6
3. “Modern” Thinking is Simply the Old Eugenics Resurfacing as “Science”
“The idea that people in authority should have the legal right to terminate the lives of other people in certain circumstances to benefit the greater good of society is not new. These thoughts have a long history, which was part of the original eugenics movement that began in 1859. The human extermination program that was implemented by Adolf Hitler before and during World War II was a prime example of eugenics. He was trying to purify the human race by killing all those who he determined would have an inferior contribution to the human germplasm if they were to reproduce. He and other leaders of the Third Reich believed that only superior human beings should be allowed to reproduce, and the inferior should be eliminated."
4. What do Eugenicists Desire?
“Eugenicists seek to create a class of people who possess superior attributes such as intelligence, physical strength, and physical appearance. They also seek to discourage reproduction by “inferior” people.When techniques of discouragement fail to reduce the birth of new “defectives,” then forced sterilization of undesirables is pursued under the authority of the state. When sterilization is not practical, then termination of life is used to decrease the surplus population of defectives.”
5. Francis Galton – the First Major Leader in the Eugenics
Australian researcher and writer Roger Sandall described how Francis Galton’s life was transformed by the theory of Darwinian evolution. Roger Sandall wrote:
Coming at a critical stage of both his scientific career and his domestic life, Darwin’s book shattered Galton’s religious beliefs and turned him towards biological research. He always had what he called “a hereditary bent of mind”, and from 1859 he proceeded to investigate, he said later, matters “clustered round the central topics of Heredity and the possible improvement of the Human Race.”
6. Creating an Elite Class of Super Humans
“Proponents of eugenics believe that a pure bloodline should be created that contains only the best traits of humanity. They believe that techniques of good breeding should be used to create a race of super humans who are made in the image of the eugenicists. These super humans will all be highly intelligent, strong, healthy, beautiful, talented, prosperous, motivated, and capable of submitting their will to the will and greater good of society.
7.”The Horrors of Eugenics
“Forced Sterilization in the U.S. Upheld by the Supreme Court – In the early 1900s, eugenicists began to use persuasion to gain voluntary cooperation with their new way of thinking about human reproduction. In the United States, the strategy of persuasion was eventually replaced by a strategy of coercion and compulsion.
In 1927, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the State of Virginia’s sterilization plan in Buck Versus Bell, which affirmed that it had the right to sterilize mentally deficient residents to prevent them from “producing more of their kind.” This decision opened the door to forced sterilization in many U.S. states.”
8. The Family is not Compatible with the Practice of Eugenics
“Eugenicists also will seek to destroy the family structure in order to accomplish their goals. The value and functioning of the family unit consisting of a husband/father, wife/mother and numerous children will be attacked on every front.
This is necessary to break the emotional bonds that tie family members together, and replace it with zealous allegiance to the state. Commitment to the power of the state must be stronger than love and commitment to family members so that defectives in the family can be sterilized or removed without a struggle.”
9. The Existence of God is not Compatible with Eugenics
“There must also be a breaking of affection and commitment to God. Eugenics is incompatible with true religion. Eugenics and the power of the state must rule over people and not the God of the Bible.
Eugenicists understand that one can only serve one master, and their master must be the god and religion of Darwinian Evolution. The moral absolutes of conservative biblical Christianity stand in direct opposition to Darwin’s theory of evolution and the full implementation of eugenic techniques.
The belief that life is a gift from God, and should be cherished and preserved, is incompatible with the outworking of eugenics, which seeks to put life under the authority of a superior class of people and under the authority of the state.”
10. Who is Superior and Who is Not
“This question is the key to understanding eugenics. It is also the key for uncovering the deceptions and lies that are used to justify eugenics as a socially advanced way of managing society.
Adolf Hitler and his colleagues decided that it was the Nordic or Aryan bloodlines that were superior to all other bloodlines on the Earth. Thus, Adolf Hitler and others like him were to become the superior bloodline. Those with similar physical characteristics/appearance, emotional functioning, and mental capacities, and those who possessed certain ideological convictions were to become archetypes of humanity. They were to be raised up above all other people and others were to be brought into subjection to them.”
11. Conclusion: Where is Modern Genetics Leading Us?
“If our tolerance for the termination of life in the United States continues to increase, then expanded opportunities to take life will follow. Who will be the next group of “defectives” who will be targeted for either repair or extermination? Perhaps it will be people whose only “defect” is that they are poor, are aliens, or are strangers to us and just don’t seem to fit in with social norms.
People may no longer call themselves eugenicists, but the desire to perfect humanity and create a “better” people remains a strong desire in the hearts and minds of many scientists, politicians, and corporations. Many people have never heard the word eugenics, nevertheless, their grumbling words condemn those they do not like. They speak against the existence of certain groups in society and speak about how things would be better if someone would do something about “those people.” Those who refuse vaccines today, for example, are considered a threat to society, and mandatory vaccine laws are being proposed in many states in 2015.
Will modern genetics respond to the grumblers among us, and be the tool that politicians ultimately use to fix the problems in our society? Will its advances be the stimulus that justifies the termination of healthy, but undesirable people in our society? Will modern genetics become the eugenics of our times? What is the dark side of genetics and how is it being used by corporations to create a new class of people in America? These questions and many others regarding modern genetics will be explored in the next article in this series.”
Brethren, this is what is coming to this earth. It is important for us to know what lies ahead.
But the most important thing is to remember how blessed we are to belong to our Lord Jesus! He is not surprised by any of this. He is omniscient. He is God.
Let us pray together for this fallen world. Let us also pray for the return of our King Jesus to gather His own unto Himself and take us to our real home in heaven.
Bill Gates, His Father and Eugenics :: By Geri Ungurean
We have read articles ad nauseam about Covid-19 and the coming vaccines. But we must understand the man, Bill Gates, and his father to fully appreciate what is happening in our world. It will help you to understand the agenda of these people.
And it will also help you in making a decision to receive the vaccine or not.
Their agenda is NOT about helping people with vaccines.
The agenda is world depopulation through sterilization.
From crazzfiles.com - The Gates Family, Eugenics and COVID-19. In the following, Ethan Nash examines links between COVID-19 ‘solutions’ and social eugenics movements, including Bill Gates Sr. and Planned Parenthood, the Gates Foundation and philanthropy deceptions, vested vaccine interests and engineering a pandemic.
THE EUGENICS MOVEMENT
In the late 19th century — a critical time in development of the sciences — British scholar Sir Francis Galton, in his book Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development, coined the term ‘eugenics.’
Galton, whose cousin was Charles Darwin, hoped to ‘better humankind’ through the ‘science of improving the human species’ by selectively mating people with specific desirable hereditary traits.
Supporters of eugenics believe people inherit mental illness, criminal tendencies and even poverty, and that these conditions can be ‘bred out’ of the human gene pool through forced sterilization. Not surprisingly, ‘undesirable’ traits were concentrated in poor, uneducated and minority populations.
Many professionals in the scientific and biological fields rigorously researched ways to ‘improve the human race’ through means of eliminating these ‘negative traits,’ and the movement would soon garner widespread political support — particularly in Australia.
As we have explored, the likes of Professor Richard Berry and growing Eugenics Societies of NSW and Victoria played a pivotal role in mass campaigns for laws allowing the establishment of a ”lethal chamber” to euthanize what these groups called ”the grosser types of our mental defectives.”
Following World War I, numerous eugenics-based ideologies were beginning to enter mainstream societies across the world. However, after Hitler would adopt these concepts and implement an aggressive form of the concept, the world grew sour, and a new change was needed to continue.
The concepts of eugenics were not exorcised from Western thinking following World War II; rather, they went underground and/or were reinvented by assuming more “compassionate” guises.
Julian Huxley’s significant contributions to the movement ensured that the underlying notions associated with eugenics would transform and continue into new social movements.
During the 1950s, these groups would re-define eugenics as ‘socially progressive,’ with linkages to the newly formed and comprehensive welfare states that offered ‘solutions’ to poverty and disease.
Huxley adeptly associated the ‘new and modern’ eugenics movement with a range of reformist ideologies, such as the popularization of birth control, the decriminalization of homosexuality, and abortion law reform. He described this process as “eugenic modernization.”
The basic premise remained the same; however, it is far easier to eliminate the poor and the suffering than it is to eliminate the complex and tenacious sources of their poverty or their suffering.
These people believe the masses are too moronic to govern themselves.
A plethora of new-age organizations and movements would arise during the era of ‘counter-culture,’ and this ‘progression’ continued; the now-notorious Gates family would soon enter the picture.
BILL GATES SR. AND PLANNED PARENTHOOD
The key to understanding Bill Gates’ exposure to eugenic concepts is to trace his family past.
Bill Gates’ father, William H. Gates, Sr., was a prominent banker and a lawyer in Preston Gates & Ellis. He also presided over many bar associations, organization boards, and started the Technology Alliance — a regional push to expand technology-based jobs throughout the 20th century.
The company spread from beginnings in Cold Spring Harbor genetics and virology labs on Long Island and Berlin, to today becoming one of the largest organizations in the US. Rockefeller-Bayar Co.; BASF and Hoechst petrochemical-pharmaceutical consortium were all initial funders of the group.
Make no mistake: Planned Parenthood was built on population control schemes — allied with the same groups who wanted genetic hierarchy laws to ‘preserve’ humanity and who sought to ‘beautify’ countries by stopping the “unfit” from reproducing.
In their 2014 Annual Report, the pro-abortion and anti-family group reported seeing over 2.5 million patients in over 4 million clinical visits, including 324,000 abortions. The group claims to be a proponent of ‘free choice,’ yet it is a eugenics front organization in disguise.
Planned Parenthood has recently gone through their second executive in just eight months, after sacking President Leana Wen for daring to suggest the group should focus more on women’s health.
Does this sound like a group that is dedicated to improving society? This one showdown revealed a genuine rift in the organization and a simple truth: promoting ‘women’s health’ was always a cover.
Bill Gates proudly speaks on his father’s involvement on the board of Planned Parenthood, which was founded on the concept that most human beings are just “reckless breeders.”
Gates’ father would take the concepts learned at Planned Parenthood and incorporate them into building the foundational blueprint for a new era of philanthropy activities that remain to this day.
THE GATES FOUNDATION
The group, like Planned Parenthood, would first focus on ‘improving’ reproductive and child health in the developing world. After pioneering philanthropist activities, the company merged with the new Gates Learning Foundation to create the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2000.
The methodologies have evolved leaps-and-bounds since the early formation of the movement; however, the objective remains the same. This time, the new multifaceted approach would see the philanthropist group partner with powerful United Nations organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF.
Today, the group is focused on many areas that drive continued work across the world. These activities have given birth to new forms of technological, eugenic endeavors.
The organization is simply continuing the Gates family legacy of trying to dominate and control the world’s systems, including in the areas of technology, medicine, and now agriculture.
In 2010, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation purchased 500,000 shares in Monsanto valued at more than $23 million. This is when it became abundantly clear that the so-called benevolent charity is up to something other than ‘eradicating’ disease and feeding the world’s poor.
The evidence that GMOs cause disease has been piling up for decades, as the list of countries banning their import and cultivation grows. Bill openly promotes GMOs as the ‘answer’ to world hunger, but many think this is in exactly the same vein as when the British Army handed small pox-infested blankets out to desperate American Indians during the French and Indian War.
Melinda Gates has also made ‘women’s issues’ one of the top priorities for their philanthropic work. This includes the decision to elevate contraception promotion and population control as “arguably the single-most important part of her work.” She has been openly criticized for these moves.
In 2017, the Gates Foundation pledged another $375 million for ‘family planning,’ with the goal of providing contraception to 120 million women across the world, particularly in developing countries.
This emphasis on blanketing developing countries with artificial contraception for which women aren’t asking for reeks of social engineering and paternalistic eugenicist thinking.
The fact that couples in developing countries often desire and value large families means nothing to many Western elitist philanthropists: the not-so-subliminal underlying presumption is that women who desire large families simply don’t know what’s good for them. As such, they need to be educated and ‘encouraged’ with large-scale, foreign-funded advertising companies and coercion.
Now that we have explored the history of the Gates family, influences and aims of philanthropist philosophies and modern eugenics programs across the world, let’s explore the relatable picture.
BILL GATES AND VACCINES
Bill Gates needs no introduction. He is one of the most influential Polyergus of all time. For 25 years, he has controlled what has grown to become a multibillion-dollar colossus, Microsoft, and made himself one of the richest men in the world. The tech world was largely born through Gates.
He accomplished this feat not by inventing new technology, but by taking existing technology, adapting it to a ‘specific market,’ and then dominating that market.
In recent years, Gates has turned a good deal of his attention towards philanthropy by creating the largest private foundation in the world, with over $46 billion in assets. He has secured billions of dollars in contributions from other wealthy benefactors such as Warren Buffett, and is primarily dedicated to ‘enhancing healthcare’ and ‘alleviating poverty’ across the world.
Bill Gates is heavily involved in development of new vaccines, as well as ‘forecasting’ international health challenges of tomorrow (such as preparing for epidemics), and works beyond the scope of national oversight and accountability in most cases.
He has spent years involved in the vaccine-manufacturing process, including quality control and clinical evaluation. This understanding has allowed Gates to ‘advise’ vaccine development programs and fund research into new areas of innovation for multiple disease programs:
Gates invests in expertise and platform technologies that help us make vaccines faster, ‘better’ and cheaper, in addition to also investing in numerous education and training programs to ensure that knowledge around vaccines is created, shared and retained. Some examples of this include:
Adaptive trial designs.
Streamlining the schedule and dosing of vaccines.
Novel delivery formats for vaccines.
Modular, automated manufacturing platforms enabling small-batch vaccine production.
The billionaire was an early investing partner in the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI), which has now grown a substantial portfolio of public-private international health partnerships that are committed to increasing access to immunization.
Today, GAVI has grown significantly. The group brings together developing country and donor governments (including Australia), the World Health Organization, UNICEF, the World Bank, the vaccine industry, research and technical agencies, civil society and other private philanthropists.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has donated $1.56 billion to the alliance’s 2016-2020 strategic period as of March 2019, and continues to advise the group on key business decisions.
Gates heavy involvement in the vaccine industry, in addition to continuing the eugenicists visions of the ‘social’ reformation, was fundamental in framing his positive public perception on the matter.
Considered a ‘hero’ in the fight to develop new technologies against growing diseases, the stage had now been set for Gates to become the new ‘go to’ voice if a pandemic was to ever break out.
COVID-19: A PLAN-DEMIC? ‘PREDICTING’ AN OUTBREAK
The Microsoft co-founder has hinted on multiple occasions over the past decade that the potential for something like the coronavirus that would soon arise and the world must be ‘ready.’
In 2015, Bill Gates gave a TED Talk titled The next outbreak? We’re not ready, which is being shared widely online in recent weeks given the impact of COVID-19 across the world.
The part of the talk that’s making rounds online shows Gates explaining that while the greatest threat to humanity when he was growing up was nuclear war, the greatest threat now is a virus:
“If anything kills over 10 million people in the next few decades, it’s likely to be a highly infectious virus rather than a war. Not missiles, but microbes.”
Rather, through these ‘cryptic’ messages, Gates was positioning himself in a positive light to connect with the public psyche. If something was to happen, ‘Gates would know the solution!’, they will cry.
Did Gates know something we didn’t know in advance? Emerging evidence suggest this ‘pandemic’ was foretold by the billionaire, which now serves as the mechanism to further carry out the agenda.
On October 18, 2019, The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, which is described on the group’s website as “a high-level pandemic exercise” carried out in New York.
The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be ‘necessary’ during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences:
“Experts agree that it is only a matter of time before one of these epidemics becomes global — a pandemic with potentially catastrophic consequences.
A severe pandemic, which becomes ‘Event 201,’ would require reliable cooperation among several industries, national governments, and key international institutions.”
“Event 201 simulated an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen was modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.
There is no possibility of a vaccine being available in the first year.”
Furthermore, the Melinda and Bill Gates Foundation funded a research center in England called the Pirbright Institute, which specializes in the study of viruses that affect farm animals, and viruses which transfer from animals to people. They own a very similar patent for a type of coronavirus affecting animals.
The world fell for the deception, hook line and sinker. Now, nations are crying out for a ‘solution’ to the growing COVID-19 ‘crisis,’ and Bill Gates (not surprisingly) has emerged at the head of the pack.
GATES TO THE RESCUE
He says the foundation would end up picking only one or two of the seven, meaning billions of dollars spent on manufacturing would be abandoned. However, spending a few billion to capitalize on the growing $35 billion vaccine market seems like a calculated investment.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has already committed $100 million to fighting coronavirus as part of its broader efforts in international health. The group is also reportedly exploring the idea of supplying at-home testing kits for the coronavirus.
It also launched a $125 million COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator and gave $5 million to help public health agencies in the Seattle area ‘enhance their capacity’ to detect the virus.
So, a man who has profited largely off vaccine development for years and also held ‘simulations’ of pandemic outbreaks is now cashing in on the chase to develop a COVID-19 vaccine? How fitting.
Gates ultimate influence in this unfolding plan can be found in the instructions given in recent weeks.
THE ‘ONLY WAY OUT’
Bill Gates now has a net worth of $97.8 billion. Yet, being the ‘relatable’ person that he is, he took to reddit for an Ask Me Anything on the COVID-19 pandemic. He would share his thoughts on ‘how best to deal’ with the outbreak and explored possible long-term effects on the world.
Gates said that broad vaccination for COVID-19 will need to become available “before you can be completely safe.” Until then, according to his claims, there’s a risk that communities could rebound unless they continue to practice strict social distancing and quarantines to see case numbers level off.
Gates said he doesn’t think large gatherings will be able to resume until widespread vaccination has taken place, as the ‘risks would outweigh the benefits’ of such events.
World leaders also agree with Gates’ timeline and perspectives. Shortly after doing the media rounds, the Australian government hinted at the fact society will be in lockdown until a vaccine is developed. This was soon followed by the New South Wales government and others.
Furthermore, Gates called for a “national tracking system similar to South Korea,” saying that “in Seattle, the University of Washington is providing thousands of tests per day, but no one is connected to a national tracking system.” He said that whenever there is a positive test, it should be used to understand where the disease is and whether we need to strengthen the social distancing.
In the future, he has floated the idea of ‘vaccine certificates’ to show proof-of-vaccination following the widespread rollout of COVID-19 products. This would be a new requirement for international and domestic travel, and is tipped to further expand to all facets of life.
Given the context detailed in this feature piece, do you trust the intentions of this man?
Gates has a rich history of eugenics influence and partakes in activities across the world that further progress the aims of the original movement, albeit in disguise.
If a COVID-19 vaccine uses strains of an actual virus, as many do, in order to encourage the body to build immunization, subjects who receive the vaccine will be carriers of that virus.
Bill Gates, and the forces that drive this puppet, are pushing the world towards a choice: Take the COVID-19 vaccine and deal with the health consequences, or refuse and be denied basic services and be labelled as a ‘health threat.’ Take the jab or be targeted.
I know where I stand.
Will you be lining up to receive the newly developed Gates-funded vaccine?
Stay tuned for more….
Brethren, this is shocking, but you must see it.
Billionaire Bill Gates really likes helping people from poor countries get vaccinated. But many are saying his motives may not be all that pure. In fact, many believe that this globalist, along with the United Nations, is conducting a massive depopulation effort.
People on the left and the 0.001% love to talk about how all the people on the right are racists and hate poor countries. But it would seem that this is all just a cover-up for what the globalists leading the “progressive” left are actually doing to people of color.
The scandal first started to break when Agriq-Quest Ltd, a Nairobi based pharmaceutical company, got into a heated dispute with the Kenyan Ministry of Health over the vacancies they were giving young women. These vaccines were innocent enough sounding in and of themselves, but what was being found added to them was a completely different story.
Billionaire globalists like Bill and Melinda Gates claim that people in Africa and other poor countries not getting vaccinated is very upsetting. And in the case of Kenya, downright “infuriating.” As Melinda Gates puts it, resistance to vaccinations “makes me angry.”
But those who really should be angry are the Kenyan people being taken advantage of by big money pharmaceutical companies and the globalists patronizing these morally debauched conglomerates.
500,000 Kenyan women and children are undergone forced sterilization as part of world “health organizations” issuing vaccinations through the government.
That is what should be making Mrs. Gates angry. Instead, it is women using their voice and saying “we don’t want to be forced to not have children against our will” that makes her mad.
It all started back in 2016 when the Catholic Church began to warn that what happened in the Philippines, Nicaragua and Mexico was happening yet again in Kenya.
Kenya’s opposition leader Raila Odinga—who swore himself in as president on Tuesday—claimed that at least 500,000 young girls and women may be infertile, following a tetanus vaccine administered by the government in 2014 and 2015.
The controversy began coming to a head in 2016 when Agri-quest Ltd, a Nairobi-based pharmaceutical company, got in a dispute with Kenya’s ministry of health over their tetanus and polio vaccinations. A group of Catholic doctors originally made the accusations claiming that the vaccines may contain a hormone that is dangerous to young women and can cause potential sterilization.
as the Agence de Presse Africaine reported:
Odinga said girls and women aged between 14 and 49 from the fastest growing populations in the country will not have children because of a state-sponsored sterilization exercise that was sold to the country as a tetanus vaccination.
The Catholic church was ignored when it mounted a strong but lonely campaign against the mass tetanus vaccination after it raised concerns about the safety of the vaccine that was being used, he said.
At the time, the Catholic church in Kenya claimed that the tetanus vaccine used by the government of Kenya and UN agencies was contaminated with a hormone (HCG) that can cause miscarriages and render some women sterile.
The Catholic Church was right. The pharmaceutical company paid to create these laced vaccinations has had their license removed.
Read rest of story HERE.
This is just one of many horror stories of the vaccines sent over to Third World countries by Bill Gates, laced with hormones which were purposely added to the vaccines to cause sterilizations.
Gates sent HPV vaccines to India, and thousands of girls fell ill – some of them were paralyzed. East Indian Scientists analyzed the components of the vaccines and found toxic substances. They filed a Lawsuit against Bill Gates, but nothing has come to fruition. When you are as rich as Bill and Melinda Gates, your attorneys can keep you safe from lawsuits.
Brethren, I felt that this article needed to be written. Many people are deciding if they will get the Covid 19 Vaccine or not. In light of the history of Eugenics, beginning with the father of Bill Gates and continuing with Bill Gates himself – this is more than a bit disconcerting. These people do not have your best interest at heart.
These are Eugenicists who believe that depopulation of the world is the only way for our world to be sustainable.
Me, my husband, daughter and our grandsons will NOT receive the vaccine.
God help us all.
Articles at grandmageri422.me
The Hidden Agenda Of Genetic Manipulation (Engdahl, 2013)
Genetics is the new name of Eugenics. The GMO Project. Genocide.
“As I dug into the research of GMO and the patenting of seeds, I came across something that perked my ears up, and that was that the earliest research on GMO’s. was financed by the Rockefeller Foundation. That interested me tremendously because I have spent years researching the Rockefeller machine – the Political machine of the most powerful family in America after WWII, and what I found out astonished even me.” Engdahl Lectures on the cohort renaming of Eugenics to Genetics and that GMO = Population Control.
The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation, F. William Engdahl
F. William Engdahl is an American German freelance journalist, historian and economic researcher. "Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation" This lecture at the Open Mind Conference 2013, focuses on how a small socio-political American elite seeks to establish its control over the very basis of human survival, the provision of our daily bread. Control the food and you control the people. This is no ordinary lecture about the perils of GMO.
Engdahl takes the audience inside the corridors of power, into the backrooms of the science labs, behind closed doors in the corporate boardrooms and reveals a World of profit-driven political intrigue, government corruption and coercion, where genetic manipulation and the patenting of life forms are used to gain worldwide control over food production. The lecture is based on Engdahls book "Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation" which is an eye-opener, a must-read for all those committed to the causes of social justice and World peace.
F. William Engdahl is an American German freelance journalist, historian and economic researcher. This lecture at the Open Mind Conference 2013, focuses on how a small socio-political American elite seeks to establish its control over the very basis of human survival, the provision of our daily bread.
Control the food and you control the people. This is no ordinary lecture about the perils of GMO. Engdahl takes the audience inside the corridors of power, into the backrooms of the science labs, behind closed doors in the corporate boardrooms and reveals a World of profit-driven political intrigue, government corruption and coercion, where genetic manipulation and the patenting of life forms are used to gain worldwide control over food production.
The lecture is based on Engdahls book “Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation” 2007.
Seeds Of Destruction By F. William Engdahl Review By Stephen Lendman – very detailed review – recommended read.
Seeds Of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda Of Genetic Manipulation Review by GlobalResearch – Engdahl carefully documents how the intellectual foundations of ‘eugenics,’ mass culling of the sick, colored, and otherwise disposable races, were actually first established, and even legally approved, in the United States. Eugenics research was financially supported by the Rockefeller and other elite families and first tested on Jews under Nazi Germany.
Notes, Links, Rough Transcript
“As I dug into the research of GMO and the patenting of seeds, I came across something that perked my ears up, and that was that the earliest research on GMO’s. was financed by the Rockefeller Foundation. That interested me tremendously because I have spent years researching the Rockefeller machine – the Political machine of the most powerful family in America after WWII, and what I found out astonished even me.
I went back to the 1930’s and found that the Rockefellers had actually created an entire field of the study of biology. They created a fraudulent branch of biology called molecular-biology, based on a principle of scientific reductionism. They maintain that they could reduce the complexity of life to a single gene, and be able to shoot foreign matter into that gene and change the expression of that gene. The problem with this, is that it’s not stable among other things. Into the 40’s with it’s tax-free money was one of the few sources for scientific research in these Elite universities and they grabbed it up, and began promoting molecular biology. Then, right after the war, Nelson Rockefeller, took a scientist that worked for the Rockefeller University, down to Mexico to see about the possibilities of introducing a variety of wheat called ‘Wonder Wheat” and a green revolution was born. A lot of hype and lies.
The green revolution was aimed at creating “Agri-Business”. In the early 1950s, the Rockefeller Foundation financed a project that today dominates the human food chain around the world. Agribusiness. Almost 100% of the corn grown is genetically-manipulated, virtually all of the soy-beans in the world. Patented seeds largely from Monsanto. The business model is a corporate model. The idea of a farmer that gets up and cares about the health of his animals, gets up at 4am when one of his cows takes ill or something to find out what the problem is – that began to be transformed in the 1970’s into Industrialized farming – mass feed lots, where 10’s of 1000’s of animals are crowded together. They started with chickens, and by now it’s spread to virtually all of the meat that is consumed. It’s pumped up with antibiotics to make them grow faster, and then it’s fed a diet of GMO almost exclusively. It’s probably a good time to think about becoming a vegetarian. Virtually all of the power feed is GMO.
Monsanto Harvester of Fear. in 1980 the U.S. Supreme Court, in a five-to-four decision, turned seeds into widgets, laying the groundwork for a handful of corporations to begin taking control of the world’s food supply. In its decision, the court extended patent law to cover “a live human-made microorganism.” In this case, the organism wasn’t even a seed. Rather, it was a Pseudomonas bacterium developed by a General Electric scientist to clean up oil spills. But the precedent was set, and Monsanto took advantage of it.
The idea of GMO came from very powerful and evil people with a fascination with something called Eugenics – race-breeding science. You have a superior race, like the Rockefellers or Rothschilds (as they see it), and then you have the unwanted, the human cancer that spreads and reproduces. After the end of WWII, the Rockefellers became some of the largest finances of something called the American Eugenics Society, out of which came the Planned Parenthood Foundation, which is nothing but a disguised form of Eugenics, and during the 30’s, they created the Negro Project. “If the black ministers ever get wind of the Negro Project is about reducing the Negro population, then our project is in real trouble”. That was Eugenics.
They held a conference and announced the new name of Eugenics is Genetics, and that began this mad project to try to alter the gene – to manipulate the gene of life – by reducing the complexity of biological life, down to the single gene, and changing its expression. The same Rockefeller foundation, from the 1920s into the eve of the first World War, financed all of the Eugenics research, from the time that Hitler came into power until 1939 – research on how to eliminate “Useless Eaters”, “Undesirable”, “Gypsies”, “Jews” and so forth. Nazi doctors were all receiving money from the Rockefellers. This is the geo-political background to the GMO project.
Center for Genetics and Society Eugenics refers to beliefs and practices aimed at controlling reproduction in order to “improve” the characteristics of human populations. In the early 20th century, eugenic beliefs were intertwined with the developing science of genetics.
Is modern genetics the new eugenics?. Genet Med 5, 469–475 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.GIM.0000093978.77435.17
The 4 Rockefeller brothers divided the world up among them after the war, In the 50’s, John D Rockefeller created the Population Council. The purpose of the Population Council, was to reduce population. They hired demographers at Elite Universities to come up with scary numbers to terrify the population about how Indian people are reproducing like rabbits, and there’s famine because there’s “too many people in India” and so forth. Africa, China, they did the same thing. So that most of the world came to believe – especially in the Industrial world – that the greatest danger on earth today is “Over-Population” but, ‘don’t worry because the Rockefellers, through their Population Council, began funding all sorts of research in birth control devices’.
In the 1970s, Henry Kissinger was commissioned to do a top-secret study called NSSM 200, in the 1990’s, it was declassified and people could read it, but it became official US government policy to impose Population-Reduction on what Kissinger called “developing countries where they have rapid population growth and rich, raw material resources that the West needs to fight the Cold War – oil, metal, rare earth etc. Kissinger argued that these rapid population increases, will create a population that will demand their governments that they get a share of the pie, that they have an economic development – a good standard of living, adequate food, shelter and so forth. They made as a condition of any US government aid, that third world or developing countries, had to have a population plan in place.
Gradually, the United Nations, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund adopted (on US/Washington Pressure) these population-reduction policies, so they did not have to do it through the US government, they had plausible deniability. This is some of the background to the Rockefeller GMO Project.
Then they went to an Institute that the Rockefeller money had created called the International Rice Research Institute in the Philippines, and financed the development of what they called “Golden Rice” because it was yellowish in colour, but the argument was that “we will develop rice that is genetically modified to contain Vitamin A, so that new-borns in poverty-areas of Asia would not have blindness that is caused by Vitamin A deficiency. After years of research, they developed their golden rice, is that a new-born would have to eat 8kg of golden rice everyday to get the amount of vitamin A that you get from carrots and other natural vegetables. So that project did not quite go the way the Rockefellers had dreamed.
Then in the USA, Monsanto went to the Whitehouse in 1992 and convinced Bush that America had developed something that could make American Agriculture the World King – Patented Seeds, paired to Monsanto-chemicals. Monsanto had been in the orbit of the Rockefellers (a Rockefeller was on the board) since WWI making chemicals and Agent Orange and Dioxin and other such things. Bush agreed to issue instructions to the FDA, the NIH, and US Dept of Agriculture, that GMO corn and soy-beans look, smell, taste like the real thing, that we don’t need to do any independent studies whether it’s healthy for humans or animals, that it’s substantially equivalent. By putting the word “substantially” in there – you completely change the rules of the game. It’s not equivalent. It’s an unnatural transformation of normal seeds. That declaration by President Bush which has been reinforced by every single President – Bill Clinton, Baby Bush and now Barak Obama, that there is no Independent Testing of the Health and Safety of GMO.
U.S. Agent Orange/Dioxin Assistance to Vietnam Updated February 10, 2021 (PDF)
The British Medical Association (BMA) has asked for a Moratorium on GMO FOOD 1999 – The BMA believes that insufficient care has been taken with regards to public health and the introduction of GM crops to the UK. We believe there is a greater need for more comprehensive risk assessments which include interactions between GMOs and the long term effects on health and the environment before field trials are taken any further.
Detection of transgenic and endogenous plant DNA in digesta and tissues of sheep and pigs fed Roundup Ready canola meal. J Agric Food Chem. 2006 Mar 8;54(5):1699-709. doi: 10.1021/jf052459o. PMID: 16506822.
Science in Society # 37 – Spring 2008 Redeeming Science from Corporate Corruption (SiS 37), studies performed by, or on behalf of, companies claiming to show GM food is safe, and accepted by government regulators as such, do nothing of the kind. We are faced with a corporate corruption of science in which every level of the corporate structure is complicit: the scientific establishment, journal editors and big government held to ransom by the biotech industry.
Not only that, the GMO lobby – the companies themselves (Monsanto, etc) drafted the rules that became the agreement of Agriculture for something called the World Trade Organization in the 1990s. In those rules, if a country tries to stop Free-Trade in GMO Soy beans from Monsanto, from coming into the country, that they are in violation of WTO rules. The health and safety of a nation is deemed less important. The rules were very carefully written by very clever Monsanto lawyers so it looks like it’s protecting health and safety when it does quite the opposite. are written by very clever Monsanto lawyers
Documents made public from a lawsuit show that the overwhelming consensus among the FDA’s own scientists was that GM crops were inherently unsafe and could create hard-to-detect, unpredicted toxins, allergens, new diseases, and nutritional problems and had, in fact, urged their superiors to… Self-propagating genetic pollution will outlast, theoretically, the effects of global warming and nuclear waste. We have never had an experience like this before in our history.
The European Union had a problem in 2003. Whilst the FDA and Commissioners were happy to take Monsanto money under the table, the general public resisted these GMO’s, so Baby Bush decided to sue the European Union for not accepting more GMO in the EU. They partly won the suit, but still there has been no wide-spread acceptance of GMO in Europe. Austria forbids GMO. A number of countries in Europe also do not allow GMO.
The situation today is such, that virtually all the packaged-meat are GMO (unless you can verify that its come from a local farmer that has taken pains to feed non-GMO feed to his pigs, cattle or chickens).
The study documented, the scientists in France documented that the chemical that’s paired to the modified seeds – and you cannot buy Round-up Ready seeds without signing a contract that you’ll buy Roundup, which not only contains glyphosate, it contains proprietary chemicals which are not revealed to the public as to what they are, and Séralinis’ team, tested the chemicals, and found that these chemicals are toxic to cells in a human embryo, in quantities less than that recommended for garden-usage, and Roundup is the most common weed-killer in the world today. It’s a form of chemical warfare.
Ethoxylated adjuvants of glyphosate-based herbicides are active principles of human cell toxicity. Toxicology. 2013 Nov 16;313(2-3):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Sep 21. PMID: 23000283.
Study points to adjuvants working with glyphosate to cause a particularly lethal concoction.
Glyphosate commercial formulation causes cytotoxicity, oxidative effects, and apoptosis on human cells: differences with its active ingredient. Int J Toxicol. 2014 Jan-Feb;33(1):29-38. doi: 10.1177/1091581813517906. Epub 2014 Jan 16. PMID: 24434723.
“causing toxic effects on the human genome” “The glyphosate formulation studied also triggered two ‘death proteins’ in human cells known as caspase 3/7, inducing pathways that activate programmed cell death (apoptosis), a clear sign of significant toxicity.”
Roundup National Toxic Encephalopathy Foundation (PDF) Very aggressive public relations and marketing by its developer, Monsanto, has resulted in the widespread belief that glyphosate is ‘safe’. Registration processes have generally supported this attitude, and there are no national or international bans. However, independent scientific studies and widespread poisonings in Latin America (resulting from aerial application) are beginning to reveal the true effects of glyphosate-based herbicides.
Differential effects of glyphosate and roundup on human placental cells and aromatase. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Jun;113(6):716-20. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7728. PMID: 15929894; PMCID: PMC1257596. Richard S, Moslemi S, Sipahutar H, Benachour N, Seralini GE.
Time- and dose-dependent effects of roundup on human embryonic and placental cells. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2007 Jul;53(1):126-33. doi: 10.1007/s00244-006-0154-8. Epub 2007 May 4. PMID: 17486286.
The cytotoxic, and potentially endocrine-disrupting effects of Roundup are thus amplified with time. Taken together, these data suggest that Roundup exposure may affect human reproduction and fetal development in case of contamination. Chemical mixtures in formulations appear to be underestimated regarding their toxic or hormonal impact.
Glyphosate-based herbicides are toxic and endocrine disruptors in human cell lines. Toxicology. 2009 Aug 21;262(3):184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.06.006. Epub 2009 Jun 17. PMID: 19539684.
Glyphosate tolerant crops bring diseases and death .Science in Society 47.12-15, 2010.
Benachour & Seralini concluded “this work clearly confirms that the adjuvants in Roundup formulations are not inert” (Ho & Cherry 2009).
A Comparison of the Effects of Three GM Corn Varieties on Mammalian Health. Int J Biol Sci 2009; 5(7):706-726. doi:10.7150/ijbs.5.706. de Vendômois JS, Roullier F, Cellier D, Séralini GE.
Why Glyphosate Should Be Banned – Institute of Science in Society Special Report
In 1999, Monsanto got into trouble with the project. Kissigner said back in the 70’s if you control oil, you control entire nations, and if you control food, you control the people.
Control what we eat, the toxins that build up in our system that 20-30 years later emerge as cancer or heart problems or other things that make us ineffective as live, thinking, active people that can make trouble for government policies that are destructive to us.
So in 1999, they announced that they are not only buying up all the Independent Seed companies around the world, but they were buying something called Delta and Pine Land – who in cooperation with the US gov’t, had developed a seed called Genetic Use Restriction Technology (GURT) or “Terminator Technology”.
Terminator allows Monsanto to sell seeds to a farmer in India, China, or Africa and that seed will commit-suicide after one harvest, so you’re in a form of bondage that has never before been possible in the history of Agriculture. Farmers cannot re-plant a portion of the seeds for their next harvest – they completely lose their Independence to a foreign multinational, and on that basis alone:
even if GMO’s would increase harvest yield
even if it could be proven that GMO’s were completely safe to human and animal health (which they aren’t)
and even if they required less herbicide (which they don’t, they require more)
I would oppose GMO with all my energy because it’s controlled by 3-4 multi-nationals – chemical companies – and 3 of those are some of the most criminal corporations on the face of the earth. They developed Agent Orange, lied about the effects of it on their own employees to avoid paying liabilities, and the US govt has lied about it and not acknowledged the damage that American soldiers underwent from the toxic effects of working with Agent Orange during the war, and they did the same with Dioxin, with PCBs, dumping it into the water nearby their factories in the US. And these 3 corporations, which intimately work with the Pentagon and have for decades, on chemical-warfare – we are supposed to trust Monsanto, that they do the scientific studies that are given to the government, that the government doesn’t need to waste tax payer money doing independent scientific studies like Séralini did in France?
Genetics is the new name of Eugenics. The GMO Project. Genocide.
Epicyte September 2001. The world was preoccupied with other things, like planes flying into buildings. Epicyte did a press release saying that their spermicidal corn was the solution to over-population. He had developed corn, when eaten by a male, makes the sperm infertile, so you cannot conceive.
These are people who are out to reduce the population to several hundred million because they regard people as cancer. Epicyte disappeared as an independent company, it was bought up by North Carolina biotech company, but not before it signed licencing agreements with Dow chemical, Dow Agrisciences, another one of the GMO giants, to licence this spermicidal corn worldwide. For obvious political reasons, they’re keeping a low-profile on spermicidal corn, but it would be interesting to test to what extent the corn seed varieties has been contaminated with.
In 2001 scientists at the Epicyte bio-lab in San Diego created the ultimate GM crop—'contraceptive corn'—after researchers discovered a rare class of human antibodies that attack sperm. By isolating the genes that regulate the manufacture of these antibodies, and by putting them in corn plants, the company has created tiny horticultural factories that make contraceptives.
Announcing his success at a press conference, the president of Epicyte, Mitch Hein, pointing to his GMO corn plants and announced, "We have a hothouse filled with corn plants that make anti-sperm antibodies."
Shortly after the 2001 Epicyte press release, all discussion of the breakthrough vanished. The company itself was taken over in 2004 by Biolex and nothing more was heard in any media about the development of spermicidal corn.
Some people say nobody in their right mind would do such a thing, would they? The problem is, there are people who are not in their right minds, and many of the most powerful, bad people on our planet, are not in their right minds, and they are doing this.
Together with the government of Norway and other foundation money, the Rockefellers spent years, in cooperation with the World UnHealthy Organization in Geneva, the WHO, developing a vaccine for Tetanus. They began giving free Vaccination in the early 1990s to women in Nicaragua, Mexico between the ages 14-45, but not to the men. Fortunately a Catholic Doctors Association became suspicious when the vaccine was only being offered to women of a child-bearing age, and took a sample of the vaccine to an independent laboratory and held a press conference announcing that it was laced with an abortifacient, that would cause a women who had conceived to abort. The WHO denied. The Catholic Doctors Association produced the lab-results, and WHO said “Oh, it must’ve been a bad batch, a contaminated batch”. This is what the GMO revolution is all about.
Tetanus vaccine may be laced with anti-fertility drug. International / developing countries. Vaccine Wkly. 1995 May 29 – Jun 5:9-10. PMID: 12346214.
They’re not intended to improve the world. They’re intended to control. They can switch-off the seed-supply in a second without notice if say China didn’t do what Washington wanted. We’ve seen what Washington has done with the banking system – cutting off the oil sales of a country like Iran because they decide to.
Monsanto has teamed up with the Gates Foundation, being “great” Humanitarians introducing vaccines all over Africa – they have a project to vaccinate every child in Africa with various forms of poisons. Instead of spending 10 billion dollars on clean water supplies which would have a dramatic effect on sickness and death, they’re spending 10 billion on injecting every child in Africa with poisons called vaccines.
The Gates foundation has become a major shareholder in Monsanto and they also, together with the Rockefeller Foundation, two of the biggest private foundations of the world, sponsor something called the Green Revolution in Africa. The secretary-general of the United Nations for many years, Kofi Annan, was recruited by Bill Gates and David Rockefeller and company, to become the secretary of the Green Revolution in Africa. The project is to introduce GMO all across Africa by stealth, and many African countries are not as stupid as some white people think – they can actually read and write and read scientific reports on the internet and reject things that they think are unhealthy for them.
Bill Gates, David Rockefeller and Warren Buffet, issued an invitation to a group of the ten of the wealthiest people in America, to come to a meeting at the Rockefeller University’s presidents house in New York, to create something they call “The Good Club”. This was in the middle of the greatest financial crisis in human history, and one would think that these very wealthy, powerful people might be talking about “What can we do to avoid such financial crisis?” No, they didn’t care about that. They talked about how to solve the Human Population explosion – that was the most-pressing problem. Some have estimated that within 20-30 years, the greatest population problem we’ll have on this planet is a collapse of population-growth-rates – the demographic “Opposite” of what people in the Obama administration and virtually every US gov’t since Jimmy Carter’s day, have claimed as the “greatest problem facing mankind (this “over-population”).
On the advice of the Population Council of John D Rockefeller III, the Chinese government, 30 years ago, adopted the “one child policy“, so China is facing a demographic catastrophe in that within about 20 years, there will be 100 million Chinese males, with no statistical possibility of a female partner. Imagine the kind of unrest that that’s likely to cause.
I’m told by Chinese professors that Monsanto has come into Rural Areas of China and bribed local government officials to introduce GMO seeds. “
In 2008 we had a dramatic spike in world grain prices, rice & grains. At the same time there was a dramatic rise in the oil rise, over $140 a barrel. This was manipulated by the Wall St banks as they were trying to recoup the losses of the real estate debacle, and it was manipulated by the Bush administration by offering tax-payer subsidies to farmers to take land out of Agriculture cultivation and grow corn to “burn as fuel”.
40% of the corn harvest in the US in 2008 was being used for bio-fuels and that created a shortage on the world grain markets – harvest failures I believe because of drought in Russia and certain other grain belts of the Ukraine, but the price of grains went soaring through the roof.
It commissioned on Pontifical Academy of Science – there are 5 Pontifical Academies of Science in the Vatican – the academy has on it’s advisors, well-known & respectable scientists around the world, the problem is, they are not always ‘honest’ scientists. The Pontifical Academy of Science decided to give GMO the green light and the Vatican as an official policy had resisted GMO up until that time, but they got an ailing pope (or thought they had an ailing pope) to be convinced of the benefit of GMO to solve World Hunger.
Even though Pope’s are supposed to be infalliable, that he doesn’t have time to do original research on the scientific validity of GMO of such issues, so he relies on expert advice. The head of this Pontifical Academy gave a Press Conference and he said “GMO’s are perfectly fine for humans, this is rubbish that they have a bad effect on our health – I know because I was Pontifical representative for the Vatican at the United Nations in New York for 8 years, and I ate GMO all the time, and look at me, I’m fine!”. Talk about an idiot.
Political manipulation, because the US Govt pushes this poison as ‘active policy’ as Wikileaks demonstrated with the Ambassador to France pushing Monsanto.
Wikileaks cable reveals U.S. conspired to retaliate against European nations if they resisted GMOs – Health Ranger Commentary, 2010 – PDF
The former United States ambassador to France suggested “moving to retaliation” against France and the European Union (EU) in late 2007 to fight a French ban on Monsanto’s genetically modified (GM) corn and changes in European policy toward biotech crops, according to a cable released by WikiLeaks.
U.S. diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks reveal the Bush administration drew up ways to retaliate against Europe for refusing to use genetically modified seeds. In 2007, then-U.S. ambassador to France Craig Stapleton was concerned about France’s decision to ban cultivation of genetically modified corn produced by biotech giant Monsanto. He also warned that a new French environmental review standard could spread anti-biotech policy across Europe. We speak with Jeffrey Smith of the Institute for Responsible Technology.
Leaked Cable: US to Start ‘Trade Wars’ with Nations Opposed to Monsanto, GMO Crops – The United States is threatening nations who oppose Monsanto’s genetically modified (GM) crops with military-style trade wars, according to information obtained and released by the organization WikiLeaks. Nations like France, which have moved to ban one of Monsanto’s GM corn varieties, were requested to be ‘penalized’ by the United States for opposing Monsanto and genetically modified foods. The information reveals just how deep Monsanto’s roots have penetrated key positions within the United States government, with the cables reporting that many U.S. diplomats work directly for Monsanto.
The Pope was invited to the Food & Agriculture Conference in Rome, and it was believed by the organisers (by the US Government and others), that the Pope had been convinced by this Pontifical Academy to give the holy blessing to GMO to solve World Hunger. Which it won’t – quite the opposite. Something happened, and the secretary of a second Pontifical Academy had been given a copy of my book by a priest in Baltimore, Maryland who knew him personally, and the priest in Baltimore, told the secretary “I don’t recommend you read this book, I order you to read this book. You must read this, it is extremely important”.
To my knowledge, my book is the only book that talks about GMO as a conscious genocide project. Other excellent books took about the health risks of GMO and various things, but this is the only geo-political analysis in the world so far as I know, about the dangers of GMO.
So the secretary of the Pontifical Academy of Life got an audience with the Pope, one on one, and briefed him on the real truth about GMO. Well, the next week came this World Hunger Conference, and the Pope appeared as a speaker as was planned, and said not a single word about approving GMO. So the US Ambassador was blue with rage but there was nothing he could do – the Pope refused to sanction GMO. He even gave an Easter Sermon where he said “These are men playing with genetics, these are men who are playing at being God, but aren’t.” So he had gotten the point quite nicely. You cannot control life in this way, but the Rockefellers are obsessive psychopaths, and they don’t give up so easily.
At this point, the GMO lobby had been badly wounded by March Against Monsanto campaign. They are not by any means dead, they still held the patents, they still have a US Supreme Court that’s allowed patents on life to stand in court – something that ought to be prohibited in every country on earth – and they are trying to spread GMO in countries where they think they can bribe officials more easily, like China, Africa, India, but there are revolts appearing in all these countries.
So the perspective is by no means bleak, but we should know exactly what it is that has been done to poison us, our children, and grandchildren, and take the requisite measures to change that, thank you.
Engdahl also wrote two important books - "A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order" in 2004. It's an essential history of geopolitics and the importance of oil. Engdahl explains that America's post-WW II dominance rests on two pillars and one commodity - unchallengeable military power and the dollar as the world's reserve currency combined with the quest to control global oil and other energy resources.
Engdahl's newest book is just out from Global Research: "Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation" and subject of this review. It's the diabolical story of how Washington and four Anglo-American agribusiness giants plan world domination by patenting life forms to gain worldwide control of our food supply and why that prospect is chilling. The book's compelling contents are reviewed below in-depth so readers will know the type future Henry Kissinger had in mind in 1970 when he said: "Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people."
Remember also, this cabal is one of many interconnected ones with fearsome power and ruthless intent to use it - Big Banks controlling the Federal Reserve and our money,
Insects As Flying Syringes For Genetic Modification, Eugenics And Population Control
POSTED BY: TESSA LENA VIA MERCOLA.COM JULY 28, 2022
My presentation for the Crimes Against Humanity Task Force documents and explains the history behind “the takeover of all genetic material on earth”. The manipulation of life on earth is an old dream but technology has now provided the means to accomplish it, and Technocrat/Transhuman scientists are working day and night to change the world’s DNA. My forthcoming book, The Evil Twins of Technocracy and Transhumanism, will connect all the dots to this mad program. It is being serialized on https://patrickwood.substack.com/⁃ TN Editor
"Voices from DARPA" Podcast, Episode 6: The Insectophile
Blake Bextine of the Agency’s Biological Technologies Office talks about his virus- and insect-mediated vision for protecting food crops from natural and human-wrought threats, including drought and biological warfare. With his Insect Allies program, Bextine aims to increase food security by recruiting insects to deliver viruses, which have been modified to bear protective genes, into plants where those virus-carried genes could save the plants from the threats they face. He also shares ideas about a future with more insects on the menu to feed the many more mouths that likely will be on the planet.
Irresponsible use of new and very advanced technologies by the military is life-threatening
Engineered viruses can be used to edit genes in a target species, including in a heritable manner
“Insect Allies” is a DARPA program designed to genetically modify mature plants in a live environment by releasing insects infected with genetically modified viruses
Some scientists, although on board with genetic modification in principle, are questioning DARPA’s motives and raising concerns
Researchers in Singapore, as well as DARPA in the U.S. have developed “remote-controlled insects”
BREAKING NEWS: The craziest crazies have somehow escaped the asylum and installed themselves in high positions of power. Insane, they are coming up with one bad idea after another and barking orders at us, mad shine in their eyes and saliva coming out of their mouths. They are crazy — and in charge of institutions, schools, newspapers and armies.
They are running around with their high-tech pistols filled with high-tech poisons and their little sadistic CRISPR scissors. They are crazy — yes, they are crazy — and they are killing us slowly, and sometimes not so slowly. Welcome to the future where toxicity is health and the old crazy is the new normal. We are not crazy — they are crazy — and they have been from the beginning. And in 2020, they stopped pretending. What now?
Project “Insect Allies”
You may think that you have seen it all but here is a great idea. Take some insects, infect them with a genetically modified virus designed to genetically edit mature plants in real time, and release them. Release them into wild and repeat, “it’s safe and effective.”
Sweet idea, right? Well, DARPA thought so, and so in 2016, they started a project called “Insect Allies” that is designed to do that. (This is a different project from Oxitec’s controversial release of GM mosquitos.) DARPA’s official story is that in the name of national security, a good way to protect the American crops from potential threats is to genetically modify them using GM viruses as genetic modifiers and insects as flying syringes. And that they just need to test it!
In a 2016 release titled, “DARPA Enlists Insects to Protect Agricultural Food Supply,” the agency stated:
“A new DARPA program is poised to provide an alternative to traditional agricultural threat response, using targeted gene therapy to protect mature plants within a single growing season.
DARPA proposes to leverage a natural and very efficient two-step delivery system to transfer modified genes to plants: insect vectors and the plant viruses they transmit. In the process, DARPA aims to transform certain insect pests into ‘Insect Allies,’ the name of the new effort.”
“‘Insect Allies’ three technical areas — trait design, insect vector optimization, and selective gene therapy in mature plants — layer together to support the goal of rapidly transforming mature plants to protect against natural or intentional agricultural disruption without the need for extensive infrastructure. The foundational knowledge and generalizable tools developed under the program could also support future agricultural innovation.”
Some suspicious peasants may foolishly wonder: What will happen in the short term and in the long term to the people who eat those plants, to the people and animals possibly bitten by those insects, to the wild insects who mate with the infected insects, and to all other life in the area and beyond that may get impacted? What ridiculous nonsense. Here is the answer, peasant: No one knows — and importantly, no one cares. Any more questions?
The first Insect Allies funded paper, titled, “Multiplexed heritable gene editing using RNA viruses and mobile single guide RNAs,” was published in 2020. Please note the word “heritable” in the headline. The paper stated:
“Mutant progeny are recovered in the next generation at frequencies ranging from 65 to 100%; up to 30% of progeny derived from plants infected with a virus expressing three sgRNAs have mutations in all three targeted loci.”
DARPA never disclosed if they tested this program outside of greenhouses.
Objections From the Scientific Community and Even the Pre-2020 Media
Actually, it turned out that a few scientists care — and at least during the pre-COVID era, they have objected.
Here is a short 2019 educational animation made by the German Max Planck Society (formerly the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History). Their main objection is the potential weaponization of the technology, they don’t mind the gene editing in principle.
But our standards for health and dignity are so low that this objection is better than no objection, and even this limited kind of objection and questioning DARPA takes some courage (even though it’s unknown if they would have objected in 2020).
Scientists want to use insects to transfer genetically modified viruses to crops in order to make them fitter against pests or environmental influences. But what happens when the viruses become independent? Or the technology for the military is misappropriated? More information: www.mpg.de/12318180/darpa-insect-ally
And here is what Vice (!!) had to say in 2018 about the outcry from scientists:
“In the editorial, published on Thursday in Science Magazine, scientists from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology and the University of Freiburg in Germany, and France’s Université de Montpellier, requested more transparency and opportunities for public discussion regarding the project and its implications.
‘Easy simplifications could be used to generate a new class of biological weapons,’ a press release reads, ‘weapons that would be extremely transmissible to susceptible crop species due to insect dispersion as the means of delivery.’”
What did DARPA say?
“In an email to Motherboard, a DARPA spokesperson rebutted the thesis of the Science Magazine piece and denied any intent to deploy technology developed through Insect Allies in an offensive setting.
‘We created Insect Allies specifically to develop technology that can deliver positive, protective traits to plants to help them survive unanticipated and/or fast-moving agricultural threats,’ the spokesperson wrote. ‘We see it as a critical addition to the national security toolkit, part of a layered strategy to preserve the security of the food supply.’”
“The Insect Allies program is a collaboration between the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Environmental Protection Agency, US Army, and other agencies. According to a DARPA slide presentation, the goal of Insect Allies is to “stably transform multiple mature crop plants in a complex, multi-species plant and insect community with enhanced trait(s) of agricultural interest” by mid-2021.”
Newsweek covered it, too. In a 2018 article, they said that “the U.S. government’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has been accused of trying to create a new class of biological weapons that would be delivered via virus-infected insects.”
“Scientists with DARPA are looking at introducing genetically modified viruses that can edit chromosomes directly in fields — these are known as horizontal environmental genetic alteration agents (HEGAAs). The DARPA program is using the principles of HEGAAs but, unlike traditional methods of dispersal — like spraying fields with them — it wants to spread them through insects.”
The researchers raising the alarm asked specifically why, for agricultural use, it was so important to use insects as gene modification vectors, given that spraying was available. In response to Newsweek at the time, DARPA denied all allegations of military use and reiterated that the project’s aim was to protect American crops. In 2022, another paper was published where researchers expressed their concerns:
“The hazard and exposure potential of an HEGAA approach can vary greatly depending on the viruses, vector insects, target plant species, and genetic modifications selected and their effects. However, at the current stage of development, the most critical aspect is the compromised reliability of the HEGAA approach, owing mainly to its complex design with three different species …
They are a cause for concern because of the numerous effects that can increase the potential for hazard and exposure. Combined with the current inadequacy of corrective measures, it is clear that there is an urgent need for early analysis of whether HEGAA approaches can be inherently contained and controlled by their specific technology design.”
“Horizontal Environmental Genetic Alteration Agents”
What are HEGAAs? According to Wikipedia, the term “genetic alteration agent” first appears in 2016 in relation to this project, in a “work plan by DARPA describing a tender for contracts to develop genetically modified plant viruses for an approach involving their dispersion into the environment. The prefixing of ‘horizontal environmental’ to the former to generate the acronym HEGAA was first used in the [aforementioned] 2018 scientific publication.”
“Agents such as pathogens, symbionts or synthetic protein assemblages that can be acquired through horizontal transmission in the environment can potentially be engineered to become HEGAAs. This would be achieved using biotechnology methods to confer to them the capacity to alter nucleotides in the chromosomes of infected individuals through sequence-specific editing systems like CRISPR, ZFNs or TALENs.
No known infectious agent naturally has the capacity to gene edit eukaryotes in a manner that can be flexibly targeted to specific sequences (distinct from substantially random natural processes like retroviral integration).”
“By definition, HEGAA induced gene editing events are intended to occur outside of contained facilities such as laboratories or hospitals.
While genetically modified viruses with CRISPR editing have been successfully used as research tools in laboratories or for gene therapy in clinical settings, all gene editing events are intended to physically occur within contained facilities. By contrast, HEGAAs for their intended mode of action relies on inducing gene editing events that occur largely or exclusively in the environment.”
There are two types of HEGAAs: somatic and germline. Somatic HEGAAs are not inheritable, while germline ones “impact somatic cells and also cell lineages from which germline cells can be ultimately generated (e.g. sperm, oocytes, pollen, ovules, zygotes or seeds).”
When it comes to the “Insect Allies” project, it’s a gray area. The original assumption was that “Insect Allies” involved somatic HEGAAs but the aforementioned 2020 paper shows that the genetic changes in plants were heritable. Here is more detail:
HEGAAs are viruses which have been genetically modified to gain a capacity to edit the chromosomes of a target species (e.g. plant or animal) when intentionally released into the environment
The word “horizontal” comes from their ability to be transmitted in the environment by infection
The word “environmental” comes from the intention for these genetically modified viruses to be dispersed into the environment
The words “genetic alteration agents” comes from the capacity to alter the chromosomes of a target species. This might be through causing a random mutation or introducing a new DNA sequence
The specificity of HEGAAs is dependent on two things (1) the range of species the genetically modified virus can infect AND (2) the presence of the suitable DNA sequences in the plant chromosomes of cells that become infected
An example of an insect dispersed viral HEGAA which disrupts a specific plant gene is illustrated in this figure below
All in all, this informational Max Planck Society affiliated website, whose purpose is “to contribute towards fostering an informed and public debate about this type of technology,” is one of the best sources of information on HEGAAs and the “Insect Allies” project. Incidentally, this particular website covers self-spreading vaccines as well. Here is a little video promo of the Euroscience Open Forum 2020:
This is a live panel discussion open to everyone with any interest in hearing about techniques that would require the intentional dispersion of genetically modified viruses into the environment. Brief accessible introductions to the two main topics under discussion will be given. Followed by a discussion and Q&A session on the considerable issues raised by these proposed techniques.
And here it the actual 2020 panel (some of it is already outdated but very educational):
To what extent might GM virus technologies developed for contained uses alter the underlying reasons historically used to justify not releasing GM viruses into the environment? This session aims to foster discussion on deliberate releases of GM viruses into the environment and the implications of developments that might be anticipated within the next 2-5 years. Perspectives from biological and social scientists, ethicists, and policy experts will focus on examples from actual ongoing R&D efforts: (1) transmissible viruses intended to manipulate the immune system of mammals (including rabbits and humans) upon infection (e.g., mass vaccination of entire populations; high hazard strategy); (2) gene editing viruses intended to genetically modify the chromosomes of the individuals they infect (e.g., genetically manipulating crops already planted in fields); (3) non-transmissible viruses without capacity for gene editing (e.g., protecting Florida orange trees from bacterial pathogens, low hazard technique).
One of the panelists above mentions “Project Coast” is South Africa — and while it is not directly related to “Insect Allies,” it kind of is.
“Project Coast” was a toxin and bioweapon development project that took place in South Africa during the apartheid era. As a part of that project, scientists developed covert assassination tools and methods of covert sterilization, intended against the black population of South Africa. A warning? No really, a warning?
Project Coast: Was the South African Apartheid regime's secret bio-weapon's lab, and its connection with British scientist and authority on biological warfare, David Kelly; and their secret bio-weapon's and eugenics program. The colonial Apartheid regime's goal was to develop GMO bio-weapons aimed toward genociding the native Black, South African populations, using weaponized Anthax, Ebola, Marburg and sterilization through toxic vaccines.
see also: Project Coast - Wikipedia
Back to DARPA
Here is more from the MPS-affiliated informational website:
“Even as the halfway point of the Insect Allies program approaches, DARPA has chosen not to publicly describe in its response to our Science article what is the basis of their having concluded that a developmental pathway exists that circumvents the early proliferation of biological weapons (described by the black development path in the accompanying image).
This is in addition to explaining in detail why their developmental plan is easier to develop than alternative paths (described by the red paths). As our Science article makes clear, this is central to justifying the wisdom of embarking on the development of HEGAAs, and many other types of GM viruses.
Over the next five years, only a minority of anticipated CRISPR-inspired innovations will involve intentional environmental releases (see recent NAS report). HEGAAs, and some other GM viruses, have the property of an early-stage biological weapons proliferation risk that is not shared with most other proposed techniques (including avant-garde ones like gene drive).
Choosing not to clearly address these obvious issues of global concern, as detailed in the Science article, makes their current model of develop first and explain later an especially unwise path, particularly for this insect-delivered program, that in many ways appears to be designed to get carried away.”
To provide a backdrop for the “Insect Allies” project, here is a brief look at the DARPA “Living Foundries” bioengineering program, launched in 2010.
DARPA’s Living Foundries program aims to “enable adaptable, scalable, and on-demand production of critical, high-value molecules by programming the fundamental metabolic processes of biological systems to generate a vast number of complex molecules.”
“Programming Biological Systems”
In order to orient ourselves in this attempted new normal, we need to understand the mindset. Please note the use of term “engineer” all throughout this benevolent-sounding presentation:
Dr. Justin Gallivan, Program Manager in DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office (BTO), discusses how biology can be tapped to yield breakthrough materials and systems. The talk was part of a two-day event held by BTO to bring together leading-edge technologists, start-ups, industry, and academic researchers to look at how advances in engineering and information sciences can be used to drive biology for technological advantage.
DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office
DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office was founded in 2014. Here is an informational video on, in their own words, “DARPA’s way of thinking about biological technology to defend the homeland.”
This session from DARPA’s 60th anniversary symposium, D60, highlights the role of DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office in defending the homeland. BTO Director Dr. Justin Sanchez presents a new biosecurity framework to address the nation’s need for novel capabilities to counter bioterrorism, to deploy innovative biological countermeasures for warfighter protection, and to accelerate force readiness. In addition, Dr. Sanchez provides examples of BTO efforts within the framework, including restoration of nervous system function and achieving cognitive overmatch.
Former Secretary of the Navy Dr. Richard Danzig draws some lessons from history to inform potential solutions for future biological security concerns. Providing a law enforcement perspective, FBI Supervisory Special Agent Ed You describes the current bio-threat landscape. Frontline Ebola physician Dr. Nahid Bhadelia presents her firsthand experience responding to the recent major outbreak in West Africa. Navy Seal Neil Hermansen delivers insights into the challenges facing the nation’s special operation forces.
According to DARPA’s website:
“DARPA has enjoyed a strong relationship with Silicon Valley since the early 1960s, working with innovators to lay the groundwork for new industries built around Agency investments in semiconductors, networking, artificial intelligence, user interfaces, programming, materials, microsystems, and more.
[We knew that!!!] Biotech is now emerging as a breakthrough opportunity space and it represents an area that is ripe for fresh collaboration among DARPA, the nation’s top researchers, venture capitalists, and entrepreneurs.”
Here are some of the listed topic of interests:
Building with Biology Using Engineered Living Materials, which focused on programming DNA to grow materials to specifications at the sites where they are needed and developing living materials that are responsive to their environments and can heal when damaged;
Staying on Target: Minimizing Off-Target Effects in Gene Editing, which focused on making personalized medicine feasible by conducting rapid, low-cost screens of an individual’s likely responses to tailored gene therapy;
Creating a Pandemic-free World, which focused on DARPA’s vision of distributed healthcare that combines technology to detect pandemic outbreaks, rapidly identify and grow potent antibodies to fight infectious disease, and response tools for creating a pandemic firebreak;
Immunity on Demand [emphasis mine], which focused on rapidly developing and delivering nucleic-acid-based protections against infectious disease;
Failing Faster: De-Risking the Path to FDA Approval, which focused on using organ-on-chip technology to better predict the efficacy of new drugs in the development pipeline;
A Real-time Window into Your Body’s Chemistry, which focused on tissue-integrating in vivo biosensors to continuously monitor physiology over the long term to predict the onset of disease;
Reinventing Psychiatry Using Neurotechnology, which focused on using implanted, closed-loop neural systems to record and stimulate the brain to treat neuropsychiatric illness;
MindFlight: Your Brain Will Be Your Pilot Today, which focused on direct neural control of complex physical systems;
Memory Enhancement in Everyday Life, which focused on non-invasive electrical and auditory stimulation technology to enhance memory by facilitating the neural replay process
Is it me, or is it that the crazies are running the asylum?
If you think that you have now seen it all, well, you haven’t. Here is a video of scientists in Singapore torturing live insects and turning them into cyborgs. Horrifying.
And here is, you guessed it, DARPA:
“Through a DARPA-funded program, scientists at the University of California invented a tiny rig that connects to an insect’s brain and flight muscles. Once implanted, the device takes over the insect’s body, turning it into a remote control cyborg capable of receiving flight commands wirelessly from a nearby laptop.”
Researchers at North Carolina State University are training a swarm of unlikely heroes. By placing an array of microphones and electrode sensors onto a small circuit board, they've created what they call a "backpack" to be worn by Madagascar hissing cockroaches. The backpacks pick up sounds and help control the insect's movement. A researcher uses a joystick to steer the roach toward the sound source. This technology could help first responders find survivors in the aftermath of a disaster.
It’s all good and fun (not really, more like a horror movie), and we could close our eyes — but will it be fun if the emboldened crazies try to remote-control your children?
About the Author
To find more of Tessa Lena’s work, be sure to check out her bio, Tessa Fights Robots.
Behavior Modification: Medications Can Change Who We Are
Globalists Openly Admitting To Population Control Agenda
China's Dystopian AI Development Incorporates Population…
Gates, Kissinger On Same Path To Population Control
Kissinger: The Genesis of U.S. Government Population Control
The Persistent History Of Population Control
Gov't Scientific Advisors Admit To Using Unethical,…
Technocrats Busted: 'Mass Formation Psychosis' Used To…
Canada Begins Eugenics Program
While people always point to Nazi, Germany, Canada is no stranger to eugenics. The Sexual Sterilization Act in 1928 forced Indigenous women to undergo sterilizations to diminish their population. Canada provided these women with a skewed “mental deficiency” test in an attempt to prove they were unfit to reproduce. The practice was widespread until the 1970s, although numerous women have reported being coerced into the practice in recent times.
Justin Trudeau’s dad, Pierre Elliot Trudeau, supported eugenics and population “cleansing.” The Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation provided the initial foundation for the practice by highlighting the scientific achievement of genome sequencing and combining it with the potential for “reducing the burden of disease on themselves and on society as a whole.”
An excerpt on “Technology and Ethics” that can be found on the Trudeau Foundation website:
"For some analysts, genetic tests, along with the 'genetic understanding of health' that they shape, reflect our society's focus on individual responsibility and productivity. In the words of Roxanne Mykitiuk, 'with genetic tests marketed as a kind of health-risk kit, individuals are being called upon to undertake self-surveillance in the name of reducing the burden of disease on themselves and on society as a whole,' and in doing so to maintain a 'disciplined order of productive citizens.'”
This thinking is identical to other current and past forms of governments who have actively sought to eliminate those who are not considered “productive citizens.” The aforementioned report concluded:
"One of the most significant and pervasive issues is the risk that these new technologies will give rise to new forms of discrimination, inequality, and violations of human dignity, such as discrimination on the basis of genetic characteristics or unequal access to genetic enhancements. Other potential adverse effects include irreparable damage to the environment and to human health and the human genome."
Justin Trudeau is now following in his dad’s footsteps. Beginning in March 2023, Canada will expand its Medical Aid in Dying, or MAID, for people “whose sole underlying condition is depression, bipolar disorder, personality disorders, schizophrenia, PTSD or any other mental affliction.” There is no denying that mental disorders cause suffering – but do they call for government-aided suicide? This means that a vulnerable person suffering from a mental disorder, who may not be able to make a decision on their own, could be persuaded by a doctor to end their life. The measure also notes that “any other mental affliction” could be grounds for death by the government, which is more dystopian than anything George Orwell could have imagined.
Mental health providers stress that suicide is never an option. This bill is about voluntary eugenics, encouraged by healthcare providers, rather than public health.
Conveniently, Canada is implementing this measure after its COVID restrictions sent the nation into a mental health tailspin. Young Global Leader Trudeau is pushing forward the Great Reset and will likely call for universal healthcare. He considers these people a “burden” to his socialistic dreams as psychiatric conditions usually require lifelong care.
This is one of the evilest measures implemented by Justin Trudeau. He is persuading vulnerable Canadians to end their lives to create Schwab’s (Justin Trudeau does not have original ideas) dream Utopia where everyone will “be happy.”
Canadian retailer Simons glamorizes assisted suicide as ‘The Most Beautiful Exit’
Suicide with a smile and soft music is still suicide. It is still self-extinction. It is still death.
(LifeSiteNews) – “Canada’s full-on embrace and glamorization of ‘assisted suicide’ for physically healthy people is one of the most dire and consequential things happening in the western world right now,” Matt Walsh noted recently. “And it’s not getting nearly as much attention as it should.”
“Glamorization” is no exaggeration. While international watchdogs, European governments, and even the steel-stomached press react in horror to the drip drip of euthanasia horror stories coming out of Canada – including five veterans being proactively offered assisted suicide, the justice minister noting that assisted suicide could be available to those who cannot ask for it, and impoverished Canadians choosing lethal injections due to lack of resources – Canada’s suicide activists and parliamentarians are forging forwards unapologetically.
In fact, the Quebec-based clothes retailer Simons decided to join the fray with a video titled “All is Beauty” or – embedded in the video itself – “The Most Beautiful Exit.” The video tells the story of Jennyfer Hatch of British Columbia, a 37-year-old with chronic pain from Ehlers Danlos syndrome who decided to die by assisted suicide on October 23. The video was posted to Simons’ shopping website and was intended to be an “inspiration.”
Peter Simons, the chief merchant for the chain, stated that the video was an ambitious project: “”We really felt — after everything we’ve been through in the last two years and everyone’s been through — maybe it would resonate more to do a project that’s less commercially oriented and more focused on inspiration and values that we hold dear.” One of those values, apparently, is assisted suicide.
The video is an overt glamorization of assisted suicide. “Last breaths are sacred,” Hatch says.
Everything, says Hatch, is beauty. The video flashes through images of her as a child; of beautiful beaches and lush forests; of laughter with friends, and floating bubbles. Her suicide, too, she says, will be beautiful – “you just have to be brave enough to see it.” It is the same message as “dying with dignity” – to die with dignity, you must die sooner. To live bravely, choose death. But suicide with a smile and soft music is still suicide. It is still self-extinction. It is still death. But watching Hatch’s video you might be persuaded, just for a moment – that it is beautiful.
Hatch’s voice falls silent, and the short film ends with a dedication: “For Jennyfer. June 1985 to October 2022.” Everything was beautiful – just not beautiful enough to convince her to stay.
This is glamorizing suicide. This is advertising self-extinction as wonderful. It is not just a beautiful exit – now, Hatch’s video says it is the most beautiful exit. It is sending precisely the wrong message to those struggling, and wondering if suicide might be their best option. As Dr. Jordan Peterson noted in response to Simon’s video: “Death romanticism is very attractive to depressed adolescents, and very dangerous for that very reason.” This is just one more example of filmmakers making suicide attractive, from Me Before You to Million Dollar Baby to Breathe.
We need more films that highlight the beauty of life – but not as an encouragement for people to kill themselves. The concluding message should not be that suicide is a beautiful exit. The conclusion should be a plea: Look around you. Please stay. Please don’t go.
How Abortion and Transgenderism = Depopulation :: By Geri Ungurean
Years ago, I wrote an article about a strange rock formation called the Georgia Guide Stones. Upon those rocks are engraved the globalists’ “ten commandments.” I actually referred to these commandments as belonging to Antichrist.
I want the reader to understand that laws like the one we saw passed in NY just days ago which allows doctors to abort unborn children right up to the day of delivery – and now a bill in Congress from Pelosi and the Dems which will classify children with so-called “Gender Dysphoria” as a group in need of protection – have one main goal in common: DEPOPULATION.
That protection will manifest in the removal of these children from homes in which the parents do not wish to enable their children to become transgenders.
I originally wrote an article on the Georgia Guide Stones back in 2015. I will place excerpts from that piece in this article, but I will expand on what I believe is happening throughout the world today and how it is directly linked to the strange rock formation called the Georgia Guide Stones.
I will also be placing an article in this piece which just came out from heritage.org. This article will help the reader to understand Pelosi’s “Equality Act” and how it is all connected to Depopulation.
In 1980, a very strange stone formation was erected in a city in Georgia. It has been called the Stonehenge of America. Its name is the Georgia Guide Stones.
“The Georgia Guide Stones is a granite monument erected in 1980 in Elbert County, Georgia, in the United States. A set of ten guidelines is inscribed on the structure in eight modern languages, and a shorter message is inscribed at the top of the structure in four ancient language scripts: Babylonian, Classical Greek, Sanskrit, and Egyptian hieroglyphs.
The monument stands at the highest point in Elbert County, about 90 miles (140 km) east of Atlanta, 45 miles (72 km) from Athens, and 9 miles (14 km) north of the center of Elberton. The stones are visible from Georgia Highway 77 (Hartwell Highway) and are reached by turning east on Guidestones Road. The structure is sometimes referred to as an “American Stonehenge.” The monument is 19 feet 3 inches (5.87 m) tall, made from six granite slabs weighing 237,746 pounds (107,840 kg) in all. One slab stands in the center, with four arranged around it. A capstone lies on top of the five slabs, which are astronomically aligned. An additional stone tablet, which is set in the ground a short distance to the west of the structure, provides some notes on the history and purpose of the Guidestones.”
Guide Stones Ten Commandments of Antichrist (Satan)
Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
Unite humanity with a living new language.
Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
Balance personal rights with social duties.
Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature
(emphasis dashes— added for the sake of this article).
Shall we go through the “commandments” one by one?
Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
This clearly states that the population on the earth should be maintained at 500 million people to be in “perpetual balance with nature.” Can they get any more into New Age terminology than that?
I checked the number of people as of 2018 who inhabit the earth. 7.6 BILLION people live on the earth at this time.
Shall we do the math? Well, to put it in its simplest form – the NWO must rid our planet of almost 94% of all people to bring the population to its goal of under 500 million.
One must ponder as to how to reduce the number of people on the earth by 94%. Bill Gates is doing his part by sending vaccines to third world countries which sterilizes young women. India got wise to this madman and analyzed the vaccines after many of their young women fell ill, while many others died.
India has a lawsuit against the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, but I seriously doubt whether this will ever be brought to trial.
The reader may read the entire article here.
Here is the article from Heritage.org which will explain Pelosi’s proposed legislation for the protection of children who wish to “trans” to the opposite sex:
Americans have long understood that children are best cared for by their parents. The state can only intervene in the family when there is demonstrable evidence of abuse and neglect.
This has long been established in our laws. But now, transgender ideology is silencing doctors and challenging the way courts define parental abuse and neglect.
Last year in Ohio, a judge removed a biological girl from her parents’ custody after they declined to help her “transition” to male with testosterone supplements. The Cincinnati Children’s gender clinic recommended these treatments for gender dysphoria (the condition of being distressed with one’s biological sex).
When her parents wanted to treat her with counseling instead, the county prosecutor charged them with abuse and neglect, while transgender activists and pro-trans doctors compared their decision to denying treatment for asthma or even cancer patients.
That all happened without federal legislation.
But now, one of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s top legislative priorities, the Equality Act, could give the transgender community a vice grip over the medical profession. It could open the floodgates for lawsuits against doctors who don’t fall in line with transgender ideology.
Politicizing the medical treatment of gender dysphoria could lead to more prosecutions against parents who refuse to aid in the sterilization of their children. As more doctors recommend that children take puberty blockers at age 11, cross-sex hormones at 16, and undergo “sex-reassignment” surgeries at 18, parents who resist could face charges of child abuse and lose custody of their children.
The tragedy in Ohio could be repeated in families across America.
Turning the Law Into a Sword Against Doctors
The transgender movement wants to dominate the field of medicine, and to do so it is threatening doctors and hospitals with penalties.
Some states have already passed laws similar to Pelosi’s Equality Act. In New Jersey and California, transgender activists have sued Catholic hospitals for “discrimination” on the basis of gender identity because they wouldn’t perform sex-change surgeries for patients with gender dysphoria.
These lawsuits may seem preposterous, but they were enabled by state anti-discrimination laws that treat sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classes and health care facilities as public accommodations. The text of the Equality Act that was introduced in the 115th Congress does the same.
Pelosi’s bill would add sexual orientation and gender identity to the 1964 Civil Rights Act, making hospitals and doctors across America vulnerable to costly litigation if they don’t follow the medical recommendations of the transgender movement. It would turn anti-discrimination law—which was meant to protect disenfranchised minority groups—into a coercive sword to threaten doctors into submission to transgender ideology.
Does Transgender Ideology Make for Good Medicine?
Part of the reason some doctors resist transgender ideology is that it is incompatible with good medicine and would harm rather than help their patients.
The American Psychological Association’s manual of mental disorders classifies gender dysphoria as a mental illness. Research shows that 75 to 95 percent of children with gender dysphoria who go through puberty without any transgender treatments actually become comfortable with their bodies.
But the transgender movement ignores these statistics, aggressively pushing for gender-dysphoric children to be treated with non-FDA-approved uses of drugs, even though side effects can include loss of bone density, decline of cognitive ability, and infertility.
Dr. Michelle Cretella, executive director of the American College of Pediatricians, describes it as “institutionalized child abuse.”
Transgender activists have already tried to silence doctors who warned patients about these dangers. The Human Rights Campaign—a leading LGBT group—devotes an entire website to trying to discredit Dr. Paul McHugh, the former lead psychiatrist at Johns Hopkins University Hospital who put a stop to the hospital’s sex-reassignment surgeries. McHugh says the surgeries were “fundamentally cooperating with a mental illness.”
**** Here is an article I wrote about Dr. McHugh:
Back to the Heritage article:
Trans Activists Are Putting Children and Doctors in the Driver’s Seat
Transgender activists and pro-trans physicians often seek to exclude parents from the process of medical decision-making. Cincinnati Children’s Hospital’s Transgender Health Clinic says parents may be excluded from interviews because they might make their children feel uncomfortable asking questions.
Remarkably, this clinic has deemed 100 percent of the patients seeking care to be “appropriate candidates for continued gender treatment.” Even the Ohio judge who terminated one couple’s parental rights expressed “concern” at this astoundingly high approval rate.
Transgender advocates dismiss these concerns by sounding an alarm that gender-dysphoric children will be at higher risk of suicide if they don’t receive hormone treatment.
But the evidence suggests transgender treatments can actually increase the likelihood of suicide. A study in Sweden on adults who underwent sex-reassignment surgeries showed they were 19 times more likely than the general population to commit suicide after undergoing operations. This is particularly noteworthy because, in Sweden, cultural support for those who identify as transgender is very strong, so social stigma is less likely to account for the suicides.
We should be particularly cautious with experimental treatments on children because the long-term effects of transgender treatments have yet to be seen. Even the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid under the Obama administration pointed out that “mortality from this patient population did not become apparent until after 10 years.”
Endocrinologist Dr. Michael Laidlaw also warns that the long-term harms to kids may not show up until years later when, as young adults, they start asking: “How come I can’t have children at this point?’ Well, it’s because their fertility was destroyed by some combination of puberty blockers, wrong sex hormones, and surgery.’”
And Dr. Stephen B. Levine, professor of psychiatry at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, asks the pertinent question: Are children really capable of comprehending the way that hormone treatments will alter their lives and render them unable to have their own children? There’s a reason we have informed consent laws—to protect people, like children, from being taken advantage of.
Expediting a Bad Trend
In this cultural and political climate, doctors and courts are more and more likely to seek to exclude parents from life-changing decisions about their children.
America has seen an explosion of “gender clinics” and diagnoses of “gender dysphoria” in just the past few years. In 2013, America had only three gender clinics. Today, there are more than 41. These clinics report 400 percent increases in children and teens identifying as trans.
The Equality Act would expedite this trend by giving the transgender movement a powerful legal weapon to drive medical consensus that could undermine the rights of parents.
As more parents wrestle with finding the most loving and helpful solutions for their children struggling with gender dysphoria, the government must support them—not undermine them. Parents must remain central to the decision-making process when it comes to the medical care of children suffering from gender dysphoria. source
Brethren, have you connected the dots? The globalist powers that be in this incredibly evil world have begun the process of depopulation of our planet. Transgender children become “sterile” after puberty is interrupted and the hormones are given to bring about the “sex change.”
The percentage of transgenders who attempt suicide is incredibly high. I’ve been told by a liberal that this suicide rate is linked to the negative reactions of peers and family. Heritage addressed that with these facts:
“But the evidence suggests transgender treatments can actually increase the likelihood of suicide. A study in Sweden on adults who underwent sex-reassignment surgeries showed they were 19 times more likely than the general population to commit suicide after undergoing operations. This is particularly noteworthy because, in Sweden, cultural support for those who identify as transgender is very strong, so social stigma is less likely to account for the suicides.”
We must pray for the helpless children who are being indoctrinated by Leftist liberal parents. These people are placing the idea in their children’s minds about transgenderism. And public schools are helping that indoctrination along by teaching children that it’s okay and healthy to feel that they may have been born as the wrong sex.
Clearly, children are not equipped to make decisions about this disastrous attempt to change their sex!
But if Pelosi and her demonic peers get their way, parents will begin to lose their children to the State.
Pray for these children! Pray for their parents!
How much longer, Lord?
In the late 1930s, Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, came up with the idea for the infamous "Negro Project." Sanger, despite the rosy and saint-like portrait the organization presents of her, was a frank racist. Judging by her public statements and private letters, the woman thought that blacks - southern blacks in particular - were simple, child-like brutes whose fertility needed managing the same way a farmer needs to tend to his breeding stock of sheep or cows.
Alarmed by the numbers of southern blacks who were migrating to northern cities, Sanger and her associates created the Negro Project. They believed that, by convincing black people to limit the size of their families, they would prevent the black population's numbers from overwhelming those of the white population. It was assumed that blacks - they especially worried about the men - would look suspiciously on any white effort to meddle with their fertility, so a clever fiction was created. Black elites - doctors, educators and even ministers - were enlisted to preach contraception and, later, abortion. Black people were told that, if they just learned to limit the size of their families, whites would come to respect them for their self-control. One day, this fiction said, this respect would lead to greater civil rights for blacks. In other words, fewer black children would equal more freedom.
This was a lie, and a cruel one at that. As we all know, black America's civil rights were not won by condoms or The Pill. Planned Parenthood had nothing to do with the eventual destruction of segregation. The wall of Jim Crow came tumbling down because black America rose up, not because we had the correct number of abortions.
Margaret Sanger's Negro Project is discussed at length in the book Blessed Are the Barren. Although the Project is not as well-known as the Tuskegee Experiment, it involves the same kinds of falsehoods and manipulations.
Not everyone smiles in your face is your friend, my father said. Recently, I visited my old neighborhood. It now has a bookstore, a drugstore, a dry cleaner and even restaurants. The abortion clinic is still there, and it still looks beautiful with the same shining white concrete and gleaming glass doors.